Search

622 Background: The RAISE trial (NCT01183780) demonstrated that ramucirumab (RAM) plus leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo (PBO) plus FOLFIRI as second-line mCRC treatment. RAS/RAF mutations are associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapies and poor prognosis, particularly BRAF mutations. The extensive RAISE biomarker program assessed the association of multiple candidate markers with efficacy outcomes. Here we present the results for RAS/ RAF mutations. Methods: Plasma and tumor tissue collection were mandatory. KRAS mutation status was determined locally before randomization. Further RAS and RAF mutations were assessed centrally by multiplex qPCR using the Modaplex system (Qiagen) only in samples that were initially reported as KRAS wild type. Thus, patients were classified into one of the 3 categories in the table. OS and PFS by RAS and RAF subgroups were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: As with previously reported KRAS analyses, the favorable RAM treatment effect was similar between patients with expanded RAS mutations compared with patients with RAS/ RAF wild-type tumors. However, in the 41 patients with BRAF mutated tumors, the RAM benefit was even more notable for both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.25–1.13) and PFS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.08). Conclusions: RAISE demonstrated that the addition of RAM to FOLFIRI improved patient outcomes regardless of RAS mutation status. The noteworthy signal for patients with BRAF mutant tumors is encouraging due to their poor prognosis but requires further validation in other clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780. [Table: see text]

713 Background: Exploratory analyses from RAISE (NCT01183780), FOLFIRI with ramucirumab or placebo in previously treated mCRC pts, suggested pts with treatment-emergent neutropenia may have improved overall survival (OS) compared to pts who did not experience neutropenia on study (Ciuleanu T, et al. abst. 2475, ESMO 2016). Subsequent analyses suggested an even stronger association between baseline ANC and OS, with high baseline ANC associated with shorter OS. A retrospective observational study was conducted to test this association as a pre-specified hypothesis. Methods: The IMS Oncology Database (electronic medical record data from US community practices) was used to identify pts ≥ 18 yrs with mCRC (ICD-9 code 153.x, 154.0 or 154.1) who initiated second-line fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan (+/- bevacizumab; bev) in 2007-2013, following progression during or after first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (+/- biologic). Eligible pts had ≥ 1 ANC in the 60 days prior to second-line therapy. Pts were stratified by second-line bev use and high/low baseline ANC ( ≥ or < 5.5x109/L) and matched by propensity scores. OS based on a validated proxy was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, gender, ECOG PS, stage, length of first-line treatment, and BMI. Results: 747 eligible pts were identified, of whom 617 were matched. Pts with baseline characteristic data had a median age of 59 yr, 57% were male, 67% were Caucasian, 74% had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and 63% had ECOG PS of 0/1 at start of second-line. Bev-treated pts with high baseline ANC (n = 122) had a median OS (mOS) of 7.7 mo vs 14.7 mo in pts with low baseline ANC (n = 323); adjusted HR 1.69 (95% CI, 1.35, 2.12; p < 0.0001). Pts with high baseline ANC not treated with bev (n = 59) had a mOS 5.4 mo vs 14.4 mo in pts with low baseline ANC (n = 113); adjusted HR 2.73 (95% CI, 1.89, 3.93; p < 0.0001). There was a modest interaction effect between bev treatment and baseline ANC (p = 0.012), indicating greater bev benefit in the high ANC group. Conclusions: Baseline ANC appears to be a strong prognostic factor and potentially a weak predictive factor for antiangiogenic therapy for OS in pts with previously treated mCRC.

668 Background: Ramucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody antagonist of VEGFR-2. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 2nd line FOLFIRI based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were improved with RAM therapy versus PBO in the RAISE trial. Recent work suggests mCRC primary tumor location is both prognostic and predictive; with improved OS and therapy-specific sensitivity observed in left (L)- vs right (R)-sided tumors. Given these findings, the RAISE trial data was subjected to post-hoc analysis to determine if sidedness influenced RAM efficacy. Methods: Primary tumor site was obtained. L-CRC was defined as the splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum, while R-CRC included transverse, ascending colon and cecum. OS/PFS in L and R subgroups were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier method and unstratified log-rank test (treatments within subgroup), unstratified Cox proportional hazards model (estimate hazard ratio [HR] and 95% CI), and Wald test (treatment-by-subgroup interaction). Results: Tumor location was available for 1012/1072 (94%) patients, 699 L- and 313 R-CRC. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. RAM treatment enhanced L-CRC median OS by 2.5 mo (median 14.5 vs 12.0 mo) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.807 (0.675, 0.965), P = 0.019; compared to a 1.1 mo increase in median OS in R-CRC vs PBO (12.7 vs 11.6) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.971 (0.750, 1.258), P = 0.823; and, RAM enhanced L-CRC median PFS by 1.6 mo (6.0 vs 4.4 mo) and HR (95% CI) = 0.776 (0.664, 0.906), P = 0.001 compared to a 1.1 mo increase in median PFS R-CRC vs PBO (5.6 vs 4.5) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.855 (0.674, 1.084), P = 0.197. The treatment-by-subgroup interaction for both OS and PFS was not significant ( P = 0.276, 0.578, respectively). Conclusions: Despite L-CRC patients having longer OS/PFS and a seemingly stronger RAM treatment effect than R-CRC, the non-significant interaction test cannot verify sidedness as being predictive of RAM efficacy. The current study confirms ramucirumab benefits mCRC patients regardless primary tumor location. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780.

691 Background: The primary objective was to assess the effect of concomitant RAM on the PK of IRI and its metabolite SN-38 when coadministered with FA and 5-FU. Methods: Key eligibility criteria included pts aged ≥18 years with metastatic or locally advanced malignant solid tumors resistant to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy was available, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Pts received intravenous infusions of FOLFIRI and RAM 8 mg/kg on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. FOLFIRI was administered alone in cycle 1; RAM was administered followed by FOLFIRI in all subsequent cycles. Blood for PK was collected at regular intervals after infusions in cycles 1 and 2 to determine IRI and SN-38 plasma concentrations. Pts who completed the first 2 cycles of study treatment were included in the drug-drug interaction (DDI) population. All pts who received at least 1 dose of RAM or FOLFIRI were included in the safety population. Results: The safety population comprised 29 pts, and the DDI population included 25 of these 29 pts. The dose-normalized area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity [AUC(0-∞)] and the maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax) of IRI and SN-38 were comparable between cycle 1 (FOLFIRI alone) and cycle 2 (RAM+FOLFIRI). The ratios of geometric least-squares (LS) means for IRI were 0.93 (90% CI; 0.83, 1.05) for AUC(0-∞) and 1.04 (90% CI; 0.97, 1.12) for Cmax. The ratios of geometric LS means for SN-38 were 0.95 (90% CI; 0.88, 1.04) for AUC(0-∞) and 0.97 (90% CI; 0.85, 1.12) for Cmax. The most prevalent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue/asthenia (n=19, 65.5%), diarrhea (n=16, 55.2%), neutropenia (n=15, 51.7%), nausea (n=14, 48.3%), and decreased appetite and anemia (n=13 each, 44.8%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were rare, except for neutropenia in 7 (24.1%) pts. Conclusions: The PKs of IRI and its metabolite, SN-38, were not affected when coadministered with RAM. RAM with FOLFIRI was well-tolerated in this study without new safety concerns. Clinical trial information: NCT01634555.

512 Background: Angiogenesis is an important therapeutic target in CRC; VEGF plays a key role in angiogenesis. RAM is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of VEGFR-2. The RAISE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding RAM to standard second-line treatment FOLFIRI. Methods: Eligible pts with mCRC who progressed on or after first-line combination therapy with bev, ox, and fp, had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function were randomized 1:1 (stratified by region, KRAS mutation status, and time to progressive disease [PD] after beginning first-line treatment) to receive RAM (8 mg/kg IV) plus FOLFIRI or PBO plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until PD, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Planned sample size of 1,050 pts ensured 85% power to demonstrate statistical significance at an overall two-sided alpha of 0.05, assuming a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8. Results: Between Dec 2010 and Aug 2013, 1,072 eligible pts were randomized (RAM 536; PBO 536). Baseline pt characteristics were similar between treatment arms. The OS HR was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.98; log-rank p=0.0219). Median OS was 13.3months (m) for RAM vs 11.7m for PBO. The PFS HR was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.90; log-rank p = 0.0005). Median PFS with RAM was 5.7m and 4.5m for PBO. ORR was 13.4% RAM; 12.5% PBO (p = 0.6336). Subgroup results were consistent with the OS and PFS results. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurring in >5% of pts in RAM+FOLFIRI were: neutropenia (RAM 38.4% vs PBO 23.3% ), hypertension (11.2% vs 2.8%), diarrhea (10.8% vs 9.7%), and fatigue (11.5% vs 7.8%). Conclusions: RAISE met its primary end-point, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in OS for RAM and FOLFIRI vs PBO and FOLFIRI in second-line mCRC pts. Benefits were similar across important clinical subgroups and no unexpected AEs were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780.

8058 Background: Outcome of early stage melanoma is related to pathological and clinical findings like SLNB status, but a systematic approach to risk stratification is lacking. Objectives: To assess outcome, and clinico-pathological criteria associated to recurrence and death of patients (pts) who underwent SLNB Methods: From 11/1994 to 5/2005, 286 clinical stages I/II melanoma pts underwent SLNB in our Institution. Median follow up was 38 months. Prognostic factors were analysed with Logranktest and proportional hazard regression. Survival curves with Kaplan-Meier method. A score was derived from coefficients of multivariate analysis and evaluated with ROC curves on 259 pts with complete data. Results: Median age: 48yr; male sex: 54%; median Breslow (Br): 1.8mm. SLNB +: 46 pts (16.1%). Ulcerated: 31%. 5-yr overall survival was 56% in SLNB+ vs 84% in SLNB-, p=0.0002. Five-yr relapse free survival was 52% in SLNB+ vs 73% in SLNB-, p=0.0017. SLNB status, Br, Clark level, Age>50yr, male sex, and ulceration were related to death by univariate analysis, but in multivariate analysis, only SLNB status (HR 2.36), Br (HR 1.66 for each T level of TNM staging) and ulceration (HR 2.35) remained. The score derived from the model was: 5 points (p) for SLNB +; 4p for ulceration; and 0p for Br4mm. Conclusions: SLNB status, Br, and ulceration were, in concordance with literature, statistically significant prognostic factors. This allowed us to build a simple score with good correlation with prognosis (c index: 0.79). This score could be a useful tool for clinical practice and for future clinical trials, but validation in different populations is required. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9076 Background: Doxorrubicin (D) and Ifosfamide (I) are the most active agents in STS. A dose-response effect for this drugs has been established. Despite multiples randomized trials of D-I as sin...