Search

Aim(s): To explore the published research related to nurses' documentation and use of vital signs in recognising and responding to deteriorating patients. Design: Scoping review of international, peer‐reviewed research studies. Data Sources: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, Medline Complete, American Psychological Association PsycInfo and Excerpta Medica were searched on 25 July 2023. Reporting Method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Results: Of 3880 potentially eligible publications, 32 were included. There were 26 studies of nurses' vital sign documentation: 21 adults and five paediatric. The most and least frequently documented vital signs were blood pressure and respiratory rate respectively. Seven studies focused on vital signs and rapid response activation or afferent limb failure. Five studies of vital signs used to trigger the rapid response system showed heart rate was the most frequent and respiratory rate and conscious state were the least frequent. Heart rate was least likely and oxygen saturation was most likely to be associated with afferent limb failure (n = 4 studies). Conclusion: Despite high reliance on using vital signs to recognise clinical deterioration and activate a response to deteriorating patients in hospital settings, nurses' documentation of vital signs and use of vital signs to activate rapid response systems is poorly understood. There were 21studies of nurses' vital sign documentation in adult patients and five studies related to children. Implications for the profession and/or patient care: A deeper understanding of nurses' decisions to assess (or not assess) specific vital signs, analysis of the value or importance nurses place (or not) on specific vital sign parameters is warranted. The influence of patient characteristics (such as age) or the clinical practice setting, and the impact of nurses' workflows of vital sign assessment warrants further investigation. Patient or Public Contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim(s): To explore vital sign assessment (both complete and incomplete sets of vital signs), and escalation of care per policy and nursing interventions in response to clinical deterioration. Design: This cohort study is a secondary analysis of data from the Prioritising Responses of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations cluster randomised controlled trial of a facilitation intervention on nurses' vital sign measurement and escalation of care for deteriorating patients. Methods: The study was conducted in 36 wards at four metropolitan hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Medical records of all included patients from the study wards during three randomly selected 24‐h periods within the same week were audited at three time points: pre‐intervention (June 2016), and at 6 (December 2016) and 12 months (June 1017) post‐intervention. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the study data, and relationships between variables were examined using chi‐square test. Results: A total of 10,383 audits were conducted. At least one vital sign measurement was documented every 8 h in 91.6% of audits, and a complete set of vital signs was documented every 8 h in 83.1% of audits. There were pre‐Medical Emergency Team, Medical Emergency Team or Cardiac Arrest Team triggers in 25.8% of audits. When triggers were present, a rapid response system call occurred in 26.8% of audits. There were 1350 documented nursing interventions in audits with pre‐Medical Emergency Team (n = 2403) or Medical Emergency Team triggers (n = 273). One or more nursing interventions were documented in 29.5% of audits with pre‐Medical Emergency Team triggers and 63.7% of audits with Medical Emergency Team triggers. Conclusion: When rapid response system triggers were documented, there were gaps in escalation of care per policy; however, nurses undertook a range of interventions within their scope of practice in response to clinical deterioration. Relevance to Clinical Practice: Medical and surgical ward nurses in acute care wards frequently engage in vital sign assessment. Interventions by medical and nurgical nurses may occur prior to, or in parallel with calling the rapid response system. Nursing interventions are a key but under‐recognised element of the organisational response to deteriorating patients. Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Nurses engage in a range of nursing interventions to manage deteriorating patients, (aside from rapid response system activation) that are not well understood, nor well described in the literature to date. Impact: This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding nurses' management of deteriorating patients within their scope of practice (aside from RRS activation) in real world settings.When rapid response system triggers were documented, there were gaps in escalation of care per policy; however, nurses undertook a range of interventions within their scope of practice in response to clinical deterioration.The results of this research are relevant to nurses working on medical and surgical wards. Reporting Method: The trial was reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for Cluster Trials recommendations, and this paper is reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement. Patient or Public Contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a digital App developed to enhance patient communication with nurses during bedside nursing handover at shift change. Methods: Six nurses and 11 patient actors/volunteers participated in 12 simulated nursing handovers across six simulation workshops. Over half the patients were aged 70+ years (55%); majority were female (82%). Handover video recordings were analysed using a structured observation tool and a revised Four Habits Coding Scheme to assess nurses' handover communication skills. Patient and nurse feedback was also sought. The STROBE checklist (Data S1) guided preparation of the study. Results: For all simulated handovers (n = 12): Nurses greeted the patient at commencement; nurses made eye contact with the patient; patients were given opportunity to ask questions; and all patient questions were answered. Nurses explained the handover process for less than half the handovers (42%). Familiarity with the patient's history was evident in every handover. Communication behaviours identified in most handovers included: good nonverbal behaviour; allowing time for the patient to absorb information; giving clear explanations; involving the patient in decisions; and exploring acceptability of the care plan. Patient and nurse feedback on the App included: The App was easy to navigate, features were well‐liked, with some improvements suggested. Conclusion: Patients and nurses provided positive feedback for the App during hospital stay and at handover. The App has the potential to enhance existing handover processes and increase safety of hospital care by using technology to educate and empower patients/carers to be active partners in communication with nurses during change‐of‐shift handover. Relevance to Clinical Practice: The App empowers and enables patients/carers to actively participate in nursing handover and allows patients to communicate concerns and provide information to their nursing team, facilitating a new approach. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients and carers were involved in the research from the original co‐design workshops that guided the development of the handover App. The research aims and outcome measures were informed by the experiences and preferences of patients/carers. Two patient representatives were involved in writing and submission of the grant application for the study to evaluate the efficacy of the App and were listed as co‐authors on this paper. Patient volunteers were involved in the current study to pilot test the handover App. Patient volunteers were recruited through a consumer representative and volunteer registry at the health service. They participated in simulated nursing handovers with two nurses to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the handover App and then provided feedback and suggestions for improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nurses working in intensive care units make autonomous decisions to manage high‐risk vasoactive medications in critically ill patients. Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) is a vasoactive medication commonly administered to patients in intensive care units. The influence of unit culture and environment on nurse‐decision‐making on noradrenaline (norepinephrine) management is unknown. Aims: The study aimed to investigate nurses' perceptions of the impact of interpersonal interactions, socialisation, and the intensive care environment on decision‐making when managing noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Materials & Methods: An exploratory qualitative study applied thematic analysis to focus group data. A purposive sample of nineteen nurses participated in four focus groups at two intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia, from March to June 2021. The COREQ checklist was used to guide study development and no patients or members of the public were involved in focus groups. Results: Three themes were generated from the researcher's interaction with data, Nursing and Medications; Culture and Decision‐making; and a Safe Practice Environment. Nurses reported decision‐making challenges associated with learning to manage noradrenaline (norepinephrine) early in their intensive care career and discussed feelings of isolation due to staffing resources, and the configuration of the intensive care environment. Nurses developed titration and weaning strategies to support decision‐making in the absence of evidence‐based algorithms. Discussion: Empathetic patient allocation early in nurses' intensive care careers facilitated a safer learning environment, and reduced isolation inherent in single room intensive care units. Nurses developed and used titration and weaning strategies, often learnt from other clinicians to manage practice uncertainty. Conclusions: Management of noradrenaline (norepinephrine) is core business for intensive care nurses worldwide. Development of titration and weaning strategies by nurses indicated unmet need for guidelines to support decision‐making. Identifying contextual elements that impact nurse management of high‐risk medications can guide development of environments, resources and policies that support nurse decision‐making, and reduce nurse anxiety and disempowerment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: To determine if the use of an emergency nursing framework improves the accuracy of clinical documentation. Background: Accurate clinical documentation is a nursing professional responsibility essential for high‐quality and safe patient care. The use of the emergency nursing framework "HIRAID" (History, Identify Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, reassessment and communication) improves emergency nursing care by reducing treatment delays and improving escalation of clinical deterioration. The effect of HIRAID on the accuracy of nursing documentation is unknown. Design: A quasi‐experimental pre‐post study was conducted and the report was guided by the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Methods: HIRAID was implemented in four regional/rural Australian emergency departments (ED) using a range of behaviour change strategies. The blinded electronic healthcare records of 120 patients with a presenting problem of shortness of breath, abdominal pain or fever were reviewed. Quantity measures of completeness and qualitative measures of completeness and linguistic correctness of documentation adapted from the D‐Catch tool were used to assess accuracy. Differences between pre‐post groups were analysed using Wilcoxon rank‐sum and two‐sample t‐tests for continuous variables. Pearson's Chi‐square and Fisher exact tests were used for the categorical data. Results: The number of records containing the essential assessment components of emergency care increased significantly from pre‐ to post‐implementation of HIRAID. This overall improvement was demonstrated in both paediatric and adult populations and for all presentation types. Both the quantitative and qualitative measures of documentation on patient history and physical assessment findings improved significantly. Conclusion: Use of HIRAID improves the accuracy of clinical documentation of the patient history and physical assessment in both adult and paediatric populations. Relevance to Clinical Practice: The emergency nursing framework "HIRAID" is recommended for use in clinical practice to increase the documentation accuracy performed by emergency nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To explore: i) the frequency and nature of patient participation in nursing handover and ii) patients' and nurses' perceived strategies to enhance patient involvement in nursing handover. Background: Patient participation in nursing handover is important for patient‐centred care, shared decision‐making, patient safety and a positive healthcare experience Design: A multi‐site prospective study using a mixed methods design. Methods: Between September and December 2019, nursing handovers were observed on ten randomly selected wards, followed by semi‐structured interviews with patients (n = 33), and nurses (n = 20) from the observed handovers. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for structured observations and thematic analysis of interviews, and triangulated to develop a greater understanding of patient participation in nursing handover. This study is reported using the Good Reporting of Mixed Methods Study guidelines. Results: The median patient age was 77 years and 47% (n = 55) patients were female. Of the 117 handovers, 76.9% (n = 90) were conducted in the patient's presence. Patients were active participants in 33.3% (n = 30) and passive participants in 46.7% (n = 42) of handovers; in 20% of handovers (n = 18), the patient had no input at all. Active participation was more likely in women (vs. men), surgical patients (vs. medical patients) and when nurses displayed engagement behaviours (eye contact, opportunity to ask questions, explanations). Three major themes were identified from the interviews: 'Being Involved', 'Layers of Influence' and 'Information Exchange'. Conclusions: The main finding was that patient participation in handover was low and strongly influenced by a complex interplay of factors including patient and nurse preferences and perceptions. Relevance to Clinical Practice: Handover is an essential tool in the provision of safe patient care. Patients were able to actively participate in nursing handover when they understood the purpose and timing of handover and had rapport with nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To review and synthesise the literature examining the patients' experience of faecal microbiota transplantation. Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation is a common treatment for many conditions, including Clostridium Difficile infections. Patients' experience of treatments is an important influence on clinical decision‐making and treatment adherence. Design: The PRISMA guidelines guided this systematic review. The review was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42020140446]. Method: A search of Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline and Embase was conducted for studies published in English and French up to June 2020. Risk of bias was examined using Critical Appraisal Skills Program tools, and quality appraisal was performed independently by three reviewers. Primary outcome of interest was the patient experience of faecal microbiota transplantation. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach. Results: The search identified 3316 citations, and 12 studies were included. Methodological quality of studies was moderate to low quality. Few studies have accurately explored the patients' experience of faecal microbiota transplantation: most focus on clinical outcomes or hypothetical scenarios regarding the patients' perspectives of faecal microbiota transplantation. Only one study was identified where the sole focus was the patients' experience of faecal microbiota transplantation. Patient's experience of faecal microbiota transplantation was diverse and complex with physiological and psychological components dependent on the patient's medical condition, the administration method and the efficacy. Conclusion: Patients did not find faecal microbiota transplantation unappealing; however, patients equally reported the procedural experience was unpleasant. Limited results and low quality evidence suggest that further evaluation of the patient experience of faecal microbiota transplantation would be beneficial. Relevance to clinical practice: Identifying the patients' experience of faecal microbiota transplantation may inform recommendations regarding alternate treatment therapies and enable opportunities to provide quality care for patients that require faecal microbiota transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To explore the use and student outcomes of Team‐Based Learning in nursing education. Background: Team‐Based Learning is a highly structured, evidence‐based, student‐centred learning strategy that enhances student engagement and facilitates deep learning in a variety of disciplines including nursing. However, the breadth of Team‐Based Learning application in nursing education and relevant outcomes are not currently well understood. Design: A scoping review of international, peer‐reviewed research studies was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Methods: The following databases were searched on 7 May 2020: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO and Education Resources Information Center. Search terms related to nursing, education and Team‐Based Learning. Original research studies, published in English, and reporting on student outcomes from Team‐Based Learning in nursing education programmes were included. Results: Of the 1081 potentially relevant citations, 41 studies from undergraduate (n = 29), postgraduate (n = 4) and hospital (n = 8) settings were included. The most commonly reported student outcomes were knowledge or academic performance (n = 21); student experience, satisfaction or perceptions of Team‐Based Learning (n = 20); student engagement with behaviours or attitudes towards Team‐Based Learning (n = 12); and effect of Team‐Based Learning on teamwork, team performance or collective efficacy (n = 6). Only three studies reported clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Over the last decade, there has been a growing body of knowledge related to the use of Team‐Based Learning in nursing education. The major gaps identified in this scoping review were the lack of randomised controlled trials and the dearth of studies of Team‐Based Learning in postgraduate and hospital contexts. Relevance to clinical practice: This scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of the use and student outcomes of Team‐Based Learning in nursing education and highlights the breadth of application of Team‐Based Learning and variability in the outcomes reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To examine the relationship between resuscitation status and (i) patient characteristics; (ii) transfer characteristics; and (iii) patient outcomes following an emergency inter‐hospital transfer from a subacute to an acute care hospital. Background: Patients who experience emergency inter‐hospital transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals have high rates of acute care readmission (81%) and in‐hospital mortality (15%). Design: This prospective, exploratory cohort study was a subanalysis of data from a larger case–time–control study in five Health Services in Victoria, Australia. There were 603 transfers in 557 patients between August 2015 and October 2016. The study was conducted in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Methods: Data were extracted by medical record audit. Three resuscitation categories (full resuscitation; limitation of medical treatment (LOMT) orders; or not‐for‐cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) orders) were compared using chi‐square or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Stratified multivariable proportional hazard Cox regression models were used to account for health service clustering effect. Findings.: Resuscitation status was 63.5% full resuscitation; 23.1% LOMT order; and 13.4% not‐for‐CPR. Compared to patients for full resuscitation, patients with not‐for‐CPR or LOMT orders were more likely to have rapid response team calls during acute care readmission or to die during hospitalisation. Patients who were not‐for‐CPR were less likely to be readmitted to acute care and more likely to return to subacute care. Conclusions: Two‐thirds of patients in subacute care who experienced an emergency inter‐hospital transfer were for full resuscitation. Although the proportion of patients with LOMT and not‐for‐CPR orders increased after transfer, there were deficiencies in the documentation of resuscitation status and planning for clinical deterioration for subacute care patients. Relevance to Clinical Practice: As many subacute care patients experience clinical deterioration, patient preferences for care need to be discussed and documented early in the subacute care admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim and objective: To investigate how intensive care nurses prepare, initiate, administer, titrate, and wean vasoactive medications. Background: The management of vasoactive medications is core business for intensive care nurses, but little is known on how nurses manage these ubiquitous and potentially harmful medications. Design: A systematic review of the literature with narrative synthesis of data. Methods: The databases CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete and EMBASE were searched from 1965 to January 2019 with keywords under five concept headings and in a variety of configurations. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality and bias, and a modified narrative synthesis was used to analyse data, investigate findings and explore relationships within and between studies. Results: The review identified 13 studies: two observational studies, two pre and post intervention studies, four survey studies, two quasi‐experimental studies, one longitudinal time series, one prospective controlled trial, and one interview incorporating content analysis. Four studies on preparing and initiating vasoactive medications described a lack of standardisation in infusion preparation and inconsistencies in dosing units and patient weights. Five of six studies on vasoactive medication administration examined nurses' use of syringe changeovers to reduce patient haemodynamic compromise and there were three studies on titration and weaning. Conclusion: Further research on nurse management of vasoactive medications is needed to develop an evidence base for specialist education and standardised practices aimed at reducing risk for patient harm. Relevance to clinical practice: Nurses working in intensive care units in many parts of the world are responsible for the management of vasoactive medications. There is great variation in practices that include preparation, initiation, administration, titration and weaning of vasoactive medications, which increases the risk for medication errors and adverse events in a vulnerable population of critically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To examine patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring devices in the acute setting. Background: Wearable vital sign monitoring devices may improve patient safety, yet hospital patients' acceptability of these devices is largely unreported. Design: A systematic review. Methods: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, MEDLINE Complete and EMBASE were searched, supplemented by reference list hand searching. Studies were included if they involved adult hospital patients (≥18 years), a wearable monitoring device capable of assessing ≥1 vital sign, and measured patient acceptability, satisfaction or experience of wearing the device. No date restrictions were enforced. Quality assessments of quantitative and qualitative studies were undertaken using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Study Quality and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist, respectively. Meta‐analyses were not possible given data heterogeneity and low research quality. Reporting adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses checklist was completed. Results: Of the 427 studies screened, seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies were of low quality and one was of high quality. In two studies, patient satisfaction was investigated. In the remaining studies, patient experience, patient opinions and experience, patient perceptions and experience, device acceptability, and patient comfort and concerns were investigated. In four studies, patients were mostly accepting of the wearable devices, reporting positive experiences and satisfaction relating to their use. In three studies, findings were mixed. Conclusion: There is limited high‐quality research examining patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring devices as an a priori focus in the acute setting. Further understanding of patient perspectives of these devices is required to inform their continued use and development. Relevance to clinical practice: The provision of patient‐centred nursing care is contingent on understanding patients' preferences, including their acceptability of technology use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To examine nursing handover of vital signs during patient care transition from the emergency department (ED) to inpatient wards. Background: Communication failures are a leading cause of patient harm making communication through clinical handover an international healthcare priority. The transition of care from ED to ward settings is informed by nursing handover. Vital sign abnormalities in the ED are associated with clinical deterioration following hospital admission. Understanding the role and perceived value of vital sign content in clinical handover is important for patient safety. Methods: An integrative design was used. A search of electronic databases was undertaken using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science and SCOPUS. Identified records were screened to elicit further studies for inclusion. A comprehensive peer‐review screening process was performed. Studies were included that described the surrounding issues of handover, vital signs, ED, transition of care and ward. Results: Five studies were included in the final review, one specific to nursing and four specific to emergency medicine. Vital signs were perceived to be an important inclusion in clinical handover, and the communication of vital signs in handover was perceived to be indicators for patient safety and risk factors for future clinical deterioration. The ED environment had an influence on effective communication within handover. Conclusions: Vital signs were an important inclusion for clinical handover. Deficiencies in vital sign content were perceived to be risk factors for patient adverse events following hospital admission. The quality of vital sign information in clinical handover may be important for accurate decision‐making. Relevance to clinical practice: Vital signs are an important component of clinical handover and are perceived to be indicators for patient safety and risk of future adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aims and objectives: To establish the frequency of clinical deterioration in the early postoperative period in patients who have undergone general or orthopaedic surgery. Background: Worldwide, clinical deterioration is a significant problem in acute care settings. Early recognition and response to clinical deterioration is one of the ten National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards in Australia. However, there is limited understanding of the frequency of clinical deterioration in surgical patients. Methods: A point prevalence study was conducted from September–October 2014. The records of 100 consecutive in patients admitted for orthopaedic (n = 48) or general surgery (n = 52) to a health service in Melbourne, Australia, were audited. The frequency of clinical deterioration episodes was summarised using descriptive statistics. Results: Baseline characteristics of the two patient groups were equivalent except that orthopaedic patients were older than the general surgery patients (median age 71 [IQR 19] years vs. 62 [IQR 17] years). There were 17 medical emergency team calls and 23 calls for urgent clinical review in 28 patients. The main indications for emergency calls were hypotension (26%), fever (19%), hypoxia (15%), tachycardia (13%) and altered blood glucose level (11%). The majority of episodes were managed on the ward, and there were one ICU transfer and no cardiac arrest calls. Conclusion: One in four patients experienced early postoperative clinical deterioration. Hypotension was the most common trigger for escalation of care highlighting a need to optimise fluid and haemodynamic management of postoperative patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Haemodynamic instability leading to the activation of rapid response systems is very common in the immediate postoperative period. There is the need for locally tailored interventions to optimise fluid management and decrease incidence of further complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim and objectives: To explore nurse’ role in recognising and responding to deteriorating post‐operative patients. Background: Clinical deterioration is a significant problem in acute care settings. Nurses play a vital role in post‐operative patient monitoring; however, there is limited understanding of the nurses’ role in recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in surgical patients. Methods: This qualitative exploratory study was conducted at a metropolitan teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected through focus groups from 1 September to 31 October 2014. Four focus groups of 2–5 surgical nurses (n = 14) were conducted to explore the nurses’ perception of their role in managing deterioration over the first 72 hr postoperatively. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed and key themes identified. Results: Nurses demonstrated a high level of awareness of their role in recognising and responding to early signs of deterioration. The themes that arose from the focus group interviews were “struggling with blood pressure,” and “we know our patient is sick.” The nurses were confident about the clinical indicators of deterioration and the appropriate channels to use to escalate care. Using track and trigger observation charts enabled nurses to identify deteriorating patients prior to the patient fulfilling rapid response system escalation criteria. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of a collective team approach to preventing, recognising and responding to clinical deterioration across the whole patient journey. Initiatives to ensure accurate written and verbal communication between medical and nursing staff warrants further assessment. Relevance to clinical practice: Nurses working in acute surgical wards are highly engaged in the process of recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in post‐operative patients. Many nurses reported being able to anticipate deterioration occurring but are required by current organisational frameworks to escalate care to rapid response systems. How nurses anticipate and manage deterioration prior to the patient fulfilling rapid response system criteria warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To obtain an understanding of how Hospital in the Home (HITH) nurses recognise and respond to clinical deterioration in patients receiving care at home or in their usual place of residence. Background: Recognising and responding to clinical deterioration is an international safety priority and a key nursing responsibility. Despite an increase in care delivery in home environments, how HITH nurses recognise and respond to clinical deterioration is not yet fully understood. Design: A prospective, descriptive exploratory design was used. A survey containing questions related to participant characteristics and 10 patient scenarios was used to collect data from 47 nurses employed in the HITH units of three major health services in Melbourne, Australia. The 10 scenarios reflected typical HITH patients and included medical history and clinical assessment findings (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, conscious state and pain score). Results: The three major findings from this study were that: (i) nurse and patient characteristics influenced HITH nurses’ assessment decisions; (ii) the cues used by HITH nurses to recognise clinical deterioration varied according to the clinical context; and (iii) although HITH nurses work in an autonomous role, they engage in collaborative practice when responding to clinical deterioration. Conclusion: Hospital in the Home nurses play a fundamental role in patient assessment, and the context in which they recognise and respond to deterioration is markedly different to that of hospital nurses. Relevance to clinical practice: The assessment, measurement and interpretation of clinical data are a nursing responsibility that is crucial to early recognition and response to clinical deterioration. The capacity of HITH services to care for increasing numbers of patients in their home environment, and to promptly recognise and respond to clinical deterioration should it occur, is fundamental to safety within the healthcare system. Hospital in the Home nurses are integral to a sustainable healthcare system that is responsive to dynamic changes in public health policies, and meets the healthcare needs of the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To explore the characteristics of and interactions between clinicians, patients and family members during management of the deteriorating adult patient in the emergency department. Background Previous research into family presence during resuscitation has identified many positive outcomes when families are included. However, over the last three decades the epidemiology of acute clinical deterioration has changed, with a decrease in in-hospital cardiac arrests and an increase in acute clinical deterioration. Despite the decrease in cardiac arrests, research related to family presence continues to focus on care during resuscitation rather than care during acute deterioration. Design Descriptive exploratory study using nonparticipatory observation. Methods Five clinical deterioration episodes were observed within a 50-bed, urban, Australian emergency department. Field notes were taken using a semistructured tool to allow for thematic analysis. Results Presence, roles and engagement describe the interactions between clinicians, family members and patients while family are present during a patient's episode of deterioration. Presence was classified as no presence, physical presence and therapeutic presence. Clinicians and family members moved through primary, secondary and tertiary roles during patients' deterioration episode. Engagement was observed to be superficial or deep. There was a complex interplay between presence, roles and engagement with each influencing which form the other could take. Conclusions Current practices of managing family during episodes of acute deterioration are complex and multifaceted. There is fluid interplay between presence, roles and engagement during a patient's episode of deterioration. Relevance to clinical practice This study will contribute to best practice, provide a strong foundation for clinician education and present opportunities for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To examine and describe the relationship between physiological status and violent and aggressive behaviours in hospital patients. Background The majority of adverse events are preceded by physiological abnormalities; whether physiological deterioration is a predictor of violent or aggressive behaviours remains unknown. Design Prospective case-control study. Methods Prospective audit of 999 patients from two major health services in Melbourne, Australia. There were 333 cases who required an emergency response for aggressive or violent behaviour (Code Grey) in the emergency department, medical or surgical units, or inpatient mental health unit between January-June 2015. Two control patients who did not have a Code Grey were randomly selected from the same unit and same day that the Code Grey occurred for the case patient. Results Patient locations were 54·4% medical or surgical units, 23·7% emergency department and 21·9% mental health units. Code Grey patients had less documentation of physiological assessment and were more likely to have respiratory rate, heart rate and conscious state abnormalities in the 12 hours preceding Code Grey. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of Code Grey was highest for patients with confusion. Conclusion Patients experiencing behavioural disturbance had lower standards of patient assessment, greater incidence of physiological abnormalities and more inpatient deaths. Early recognition of, and response to, patient and physiological predictors of Code Grey should be a strategy to prevent behavioural escalation to the point of Code Grey. Relevance to clinical practice Strategies are needed to improve physiological assessment of patients with behavioural disturbance while ensuring staff safety. There are patient and physiological factors associated with increased risk of Code Grey that may be used to prevent behavioural escalation to the point of an emergency response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To explore the factors emergency nurses use to inform their decisions regarding frequency and nature of vital sign assessment. Background Research related to clinical deterioration and vital sign assessment in the emergency department is in its infancy. Studies to date have explored the frequency of vital sign assessment in the emergency department; however, there are no published studies that have examined factors that emergency nurses use to inform their decisions regarding frequency and nature of ongoing vital sign assessment. Design A prospective exploratory design was used. Data were collected using a survey consisting of eight patient vignettes. Methods The study was conducted in one emergency department in metropolitan Melbourne. Participants were emergency nurses permanently employed at the study site. Results A 96% response rate was achieved ( n = 47/49). The most common frequency of patient reassessment nominated by participants was 15 or 30 minutely, with an equal number of participants choosing these frequency intervals. Abnormality in initial vital sign parameters was the most common factor identified for choosing either a 15- or 30-minute assessment interval. Frequency of assessment decisions was influenced by years of emergency nursing experience in one vignette and level of postgraduate qualification in three vignettes. Heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure were all nominated by over 80% of participants as vital signs that participants considered important for reassessment. The frequency and nature of vital signs selected varied according to vignette content. There were significant negative correlations between assessment of conscious state and years of nursing experience and assessment of respiratory rate and years of emergency nursing experience. Level of postgraduate qualification did not influence selection of parameters for reassessment. Conclusion Emergency nurses are tailoring vital sign assessment to patients' clinical status, and nurses are integrating known vital sign data into vital sign decision-making. Relevance to clinical practice Accurate assessment and interpretation of vital sign data is fundamental to patient safety. Emergency nurses are responsible for the initial and ongoing assessment of undiagnosed or undifferentiated patients. Prior to medical assessment, emergency nurses are solely responsible for patient assessment, escalation of care and implementation of interventions within nursing scope of practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To describe the importance of, and methods for, successfully conducting and translating research into clinical practice. Background There is universal acknowledgement that the clinical care provided to individuals should be informed on the best available evidence. Knowledge and evidence derived from robust scholarly methods should drive our clinical practice, decisions and change to improve the way we deliver care. Translating research evidence to clinical practice is essential to safe, transparent, effective and efficient healthcare provision and meeting the expectations of patients, families and society. Despite its importance, translating research into clinical practice is challenging. There are more nurses in the frontline of health care than any other healthcare profession. As such, nurse-led research is increasingly recognised as a critical pathway to practical and effective ways of improving patient outcomes. However, there are well-established barriers to the conduct and translation of research evidence into practice. Design This clinical practice discussion paper interprets the knowledge translation literature for clinicians interested in translating research into practice. Methods This paper is informed by the scientific literature around knowledge translation, implementation science and clinician behaviour change, and presented from the nurse clinician perspective. We provide practical, evidence-informed suggestions to overcome the barriers and facilitate enablers of knowledge translation. Examples of nurse-led research incorporating the principles of knowledge translation in their study design that have resulted in improvements in patient outcomes are presented in conjunction with supporting evidence. Conclusions Translation should be considered in research design, including the end users and an evaluation of the research implementation. The success of research implementation in health care is dependent on clinician/consumer behaviour change and it is critical that implementation strategy includes this. Relevance to practice Translating best research evidence can make for a more transparent and sustainable healthcare service, to which nurses are central. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the new evidence-informed nursing assessment framework HIRAID (History, Identify Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, reassessment and communication) on the quality of patient assessment and fundamental nontechnical skills including communication, decision making, task management and situational awareness. Background Assessment is a core component of nursing practice and underpins clinical decisions and the safe delivery of patient care. Yet there is no universal or validated system used to teach emergency nurses how to comprehensively assess and care for patients. Design A pre-post design was used. Methods The performance of thirty eight emergency nurses from five Australian hospitals was evaluated before and after undertaking education in the application of the HIRAID assessment framework. Video recordings of participant performance in immersive simulations of common presentations to the emergency department were evaluated, as well as participant documentation during the simulations. Paired parametric and nonparametric tests were used to compare changes from pre to postintervention. Results From pre to postintervention, participant performance increases were observed in the percentage of patient history elements collected, critical indicators of urgency collected and reported to medical officers, and patient reassessments performed. Participants also demonstrated improvement in each of the four nontechnical skills categories: communication, decision making, task management and situational awareness. Conclusion The HIRAID assessment framework improves clinical patient assessments performed by emergency nurses and has the potential to enhance patient care. Relevance to clinical practice HIRAID should be considered for integration into clinical practice to provide nurses with a systematic approach to patient assessment and potentially improve the delivery of safe patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives. To explore nurses' documentation of physiological observations in acute care; emergency department, medical and surgical units. Background. In Australia, physiological observations include respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and level of consciousness. There is a clear relationship between abnormal physiological observations and adverse events. Nurses have highest level of responsibility for accurate measurement, interpretation and documentation of physiological observations. Design. A descriptive exploratory design was used and the study data were collected using a prospective point prevalence approach between 25 July 2012-22 August 2012. Methods. The study was conducted in the emergency department, two 30-bed medical units and one 30-bed surgical unit of a 578 bed public health service in Melbourne, Australia. All adult patients aged >18 years present during data collection periods were eligible for inclusion. Patients in the emergency department resuscitation area were excluded. Patient characteristics and physiological observations for the preceding 24 hours in ward patients or eight hours in emergency department patients were collected. Results. One hundred and seventy-eight patients were included; 38 emergency department patients, 84 medical patients and 56 surgical patients. The median age was 72-5 years and 43-8% were males. The most frequently documented physiological observations were respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, heart rate and systolic blood pressure. The least frequently recorded physiological observations were temperature and conscious state. One or more abnormal physiological parameters was documented in 79-8% (n = 142) patients; evidence of reporting abnormalities was documented in 19-7% of patients (n = 28/142). When controlled for length of stay, physiological observations were more frequently documented in the emergency department. Conclusions. There was variability in the number of parameters documented and frequency of physiological observations documented by nurses. Relevance to clinical practice. Physiological abnormalities that do not necessarily fulfil rapid response team activation criteria are common in acute care patients and provide nurses with an opportunity for early recognition of deteriorating patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives. To test the feasibility of an evidence-based care bundle in a Thai emergency department. The specific objective of this study was to examine the impact of the implementation of the care bundle on the initial emergency nursing management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Background. A care bundle approach is one strategy used to improve the consistency, quality and safety of emergency care for different patients groups, however, has not been tested in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Design. A pretest/post-test design was used. The study intervention was an evidence-based care bundle for initial emergency nursing management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods. Nonparticipant observations were conducted between October 2012-June 2013 at an emergency department of a 640 bed regional hospital in Southern Thailand. The initial emergency nursing care was observed in 45 patients with severe traumatic brain injury: 20 patients in the pretest period and 25 patients in the post-test period. Results. There were significant improvements in clinical care of patients with severe traumatic brain injury after implementation of the care bundle: (1) use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, (2) frequency of respiratory rate assessment, (3) frequency of pulse rate and blood pressure assessment, and (4) patient positioning. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that implementation of an evidence-based care bundle improved specific elements of emergency nurses' clinical management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Relevance to clinical practice. The study suggests that a care bundle approach can be used as a strategy to improve emergency nursing care of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To argue that if all nurses were to adopt the primary survey approach (assessment of airway, breathing, circulation and disability) as the first element of patient assessment, they would be more focused on active detection of clinical deterioration rather than passive collection of patient data. Background Nurses are the professional group that carry the highest level of responsibility for patient assessment, accurate data collection and interpretation. The timely recognition of, and response to deteriorating patients, is dependent on the measurement and interpretation of pertinent physiological data by nurses. Design Discursive paper. Methods Traditionally taught and commonly used approaches to patient assessment such as 'vital signs' and 'body systems' are not evidence-based nor framed in patient safety. The primary survey approach as the first element in patient assessment has three major advantages: (1) data are collected according to clinical importance; (2) data are collected using the same framework as most organisation's rapid response system activation criteria; and (3) the primary survey acts as a patient safety checklist, thereby decreasing the risk of failure to recognise, and therefore respond to, deteriorating patients. Conclusion The vital signs and body systems approaches to patient assessment have significant limitations in identifying clinical deterioration. The primary survey approach provides nurses with a consistent, evidence-based and sequenced approach to patient assessment in every clinical setting. Relevance to clinical practice All nurses should use a primary survey approach as the first element of patient assessment in every patient encounter as a patient safety strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives To evaluate structured patient assessment frameworks' impact on patient care. Background Accurate patient assessment is imperative to determine the status and needs of the patient and the delivery of appropriate patient care. Nurses must be highly skilled in conducting timely and accurate patient assessments to overcome environmental obstacles and deliver quality and safe patient care. A structured approach to patient assessment is widely accepted in everyday clinical practice, yet little is known about the impact structured patient assessment frameworks have on patient care. Design Integrative review. Methods An electronic database search was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System, Pub Med and Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses. The reference sections of textbooks and journal articles on patient assessment were manually searched for further studies. A comprehensive peer review screening process was undertaken. Research studies were selected that evaluated the impact structured patient assessment frameworks have on patient care. Studies were included if frameworks were designed for use by paramedics, nurses or medical practitioners working in prehospital or acute in-hospital settings. Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no studies that evaluate the impact of a generic nursing assessment framework on patient care. The use of a structured patient assessment framework improved clinician performance of patient assessment. Limited evidence was found to support other aspects of patient care including documentation, communication, care implementation, patient and clinician satisfaction, and patient outcomes. Conclusion Structured patient assessment frameworks enhance clinician performance of patient assessment and hold the potential to improve patient care and outcomes; however, further research is required to address these evidence gaps, particularly in nursing. Relevance to clinical practice Acute care clinicians should consider using structured patient assessment frameworks in clinical practice to enhance their performance of patient assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims. The aim of this study was to improve the emergency nursing care of acute stroke by enhancing the use of evidence regarding prevention of early complications. Background. Preventing complications in the first 24–48 hours decreases stroke-related mortality. Many patients spend considerable part of the first 24 hours following stroke in the Emergency Department therefore emergency nurses play a key role in patient outcomes following stroke. Design. A pre-test/post-test design was used and the study intervention was a guideline for Emergency Department nursing management of acute stroke. Methods. The following outcomes were measured before and after guideline implementation: triage category, waiting time, Emergency Department length of stay, time to specialist assessment, assessment and monitoring of vital signs, temperature and blood glucose and venous-thromboembolism and pressure injury risk assessment and interventions. Results. There was significant improvement in triage decisions (21·4% increase in triage category 2, p = 0·009; 15·6% decrease in triage category 4, p = 0·048). Frequency of assessments of respiratory rate ( p = 0·009), heart rate ( p = 0·022), blood pressure ( p = 0·032) and oxygen saturation ( p = 0·001) increased. In terms of risk management, documentation of pressure area interventions increased by 28·8% ( p = 0·006), documentation of nil orally status increased by 13·8% (ns), swallow assessment prior to oral intake increased by 41·3% ( p = 0·003), speech pathology assessment in Emergency Department increased by 6·1% (ns) and there was 93·5 minute decrease in time to speech pathology assessment for admitted patients (ns). Relevance to clinical practice. An evidence-based guideline can improve emergency nursing care of acute stroke and optimise patient outcomes following stroke. As the continuum of stroke care begins in the Emergency Department, detailed recommendations for evidence-based emergency nursing care should be included in all multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of acute stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Design Methods Results Conclusions Implications for patient care Impact To explore and describe acute care nurses’ decisions to recognise and respond to improvement in patients’ clinical states as they occurred in the real‐world clinical environment.A descriptive study.Nine medical and eleven surgical nurses in a large Australian metropolitan hospital were individually observed during nurse–patient interactions and followed up in interview to describe their reasoning and clinical judgements behind observed decisions. Verbal description of observations and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.The three themes constructed from the data were as follows: nurses checking in; nurses reaching judgements about improvements; and nurses deciding on the best person to respond. Acute care nurses made targeted assessment decisions based on predicted safety risks related to improvement in clinical states. Subjective and objective cues were used to assess for and make judgements about patient improvement. Acute care nurses’ judgment of patient safety and a desire to promote patient centred care guided their decisions to select the appropriate person to manage improvement.The outcomes of this research have demonstrated that the proven safety benefits of acute care nurses’ decision making in response to deterioration extend to improvement in patients’ clinical states. In response to improvement, acute care nurses’ decisions protect patients from harm and promote recovery.Early recognition and response to improvement enable acute care nurses to protect patients from risks of unnecessary treatment and promote recovery.This study makes explicit nurses’ essential safety role in recognising and responding to improvement in patients’ clinical states. Healthcare policy and education must reflect the equal importance of assessment for and management of deterioration and improvement to ensure patients are protected and provided with safe care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]