Search

Fatigue is associated with multidimensional factors in heart failure patients. Investigating longitudinal changes in fatigue and its association in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is needed to create interventions for improving fatigue during recovery.This study examined the trajectory of fatigue and its associated factors over time in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.This longitudinal study enrolled 125 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in northern Taiwan. Patients completed questionnaires before surgery, at discharge, and at 1, 3 and 6 months post-discharge. Fatigue was measured using the General Fatigue Scale. Generalised estimating equation models were fitted to identify variables associated with fatigue over time. This study complied with the STROBE checklist.The sample (mean age = 60.70 ± 10.42) was mostly male (68%). High fatigue was found in 73.6% of patients before cardiac surgery and significantly decreased over the six months after discharge. NYHA III/IV, lower haemoglobin level, more symptom distress, poor sleep quality, higher anxiety and depression and lower social and family support were significantly associated with an increase in fatigue levels over time. Compared with before discharge, decreases in sleep quality at 1, 3 and 6 months were significantly associated with an increase in fatigue levels (p .001). The increases in social support (B = 0.20, p = .016) and family support (B = 0.37, p = .002) at 6 months were significantly associated with an increase in the fatigue scores.Fatigue was common and associated with symptoms, sleep quality, emotion and social support in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In addition to symptom management, improving sleep quality and social support are important to manage fatigue for the long-term care of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Patient education on symptom management, sleep hygiene and family support is suggested to improve fatigue in patients recovering from cardiac surgery.

Aim. To determine the inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, construct and concurrent validity and feasibility of the pain assessment scale for preterm infants. Background. Repeated exposure to painful procedures has an adverse impact on preterm infants’ health outcomes. Although many scales are available for assessing these infants’ pain, only a few reliably and validly assess pain and no gold standard has been established in clinical practice. Design. Instrument development and psychometric analysis. Methods. Preterm infants (n = 60) born 27·6–36·3 weeks gestational age were assessed for pain 3 minutes before (phase I), during (phase II), 3 minutes after (phase III) and the tenth minute after (phase IV) heel-stick procedures. Pain scores were independently coded from video recordings and observations by three trained nurses using our pain-assessment scale, premature infant pain profile and visual analogue scale. Results. Scores on the pain assessment scale for preterm infants differed significantly across four phases of heel-stick procedures (F = 56·86, p 27 weeks. Further examination of the scale’s psychometrics is recommended with diverse samples of infants and different painful procedures. Relevance to clinical practice. The pain assessment scale for preterm infants clearly defines item scoring and weighting, consistently discriminates different levels of pain and helps nurses to recognise infants’ pain. Nurses can easily remember the definition of each item, allowing them to use our scale to evaluate preterm infants’ pain at any time and to provide pain-relief interventions when needed.

Aims. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between specific nurse care-giving behaviours and preterm infant behavioural responses during bathing and to identify nurse behaviours associated with infant ‘stress’. Background. Although recent advances in medical technology have improved neonatal intensive care, the high mortality and morbidity rates in preterm infants have not decreased proportionally. As caregivers strive to reduce infant mortality and morbidity, a factor for consideration is which caregiver behaviours are associated with preterm infant well-being. Design. A descriptive correlational design. Method. Convenience samples of 24 preterm infants and 12 nurses were recruited. A total of 120 baths were videotaped. Infant and nurse behaviours were measured using the coding schemes developed by the researchers. Pearson coefficient correlation, non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, t-test and generalised linear models were methods for data analysis. Results. As nurses provided more support, stress was reduced in the infants, and their self-regulation during the bath was enhanced especially by the use of ‘containment’ and ‘positional support’. Conversely, non-therapeutic caregiver behaviours including ‘rapid and rough handling’ of the baby, ‘chatting with other people’ and ‘inappropriate handling’ increased infant ‘stress’ during the bath. Conclusion. The findings provide new information about the link between care-giving and infant responses and how caregivers can better interact with preterm infants during a very sensitive period of brain development. Relevance to clinical practice. How nurses take care of the preterm infants influences their responses to care-giving stimuli. To interact better with the infant during care-giving procedures, nurses need to provide more supportive care-giving behaviours especially ‘position support’ and ‘containment’ based on the infant’s needs, and avoid care-giving that may be too rough and occur too quickly without attending the baby’s stressful signals, positioning the baby in hyperextension posture, or chatting with other people during procedures.

To determine the inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, construct and concurrent validity and feasibility of the pain assessment scale for preterm infants.Repeated exposure to painful procedures has an adverse impact on preterm infants' health outcomes. Although many scales are available for assessing these infants' pain, only a few reliably and validly assess pain and no gold standard has been established in clinical practice.Instrument development and psychometric analysis.Preterm infants (n = 60) born 27·6-36·3 weeks gestational age were assessed for pain 3 minutes before (phase I), during (phase II), 3 minutes after (phase III) and the tenth minute after (phase IV) heel-stick procedures. Pain scores were independently coded from video recordings and observations by three trained nurses using our pain-assessment scale, premature infant pain profile and visual analogue scale.Scores on the pain assessment scale for preterm infants differed significantly across four phases of heel-stick procedures (F = 56·86, p0·0001). Internal consistency was 0·84 and inter-rater reliability was 0·88-0·93. Scores on our pain scale correlated well with scores on the premature infant pain profile (0·74-0·83) and visual analogue scale (0·72-0·81).The pain assessment scale for preterm infants integrates all possible pain indicators, with each item modified for clinicians' simple and easy pain measurement to potentially yield different information. Our scale is valid, reliable and feasible for preterm infants with gestational age27 weeks. Further examination of the scale's psychometrics is recommended with diverse samples of infants and different painful procedures.The pain assessment scale for preterm infants clearly defines item scoring and weighting, consistently discriminates different levels of pain and helps nurses to recognise infants' pain. Nurses can easily remember the definition of each item, allowing them to use our scale to evaluate preterm infants' pain at any time and to provide pain-relief interventions when needed.