Search

Purpose We investigated the long-term risk of second primary malignancy after chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in a much larger cohort than any yet published, to our knowledge. Patients and Methods We followed 5,798 patients with HL treated with chemotherapy in Britain from 1963 to 2001—of whom 3,432 also received radiotherapy—to assess second primary malignancy risks compared with general population-based expectations. Results Second malignancies occurred in 459 cohort members. Relative risk (RR) of second cancer was raised after chemotherapy alone (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7 to 2.4) but was much lower than after combined modalities (RR, 3.9; 95% CI, 3.5 to 4.4). After chemotherapy alone, there were significantly raised risks of lung cancer, non-HL, and leukemia, each contributing approximately equal absolute excess risk. After combined modalities, there were raised risks of these and several other cancers. Second cancer risk peaked 5 to 9 years after chemotherapy alone, but it remained raised for 25 years and longer after combined modalities. Risk was raised after each common chemotherapy regimen except, based on limited numbers and follow-up, adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine. The age and time-course relations of lung cancer differed between chemotherapy alone and combined modalities. Conclusion Although chemotherapy alone leads to raised risk of second malignancy, this risk is lower and affects fewer anatomic sites than that after combined modalities, and it is slight if at all after 15 years follow-up. The mechanism of lung cancer etiology may differ between chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Purpose Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Salvage regimens have never been compared; their efficacy in the rituximab era is unknown. Patients and Methods Patients with CD20+ DLBCL in first relapse or who were refractory after first-line therapy were randomly assigned to either rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin (R-ICE) or rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP). Responding patients received high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results The median age of the 396 patients enrolled (R-ICE, n = 202; R-DHAP, n = 194) was 55 years. Similar response rates were observed after three cycles of R-ICE (63.5%; 95% CI, 56% to 70%) and R-DHAP (62.8%; 95 CI, 55% to 69%). Factors affecting response rates (P < .001) were refractory disease/relapse less than versus more than 12 months after diagnosis (46% v 88%, respectively), International Prognostic Index (IPI) of more than 1 versus 0 to 1 (52% v 71%, respectively), and prior rituximab treatment versus no prior rituximab (51% v 83%, respectively). There was no significant difference between R-ICE and R-DHAP for 3-year event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival. Three-year EFS was affected by prior rituximab treatment versus no rituximab (21% v 47%, respectively), relapse less than versus more than 12 months after diagnosis (20% v 45%, respectively), and IPI of 2 to 3 versus 0 to 1 (18% v 40%, respectively). In the Cox model, these parameters were significant (P < .001). Conclusion In patients who experience relapse more than 12 months after diagnosis, prior rituximab treatment does not affect EFS. Patients with early relapses after rituximab-containing first-line therapy have a poor prognosis, with no difference between the effects of R-ICE and R-DHAP.

Purpose Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent disorder that is treatable but considered incurable with chemotherapy alone. The curative potential of allogeneic transplantation using conventional myeloablative conditioning has been demonstrated, but this approach is precluded in the majority of patients with FL because of excessive toxicity. Thus, reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are being explored. Patients and Methods This study reports the outcome of 82 consecutive patients with FL who underwent transplantation using fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab for in vivo T-cell depletion. Patients were heavily pretreated, having received a median of four lines of prior therapy, and 26% had experienced treatment failure with previous autologous transplantation. Median patient age was 45 years, and 52% of patients received stem cells from unrelated donors. Results With a median follow-up time of 43 months, the nonrelapse mortality was 15% at 4 years (8% for sibling and 22% for unrelated donor transplantations), acute grade 2 or 3 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 13%, and the incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was only 18%. Although relapse risk was 26%, this was significantly reduced where mixed chimerism had been converted to full donor chimerism by the use of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; P = .03). In addition, 10 (77%) of 13 patients given DLI for relapse after transplantation experienced remission, with nine of these responses being sustained. Current progression-free survival at 4 years was 76% for the whole cohort (90% for those with sibling donors and 64% for those with unrelated donors). Conclusion The excellent long-term survival with associated low rates of GVHD and the frequency and durability of DLI responses make this an extremely encouraging strategy for the treatment and potential cure of FL.

Purpose Notch pathway activation by mutations in either NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 is one of the most common molecular events in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and, in pediatric disease, predicts for favorable outcome. Their prognostic significance in adult T-ALL is unclear. We sought to evaluate the outcome according to mutation status of patients with adult T-ALL treated on the United Kingdom Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia XII (UKALLXII)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) E2993 protocol. Methods NOTCH1 and FBXW7 were screened by a combination of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and sequencing in 88 adult patients with T-ALL treated on the UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 protocol and compared with clinical characteristics and outcome. Results NOTCH1 and FBXW7 mutations were common (60% and 18%, respectively) and were not associated with age or WBC count. NOTCH1 heterodimerization domain mutations were associated with FBXW7 mutations (P = .02), and NOTCH1 proline, glutamic acid, serine, threonine (PEST) rich domain and FBXW7 mutations were mutually exclusive. There were an equal number of high- and standard-risk patients in the NOTCH1 and FBXW7 mutated (MUT) groups. Patients wild type (WT) for both markers trended toward poorer event-free survival (EFS; MUT v WT, 51% v 27%, P = .10; hazard ratio, 0.6). Analysis by each marker individually was not significantly predictive of outcome (NOTCH1 MUT v WT, EFS 49% v 34%, P = .20; FBXW7 MUT v WT, EFS 53% v 41%, P.72). Conclusion NOTCH1 and FBXW7 mutant-positive patients do not fare sufficiently well to warrant an individualized treatment approach in future studies.

PURPOSE: Conventional allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) after a prior failed autograft is associated with a transplant-related mortality rate of 50% to 80%. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sibling, HLA-matched, nonmyeloablative allogeneic SCT with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in patients with lymphoid malignancy after failure of autologous SCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 38 patients with refractory, progressive, or relapsed disease after autologous SCT were entered onto this study. The conditioning regimen consisted of the humanized monoclonal antibody CAMPATH-1H, fludarabine, and melphalan. Fifteen of 35 assessable patients received DLI after SCT. RESULTS: Sustained neutrophil engraftment was achieved in 37 recipients, and platelet engraftment was achieved in 35 patients. The estimated transplant-related mortality was 7.9% at day 100 and 20% at 14 months, the median duration of follow-up. Eight patients experienced grade I/II acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after transplantation, but no grade III/IV GVHD was observed in this setting. However, grade III/IV GVHD occurred in seven patients who received DLI. The actuarial overall survival at 14 months was 53%, with a progression-free survival of 50%. DLI produced a further response in three of 15 recipients. CONCLUSION: Nonmyeloablative allogeneic SCT after CAMPATH-1H–containing conditioning is a relatively safe option compared with conventional allogeneic transplantation for patients who have failed previous autologous SCT. The low incidence of early GVHD enabled the subsequent administration of DLI to improve further clinical responses in this poor-risk group of lymphoma and myeloma patients.

PURPOSE To assess hematologic recovery and procedure-related mortality in patients who received high-dose therapy with stem-cell support, in whom the peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) collection fails (CD34+ cells < 1 x 10(6)/kg). The predictive value of granulocyte-monocyte colony-forming cell (GM-CFC) measurements and the value of bone marrow obtained after PBSC collection failure was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study group comprised 324 consecutive patients mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and cyclophosphamide (273 patients), G-CSF with other chemotherapy (37 patients), and G-CSF alone (14 patients). Between one and four aphereses were performed. RESULTS In 51 of 324 patients, there was failure to obtain 1 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells. Twenty-three patients had greater than 1 x 10(5)/kg GM-CFC; 22 patients proceeded to high-dose therapy. Neutrophil recovery occurred within 21 days, but platelet independence was delayed (> 28 days) in eight patients. Of 28 patients with less than 1 x 10(5)/kg GM-CFC, six received high-dose therapy with PBSC alone and five had delayed engraftment. Twelve patients with less than 1 x 10(5)/kg GM-CFC received high-dose therapy supported by bone marrow collected after PBSC collection failure. Eleven patients were assessable for engraftment; four patients had slow (> 21 days) or delayed (> 28 days) neutrophil recovery and eight patients had delayed platelet recovery. In the group of patients who received less than 1 x 10(5)/kg GM-CFC, there were five procedure-related deaths. CONCLUSION This study shows that delayed hematologic recovery is frequent if less than 1 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells are infused after high-dose therapy, particularly with GM-CFC less than 1 x 10(5)/kg. The procedure-related mortality in this latter group is high. In most patients whose PBSC collection contains less than 1 x 10(5)/kg GM-CFC, the use of bone marrow cells does not improve engraftment, which suggests that poor PBSC mobilization usually indicates poor marrow function.

PURPOSE High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) and autologous bone marrow (ABM) transplant (T) has documented survival benefits for relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Treatment costs associated with HDC and its supportive care have restricted its use both on and off clinical trial. In a prospective randomized clinical trial, filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT resulted in faster recovery of bone marrow function, with less hospitalization and supportive care than ABMT. This study was undertaken to analyze the costs of the two strategies using prospectively collected data from a randomized clinical trial that compared filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT versus ABMT. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical results and resource utilization from a randomized clinical trial that compared filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT versus ABMT following carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) HDC for HD and NHL are presented. The trial was performed in six centers in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Belgium. Resource utilization data were used to project costs and Massay Cancer Center (MCC) in the United States incurred the cost of treating the cohort. Costs were projected to the United States, because the economic implications to United States centers are significant, costs of care vary markedly among countries but resource utilization on this trial did not, and a randomized trial is unlikely to be performed in the United States. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients with relapsed HD or NHL underwent HDC with BEAM. The PBPCT and ABMT groups had similar short-term survival after BEAM. PBPCT patients had a shorter hospitalization (median, 17 v 23 days; P = .002), neutrophil recovery (11 v 14 days; P = .005), platelet recovery to > or = 20 x 10(9)/L (16 v 23 days; P = .02), and days of platelet transfusions (6 v 10; P < .001). Estimated costs were $8,531 for ABM harvest and $5,760 for PBPC collection, including filgrastim mobilization. The total estimated average cost was $59,314 for each ABMT patient versus $45,792 for each PBPCT patient. Cost savings of $13,521 (23%) were due to shorter hospitalizations with less supportive care. CONCLUSION PBPCT is as safe and more effective than ABMT for HD and NHL in the short term. PBPCT represents a significant cost savings due to lower autograft collection costs, shorter hospital stays, and less supportive care. The savings exceed the costs for filgrastim mobilization and PBPC collection. Actual savings will vary depending on local practice patterns, charges, and costs.

PURPOSE To evaluate the outcome of patients with relapsed or resistant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and to determine the main prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred seven patients with relapsed or resistant intermediate-/high-grade NHL underwent high-dose carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy and ABMT at University College Hospitals between September 1981 and February 1993. The minimum follow-up duration of all patients is 6 months. RESULTS At 3 months, the overall response rate to BEAM and ABMT was 73% (41% complete response and 32% partial response). The 5-year actuarial overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 41% and 35%, respectively. The early procedure-related mortality rate was 7% (eight of 107 patients). On multivariate analysis, the main prognostic factor was disease status at the time of ABMT. Patients with chemosensitive disease had an actuarial 5-year survival rate of 49% at 5 years compared with 13% for those with chemoresistant disease (P < .001). For patients considered to have chemosensitive disease at the time of transplantation, there is a significant difference in the actuarial progression-free survival rates for those who received high-dose therapy after attaining a partial response to first-line therapy (69% at 5 years) as compared with those with sensitive but relapsed disease (32% at 5 years) (P = .003). CONCLUSION Patients with chemosensitive disease benefit most from high-dose chemotherapy, and those who receive such therapy early after achieving a partial response to first-line therapy have a high rate of cure.

PURPOSE The aims of this study were to develop a simplified, safe, and cost-effective peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-six patients with relapsed or resistant lymphomas were entered onto a sequential cohort study in which schedules of various granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were administered after cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2. Hematologic recovery after high-dose carmustine (BCNU) etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy was compared with that of 46 patients who received autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) without growth factors and 28 patients who received ABMT followed by G-CSF. RESULTS When G-CSF (10 micrograms/kg/d) was administered from the day after the cyclophosphamide, neutropenia developed on day 8 followed by an abrupt increase in the WBC count. The optimal time for PBPC harvesting was the day on which the postnadir WBC count was greater than 8.0 x 10(9)/L, as shown by CD34+ cell counts and granulocytic-macrophage colony-forming cell (GM-CFC) assays. The reproducibility of the response was such that routine monitoring of CD34+ cell counts and GM-CFC was not necessary. A single leukapheresis on this day was adequate for prompt hematologic engraftment, and posttransplant G-CSF made little further impact on the rapid recovery. Compared with both control groups, the use of PBPC led to more rapid neutrophil recovery, markedly accelerated platelet recovery, less use of antimicrobial agents and parenteral nutrition, and more than 10 days earlier discharge from hospital. All of these differences were highly significant (P < .01). CONCLUSION A simplified mobilization protocol is described that requires only one apheresis to achieve rapid hematologic engraftment.

PURPOSE The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the efficacy of eight cycles of chlorambucil, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (LOPP) with four cycles of LOPP that alternate with four cycles of etoposide, vinblastine, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Familitalia Carlo Erba, Ltd, UK), and prednisone (EVAP) in patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 1983 and December 1989, 594 patients were entered onto the study. Of the 594, 295 patients were allocated to receive LOPP, and 299 were allocated to receive LOPP/EVAP. RESULTS The complete remission (CR) rates were 57% and 64%, respectively, after initial chemotherapy (difference not significant [NS]), and 65% and 75%, respectively, after the subsequent administration of radiotherapy to residual masses (P less than .01). The procedure associated mortality in the LOPP and LOPP/EVAP arms was 1% and 3%, respectively. The actuarial CR relapse-free survival was significantly greater in the LOPP/EVAP arm (P less than .001) as was the overall survival (P less than .05). The CR relapse-free rate, disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and overall survival rate at 5 years were 52%, 32%, and 66%, respectively, in the LOPP arm, compared with 72%, 47%, and 75% in the LOPP/EVAP arm, respectively. CONCLUSION These results indicate that LOPP and EVAP is superior to LOPP alone as initial treatment for advanced Hodgkin's disease.