Search

LBA9500 Background: In previous analyses of the phase 3, double-blind KEYNOTE-716 study, adjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with placebo in patients (pts) with resected AJCC-8 stage IIB or IIC melanoma. We present new data from the analysis of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with longer follow up. Methods: A total of 976 pts aged ≥12 years with complete resection of cutaneous stage IIB or IIC melanoma and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg (2 mg/kg for pediatric pts) or placebo Q3W for 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) in Part 1 of the study. Randomization was stratified by T category 3b, 4a, 4b (adults) with a separate stratum for pediatric pts. Treatment continued until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Pts who received placebo in Part 1, or who did not experience disease progression within 6 months of completing Part 1 were eligible for additional cycles of pembro Q3W at recurrence (Part 2). The primary endpoint was RFS per investigator. DMFS by investigator is a secondary endpoint. The data cut-off date for this interim analysis was Jan 4th, 2022. Results: At median follow-up of 26.9 mo (range, 4.6-39.2), adjuvant pembro significantly improved DMFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.47-0.88; P=0.0029; median not reached [NR] for both) vs placebo. The 24-mo DMFS rate was 88.1% vs 82.2%. There was consistent reduction in the risk of recurrence with pembro vs placebo (HR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.50-0.84) with further follow-up. The 24-mo RFS rate was 81.2% vs 72.8%. Grade ≥ 3 any-cause AEs occurred in 137 (28.4%) vs 97 (20.0%) pts in the pembro vs placebo arms. Grade ≥ 3 drug-related AEs occurred in 83 (17.2%) vs 24 (4.9%) pts. One pt in the pembro arm and 5 pts in the placebo arm died due to an any-cause AE. No deaths were drug-related. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 182 (37.7%) vs 45 (9.3%) pts, most commonly hypothyroidism (17.2% vs 3.7%). Conclusions: Adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma significantly improved DMFS, with continued reduction in the risk of recurrence, and a favorable benefit-risk profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03553836.

2559 Background: In the preliminary analysis of the FAMI-L1 study, we found a significant association between family history of cancer (FHC) and better clinical outcomes with anti-PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated advanced cancer patients treated with single agents PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Patients were categorized as follow: FHC-high (in case of at least one cancer diagnoses in both straight and collateral family line), FHC-low (in case of a cancer diagnoses in only one family line) and FHC-negative. FHC was collected till the second degree of relatedness. Results: Between September 2013 and May 2018, 772 consecutive patients were evaluated. Median age was 68 years; male/female ratio was 521/251. Primary tumors were: NSCLC (58.3%), melanoma (22.1%), renal cell carcinoma (16.6%) and others (3%). 114 patients (14.9%) had ECOG-PS ≥ 2. 341 patients (44.3) were FHC-positive: 268 of them (34.75) were FHC-low while 74 (9.6%) were FHC-high. FHC-high patients had a significantly higher incidence of irAEs compared to FHC-negative (55.4% vs 35.6%; p = 0.0012) and to FHC-low (41.4%; p = 0.0323). No significant differences were found in terms of ORR among subgroups (data not shown). At median follow-up of 15.8 months, median PFS was 9.1 months (95%CI: 8.1-10.4; 452 events) and median OS was 19.7 months (95%CI: 15.7-24.4; 436 censored). No significant differences were found regarding PFS (data not shown). Median OS of FHC-high patients was 31.6 months (95%CI: 26.2-31.6; 50 censored patients), which was significantly longer than 18.2 months (95%CI: 14.7-21.3; 229 censored patients) of FHC-negative patients (HR = 0.60 [95%CI: 0.39–0.92), p = 0.0213). No significant differences in terms of OS were found between FHC-high/low patients (data not shown). After adjusting for primary tumor, sex, treatment-line, number of metastatic sites and ECOG-PS, FHC-high was confirmed an independent predictor of longer OS compared to FHC-negative (HR: 0.57 [95%CI: 0.37-0.88], p = 0.0098). Conclusions: FHC-high seems to be an independent predictor for longer OS in cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1. DNA damage and response (DDR) genes alterations may underlie that results.

e15021Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized treatment and outcome of NSCLC. Unfortunately, only 25-30% of patients have a long-term benefit, while the remaining 70-75% demons...

9065 Background: Ipilimumab was the first agent approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma that showed an overall survival benefit in randomised phase III trials. Early clinical studies explored the potential relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with ipilimumab and antitumor activity but no definitive conclusion has been reached. Here, we evaluated the possible correlation between efficacy of ipilimumab treatment and irAEs in patients (pts) enrolled in the EAP in Italy. Methods: Ipilimumab was available upon physician request for pts aged ≥16 years with unresectable stage III/stage IV melanoma who had either failed systemic therapy or were intolerant to ≥1 systemic treatment and for whom no other therapeutic option was available. Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses. Tumour assessments were conducted at baseline and after completion of induction therapy using immune-related response criteria. Pts were monitored for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs (irAEs), using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3.0. Results: In total, 855 Italian pts participated in the EAP from June 2010 to April 2012 across 55 centres. Among 833 evaluable pts, 278 pts (33.4%) reported an irAE and 555 (66.6%) did not. As of December 2012, the disease control rates among pts with or without irAEs were 35.3% and 33.9% respectively. We noted that there was a difference in the distribution of pts with or without irAEs among pts who experienced a fast progression, thus not being able to receive at least 3 cycles, and pts with slow progression. In fact, due to the mechanism of action of the drug and consequent delayed onset of irAEs, pts with irAEs among fast and slow progressors were 22% and 37% respectively. Therefore, median overall survival was evaluated by adjusting the 2 groups for this factor and results showed a comparable survival between pts who reported an irAE and pts who did not (10.0 vs 9.7 months respectively). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of EAP data suggest that activity and efficacy of ipilimumab is not related with the occurrence of irAEs.