Search

Purpose To assess the role of residual tumor resection performed after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCT). Patients and Methods Between July 1987 and October 1999, postchemotherapy resections of residual tumors were performed in 57 patients who had been treated with HDCT for relapsed or refractory GCT and who had achieved a partial remission to this treatment. Results Complete resections of residual masses were achieved in 52 (91%) of 57 patients who were rendered disease free; in five (9%) of 57 patients, the resections were incomplete. Resection of a single site was performed in 39 (68%) of 57 patients, and the remaining 18 (32%) of 57 patients required interventions at two or more residual tumor sites. Necrosis was found in 22 (38%) of 57 patients, mature teratoma with or without necrosis was found in nine (16%) of 57 patients, and viable cancer with or without additional necrosis or mature teratoma was found in 26 (46%) of 57 patients. Viable cancer consisted either of residual germ cell or undifferentiated cancer in 22 (85%) of 26 patients, with additional non-GCT histologies in the remaining four patients. Patients with viable cancer had a significantly inferior outcome after surgery compared with patients with necrosis and/or mature teratoma even if all cancer was completely resected. Pulmonary lesions with a diameter of more than 2 cm were the only predictive variable for viable cancer in univariate analysis. Conclusion Resections of all residual tumors should be attempted in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT and partial remissions after HDCT.

Purpose: Patients with disseminated germ cell cancer and poor prognosis (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group [IGCCCG] classification) achieve only a 45% to 50% long-term survival by standard chemotherapy. First-line high-dose chemotherapy might be able to improve the result. This analysis reports toxicity and long-term results of a large phase I/II study of sequential high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) in patients with advanced germ cell tumors. Patients and Methods: Between July 1993 and November 1999, 221 patients with either Indiana “advanced disease” (n = 39) or IGCCCG “poor prognosis” criteria (n = 182) received one cycle of VIP followed by three to four sequential cycles of high-dose VIP chemotherapy plus stem cell support, every 3 weeks, at six consecutive dose levels. Results: Dose limiting toxicity occurred at level 8 (100 mg/m2 cisplatinum, 1750 mg/m2 etoposide, 12 g/m2 ifosfamide) with grade 4 mucositis (three of eight patients), grade 3 CNS toxicity (one of eight patients), grade 4 renal toxicity (one of eight patients), and prolonged granulocytopenia (one of eight patients). After 4-year median follow-up, progression-free survival and disease-specific survival rates in the poor prognosis subgroup were 69% and 79% at 2 years and 68% and 73% at 5 years, with 76% for gonadal/retroperitoneal versus 67% for mediastinal primaries. Severe toxicity included treatment related death (4%), treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia (1%), long-term impared renal function (3%), chronic renal failure (1%), and persistant grade 2–3 neuropathy (5%). Conclusion: Repetitive cycles of high-dose VIP with peripheral stem cell support can be successfully applied in a multicenter setting. Dose level 6 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 1500 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 10 g/m2 is recommended for further investigation in randomized trials. An ongoing randomized trial within the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer evaluates this protocol against four cycles of standard cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin.

PURPOSE: To compare first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) with autologous blood stem-cell transplantation to standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) in male patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs), a matched-pair analysis was performed within a homogenous group of patients classified as having either Indiana advanced disease or a poor prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (IGCCCG) criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multivariate analysis was performed that included 147 consecutive patients who had received sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) therapy (HD-CT) in a German multicenter trial between 1993 and 1997 and 309 patients who had been treated with standard-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (PEB) or VIP chemotherapy (SD-CT) within two randomized trials at Indiana University between 1984 and 1992. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated HD-CT to be significantly superior to SD-CT when adjustments were made for prognostic factors (P = .021). Primary tumor site (mediastinal v retroperitoneal/gonadal, P = .035) and presence of visceral metastases (P = .0004) were shown to be significant prognostic factors for overall survival. On the basis of these factors, as well as on tumor marker levels (good, intermediate, or poor, according to IGCCCG criteria), 146 of 147 HD-CT patients were fully matched to an SD-CT patient. Median follow-up was 21 months (range, 0 to 70 months) for the HD-CT patients and 22 months (range, 0 to 90 months) for the SD-CT patients. Two-year progression-free survival (75% v 59%) and overall survival (82% v 71%) were significantly prolonged in HD-CT patients (P = .0056 and P = .0184, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that first-line HD-CT in patients with poor-prognosis GCT may result in a significant improvement of progression-free and overall survival as compared with SD-CT. Salvage HD-CT seems not to compensate this survival advantage.