Search

Peginterferon beta‐1a reduced annualized relapse rate as compared with placebo and was approved to treat multiple sclerosis patients. A population pharmacokinetic and an exposure‐efficacy model were developed to establish the quantitative relationship between pharmacokinetics and annualized relapse rate. The pharmacokinetics was well described by a 1‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and linear elimination kinetics. Body mass index was the most significant covariate that impacted both clearance and volume of distribution, which in turn impacted area under the curve and maximum serum concentration. Cumulative monthly area under the curve and annualized relapse rate were best described by a Poisson‐gamma (negative binomial) model, demonstrating that the improved efficacy of every‐2‐weeks dosing was driven by greater drug exposure. The results supported the superior efficacy of the every‐2‐week dosing regimen compared with the every‐4‐weeks dosing regimen.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline. Patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were enrolled in parallel with demographically matched healthy subjects. All study participants received a single 75-mg oral tonapofylline capsule. The pharmacokinetic parameters for both tonapofylline and its active metabolite, acyl-glucuronide (tonapofylline-AG), were affected by hepatic impairment significantly (P < .1) except for time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)), terminal half-life (t(½)), and apparent volume of distribution based on the terminal phase (Vdz/F). In the mild group, peak plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the time-concentration curve from time 0 to 48 hours postdose (AUC(48 h)), and from time 0 to infinity (AU(Cinf)) of tonapofylline modestly increased as compared with the control healthy subjects (GMR 1.62, 1.57, and 1.53, respectively). The extent of increase of these parameters for tonapofylline-AG was more profound than tonapofylline with geometric mean ratio (GMR) ranging from 2.02 to 2.08. Moderate hepatic impairment was also associated with modest increases of C(max), AUC(48 h), and AUC(inf) of tonapofylline (GMR 1.41, 1.98, and 2.08, respectively). Similar to the mild group, the increase of these parameters were higher for tonapofylline-AG with GMR ranging from 2.80 to 3.86. Single oral 75-mg tonapofylline was safe and well tolerated in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Previous studies suggest that adenosine A₁ receptor antagonists may promote natriuresis without deleterious effects on renal function. This study evaluated renal and hemodynamic effects as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of BG9928, a selective adenosine A₁-receptor antagonist, in patients with heart failure. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study, 33 patients received a single dose of BG9928 (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously. Change from baseline in urinary sodium excretion for the 8-hour postdose interval was greater for all dosing groups versus placebo. The 0.03-mg/kg and 0.3-mg/kg groups had significant reductions in body weight versus placebo (-0.8 kg, -1.1 kg, 0.3 kg, respectively; P005). No changes in creatinine clearance or hemodynamic parameters were observed among any of the BG9928 groups versus placebo. However, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure tended to decrease and correlated with weight loss. Across the range of doses studied, pharmacokinetic parameters were linear and predictable. One patient who received the highest dose (3.0 mg/kg) developed seizures, and no further patients received that dose. Single intravenous BG9928 doses of up to 1.0 mg/kg were well tolerated and increased sodium excretion without worsening renal function. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical benefit of adenosine A₁ receptor antagonism.