Search

Purpose Parents of children with incurable cancer make complex and difficult decisions about remaining treatment options. We compared the self-reported rationale, good parent definition, and desired clinical staff behaviors of parents who recently decided for phase I (P1) chemotherapy with parents who chose a do not resuscitate (DNR) or terminal care (TC) option. Patients and Methods Sixty-two parents of 58 children were asked for the basis of their decision, their definition of a good parent, and what staff behaviors supported their good parent role. After semantic content analysis, results were compared in the P1 versus DNR/TC groups. These categories were mutually exclusive but did not necessarily represent an either/or decision. Results Thirty-one decisions were for P1 chemotherapy and 27 for DNR/TC. Median survival time after study enrollment was greater in the P1 group (0.4 v 0.1 years). Most P1 group parents reported having felt compelled to continue cancer-directed therapy (71% v 7%), whereas those who opted for DNR/TC cited quality of life (QOL; 74% v 3%) and patient wishes (67% v 13%). Decision factors common to both groups were medical facts, doing right, and others’ opinions. Both groups believed that a good parent did right, provided support and presence, and sacrificed for the child. The groups desired similar support from clinicians and expressed gratitude. Conclusion Despite similar definitions of a good parent and desired staff behaviors, parents in the P1 group reported having felt compelled to continue cancer-directed therapy, whereas QOL and patient wishes were emphasized in decisions for DNR/TC.

Purpose To assess the maximum-tolerated dosages (MTDs), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib and of intravenous (IV) irinotecan when administered together in children with refractory solid tumors. To assess the effect of gefitinib on the pharmacokinetics of IV irinotecan and on the bioavailability of a single oral dose of irinotecan. Patients and Methods IV irinotecan (15 or 20 mg/m2) was given daily for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks. Oral gefitinib (150 or 112.5 mg/m2) was concomitantly given daily for 12 or 21 days. A single oral dose of irinotecan was given on day 9 of course 2 to allow pharmacokinetic analysis. Results The study enrolled 29 patients with recurrent solid tumors. The 21-day regimen of oral gefitinib with irinotecan was not tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common DLT. The MTD of the combination regimen was 15 mg/m2/d of IV irinotecan for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks and 112.5 mg/m2/d of gefitinib given for 12 days. Gefitinib increased the bioavailability of oral irinotecan by four-fold over that observed in historical controls (median, 0.09 v 0.42; P < .000001), reducing the apparent clearance (an inverse measure of exposure) of irinotecan and SN-38 by 37% and 38%, respectively (P < .0001). A partial response was observed in a patient with refractory Ewing sarcoma. Conclusion IV irinotecan given with 12 days of oral gefitinib is well tolerated in children. We observed one partial response. Gefitinib significantly enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan. This combination warrants further investigation, particularly with orally administered irinotecan.

PurposeTo determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors.Patients and MethodsEverolimus was administered orally at a daily dose of 2.1, 3, 5, or 6.5 mg/m2in cohorts of three to six patients per dosage level. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed during the first course. The phosphorylation status of various components of the mTOR signal pathway was assessed in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from treated patients.ResultsThere were 26 patients enrolled; 18 were assessable. DLTs included diarrhea (n = 1), mucositis (n = 1), and elevation of ALT (n = 1) at 6.5 mg/m2. At the MTD of 5 mg/m2, the median everolimus clearance was 15.2 L/h/m2, with a plasma everolimus concentration-time area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity of 239.6 ng/mL·h. Significant inhibition of mTOR pathway signaling was observed in PBMCs from patients achieving AUCs ≥ 200 ng/mL·h, equivalent to dosages of 3 to 5 mg/m2of everolimus. No objective tumor responses were observed.ConclusionContinuous, orally administered everolimus is well tolerated in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors and demonstrates similar pharmacokinetic properties to those observed in adults. Everolimus significantly inhibits the mTOR signaling pathway in children at the MTD. The recommended phase II dose in children with solid tumors is 5 mg/m2.

Purpose The viewpoint of the terminally ill child at the time of an end-of-life decision has not been formally investigated. We identified the preferences of children and adolescents with advanced cancer about their end-of-life care and the factors that influenced their decisions. Patients and Methods Pediatric patients 10 or more years of age were interviewed within 7 days of participating in one of the following three end-of-life decisions: enrollment onto a phase I trial (n = 7), adoption of a do not resuscitate order (n = 5), or initiation of terminal care (n = 8). The patient, a parent, and the primary pediatric oncologist were interviewed separately by using open-ended interview questions. Results Twenty patients, aged 10 to 20 years (mean, 17 years and 4 months), with a refractory solid tumor (n = 12), brain tumor (n = 4), or leukemia (n = 4) participated. Eighteen patients (90%) accurately recalled all of their treatment options and identified their own death as a consequence of their decision. The factors that were most frequently identified included the following: for patients, caring about others (n = 19 patients); for parents, the child's preferences (n = 18 parents); and for physicians, the patient's prognosis and comorbid conditions (n = 14 physicians). Conclusion These children and adolescents with advanced cancer realized that they were involved in an end-of-life decision, understood the consequences of their decision, and were capable of participating in a complex decision process involving risks to themselves and others. The decision factors most frequently reported by patients were relationship based; this finding is contrary to existing developmental theories.

PurposeEpidermal growth factor receptor is expressed in pediatric malignant solid tumors. We conducted a phase I trial of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in children with refractory solid tumors.Patients and MethodsGefitinib (150, 300, 400, or 500 mg/m2) was administered orally to cohorts of three to six patients once daily continuously until disease progression or significant toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during course one (day 1 through 28).ResultsOf the 25 enrolled patients, 19 (median age, 15 years) were fully evaluable for toxicity and received 54 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity was rash in two patients treated with 500 mg/m2and elevated ALT and AST in one patient treated with 400 mg/m2. The maximum-tolerated dose was 400 mg/m2/d. The most frequent non–dose-limiting toxicities were grade 1 or 2 dry skin, anemia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. One patient with Ewing’s sarcoma had a partial response. Disease stabilized for 8 to ≥ 60 weeks in two patients with Wilms’ tumor and two with brainstem glioma (one exophytic). At 400 mg/m2, the median peak gefitinib plasma concentration was 2.2 μg/mL (range, 1.2 to 3.6 μg/mL) and occurred at a median of 2.3 hours (range, 2.0 to 8.3 hours) after drug administration. The median apparent clearance and median half-life were 14.8 L/h/m2(range, 3.8 to 24.8 L/h/m2) and 11.7 hours (range, 5.6 to 22.8 hours), respectively. Gefitinib systemic exposures were comparable with those associated with antitumor activity in adults.ConclusionOral gefitinib is well tolerated in children. Development of the drug in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy will be pursued.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in reducing blood transfusion requirements and stimulating hematopoiesis in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Patients and Methods Thirty-eight patients given six cycles of intensive induction chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma were randomized to receive G-CSF (n = 20) or G-CSF + EPO (n = 18). Cytokines were given subcutaneously each day, starting 24 hours after each chemotherapy cycle and continuing until 48 hours before the start of the next cycle. The primary end point was the effect of EPO on total red cell transfusion requirements during induction therapy. Results Patients who received G-CSF + EPO had a higher red cell transfusion requirement (median, 161.0 mL/kg) than did those who received G-CSF alone (median, 106.6 mL/kg; P = .005). In addition, among patients given transfusions for hemoglobin ≤ 8 g/dL, those in the G-CSF + EPO group received more red cell transfusions than did those given G-CSF alone (median per patient, 10 v 8, respectively; P = .044). The two treatment groups had similar cumulative durations of neutropenia, incidences of febrile neutropenia, platelet transfusion requirements, and numbers of platelet transfusions; they also received induction chemotherapy for similar durations and had similar probabilities of progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion The addition of EPO to the G-CSF regimen provides no benefit for patients receiving intensive induction chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: To determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a protracted, intermittent schedule of daily 30-minute infusions of topotecan (TPT) for up to 12 consecutive days, every 3 weeks, in children with refractory leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine children were enrolled onto this phase I trial (24 with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia [ANLL] and 25 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]). TPT dosage was escalated from 2.0 to 5.2 mg/m2/d for 5 days and 2.4 mg/m2/d from 7 days to the same dose for 9 and 12 days in cohorts of three to six patients when no DLT was identified. TPT pharmacokinetics were studied in 33 children once or twice (first and last doses in patients who received TPT for > 7 days). RESULTS: Seventy assessable courses of TPT were administered to 49 children who had refractory leukemia. DLTs were typhlitis, diarrhea, and mucositis, and the MTD was 2.4 mg/m2/d for 9 days in this group of heavily pretreated children. In 33 patients, the median TPT lactone clearance after the first dose was 19.2 L/h/m2 (range, 9.4 to 45.9 L/h/m2) and did not change during the course. There were significant responses (one complete response [CR] and four partial responses [PR] in patients with ANLL and one CR and two PRs in patients with ALL), and all but one were at dosages of TPT given for at least 9 days. CONCLUSION: The MTD was 2.4 mg/m2/d for 9 days. Further testing is warranted of TPT’s schedule dependence in children with leukemia.

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated systemic exposure (MTSE) and exposure-limiting toxicity of continuous infusion topotecan in children with recurrent acute leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received escalating levels of topotecan systemic exposure as measured by steady-state topotecan lactone concentration (Css). Samples obtained within the first 24 hours were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) for topotecan. A two-compartment model was fit to the data using a Bayesian algorithm. Css was calculated for each patient; if it differed by more than 20% of target, a new dosage was begun within 6 hours. Follow-up concentrations were obtained as well as serial plasma samples postinfusion. Toxicity and evidence of activity were assessed after each course. RESULTS Thirteen boys and five girls received 23 courses of topotecan. Target Css ranged from 1.0 to 5.3 ng/mL (topotecan doses, 0.5 to 3.3 mg/m2/d). Nineteen of 23 courses were within +/- 20% of target after adjustment (range, 77% to 139%). The MTSE was 4.0 ng/mL, and mucositis was exposure-limiting at 5.3 ng/mL. A significant relation between topotecan lactone Css and the severity of mucositis was observed. Myelosuppression was experienced but was not considered exposure-limiting. One complete response and one partial response were noted. CONCLUSION The MTSE for continuous infusion topotecan was 4.0 ng/mL. Responses were noted at Css comparable to those producing responses in a severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse model. Further studies of topotecan are warranted.

PURPOSE A phase I study was undertaken to determine the toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (rTNF) in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-seven patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors were enrolled on the study. rTNF was administered daily for 5 days by 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion, and doses were escalated in cohorts of three to six patients. Courses were repeated after a 9-day rest period, if toxicity was tolerable. Daily doses ranged from 100 to 350 micrograms/m2. RESULTS Most courses were associated with grade I/II fever, rigors, nausea, or vomiting. Three patients experienced moderate dyspnea that responded to supplemental oxygen. All abnormalities resolved on discontinuation of the infusion. One patient had a cardiac arrest 90 minutes after receiving the first dose of rTNF and died 10 days later of related complications. In two other patients, rTNF was discontinued due to persistent grade IV hypotension. Toxicities were not consistently related to dose and no cumulative effects were noted. The dose-limiting toxicity was transient hepatic dysfunction, which occurred in three of six patients receiving 350 micrograms/m2; this toxicity was rapidly reversed on discontinuation of the rTNF. One patient, whose non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had recurred after bone marrow transplantation, had a partial response. Disease was stabilized in two patients. CONCLUSION We recommend that phase II testing proceed at a dose of 300 micrograms/m2/d on the schedule described.

PURPOSE The primary objective for this study was to determine whether controlling pharmacokinetic variability, by designing patient-specific dosage regimens for teniposide using a Bayesian estimation control strategy, would permit an increase in dose intensity without increased toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty patients with relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia were given teniposide as part of their induction and maintenance therapy. Before beginning reinduction therapy, an intensive pharmacokinetic study was performed based on 12 measured teniposide plasma concentrations. Doses were determined to achieve a targeted systemic exposure defined by an area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) beginning at an AUC consistent with that predicted for a patient with average pharmacokinetic parameters receiving the currently accepted maximal-tolerated dose. The targeted systemic exposure was then escalated in increments of 25% in cohorts of at least three patients until unacceptable toxicity occurred. In 36 follow-up studies, when teniposide was administered during maintenance therapy, a Bayesian strategy based on only three or five measured drug concentrations was evaluated for precision and bias for achieving the targeted systemic exposure against the full pharmacokinetic study. RESULTS Teniposide clearance varied over a fivefold range (3.7 to 21.6 mL/min/m2). With the use of the patient-specific dosage regimens, the intensity of systemic exposure was increased 50% (1,656 mumol.h v 1,060 mumol/L.h) over that previously possible with standard fixed doses, with no increase in acute, nonhematologic toxicity. Teniposide concentrations (n = 265) were well predicted (R2 = .82) with as few as three measured values from the initial study. CONCLUSION Targeting systemic exposure is clinically feasible, precise, and allows increased dose intensity for teniposide without increased risk of acute, nonhematologic toxicity, when compared with fixed-dose regimens.

To gauge the impact of intensified therapy on the survival of infants (younger than 1 year, n = 129) and children (greater than or equal to 1 year of age, n = 275) with neuroblastoma, we analyzed the results of eight successive clinical trials comparing various combinations of antineoplastic drugs, surgery, and radiotherapy. Changes in treatment did not affect the survival of children with involved noncontiguous lymph nodes or distant metastatic disease until the combination of cisplatin and teniposide (CDDP/VM26) was added to a basic regimen of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (CTX/DOX). The resulting 4-year survival was 28% +/- 5% (SE) compared with 7% +/- 2% for previous treatments (P less than .001 by the log-rank test). The 4-year survival of infants with metastatic disease was improved by administering CTX/DOX to all patients, reserving CDDP/VM26 for those whose disease was resistant to the former combination: 82% +/- 6% versus 45% +/- 8% in earlier studies; P less than .001. In the subset of infants whose tumors had disseminated to bone or bone marrow at diagnosis, this therapeutic approach increased the probability of long-term survival from 48% +/- 10% to 85% +/- 9% (P = .01). The small group of children over 1 year of age with localized unresectable tumors also fared significantly better with the switch to CTX/DOX chemotherapy (4-year survival, 93% +/- 7% v 42% +/- 13%; P = .02). Multivariate analysis indicated that young age, limited-disease stage, nonadrenal primary site, and intensified treatment were independent predictors of a more favorable outcome. We conclude that substantial advances in the treatment of neuroblastoma have occurred over the past 25 years at this institution. The current overall 4-year survival probability of 57% +/- 4% compares favorably with estimates for most other common solid tumors of childhood.

Primary lymphoma of bone (PLB) occurs infrequently in children. Between January 1962 and November 1988, 395 children with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Eleven of these patients (2.8%) presented with a bone primary, usually in the femur (eight of 11 patients). The median age of these seven boys and four girls at presentation was 13 years (range, 5.5 to 19 years). Seven patients had one or more additional bones involved. All patients had high-grade lymphomas based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Working Formulation. The histologic subtypes included six large-cell lymphomas, three lymphoblastic lymphomas, one small-noncleaved, non-Burkitt's lymphoma, and one unclassifiable lymphoma. Treatment consisted of multiagent chemotherapy combined with local radiation therapy in seven of 11 patients. Six of 10 children who received chemotherapy as a component of their initial therapy, including all who presented with localized tumor, are alive with no evidence of disease 2+ to 85+ months (median, 42.5 months) after cessation of treatment; one patient has just completed chemotherapy. Each of the four patients who died showed leukemic conversion 5 to 11 months after diagnosis, and three died of progressive disease. One patient died of sepsis during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia with no evidence of disease at necropsy. We conclude that optimal therapy for PLB, as with all other forms of NHL, should focus on the histologic subtype and stage of disease.