Search

6011 Background: The neoadjuvant setting is an excellent opportunity to study ‘ in vivo’ the biological impact of treatment on tumor cells and the immune TME. Both chemotherapy and anti-angiogenics may have immunomodulatory properties which could prime the TME and increase effectiveness of immunotherapeutic agents. We performed comprehensive multiplexed immune biomarker analyses on paired tumor samples at diagnosis and after 3 cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin+paclitaxel (CP) +/- the anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib (N) in the randomized CHIVA trial. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to CP + N or placebo for 3 cycles prior to interval debulking, samples were evaluable for immune profiling for 124 pts at diagnosis and 107 at surgery from the CHIVA trial. For 86 patients matched paired samples were available. Multiplexed IF or IHC panels were performed for CD4, CD3, CD8, CK, Granzyme B, FOXP3, CD68, CD163 and DC-Lamp. Wilcoxon tests were used to compare measurements. Results: At diagnosis the most abundant cells were CD8+ and CD4+ cells (median=118 and 119cells/mm2, respectively) compared to Foxp3+ TRegs (median=30/mm2). Among the myeloid lineage, the proportion of CD68+ (M1) and CD163+ (M2) macrophages was balanced, while mature dentritic cells (DC) represented

650 Background: Medical treatment of patients (pts) with mnccRCC remains uncertain, with no established standard treatment. In addition, no data on late line of treatment have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcome for patients receiving 3L therapy in mnccRCC Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed using the IGRECC (Institut Gustave Roussy REnal Cell Carcinoma) database to describe clinical features and outcomes of 3L therapy in mnccRCC pts. Kaplan Meier estimation was applied for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) Results: Out of all pts with mRCC treated with a targeted therapy from 2005 to 2016, 202/1027 (20%) had mnccRCC. 117 (58%) received 2L therapy and 62 (30%) received 3L therapy. These pts had papillary RCC (61%), unclassified RCC (19), Xp11translocation renal cell carcinoma (13%) and chromophobe tumors (7%). The most common 3L therapies were: everolimus (29%), sorafenib (18%), other drugs in clinical trials (16%), sunitinib (11%), axitinib (10%) and cabozantinib (10%). Baseline characteristics are displayed in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 47 months (mo) (min: 0.7 max: 74), the median PFS is 5 mo (95%CI 2.7 - 5.8) and the median OS is 11.7 mo (95%CI 10 - 20). Pts with a favourable, intermediate and poor risk International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) score had a median OS of 21 mo (95%CI 8 – NR), 11.9 mo (95%CI 10 – 25), and 6.2 mo (95%CI 2 – 8), respectively (p < 0.0001). One patient (2%) obtained a partial response and 26 pts (51%) achieved a stable disease, among 51 evaluable pts Conclusions: This is the first report investigating the impact of 3L systemic therapy in a rare population. Selected pts could benefit of more lines of therapy and IMDC score appears to stratify well prognostic groups, especially poor risk patients. [Table: see text]

647 Background: During the last decade, 10 agents have been approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with mccRCC, and guidelines have been developed up to 3L. The aim of the study is to describe the potential benefit of therapies beyond 3L in clinical practice Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed using IGRECC (Institut Gustave Roussy REnal Cell Carcinoma) database to describe clinical features and outcomes beyond 3L in mccRCC. Kaplan Meier estimation was applied for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) Results: Between 2005 and 2016, 825 (80%) pts had mccRCC and were treated with targeted therapies, of which 517 (63%) had 2L, 271 (33%) had 3L, 145 (18%) had 4L and 75 (9%) had 5L of therapy. Baseline characteristics and treatments are displayed in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 29 months (mo) (min: 20 max: 51), for patients receiving 4L, the median PFS is 5 mo (95%CI 4 – 6) and the median OS is 15.5 mo (95%CI 12 – 21). Pts with International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) score favourable (18%), intermediate (59%), and poor risk (23%) at 4L initiation had a median OS of 24 mo (95%CI 11 – NR), 16 mo (95%CI 12.6 – 24), and 8 mo (95%CI 6 – 15), respectively (p < 0.0036). Partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were achieved in 13% and 56% of 122 evaluable pts. With a median follow-up of 16 mo (min: 13 max: 37) in 5L, the median PFS is 4.5 mo (95%CI 3 – 6) and the median OS is 19.5 mo (95%CI 11 - 28). Pts with a poor IMDC score risk at 5L initiation (33%) had a median OS of 7 mo (95%CI 3 – 10) (p < 0.0001). PR and SD were achieved in 16% and 52% of 55 evaluable pts in 5L Conclusions: The approved agents remain active as 4L or 5L options for mccRCC in pts who can reach this situation. Interestingly, both PFS and OS appear to be very similar in 4L and 5L as compared to 3L. Therefore, we believe that selected pts may derive benefit from these treatments beyond the barriers of regulatory or reimbursement approval [Table: see text]