Search

What is known and objectives Patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bariatric ( RYGB) surgery present a reduced absorption site, and special attention should therefore be taken when prescribing oral-dosage forms. This study was carried out to investigate the extent to which non-bariatric clinicians are aware of this issue when prescribing medicines for this population, and what type of information is available to aid them in their decision-making. Methods Two questionnaires were created, one for non-bariatric clinicians and another for their patients who had undergone RYGB surgery, to gather information about the prescription practices for this population. Additionally, a literature search of pharmacokinetic studies on bariatric patients and recommended prescription practices was carried out. Results and discussion Of the 62 non-bariatric clinicians surveyed, 50% believed RYGB surgery interferes with drug absorption; however, 68% still prescribed tablets as the first choice form of dosage. Young clinicians (35%) were less likely to believe that RYGB surgery could affect drug absorption than experienced clinicians (43%). The main reasons for changing dosage forms were patient complaints about efficacy or difficulty in swallowing tablets. Of the 73 patients, 43 were taking drugs in tablet form after the surgery, 24 of whom had health issues unrelated to the surgery. None of the journals read by the clinicians contained pharmacokinetics ( PK) studies involving bariatric surgery patients or presented recommendations for the prescription of oral-dosage forms for this population. The literature search revealed a total of 22 drugs that had undergone PK studies in RYGB patients. Fifteen of them were reported to have decreased effects, 12 of which were administered as tablets. What is new and conclusion There is still a relative lack of clinical evidence to guide clinicians when prescribing medicines for bariatric patients. It is therefore recommended that pharmacists should have greater participation in the prescription process to advise non-bariatric clinicians and educate RYGB surgery patients to help avoid therapeutic failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and Objective: Anti-tuberculosis drugs (ATD), although highly effective, often cause liver injury. Glutathione S-transferases (GST) play a crucial protective role in the detoxifying mechanisms of drugs. Several studies have investigated the genetic null variants of GSTM1 and GSTT1 as possible risk factors for ATD-induced liver injury; however, those findings are inconsistent. We investigated GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in Brazilian patients with tuberculosis (TB), adjusting for other possible predictors of ATD-induced liver injury. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study with patients who were treated for TB from 2006 to 2011. GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene deletions were analysed from genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were extracted from medical records and possible predictors of liver injury were evaluated. Results and Discussion: This study enrolled 177 patients. Anti-tuberculosis drugs-induced liver injury incidence was 33·3%. Hepatitis B infection (HBV) and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) baseline were significant predictors. Neither GSTM1 nor GSTT1 null genotypes were associated with ATD-induced liver injury; nevertheless, the comparison among four different liver toxicity grades showed that GSTM1 non-null genotype was significant more frequent among the higher grades of liver toxicity. What is new and Conclusion: GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes do not seem to play important roles in ATD-induced liver injury in Brazilians. However, there was evidence that GSTM1 polymorphisms were possibly related to the intensity of toxicity. Active HBV and initial high ALT could predict ATD-induced liver injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and Objective: Some antimicrobial agents are active in vitro against Leptospiras. The use of penicillins at the late stage of leptospirosis is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the use of penicillin in patients with leptospirosis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients with leptospirosis admitted to two hospitals in Fortaleza city, Brazil, between 1985 and 2008. AKI was defined according to the RIFLE and AKIN classifications. Patients were divided in two groups according to whether they were treated with a penicillin or not. Results: Two hundred and eighty-seven patients were included, with an average age of 36·8 ± 15·6 years and mostly male (80·8%). One hundred and twelve patients (39%) received a penicillin. Patients treated with a penicillin were younger (32 ± 14 years vs. 39 ± 16 years, P = 0·0002) and had a shorter hospital stay (8·4 ± 5·0 vs. 11 ± 7·7 days, P < 0·0001). There was no difference in the onset of symptoms before hospital admission between the two groups (6·5 ± 3·0 vs. 7·7 ± 4·7, P = 0·33). Systolic blood pressure was lower in the penicillin group (111 ± 21 vs. 119 ± 22 mmHg, P = 0·04). AKI, need of dialysis and renal recovery at the time of hospital discharge were more frequent in patients who did not use a penicillin ( P < 0·05). Mortality was similar in both groups (11·6% vs. 13·7%, P = 0·60). Conclusion: Treatment of leptospirosis with antibiotics, including the penicillin, remains controversial. The main benefit of using penicillin in the present study was a reduction in the length of hospital stay and fewer complications, such as AKI, but its use was not associated with a decrease in mortality. On balance of risks and benefits, we recommend the use of penicillin in late-stage leptospirosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]