Search

Six hundred fourteen previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma were evaluated on this phase III Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial. For remission induction, two noncross-resistant drug combinations (vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone [VMCP] and vincristine, carmustine [BCNU], Adriamycin [doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH], and prednisone [VBAP]) were administered with either a direct alternating or a syncopated schedule. Pretreatment serum beta-2 microglobulin (beta 2M) was the single most important prognostic factor for survival (P less than .0001). There was no difference in toxicity, response, or survival by induction chemotherapy schedule (P greater than .7). For consolidation, 180 eligible and responsive patients were randomized to receive either an additional year of VMCP or sequential hemibody radiation (HBI) with vincristine and prednisone (VP) administered between the two HBI courses. Relapse-free survival (26 months) and overall survival (median, 36 months) were better with VMCP than with HBI (median, 20 months and 28 months; P = .04 and .018, respectively). HBI was also evaluated on a nonrandomized basis in 66 patients who achieved either a partial response (PR) or who were nonresponders to induction therapy. While HBI converted 24% of the PR patients to remission status, this effect was only seen in 5% of nonresponding patients. The survival of responsive and nonresponding patients receiving HBI was similar. All HBI groups had an inferior outcome to those receiving VMCP consolidation. Myelosuppression was also significantly worse after HBI. Survival from the time of relapse did not differ between patients randomized to receive VMCP or HBI. Thus HBI induced less durable remissions, but did not render patients less amenable to postrelapse chemotherapy. Our findings do not support the use of HBI in either chemotherapy responsive or nonresponding patients with multiple myeloma.

Previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma were entered on a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the use of alternating combination chemotherapy, including vincristine, doxorubicin, alkylating agents, and prednisone (160 patients) was more effective than conventional chemotherapy with melphalan and prednisone (77 patients), and whether the addition of the immunomodulating agent levamisole to maintenance chemotherapy enhanced the survival of patients achieving remission. The treatment groups were well matched for all major factors. The more aggressive chemotherapy was more effective at inducing remission, with a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving at least 75% tumor mass regression (53% with alternating combinations versus 32% with melphalan-prednisone, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the median survival was increased to 43 months with alternating combination chemotherapy as compared to 23 months with melphalan-prednisone (p = 0.004). After six to 12 months of induction therapy, 84 patients achieving remission were rerandomized to receive maintenance chemotherapy alone or with the addition of levamisole. The survival from the start of maintenance therapy was longer in patients receiving the added levamisole than with chemotherapy alone (p = 0.01). These findings support the use of aggressive multiagent chemotherapy for remission induction in patients with advanced-stage multiple myeloma.