Search

33 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is an androgen-dependent disease that initially responds to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); however, it can become resistant to therapies that reduce testosterone levels, signaling a transition to non-metastatic, castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC). Racial disparities are known in PC, with black and Hispanic men presenting with more advanced disease and having a higher mortality rate compared to non-Hispanic white men. The goal of treatment management in patients with nmCRPC is to prevent or delay metastases. This study examines the disease progression observed among patients with nmCRPC who received care and treatment in an equal access healthcare system, the Veterans Health Administration. Methods: Patient information was obtained from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Cancer Registry (VACCR) and the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) to identify patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer at the VA and later developed nmCRPC, defined as (1) evidence of a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), i.e., 2 consecutive increases in PSA concentration over a baseline value; (2) evidence of ongoing androgen deprivation consisting of a serum testosterone level of ≤50 ng/dL (≤2.0 nmol/L); and (3) the absence of metastatic disease as evidenced in radiology reports. Treatments of nmCRPC were identified by review of NCCN Prostate Cancer Guidelines and extracted from CDW pharmacy dispensation records and indexed at nmCRPC diagnosis. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify time to metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients. Results: 654,148 patients were diagnosed with PC and received care in the VA from 2006 to 2021; of these, 12,992 developed nmCRPC, of whom 7,323 (56%) were white, 3,671 (28%) were black, 826 (6%) were Hispanic, and 1,172 (9%) were reported as other. Compared with white men at nmCRPC diagnosis, black men were younger (70 years vs. 74 years) while Hispanic men were older (75 years). White and Hispanic men had similar PSA at nmCRPC (10.2 ng/mL and 10.4 ng/mL), while the PSA for black men was higher (14.3 ng/mL). Similar treatment patterns were observed in all patients regardless of race; with ADT (60%), bicalutamide (24%), and finasteride (3%), the most frequently used first-line treatments. The mean time from nmCRPC to metastatic CRPC was 27.5 days for white men, 31.6 days for black men, 27.6 for Hispanic men, and 26.0 days for others. After adjusting for age, comorbidities, PSA doubling time, and treatment, the hazard ratio (HR) for developing metastatic disease was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.90

394 Background: TeleOncology encompasses the delivery of care virtually though modalities such as electronic consultation (e-consult), telephone and video visits. The National TeleOncology (NTO) program was created by Veterans Affairs (VA) to address growing disparities in care across the VA network. Through NTO, subspecialty hematologists/oncologists can provide recommendations and care for patients located at VA centers across the county. We aimed to investigate differences in patient utilization of available forms of TeleOncology. Methods: NTO was started in 2020 and offers virtual care to over 20 VA sites. Patient visits were catalogued across different forms of TeleOncology including telephone, e-consult (chart review only), VA Video Connect (VVC, synchronous video visit with patient at home), and Clinical Video Telehealth (CVT, synchronous video visit with patient at local VA). Total and unique patient encounters were analyzed based on patient age, gender, race, care assessment need (CAN) score (predictor for identifying patients at high-risk for poor outcomes), and patient rurality. Modalities of telehealth were then compared. Results: 3008 unique patients and 5921 encounters were recorded (October 2019-May 2022). The majority of patients accessed care by CVT visit (n = 1915). Patient characteristics were statistically different between the modes of TeleOncology. Patients participating in CVT were older (Mean 70.5 (95% CI 69.97-70.97) vs 65.5 years old (95% CI 64.62-66.68) and had higher CAN scores (mean score 82 (95% CI 80.96-82.74) vs 69 (95% CI 66.76-70.74)), compared to patients assessed through e-consult. Conversely black and female patients were overrepresented in the e-consult group compared to the CVT group (Table). Patients receiving care by telephone were more often located in a rural or highly rural region compared to those seen through VVC (71.5% vs 52%). Conclusions: The NTO program offers unique insights into utilization patterns of different forms of virtual care. Patient characteristics were not similar across the e-consult, telephone, and video visit groups. Importantly racial and gender disparities were noted, with African American and female patients, being disproportionately cared for through chart review only compared to a video visit. These results represent a first step in understanding how patients’ interface with virtual care modalities. Future studies could investigate how patient and system factors might influence observed patterns.[Table: see text]

e17042 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer diagnosed among U.S. Veterans. Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) occurs in patients who, despite having received androgen deprivation therapy, experience a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and castrate testosterone levels, with no evidence of metastatic disease on radiographic imaging. Given the recent approval of novel antiandrogens, the treatment landscape for nmCRPC has rapidly evolved. Although there have been numerous clinical trials examining the safety and efficacy of these treatments, few studies have identified real-world treatment patterns among nmCRPC patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using patient information obtained from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Cancer Registry and the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) to identify patients who were diagnosed with PC at the VA, and later developed nmCRPC, defined as having: (1) evidence of rising PSA, i.e., 2 consecutive increases in PSA concentration over a baseline value; (2) evidence of ongoing androgen deprivation consisting of a serum testosterone level of ≤50 ng/dL (≤2.0 nmol/L); and (3) no evidence of metastatic disease on radiology reports. Treatments were extracted from CDW pharmacy dispensation records and were indexed at nmCRPC diagnosis. Results: A total of 12,549 patients were diagnosed with nmCRPC and treated in the VA from 2006 to 2020; of these, 7,239 (58%) were white, 3,386 (27%) were black, 784 (6%) were Hispanic, and 1,140 (9%) other. Median age at PC diagnosis was 69 years, with most patients residing in the South 4,817 (38%). Of the 7,659 (61%) patients receiving first-line (1L) nmCRPC therapy, 5,508 (72%) received bicalutamide, 621 (8%) ketoconazole, 563 (7%) abiraterone, 492 (6%) enzalutamide, and 242 (3%) flutamide. Although bicalutamide remained the most frequently used 1L nmCRPC therapy regardless of year, the adoption of abiraterone and enzalutamide beginning in 2012 resulted in a decline of 1L bicalutamide from 80% of patients in 2006 to 43% in 2020. Ketoconazole was the second most common 1L nmCRPC therapy and the most common second-line (2L) and third line (3L) nmCRPC therapy. Of patients receiving 1L therapy, 2,244 (31%) received 2L therapy, and of these, 708 (32%) received 3L therapy. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest real-world cohort of nmCRPC patients treated in a nationwide equal-access health care system. Despite the recent approval of several nmCRPC treatments (apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide) which have demonstrated improved metastasis-free survival and treatment-related quality of life, our real-world findings suggest that older, first-generation antiandrogens remain the predominant 1L treatment for nmCRPC patients.

e19575 Background: Per label, mogamulizumab (Moga) is administered on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the first 28-day cycle (loading) and on days 1 and 15 of each subsequent cycle (maintenance) for adult patients with relapsed or refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) after ≥1 prior systemic therapy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, professional organizations suggested dosing intervals for systemic cancer therapies be extended to limit in-person visits. This study examined the real-world use of Moga before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Methods: Using the Symphony Health Solutions database, adults with ≥1 diagnosis (dx) of MF or SS (ICD-10 CM: C84.0x or C84.1x) and ≥1 Moga claim during 10/1/2018-5/6/2021 were identified. Within the MF (no SS dx) and SS (any SS dx) cohorts, patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on their Moga initiation date: 10/1/2018-3/31/2020 (pre COVID-19) and 4/1/2020-5/6/2021 (COVID-19). Patient characteristics and dosing intervals between Moga doses 1-4 (loading) and between subsequent doses (maintenance) were examined. Results: Overall, 154 MF and 204 SS patients initiated Moga during the study period (mean age: 66.8 and 69.2 years; male: 64% and 55%, respectively). In the MF cohort, 98 and 56 patients were in the “pre COVID-19” and “COVID-19” subgroups. The mean dosing interval was shorter among patients in the “COVID-19” subgroup for both the loading (9.1 vs. 13.2 days) and maintenance doses (15.2 vs. 16.1 days) (Table). In the SS cohort, 121 and 83 patients were in the “pre COVID-19” and “COVID-19” subgroups. Mean loading (9.0 vs. 11.1 days) and maintenance (15.0 vs. 16.8 days) dosing intervals were shorter for patients included in the “COVID-19” subgroup. Conclusions: Among MF and SS patients, dosing intervals for Moga in loading and maintenance were not extended during the 1st year of the COVID-19 compared to pre COVID-19. There was a trend towards closer concordance with the label during COVID-19.[Table: see text]

1545 Background: Cancer therapies are leveraging oral targeted treatments over traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) at an increasing rate. Compared to CT, use of oral antineoplastic treatments (OATs) shift some of the burden of medication management onto patients. To address these challenges, several health systems have developed multidisciplinary OAT management teams or ‘clinics’ whereby an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist (OCP) collaborates with oncology teams to ensure optimal use of these agents. Through the VA MISSION Act of 2018, Veterans can be prescribed treatments in the community which are dispensed by VA. These Veterans often live in rural areas and may lack access to comprehensive medication management resources. Methods: The VA CARES Program is a telemedicine medication management ‘clinic’ and care delivery model for patients receiving OATs leveraging custom designed health information technology (HIT) tools to remotely coordinate OAT related care. Veterans are automatically enrolled in the program if they have OATs prescribed by community providers which are to be dispensed by VA. An OCP provides telemedicine medication management services. The OCP performs a screening assessment, ensures appropriate indication and dosing, reviews baseline laboratory results, and performs a thorough drug-drug interaction analysis. The OCP then provides OAT education. Throughout the duration of therapy the OCP ensures necessary therapeutic monitoring, and regularly follows up with the Veterans. Subsequent encounters are to assess knowledge, adherence, toxicities, new drug-drug interactions, and need for OAT refills. The outcome measures for the VA CARES Program include safety (number and type of pharmacist interventions), economic benefits (cost savings or cost avoidance), and patient satisfaction. Results: In the initial 13 months, the VA CARES Program screened N = 78 and enrolled N = 64 (82%) Veterans from three VA medical facilities in VISN-19 from January 2020 to January 2021. The CPS performed n = 342 telemedicine visits and n = 80 interventions leading to improved safety, effectiveness, and/or an economical benefit. The most common interventions included detection and/or prevention of drug-drug interactions (n = 45) and adverse events (n = 18), drug not indicated (n = 13), alternative therapy suggested (n = 7), and limited-quantity dispensed (n = 7). The CPS interventions saved an estimated $210,864 in medication-related costs or avoidance. The Veterans surveyed were highly satisfied with the program services. Conclusions: Telemedicine delivery of oncology medication management by an OCP across systems is feasible, and provides clinical and economic benefits.

Purpose Cancer cells can exploit the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint pathway to avoid immune surveillance by modulating T-lymphocyte activity. In part, this may occur through overexpression of PD-1 and PD-1 pathway ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) in the tumor microenvironment. PD-1 blockade has produced significant antitumor activity in solid tumors, and similar evidence has emerged in hematologic malignancies. Methods In this phase I, open-label, dose-escalation, cohort-expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma received the anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab at doses of 1 or 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab and to assess PD-L1/PD-L2 locus integrity and protein expression. Results Eighty-one patients were treated (follicular lymphoma, n = 10; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, n = 11; other B-cell lymphomas, n = 10; mycosis fungoides, n = 13; peripheral T-cell lymphoma, n = 5; other T-cell lymphomas, n = 5; multiple myeloma, n = 27). Patients had received a median of three (range, one to 12) prior systemic treatments. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 51 (63%) patients, and most were grade 1 or 2. Objective response rates were 40%, 36%, 15%, and 40% among patients with follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, respectively. Median time of follow-up observation was 66.6 weeks (range, 1.6 to 132.0+ weeks). Durations of response in individual patients ranged from 6.0 to 81.6+ weeks. Conclusion Nivolumab was well tolerated and exhibited antitumor activity in extensively pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory B- and T-cell lymphomas. Additional studies of nivolumab in these diseases are ongoing.

e23120 Background: Cancer patients experience symptoms which may precede diagnosis, occur during therapy, and persist into survivorship. Symptom assessments and patient reported outcomes have been shown to improve quality of life and extend survival in cancer patients. The Veterans Administration Symptom Assessment Scale (VSAS) is a clinical tool to document cancer-related symptoms. Here, we report VSAS adoption in five Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hematology-oncology sites during a five-year period. Methods: Data was collected from the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW): VSAS data, date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, vital status, year of cancer diagnosis, ICD-O-3, VHA facility, and clinic stop codes. Descriptive analyses of patient demographics, disease characteristics, and VSAS utilization was performed. VSAS is comprised of 13 symptoms, rated on a 0 to 10 scale. A VSAS visit was defined as the date the VSAS was administered to a patient. Results: From January 2013 through June 2018, there were 41,917 instances of VSAS administered to 9,409 unique patients at five VHA facilities: 8,512 (90.5%) were male; 5,241 (56%) were non-Hispanic White, 3,743 (40%) were Black, and 297 (3%) were other racial categories or not available. The median age at the first VSAS visit was 67 years. In patients whose oncologic diagnosis was recorded by a cancer registrar (4,536), the most common diagnoses were prostate cancer, lung cancer (all histologies), colon cancer, and multiple myeloma. The number of VSAS administrations increased annually, from 866 in 2013 to 12,775 in 2017, which may be attributed to increased adoption of VSAS across and within VHA facilities. Individual patients completed the VSAS 1-57 times (median 2). At the five VHA facilities utilizing VSAS in 2017, VSAS was administered at 56% of hematology-oncology clinic visits. Conclusions: VSAS is a tool to measure and document patient symptom burden, and has been successfully adopted in the last five years at select VHA facilities. Expanded use of VSAS throughout the VHA is an important step in improving the quality of life and extending survival of veterans with cancer and blood disorders.

7539 Background: CTCLs are chronic skin malignancies, characterized by relapsing/remitting behavior and progressive resistance to treatments, with a reported median time to next treatment (TTNT; ie, systemic treatment excluding topical steroids) in mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) of 5.4 months (mo) (Hughes et al. Blood, 2015). The phase 3 MAVORIC study demonstrated mogamulizumab (MOGA) was superior to vorinostat (VORI) in progression-free survival (median 7.7 vs 3.1 mo, P

2511Background: MRG-106 is an inhibitor of miR-155, a microRNA with a strong link to CTCL pathogenesis. The goals of this FIH study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and efficacy of MRG...

7564 Background: MRG-106 is an oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-155, a microRNA with a strong mechanistic link to CTCL, selected based on its activity in mycosis fungoides (MF) cell lines. The objective of this first-in-human study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of MRG-106 in MF patients. Methods: This Phase 1 trial employs a dose-escalation design to evaluate either intratumoral (IT, 75 mg/dose) or subcutaneous (SC, ≤ 900 mg/dose) administration of MRG-106. Patients were required to have biopsy-proven stage I-III MF and plaque- or tumor-stage lesions. Results: Fifteen patients (12M/3F, median age 59 years) have been dosed over 1-4 weeks. All patients tolerated the IT or SC administrations well with only minor local injection reactions in 8 patients. Thirteen of 15 patients completed dosing as scheduled. There were no clinically significant MRG-106 related adverse events with the exception of one grade 3 pruritus. The MTD has not yet been reached. In the IT cohort, a reduction of ≥50% in the baseline Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) score was observed in the MRG-106 treated lesions in all 4 evaluable patients who completed dosing; such responses were maintained to the End of Study visit (Day 28 or 35). Histological examination of pre- and post-treatment biopsies of the MRG-106-injected lesion from most patients revealed a trend in reduction in neoplastic cell density and depth; 1 patient had a complete loss of the neoplastic infiltrate. Gene expression analysis of the pre- and post-treatment biopsies showed reduction of the PI3K/AKT, JAK/STAT, and NFkB survival pathways and increased cell death consistent with the expected MRG-106 mechanism of action. In the SC cohorts, 3/8 patients had a maximal decrease in their modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) of > 39% indicative of a significant response. One patient at the 900 mg SC dose level had a possible flare of their disease after 3 doses that resolved after 3 weeks. Conclusions: Based on favorable clinical safety, efficacy and PK data, additional patients are being accrued. Updated results will be presented as available. Clinical trial information: NCT02580552.

7537 Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an incurable malignancy with patients (pts) ultimately relapsing following standard therapies. Active immunotherapy has the potential to induce life-long host anti-tumor immunity and disease control. G100 consists of glucopyranosyl lipid-A (GLA), a TLR-4 agonist in a specific formulation. Preclinically, G100 activates dendritic cells, T cells and NK cells, and triggers systemic anti-tumor immunity. In Merkel Cell carcinoma pts, G100 administered intratumorally (IT) induced tumor inflammation and responses including a CR after G100 alone. This is the first study of G100 IT in pts with NHL. Methods: Previously treated or naïve pts with FL with an injectable tumor site and distal sites of disease were eligible. In Part 1, G100 cohorts of 5 or 10µg were enrolled in a 3+3 design, followed by a large tumor ( > 4cm) cohort at 20µg. Pts received 6-9 doses of G100 IT ~qwk after radiation (RT, 2 Gy x2 doses) to the lesion. A 2nd course of G100 could be given without RT to an additional site. Results: As of 31Dec16, all 9 pts in Part 1 dose escalation (3 pts each at 5, 10, or 20 µg/dose) were evaluable for safety and efficacy. An additional 13 pts at 10µg/dose were included in the safety analysis only. No G100-related DLTs or SAEs were observed at any dose level. Of 22 safety pts, all G100 related AEs were grade 1/2 and none occurred in > 2 pts. Tumor biopsies following G100 demonstrated diffuse infiltration of CD8+ T cells in 5/5 pts and T cell repertoire analyses indicated an increased frequency of clonal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Best responses include: 4 PRs (45%), 3 SDs (33%) and 2 pending (22%). Of the 4 PR pts, tumor regression ranged 58-89% including up to 56% shrinkage of abscopal (distal) sites. Conclusions: G100 IT was safe, well-tolerated, induced CD8+ T cell infiltration and expansion of TIL clones. G100/RT treated and abscopal lesion regressions were observed signifying the induction or boosting of systemic anti-tumor immunity. The induction of immune responses, favorable safety profile and clinical activity indicate that G100 IT is an active agent that warrants further investigation. Part 2 enrollment continues with randomization to G100/RT ± pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02501473.

7526 Background: The presence of deletion 17p (del17), determined by chromosome analysis and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), is a strong negative prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Prior to the introduction of novel agents (ibrutinib, venetoclax), the clinical utility of cytogenetics/FISH was limited by the absence of chemoimmunotherapy regimens that were proven effective in patients with del17. Testing practices for chromosomal aberrations since the introduction of novel agents have not been reported. We report cytogenetic/FISH trends in a nationwide cohort of veterans diagnosed with CLL. Methods: CLL patients diagnosed 2008-2015 and receiving care at VA were identified through the VA Clinical Cancer Registry. Electronic medical records were used to determine cytogenetic/FISH testing (lab records), treatment histories (pharmacy dispensation records), and evidence of system use (heme-onc notes). Cytogenetic/FISH testing was identified by presence of specific keywords in the test name or Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) descriptions, then validated by human annotation. The testing rates are reported for the entire cohort, at time of diagnosis, time of regimen initiation (including the 12 months preceding initiation), during the novel era (2014 – 2015) and prior (2008–2013). Results: From 2008 to 2015, 3,638 CLL patients were diagnosed and received care at VA. Documented records of treatment regimens were available for 1,562 patients who received a total of 2,929 treatment regimens. Only 24% (998) of patients were tested at any point in time during their care at the VA, 17% (622) were tested at time of diagnosis, and 19% (542) of treatment courses were preceded by cytogenetic/FISH testing. No testing differences existed following the introduction of the novel agents at diagnosis (both ~ 17%), or prior to regimen initiation (20% vs 16%). Conclusions: Our study suggests CLL patients diagnosed and receiving care at the VA are not routinely undergoing cytogenetics/FISH testing at diagnosis or prior to treatment. Changing this practice pattern will personalize treatments so that del17 CLL patients receive less toxic and more effective therapies.

7519Background: Patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who relapse after or become refractory (R/R) to BCR pathway inhibitors have poor outcomes. Venetoclax (VEN) is a selective, or...

e14552 Background: Lynch syndrome, or HNPCC, is the most common inherited colorectal carcinoma (CRC) syndrome accounting for 2-5% of all cases. Pathologists initiate IHC testing based on patient ag...

8506 Background: Pts with high-intermediate/high-risk DLBCL have relatively poor outcomes with R-CHOP. Single-agent brentuximab vedotin has shown activity in pts with relapsed or refractory DLBCL (...

TPS8623 Background: CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is selectively expressed on type 2 helper T cells and certain functional regulatory T cells. Its expression allows T-cell trafficking to skin and ...

TPS3113 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an immune checkpoint receptor that inhibits T-cell activation upon interaction with its ligands PD-L1 or PD-L2. Increased PD-L1 expression has been reported with various hematologic malignancies and may prevent the host immune response from exerting an antitumor effect on the malignant cells. Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal PD-1 receptor blocking antibody, has demonstrated antitumor activity in pts with solid tumors including melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma. We hypothesized that nivolumab could also mediate antitumor activity in pts with hematologic malignancies, a significant area of unmet medical need. We describe a phase I study to evaluate the effects of nivolumab in pts with select hematologic malignancies. Methods: This open-label, two-part study will enroll approximately 100 pts. During dose escalation, successive cohorts of pts with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies will be treated using a 6+3 escalation design. Pts will receive 1 or 3 mg/kg nivolumab IV every 2 weeks (wks) (the first dose will be followed by a 3-wk evaluation period), for 2 years, with the potential for an additional year of therapy for pts who progress during the follow-up period. Subsequently, 5 tumor-specific cohorts of 16 pts will be enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma/primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Response will be assessed at wks 4, 8, 16, 24, and every 16 wks thereafter. The primary study objective is to establish dose limiting toxicities, the MTD, and the recommended phase II nivolumab dose. Secondary objectives are to characterize nivolumab pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, preliminary antitumor activity, and the potential association between PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and clinical efficacy. Exploratory objectives include investigation of the immunoregulatory effects of nivolumab in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and/or tumor. Pts are currently being enrolled at 3 mg/kg. Clinical trial information: NCT01592370.