1. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Is a More Sensitive Screening Tool than QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube for Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities
- Author
-
Chong-Jen Yu, Jung-Yien Chien, Yen-Hsu Chen, Hsiu Tzy Chiang, Wen Chien Ko, Min-Chi Lu, and Po-Ren Hsueh
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,QUANTIFERON-TB GOLD ,030106 microbiology ,Taiwan ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Patient age ,Latent Tuberculosis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Prevalence ,Homes for the Aged ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Screening tool ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Reference standards ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Latent tuberculosis ,business.industry ,Age Factors ,Mycobacteriology and Aerobic Actinomycetes ,Middle Aged ,Reference Standards ,medicine.disease ,bacterial infections and mycoses ,Predictive value ,Long-term care ,Female ,business ,Interferon-gamma Release Tests - Abstract
We investigated the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among the residents in seven long-term care facilities (LTCFs) located in different regions of Taiwan and compared the performance of two interferon gamma release assays, i.e., QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) for screening LTBI. We also assessed the diagnostic performance against a composite reference standard (subjects with persistent-positive, transient-positive, and negative results from QFTs during reproducibility analysis were classified as definite, possible, and not LTBI, respectively). Two hundred forty-four residents were enrolled, and 229 subjects were included in the analysis. The median age was 80 years (range, 60 to 102 years old), and 117 (51.1%) were male. Among them, 66 (28.8%) and 74 (32.3%) subjects had positive results from QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, respectively, and the results for 215 (93.9%) subjects showed agreement. Using the composite reference standard, 66 (28.8%), 11 (4.8%), and 152 (66.4%) were classified as definite, possible, and not LTBI, respectively. For definite LTBI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of QFT-GIT were 89.4%, 95.7%, 89.4%, and 95.7%, respectively, and those for QFT-Plus were 100.0%, 95.1%, 89.2%, and 100.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of QFT-GIT decreased gradually with patient age. Compared to QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus displayed significantly higher sensitivity (100.0% versus 89.4%, P = 0.013) and similar specificity (95.1% versus 95.7%). In conclusion, a high prevalence of LTBI was found among elders in LTCFs in Taiwan. The new QFT-Plus test demonstrated a higher sensitivity than QFT-GIT in the older adults in LTCFs.
- Published
- 2018