Search

e16129Background: The role of immune biomarkers in predicting benefits of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was still controversial. We was aimed to investigate the prognostic value of immune biomarke...

e16125Background: The role of adjuvant interferon, tumor vaccines or cellular immunotherapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to be debated. This study aimed to assess the...

1 Background: Previous clinical data suggested that the tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were predictive in breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy; however, clinical relevance has yet to be established. We hypothesized that TILs would be associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched until March 2017 for studies that investigated the association of TILs with survival for anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. OS and DFS were combined using random-effects meta-analysis and calculated as combined hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CIs). The PROSPERO registry number is CRD42017072133. Results: Twelve studies comprising 9,023 patients were eligible for analysis. Six were prospective adjuvant trials (n = 7686) and six were retrospective studies (n = 1337). Pooled analysis indicated that high TILs have no significant predictive association in overall population (DFS, HR = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.70 – 1.08; OS, HR = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.89 – 1.07), Luminal A/B (DFS, HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.94 – 1.04; OS, HR = 1.01, 95% CI, 0.92 – 1.12), and HER2–positive patients (DFS, HR = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71 – 1.00; OS, HR = 0.89, 95% CI, 0.77 – 1.02), but were related to improved DFS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73 – 0.89) and OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66 – 0.84) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Additionally, increasing TILs were not significantly associated with reduced risk of relapse in HER2-positive patient through adjuvant trastuzumab (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93 – 1.01). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides an evidence that TILs predicts survival to anthracycline/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients and suggests that predictive benefit seemed to be influenced by breast cancer subtypes as well.

168 Background: Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is becoming the standard of care for patients and it was approved for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) growing at a rapid pace. However, selecting patients who are appropriate for therapy and which therapeutic strategies to use can be challenging. Methods: We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors versus observation in patients with advanced NSCLC until September 2017. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled by meta-analysis. The GRADE system was used to describe the quality of evidence. Results: The analysis included 11 trials with 5,538 unique patients. High- to moderate-quality evidence indicated that immune checkpoint inhibitors extended NSCLC survival and PFS, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) (OS: 0.79, P = 0.000; PFS: 0.78, P = 0.000). High- to moderate-quality evidence revealed prolonged OS and PFS were similar across preplanned subgroups in patients with squamous (0.77, P = 0.000 and 0.74, P = 0.001) or nonsquamous disease (0.76, P = 0.003 and 0.73, P = 0.041), EGFR wild-type positive status (0.67, P = 0.000 and 0.59, P = 0.010), current or former smokers (OS: 0.83, P = 0.009), and male (0.79, P = 0.000 and 0.67, P = 0.023). Increasing improvement in OS was associated with increasing PD-L1 expression (TC3 or IC3 HR 0.54, P = 0.000; TC2/3 or IC2/3 HR 0.62, P = 0.007; TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 HR 0.64, P = 0.000; TC0 and IC0 HR 0.72, P = 0.017; high- to moderate-quality evidence). In exploratory subgroup analysis suggest that there was advantageous of immune checkpoint inhibitors in previous definitive chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy, with concurrent administration of chemotherapy (OS as HR: P = 0.001, P = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: This large and comprehensive analysis produced firm evidence that immune checkpoint inhibitors extended advanced NSCLC survival and PFS, while in some patients with EGFR wild-type positive status, current or former smokers, male and higher PD-L1 expression had substantial benefit. The benefits from therapy appear to be influenced by preceding definitive therapy and concurrent chemotherapy.

2 Background: Current guidelines have limited information regarding tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were predictive in breast cancer survival treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, although some studies suggest a benefit. We quantify the prognostic value of this biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched until March 2017 for studies that investigated the association of TILs with survival for anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were combined using random-effects meta-analysis calculated as combined hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CIs). The interaction test was adopted in order to determine the differential effect according to the histology subtypes and TILs subsets. The PROSPERO registry number is CRD42017072133. Results: We identified 16 studies comprising 2,523 patients were entitled. According to histology subtypes analysis indicated that TILs were not prognostic markers for DFS and OS in overall population, but high TILs were related to improved DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.63 – 0.86) and OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.51 – 0.83) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, and high TILs were also related to better DFS (HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.40 – 0.96) in HER2–positive patients. For TILs subsets, our results indicated that high TILs were prognostic markers for DFS (HR = 0.94, 95% CI, 0.89 – 0.98) and OS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58 – 0.94). In an ad-hoc analysis, increasing CD8+ lymphocytes were associated with improved DFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.33 – 0.65) and OS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.24 – 0.71), high CD8/FOXP3 ratio was correlated with prolonged DFS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.29 – 0.63) and OS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26 – 0.76), while rich FOXP3+ lymphocytes were associated with reduced DFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CI, 1.01 – 2.15) in overall population. Conclusions: The present results reveal TILs as a predictor of survival to anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, predictive benefit appears to be influenced by breast cancer subtypes and TILs subsets as well.

194 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors selection in advanced melanoma is complicated further, with choices among anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD-1 therapeutic antibodies options. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors for discussing evidence-based treatment strategies by a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) data. Methods: We searched for RCTs investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma until September 2017. Hazard ratios (HRs) was estimated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The quality of the evidence was evaluated with the GRADE framework. Results: Overall, 18 RCTs including a total of 8,917 patients were identified. Immune checkpoint inhibitors versus placebo or observation prolonged PFS (HR = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.78, P < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84, P < 0.0001). The combination immunotherapy had significantly higher benefit than monotherapy for PFS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92, P = 0.005) and OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79, P < 0.0001). Treatment with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.69, P < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.77, P < 0.0001) compared with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody. According to BRAF status analysis, there was a PFS benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus placebo or observation (mutant, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.96, P = 0.035; wild–type, HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69, P = 0.001), anti-PD-1 outperformed anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (mutant, PFS HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.79, P < 0.0001; wild–type, PFS HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.71, P < 0.0001); and combination compared with single-agent immunotherapy (mutant, HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.98, P = 0.046; wild–type, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.69, P = 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis provides an evidence that immune checkpoint inhibitors enhanced OS and PFS in patients with advanced melanoma, as well as combination immunotherapy and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody appear to be clinically beneficial option preference.