Search

Background Schizophrenia is a complex disabling mental disorder, and many patients present poor response to available treatments. Accumulating evidence about the role of the glutamate/nitric oxide pathway in mediating the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia suggests potential benefits of drugs that modulate this system. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) as an adjunctive therapy for symptomatic outpatients with schizophrenia. Methods This was a 2-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 24 schizophrenia patients. Participants were treated with ISMN 50 mg for 1 month and placebo for another month in a crossover design. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning, and MATRICS Cognitive Consensual Battery were used for symptom assessment and arterial spin labeling was used to assess brain activation patterns. Results We found significant differences in the total, general, and positive subscales of the PANSS, Global Assessment of Functioning scores, and Clinical Global Impression scores during treatment with ISMN relative to placebo. No treatment effects were found comparing scores in the MATRICS Cognitive Consensual Battery and the negative subscale of the PANSS between the active and placebo conditions. A post hoc analysis of neuroimaging data showed reduced activity in the thalamus in subgroup of patients with severe psychopathology. Conclusions Schizophrenia patients with persistent symptoms showed significant improvement after 4 weeks of treatment with ISMN 50 mg/d compared with placebo. Isosorbide mononitrate added beneficial effects to antipsychotic treatment in terms of positive symptoms and functioning.

Ayahuasca is an Amazonian botanical hallucinogenic brew which contains dimethyltryptamine, a 5-HT2A receptor agonist, and harmine, a monoamine-oxidase A inhibitor. Our group recently reported that ayahuasca administration was associated with fast-acting antidepressive effects in 6 depressive patients. The objective of the present work was to assess the antidepressive potentials of ayahuasca in a bigger sample and to investigate its effects on regional cerebral blood flow. In an open-label trial conducted in an inpatient psychiatric unit, 17 patients with recurrent depression received an oral dose of ayahuasca (2.2 mL/kg) and were evaluated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, and the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale during acute ayahuasca effects and 1, 7, 14, and 21 days after drug intake. Blood perfusion was assessed eight hours after drug administration by means of single photon emission tomography. Ayahuasca administration was associated with increased psychoactivity (Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale) and significant score decreases in depression-related scales (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) from 80 minutes to day 21. Increased blood perfusion in the left nucleus accumbens, right insula and left subgenual area, brain regions implicated in the regulation of mood and emotions, were observed after ayahuasca intake. Ayahuasca was well tolerated. Vomiting was the only adverse effect recorded, being reported by 47% of the volunteers. Our results suggest that ayahuasca may have fast-acting and sustained antidepressive properties. These results should be replicated in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

This long-term extension of an 8-week randomized, naturalistic study in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia compared the efficacy and safety of clonazepam (n = 47) and paroxetine (n = 37) over a 3-year total treatment duration. Target doses for all patients were 2 mg/d clonazepam and 40 mg/d paroxetine (both taken at bedtime). This study reports data from the long-term period (34 months), following the initial 8-week treatment phase. Thus, total treatment duration was 36 months. Patients with a good primary outcome during acute treatment continued monotherapy with clonazepam or paroxetine, but patients with partial primary treatment success were switched to the combination therapy. At initiation of the long-term study, the mean doses of clonazepam and paroxetine were 1.9 (SD, 0.30) and 38.4 (SD, 3.74) mg/d, respectively. These doses were maintained until month 36 (clonazepam 1.9 [SD, 0.29] mg/d and paroxetine 38.2 [SD, 3.87] mg/d). Long-term treatment with clonazepam led to a small but significantly better Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement rating than treatment with paroxetine (mean difference: CGI-Severity scale -3.48 vs -3.24, respectively, P = 0.02; CGI-Improvement scale 1.06 vs 1.11, respectively, P = 0.04). Both treatments similarly reduced the number of panic attacks and severity of anxiety. Patients treated with clonazepam had significantly fewer adverse events than those treated with paroxetine (28.9% vs 70.6%, P < 0.001). The efficacy of clonazepam and paroxetine for the treatment of panic disorder was maintained over the long-term course. There was a significant advantage with clonazepam over paroxetine with respect to the frequency and nature of adverse events.