Search

Background/Objectives: The health burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD) has been increasing lately. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in MASLD patients; therefore, the treatments for MASLD should improve both CV risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, in addition to an improvement in liver function. The evidence on the long-term effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on the progression of MASLD in Asian populations is very limited. Methods: The retrospective longitudinal study was performed by using the medical records at our institute. We picked up patients with type 2 diabetes who had taken SGLT2is for at least 3 years or longer between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2018. We collected the data on metabolic parameters, including laboratory data and anthropometric parameters, and compared the data before and after the initiation of SGLT2is treatment. Results: During the observation period, 324 patients had taken SGLT2is for 3 years. Three-year SGLT2is treatment significantly reduced body weight, hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). Such favorable changes in serum lipids were remarkable in patients with statins. Furthermore, this treatment significantly improved liver function and the markers for hepatic steatosis and hepatic fibrosis. Conclusions: Considering that the development of CVD determines the prognosis of MASLD patients, long-term SGLT2is treatment may be an ideal therapy for MASLD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical trials demonstrating improved cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT2 inhibitors have often had limited representation from Black and Hispanic populations. While the mechanisms of action are not well known, ethnicity- or gender-based receptor physiology may render SGLT2 inhibitors a better agent in certain populations over others. Methods: A medical records query yielded diabetic patients initiated on SGLT2 inhibitors between 2013 and 2020. Patients with coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart failure were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiographic studies (TTE) before and after starting SGLT2 inhibitors were analyzed, and post-processing left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) analysis was also performed on each echocardiographic study. Univariate outliers and patients with missing data were excluded. Results: Among 94 patients with TTE (mean age 60.7 years; 68% Hispanics, 22.3% Blacks; median follow up of 7 months), there were significant improvements in the mean LV GLS (−15.3 vs. −16.5; p = 0.01), LV mass (LVM) (198.4 ± 59.6 g vs. 187.05 ± 50.6 g; p = 0.04), and LV mass index (LVMI) (100.6 ± 26.6 g/m2 vs. 94.3 ± 25.4 g/m2; p = 0.03) before and after initiating SGLT2 inhibitors but no significant change in the ratio (MV E/E') of peak early diastolic mitral flow velocity (E) and spectral pulsed-wave Doppler-derived early diastolic velocity from the septal mitral annulus (E') (12.5 ± 5.7 vs. 12.7 ± 4.8; p = 0.38). Changes in HbA1c (r2 = 0.82; p = 0.026), LVM (r2 = 0.20; p = 0.04), and LVMI (r2 = 0.20; p = 0.04) were found to be independently associated with changes in values of LV GLS on follow-up echocardiograms, when compared to the pre-medication LV GLS number. Conclusion: Non-White diabetic patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors against a backdrop of other cardioprotective medications demonstrate significant improvements in LV remodeling and LV GLS, driven in part by an improvement in glycemic control. Large, prospective studies are needed to explore the differences in the therapeutic actions of SGLT2 inhibitors among different populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent clinical syndrome with serious morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, acute heart failure (AHF) is the main cause of hospital admission in people aged 65 years or more. Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have been shown to improve the survival and quality of life in patients with HF regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Our aims were to describe the characteristics of adults with multiple pathologies admitted with acute heart failure as the main diagnosis and of the population treated with SGLT2is, as well as to evaluate if their use was associated with lower readmission and mortality rates. Methods: A prospective study of patients from the PROFUND-IC registry who were admitted with AHF as the main diagnosis was conducted. Clinical and analytical characteristics were analyzed, as well as readmissions and mortality. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the sample between those taking SGLT2is and those who were not were performed, using the chi-square test for qualitative variables and Welch's test for quantitative measures, as well as the Fisher and Wilcoxon tests as indicated for nonparametric tests. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to analyze the readmission and mortality of patients at 12 months based on SGLT2i treatment. Finally, a propensity score matching was performed, guaranteeing that the observed effect of the drug was not influenced by the differences in the characteristics between the groups. Results: There were 750 patients included: 58% were women, and the mean age was 84 years. Functional class II according to the NYHA scale predominated (54%), and the mean LVEF was 51%. SGLT2 inhibitors were prescribed to only 28% of patients. Most of the patients were men (48.6% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.029), they were younger (82 vs. 84 years, p = 0.002), and their LVEF was lower (48% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Lower mortality was observed in the group treated with SGLT2is, both during baseline admission (2.4% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.017) and at the 12-month follow-up (6.2% vs. 13%, p = 0.023); as well as a lower readmission rate (23.8% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.001). After the propensity score matching, a decrease in the 12-month readmission rate continued to be observed in the group treated with SGLT2is (p = 0.03). Conclusions: SGLT2is use was associated with lower readmission rates at the 12-month follow-up in older adults with multiple pathologies admitted with acute heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical impact of the withdrawal of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on all-cause readmission in patients with heart failure remains unknown. Methods: We enrolled a total of 212 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for heart failure and received SGLT2i during their index hospitalization between February 2016 and July 2022. Of these patients, 51 terminated SGLT2i during or after their index hospitalization. We evaluated the prognostic impact of the withdrawal of SGLT2i on the primary outcome, which was defined as the all-cause readmission rate/times. Results: Over a median of 23.2 months, all-cause readmission occurred in 38 out of 51 patients (74.5%) withdrawn from SGLT2i and 93 out of 161 patients (57.8%) with continuation of SGLT2i (p = 0.099). The incidence of all-cause readmissions per year was 0.97 [0–1.50] in patients withdrawn from SGLT2i and 0.50 [0–1.03] in patients with continuation of SGLT2i (p = 0.030). There was no significant difference in total medical costs (62,906 [502–187,246] versus 29,236 [7920–180,305] JPY per month, p = 0.866) between both patient groups. Conclusions: Termination of SGLT2i may be associated with incremental all-cause readmission and no benefit in reducing total medical costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) represent an emerging class of drugs with diverse indications. Despite their therapeutic potential, concerns regarding safety, particularly diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), remain contentious, with uncertainty regarding differences among various SGLT2is. This study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis and meta-regression to evaluate the risk of SGLT2i-induced DKA and associated factors. Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases for randomized clinical trials assessing SGLT2is across indications, reporting incidences of DKA. Mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates (MTCPEs) were calculated, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) served as effect estimates. We analyzed differences across dose categories (low, medium, and high) and conducted a meta-regression analysis to identify risk factors. The strength of evidence for key comparisons was determined. Results: Our analysis included 73 articles encompassing 85,997 participants assessing the risk of DKA. SGLT2is were associated with a heightened risk of DKA compared to placebo/control interventions (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.35, 2.46), a finding confirmed by bootstrap analysis. Among SGLT2is, dapagliflozin (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.17, 3.08), sotagliflozin (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.14, 3.25), canagliflozin (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.11, 12.45), and ertugliflozin (OR: 3.92; 95% CI: 1.04, 14.77) exhibited increased DKA risk. No significant differences were observed among specific SGLT2is. Sub-group analyses revealed a high risk of DKA with low (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.3, 2.95) and high doses (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.3), type 1 diabetes (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.6, 8.1), type 2 diabetes (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3, 2.4), as well as a diabetes duration exceeding 10 years (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 10.8). The evidence of certainty for most comparisons was moderate. Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have been found to elevate the risk of DKA. The key factors that significantly predict the likelihood of DKA include the presence of diabetes (whether T1D or T2D) and the duration of diabetes. Based on these findings, standard treatment guidelines should advise taking specific precautions against DKA in patients identified as high-risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Contemporary evidence supports the cardiovascular and renal benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in patients with diabetes. While metformin has traditionally been recommended as a first-line treatment, its exact role in improving cardiovascular outcomes remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of combination therapy with metformin on the cardiovascular and renal outcomes in high-risk, treatment-naïve diabetic patients who have undergone SGLT2i therapy. Methods: Using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. Treatment-naïve patients with diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) undertaking SGLT2i therapy from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2021 were included. Patients were categorized based on the concomitant use of metformin. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize confounding factors. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), with secondary outcomes including cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and renal outcomes. Results: In total, 10,151 treatment-naïve diabetic patients with ASCVD were identified, with 2570 in the only SGLT2i therapy group and 7581 in the SGLT2i plus metformin group. In total, 2262 pairs were analyzed after propensity score adjustment. The risk of MACEs (36.6 vs. 42.1 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.09) and other outcomes did not significantly differ between the two treatment groups. Conclusions: In high-risk, treatment-naïve diabetic patients, initiating SGLT2i therapy alone or in combination with metformin resulted in comparable cardiovascular and renal outcomes. These findings suggest that metformin might not be mandatory as a first-line treatment for achieving cardiovascular benefits in such patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) increase uric acid excretion. The intensity of uricosuria is linked to glycosuria. (2) Methods: We aim to analyze the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on urinary fractional excretion (FE) of uric acid and glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a single-center retrospective study with patients with T2DM and CKD who started on treatment with SGLT2is. Patients on renal replacement therapy or with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) analogs were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the SGLT2i molecule, the main comorbidities, and concomitant treatment. As a secondary objective, the study analyzed the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on uricemia levels. (3) Results: Seventy-three patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 1.2 years. Uric acid and glucose FE significantly increased after the initiation of SGLT2is. This increase remained stable during the follow-up without differences among eGFR groups. No significant reduction in uricemia was observed. However, a trend towards a decrease was observed. (4) Conclusion: The use of SGLT2is in patients with CKD and T2DM is associated with an increase in uric acid FE, which maintains stability irrespective of glomerular filtration loss at least during 24 months of follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for a substantial proportion of mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), frequently triggered by ventricular arrhythmias (VA). This review aims to analyze the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying VA and SCD in HFrEF and evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in reducing SCD. Beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have shown significant efficacy in reducing SCD risk. While angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers exert beneficial impacts on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, their direct role in SCD prevention remains less clear. Emerging treatments like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors show promise but necessitate further research for conclusive evidence. The favorable outcomes of those molecules on VA are notably attributable to sympathetic nervous system modulation, structural remodeling attenuation, and ion channel stabilization. A multidimensional pharmacological approach targeting those pathophysiological mechanisms offers a complete and synergy approach to reducing SCD risk, thereby highlighting the importance of optimizing GDMT for HFrEF. The current landscape of HFrEF pharmacotherapy is evolving, with ongoing research needed to clarify the full extent of the anti-arrhythmic benefits offered by both existing and new treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently available for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. SGLT2i acts by inhibiting renal SGLT2, thereby increasing glucosuria and lowering serum glucose. Recent trials are emerging supporting a role for SGLT2i irrespective of the diabetic status pointing towards that SGLT2i have other mechanisms of actions beyond blood sugar control. In this review, we will shed light on the role of this group of medications that act as SGLT2i in non-diabetics focusing on pre-clinical and clinical data highlighting the mechanism of renoprotection and effects of SGLT2i in the non-diabetic kidneys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is no clinical evidence about the effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on diabetic patients who have been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Methods: The dataset is based on insurance benefit claims sent to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea from January, 2018 to April, 2022. Among 9,822,577 patients who were involved in the claims, diabetic patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had a prescription for an SGLT2 inhibitor. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which were a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization over 90 days. Results: A total of 172,682 patients was analyzed. In the propensity score-matched analysis, the rate of MACCE was lower in the SGLT2 inhibitor group compared to the non-SGLT2 inhibitor group (0.89% vs. 1.31%; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.53–0.94; p =0.020). Each of the MACCEs showed no differences between the two groups. The rate of pneumonia was similar between the two groups (4.45% vs. 4.39%; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–1.16; p = 0.620). Conclusions: In the diabetic patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with improved clinical outcomes in terms of MACCEs. SGLT2 inhibitors might be considered for prescription to diabetic patients in the current context of long COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) slow the progression of renal dysfunction and improve the prognosis of patients with heart failure. Amyloidosis constitutes an important subgroup for which evidence is lacking. Amyloidotic fibrils originating from misfolded transthyretin and light chains are the causal agents in ATTR and AL amyloidosis. In these most frequent subtypes, cardiac involvement is the most common organ manifestation. Because cardiac and renal function frequently deteriorate over time, even under best available treatment, SGLT2i emerge as a promising treatment option due to their reno- and cardioprotective properties. We retrospectively analyzed patients with cardiac amyloidosis, who received either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Out of 79 patients, 5.1% had urinary tract infections; 2 stopped SGLT2i therapy; and 2.5% died unrelated to the intake of SGLT2i. No genital mycotic infections were observed. As expected, a slight drop in the glomerular filtration rate was noted, while the NYHA functional status, cardiac and hepatic function, as well as the 6 min walk distance remained stable over time. These data provide a rationale for the use of SGLT2i in patients with amyloidosis and concomitant cardiac or renal dysfunction. Prospective randomized data are desired to confirm safety and to prove efficacy in this increasingly important group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The health burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD) has been increasing lately. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in MASLD patients; therefore, the treatments for MASLD should improve both CV risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, in addition to an improvement in liver function. The evidence on the long-term effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on the progression of MASLD in Asian populations is very limited. Methods: The retrospective longitudinal study was performed by using the medical records at our institute. We picked up patients with type 2 diabetes who had taken SGLT2is for at least 3 years or longer between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2018. We collected the data on metabolic parameters, including laboratory data and anthropometric parameters, and compared the data before and after the initiation of SGLT2is treatment. Results: During the observation period, 324 patients had taken SGLT2is for 3 years. Three-year SGLT2is treatment significantly reduced body weight, hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). Such favorable changes in serum lipids were remarkable in patients with statins. Furthermore, this treatment significantly improved liver function and the markers for hepatic steatosis and hepatic fibrosis. Conclusions: Considering that the development of CVD determines the prognosis of MASLD patients, long-term SGLT2is treatment may be an ideal therapy for MASLD patients.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a class of antidiabetic agents known to exert cardioprotective, renoprotective, and hypoglycemic effects. However, these agents have been associated with adverse effects, such as genital infection, volume depletion, hypoglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis, resulting in drug discontinuation. Herein, we aimed to determine the reasons for discontinuing treatment with SGLT2is among Japanese patients with diabetes. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 766 patients with diabetes who had initiated SGLT2is between January 2014 and September 2021. The follow-up period was 2 years from the initiation of the SGLT2is. Overall, 97 patients (12.7%) discontinued the SGLT2is during the follow-up period. The most common reasons for discontinuing the SGLT2is were frequent urination (19.6%), followed by genital infection (11.3%), improved glycemic control (10.6%), and renal dysfunction (8.2%). A comparison of the characteristics between the continuation and the discontinuation group was conducted, excluding those who discontinued the SGLT2is because of improved glycemic control. The patients in the discontinuation group (68 [55–75] years) were older than those in the continuation group (64 [53–71] years; p = 0.003). Importantly, we found no significant association between diabetes duration, diabetic control, renal function, or complications of diabetes in both groups. This real-world study revealed that frequent urination was the most common reason underlying SGLT2i discontinuation among Japanese patients with diabetes. To avoid discontinuation, precautions against various factors that may cause frequent urination must be implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension is a critical component of cardiovascular disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease, and specifically diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Causation versus correlation remains up for debate, but what has been confirmed is the delay of DKD progression when hypertension is controlled or moved to guideline drive ranges. Many medications have been studied and used in real world experience for best outcomes, and we discuss below the proven winners thus far making up the renin angiotensin aldosterone system. As well, we discuss guideline changing medications including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and newer generation mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. With the growing prevalence of diabetes and DKD in the population, newer agents are emerging in multiple drug class and will be highlighted below. Clinicians continue to search for the optimal care plans for this challenging patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF) is associated with a high morbidity and mortality burden. In light of more recent evidence, SGLT2 inhibitors are currently recommended as first-line therapy in managing patients with HF, regardless of ejection fraction, to reduce HF burden. The DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials, and particularly, the pooled analysis of both studies, have shown that dapagliflozin significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular death, all-cause death, total HF hospitalizations, and MACE in the whole spectrum of HF, with sustained benefits over time. Recent data have shown that the full implementation of dapagliflozin in clinical practice would translate into a robust reduction in hospitalizations for HF and death in real-life populations. Many pathophysiological mechanisms have been involved in these benefits, particularly the positive effects of dapagliflozin on reversing cardiac (atrial and ventricular) remodeling, reducing cardiac fibrosis and inflammation, and improving endothelial dysfunction. In this manuscript, we reviewed from a practical point of view the role of dapagliflozin in the management of the whole spectrum of patients with HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the current modern era of unhealthy lifestyles, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disease and has become a serious global health problem. To date, there is no approved pharmacotherapy for the treatment of NAFLD, and necessary lifestyle changes such as weight loss, diet, and exercise are usually not sufficient to manage this disease. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a significantly higher risk of developing NAFLD and vice versa. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are antidiabetic agents that have recently been approved for two other indications: chronic kidney disease and heart failure in diabetics and non-diabetics. They are also emerging as promising new agents for NAFLD treatment, as they have shown beneficial effects on hepatic inflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis. Studies in animals have reported favorable effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, and studies in patients also found positive effects on body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance, glucose levels, liver enzymes, apoptosis, and transcription factors. There are some theories regarding how SGLT2 inhibitors affect the liver, but the exact mechanism is not yet fully understood. Therefore, biomarkers to evaluate underlying mechanisms of action of SGLT2 inhibitors on the liver have now been scrutinized to assess their potential as a future in-label therapy for NAFLD. In addition, finding suitable non-invasive biomarkers could be helpful in clinical practice for the early detection of NAFLD in patients. This is crucial for a positive disease outcome. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the most recent findings on the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on NAFLD biomarkers and the potential of SGLT2 inhibitors to successfully treat NAFLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may have pleiotropic and beneficial effects in terms of ameliorating of risk factors for the progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the use of these drugs in patients with ADPKD, as they were excluded from several clinical trials conducted to explore kidney protection provided by SGLT2 inhibitors. This retrospective single-arm case series study was performed to investigate the effects of dapagliflozin, a selective SGLT2 inhibitor administered at 10 mg/day, on changes in height-adjusted kidney volume (htTKV) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in ADPKD patients. During a period of 102 ± 20 days (range 70–156 days), eGFR was decreased from 47.9 (39.7–56.9) to 40.8 (33.7–44.5) mL/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.001), while htTKV was increased from 599 (423–707) to 617 (446–827) mL/m (p = 0.002) (n = 20). The annual increase in htTKV rate was significantly promoted, and urinary phosphate change was found to be correlated with the change in htTKV (rs = 0.575, p = 0.020). In the examined patients, eGFR was decreased and htTKV increased during short-term administration of dapagliflozin. To confirm the possibility of the effects of dapagliflozin on ADPKD, additional interventional studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) present a promising therapeutic option in cardiorenal diseases, mitigating the limitations of steroidal MRAs. Finerenone, a third-generation nonsteroidal MRA, has demonstrated beneficial effects in heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Clinical trials, including FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD, revealed finerenone's efficacy in improving kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on finerenone experienced reduced rates of cardiovascular events, including hospitalization for HF. However, these trials excluded symptomatic HF patients, focusing on asymptomatic or early-stage HF. The ongoing FINEARTS-HF trial evaluates finerenone in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Additionally, studies exploring finerenone and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors' (Empagliflozin) combination effects in CKD and T2DM (CONFIDENCE) and the selective MR modulator AZD9977 with another SGLT2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin) in HF and CKD (MIRACLE) aim to expand treatment options. While SGLT-2 inhibitors were shown to reduce hyperkalemia risk in FIDELIO-DKD and potentially lower new-onset HF incidence in FIGARO-DKD, further research is essential. So far, the evidence for the beneficial effect of finerenone in the spectrum of cardiorenal diseases is based only on the results of studies conducted in patients with T2DM, and clinical trials of finerenone in patients with nondiabetic kidney disease are ongoing. Nonsteroidal MRAs hold significant potential as pivotal treatment targets across the cardiorenal disease spectrum. This review will focus on the effects of finerenone on cardiorenal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recently renamed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects ~70% of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with ~20% showing signs of advanced liver fibrosis. Patients with T2D are at an increased risk of developing cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma and their liver-related mortality is doubled compared with non-diabetic individuals. Nonetheless, the condition is frequently overlooked and disease awareness is limited both among patients and among physicians. Given recent epidemiological evidence, clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for NAFLD/MASLD and advanced liver fibrosis in patients with T2D. While many drugs are currently being tested for the treatment of NAFLD/MASLD, none of them have yet received formal approval from regulatory agencies. However, several classes of antidiabetic drugs (namely pioglitazone, sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and multi-agonists) have shown favorable effects in terms of liver enzymes, liver fat content and, in some occasions, on histologic features such as inflammation and fibrosis. Therefore, diabetologists have the opportunity to actively treat NAFLD/MASLD, with a concrete possibility of changing the natural history of the disease. In the present narrative review, we summarize evidence and clinical recommendations for NAFLD/MAFLD screening in the setting of T2D, as well as on the effect of currently available glucose-lowering drugs on hepatic endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Despite guideline-directed therapy of CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes, the risk of renal failure and cardiovascular events still remains high, and diabetes remains the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in affected patients. To date, current medications for CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus have not reset residual risk in patients due to a high grade of inflammation and fibrosis contributing to kidney and heart disease. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the pharmacological and clinical differences between finerenone and other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and then move on to the main evidence in the cardiovascular and renal fields, closing, finally, on the potential role of therapeutic combination with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our aim was to evaluate osteomyelitis and other major lower limb safety outcomes (i.e., peripheral artery disease or PAD, ulcers, atraumatic fractures, amputations, symmetric polyneuropathy, and infections) in patients affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-is). We thus performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2-is at approved doses for T2DM with a placebo or standard of care. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through August 2022. Separate intention-to-treat analyses were implemented for each molecule to calculate Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRMH) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through a random-effects model. We processed data from 42 RCTs for a total of 29,491 and 23,052 patients, respectively assigned to SGLT2-i and comparator groups. SGLT2-is showed a pooled neutral effect on osteomyelitis, PAD, fractures, and symmetric polyneuropathy, whereas slightly deleterious sway on ulcers (RRMH 1.39 [1.01–1.91]), amputations (RRMH 1.27 [1.04–1.55]), and infections (RRMH 1.20 [1.02–1.40]). In conclusion, SGLT2-is appear to not significantly interfere with the onset of osteomyelitis, PAD, lower limb fractures, or symmetric polyneuropathy, even though the number of these events proved consistently higher in the investigational groups; otherwise, local ulcers, amputations, and overall infections may be favoured by their employment. This study is registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There are several pathologic mechanisms involved in diabetic nephropathy, but the role of oxidative stress seems to be one of the most important. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a relatively new class of antidiabetic drugs that might also have some other effects in addition to lowering glucose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on oxidative stress and renal function in diabetes. Methods: Male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: control, control-treated, diabetic, and diabetic-treated (n = 8 per group). Diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal dose of streptozotocin (50 mg/kg). The treated animals received empagliflozin for 5 weeks (20 mg/kg/day/po). All groups were sacrificed on the 36th day, and blood and tissue samples were collected. Serum levels of urea, uric acid, creatinine, and glucose levels were determined. The level of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GLT), as well as the activity of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), was measured in all groups. Data were analyzed using one-way Anova and paired T-tests, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Diabetes significantly increased urea (p < 0.001), uric acid (p < 0.001), and creatinine (p < 0.001) in the serum, while the activities of CAT (p < 0.001) and SOD (p < 0.001) were reduced. GLT was also reduced (p < 0.001), and MDA was increased (p < 0.001) in non-treated animals. Treatment with empagliflozin improved renal function, as shown by a reduction in the serum levels of urea (p = 0.03), uric acid (p = 0.03), and creatinine (p < 0.001). Empagliflozin also increased the antioxidant capacity by increasing CAT (p = 0.035) and SOD (p = 0.02) activities and GLT content (p = 0.01) and reduced oxidative damage by lowering MDA (p < 0.001). Conclusions: It seems that uncontrolled diabetes induces renal insufficiency by decreasing antioxidant defense mechanisms and inducing oxidative stress. Empagliflozin might have additional benefits in addition to lowering glucose—-reversing these processes, improving antioxidative capacity, and improving renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially from cardiovascular (CV) causes, and especially in people with diabetes mellitus (DM). Already the presence of DM increases CV risk and potentiates the risk of CKD. Therefore, besides glycemic control, prevention and treatment of CKD to slow its progression are of clinical importance. A significant nephroprotective effect of novel antidiabetic drugs, namely sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), has been shown on top of their glucose-lowering effects and was confirmed in cardiovascular outcome trials. GLP1-RA mainly reduced the risk of macroalbuminuria, whereas SGLT2-I were also associated with a lower risk of declining glomerular filtration rate (GFR) over time. The nephroprotective effects of SGLT2-I are also evident in people without DM. According to current guidelines, SGLT2-I and/or GLP1-RA are recommended for people with DM who have chronic kidney disease and/or increased cardiovascular risk. However, other antidiabetic drugs offer nephroprotective properties, which will also be discussed in this review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults and diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. However, the relationship between both pathologies has not been fully documented and new evidence supports the existence of direct and independent links. In the myocardium, a combination of structural, electrical, and autonomic remodeling may lead to AF. Importantly, patients with AF and DM showed more dramatic alterations than those with AF or DM alone, particularly in mitochondrial respiration and atrial remodeling, which alters conductivity, thrombogenesis, and contractile function. In AF and DM, elevations of cytosolic Ca2⁺ and accumulation of extra cellular matrix (ECM) proteins at the interstitium can promote delayed afterdepolarizations. The DM-associated low-grade inflammation and deposition/infiltration of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) enforce abnormalities in Ca2+ handling and in excitation-contraction coupling, leading to atrial myopathy. This atrial enlargement and the reduction in passive emptying volume and fraction can be key for AF maintenance and re-entry. Moreover, the stored EAT can prolong action of potential durations and progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In this way, DM may increase the risk of thrombogenesis as a consequence of increased glycation and oxidation of fibrinogen and plasminogen, impairing plasmin conversion and resistance to fibrinolysis. Additionally, the DM-associated autonomic remodeling may also initiate AF and its re-entry. Finally, further evidence of DM influence on AF development and maintenance are based on the anti-arrhythmogenic effects of certain anti-diabetic drugs like SGLT2 inhibitors. Therefore, AF and DM may share molecular alterations related to Ca2+ mobility, mitochondrial function and ECM composition that induce atrial remodeling and defects in autonomic stimulation and conductivity. Likely, some specific therapies could work against the associated cardiac damage to AF and/or DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are effective anti-diabetic drugs improving cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This study investigated cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and cognitive outcomes of SGLT2i therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and T2DM. Methods: Observational study using TriNetX, a global health research network of anonymised electronic medical records from real-world patients between January 2018 and December 2019. The network includes healthcare organisations globally but predominately in the United States. AF patients (ICD-10-CM code: I48) with T2DM were divided according to SGLT2i use or not, and balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Patients were followed-up for 3-years. The primary endpoints were ischaemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and incident dementia. Secondary endpoints were incident heart failure and mortality. Results: We identified 89,356 AF patients with T2DM of which 5061 (5.7%) were taking a SGLT2i. After PSM, 5049 patients (mean age 66.7 ± 10.6 years; 28.9% female) were included in each group. At 3-years follow-up, the risk of ischaemic stroke/TIA was higher in patients not receiving SGLT2i (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01–1.24) and for ICH (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.25–1.99) and incident dementia (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.30–2.12). Incident heart failure (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.34–1.68) and mortality (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.58–1.99) risks were increased in AF patients not receiving SGLT2i. Conclusions: In our large 'real world' analysis of patients with concomitant AF and T2DM, SGLT2i reduced the risk of cerebrovascular events, incident dementia, heart failure and death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decompensated liver cirrhosis is often complicated by refractory ascites, and intractable ascites are a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. The treatment of ascites in patients with cirrhosis is based on the use of aldosterone blockers and loop diuretics, and occasionally vasopressin receptor antagonists are also used. Recent reports suggest that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may be a new treatment for refractory ascites with a different mechanism with respect to conventional agents. The main mechanisms of ascites reduction with SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be natriuresis and osmotic diuresis. However, other mechanisms, including improvements in glucose metabolism and nutritional status, hepatoprotection by ketone bodies and adiponectin, amelioration of the sympathetic nervous system, and inhibition of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, may also contribute to the reduction of ascites. This literature review describes previously reported cases in which SGLT2 inhibitors were used to effectively treat ascites caused by liver cirrhosis. The discussion of the mechanisms involved is expected to contribute to establishing SGLT2 therapy for ascites in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) on the right ventricular (RV) systolic function using advanced echocardiographic analysis among outpatients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has thus far been poorly investigated. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, single-blinded study in which an echocardiographic expert was blinded to the allocation of the treatment. A total of 36 outpatients with HFrEF were randomized to either OMT or OMT+SGLT2i. Both groups underwent an echocardiographic examination of the RV systolic function at the baseline and at the 3-month follow-up (3mFU). Results: The patients in both groups did not significantly differ with respect to the relevant baseline comorbidities, therapy, and clinical characteristics. The patients receiving OMT+SGLT2i showed a significant improvement from the baseline to the 3mFU in all the measured RV echocardiographic parameters, while for the OMT group, a significant improvement after the 3mFU was observed for TAPSE and s'. The mean percent change from the baseline to the 3mFU was significant when comparing OMT+SGLT2i to the OMT group concerning RV FWS (+91% vs. +28%, p = 0.039), TR maxPG (−27% vs. +19%, p = 0.005), and TR Vmax (−17% vs. +13%, p = 0.008), respectively. Conclusions: Adding SGLT2i to OMT in patients with HFrEF resulted in a greater improvement in the RV systolic function from the baseline to the 3mFU compared to the OMT alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic hyperglycemia induces pathophysiologic pathways with negative effects on the metabolism of most substrates as well as lipids and lipoproteins, and thereby induces dyslipidemia. Thus, the diabetic milieu is commonly accompanied by different levels of atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is per se a major risk factor for subsequent complications such as atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and nephropathy. Therefore, readjusting lipid metabolism in the diabetic milieu is a major goal for preventing dyslipidemia-induced complications. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of relatively newly introduced antidiabetes drugs (including empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, etc.) with potent hypoglycemic effects and can reduce blood glucose by inducing glycosuria. However, recent evidence suggests that they could also provide extra-glycemic benefits in lipid metabolism. It seems that they can increase fat burning and lipolysis, normalizing the lipid metabolism and preventing or improving dyslipidemia. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms involved in this process are not well-understood. In this review, we tried to explain how these drugs could regulate lipid homeostasis and we presented the possible involved cellular pathways supported by clinical evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most frequent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), estimated to affect approximately one-third of the diabetic population, and the most common cause of preventable vision loss. The available treatment options focus on the late stages of this complication, while in the early stages there is no dedicated treatment besides optimizing blood pressure, lipid and glycemic control; DR is still lacking effective preventive methods. glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 Ras) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have a proven effect in reducing risk factors of DR and numerous experimental and animal studies have strongly established its retinoprotective potential. Both drug groups have the evident potential to become a new therapeutic option for the prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy and there is an urgent need for further comprehensive clinical trials to verify whether these findings are translatable to humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been associated with decreased skeletal muscle mass but remains unclear in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) undergoing comprehensive outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Therefore, this study investigates the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the outcomes of patients with CVD and T2DM undergoing comprehensive outpatient CR. The study included 402 patients with CVD and T2DM who participated in comprehensive outpatient CR. Physical functions (grip strength, maximal quadriceps isometric strength, usual gait speed, and 6-minute walking distance) were measured at discharge as baseline and 5 months thereafter, and the association between physical functions and SGLT2 inhibitor use was reviewed. Physical functions improved regardless of SGLT2 inhibitor use. Multiple regression analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitor use was not associated with improvement or decline in physical functions (p ≥ 0.05). The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CVD and T2DM undergoing outpatient CR did not impair improvement in physical functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study compared the renoprotective effects of sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of patients with T2DM. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 after the index date. We analyzed changes in repeatedly measured laboratory data, such as eGFR and serum uric acid (SUA). We included 2396 patients (1198 patients in each group) in the present study. The rate of renal events was significantly lower in the SGLT2 inhibitors group than that in the DPP-4 inhibitors group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.72; p = 0.0007). The annual mean change in the eGFR was significantly smaller in the SGLT2 inhibitors group than that in the DPP-4 inhibitors group, with a between-group difference of 0.86 ± 0.18 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.23; p < 0.0001). Moreover, the mean change in SUA was lower in the SGLT2 inhibitors group. Considering the lower incidence of renal impairment, the slower decline in eGFR, and reduced SUA, SGLT2 inhibitors could help delay renal impairment in patients with T2DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with chronic HF. However, little is known about the specific factors associated with clinical events during SGLT2i therapy in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods: Consecutive patients who were hospitalized for ADHF and received SGLT2i during the index hospitalization between February 2016 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. We investigated the factors associated with recurrent hospitalization for HF during the SGLT2i therapy. Results: A total of 143 patients (median age 73 years, 92 men) were included. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was negatively associated with a primary endpoint with a hazard ratio of 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.90–0.98, p = 0.007). Those with lower eGFR < 40.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 47) had significantly lower freedom from HF hospitalization during 1-year therapeutic period (73% versus 94%, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Among patients who initiated medical therapy incorporating SGLT2i during the hospitalization for ADHF, a lower eGFR at baseline was associated with a recurrent hospitalization for HF. Early administration of SGLT2i prior to deterioration of renal function would be highly recommended to enjoy greater benefit from SGLT2i. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current data indicate that in the community, approximately 50% of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF)—the so-called HFpEF. Treatment of HFpEF has been considered an unmet need for decades. We believe that the main underlying reasons have been (a) the ever-changing LVEF cut-offs used for HF classification; (b) controversies regarding the definition of the LVEF normal range; (c) the fact that HFpEF does not represent a phenotype, but a category of diseases with entirely different characteristics (hypertensive heart disease, valvular heart disease (VHD), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) etc.); (d) the lack of recognition that hypertensive HFpEF is the most common and important HFpEF phenotype; (e) the assumption that neurohormonal overactivity is absent in HF patients with a LVEF > 45–50% which has been proven to be wrong. Current HFpEF trials, in which the vast majority of the participants suffered from hypertension (HTN), whereas VHD and HCM were absent, demonstrated that neurohormonal and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in HF patients over a wide LVEF range. Thus, restricting these lifesaving treatments to HF patients with reduced LVEF is not justified anymore and it should be additionally considered for HFpEF patients suffering from HTN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of both diabetes mellitus type 2 and heart failure is rapidly growing, and the diseases often coexist. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a new antidiabetic drug class that mediates epithelial glucose transport at the renal proximal tubules, inhibiting glucose absorption—resulting in glycosuria—and therefore improving glycemic control. Recent trials have proven that SGLT2i also improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes, including reduced cardiovascular mortality and fewer hospitalizations for heart failure. Reduced preload and afterload, improved vascular function, and changes in tissue sodium and calcium handling may also play a role. The expected paradigm shift in treatment strategies was reflected in the most recent 2021 guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology, recommending dapagliflozin and empagliflozin as first-line treatment for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Moreover, the recent results of the EMPEROR-Preserved trial regarding empagliflozin give us hope that there is finally an effective treatment for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of these new anti-glycemic oral agents in the management of diabetic and heart failure patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most frequent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), estimated to affect approximately one-third of the diabetic population, and the most common cause of preventable vision loss. The available treatment options focus on the late stages of this complication, while in the early stages there is no dedicated treatment besides optimizing blood pressure, lipid and glycemic control; DR is still lacking effective preventive methods. glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 Ras) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have a proven effect in reducing risk factors of DR and numerous experimental and animal studies have strongly established its retinoprotective potential. Both drug groups have the evident potential to become a new therapeutic option for the prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy and there is an urgent need for further comprehensive clinical trials to verify whether these findings are translatable to humans.

Current data indicate that in the community, approximately 50% of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF)—the so-called HFpEF. Treatment of HFpEF has been considered an unmet need for decades. We believe that the main underlying reasons have been (a) the ever-changing LVEF cut-offs used for HF classification; (b) controversies regarding the definition of the LVEF normal range; (c) the fact that HFpEF does not represent a phenotype, but a category of diseases with entirely different characteristics (hypertensive heart disease, valvular heart disease (VHD), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) etc.); (d) the lack of recognition that hypertensive HFpEF is the most common and important HFpEF phenotype; (e) the assumption that neurohormonal overactivity is absent in HF patients with a LVEF > 45–50% which has been proven to be wrong. Current HFpEF trials, in which the vast majority of the participants suffered from hypertension (HTN), whereas VHD and HCM were absent, demonstrated that neurohormonal and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in HF patients over a wide LVEF range. Thus, restricting these lifesaving treatments to HF patients with reduced LVEF is not justified anymore and it should be additionally considered for HFpEF patients suffering from HTN.

The mechanism of action of SGLT2i in HF is different from that of other HF therapies that focused on reverse left ventricular remodeling, blocking the neurohormonal activation (such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors), or enhancing the natriuretic peptide system (such as neprilysin inhibitors) [[4]]. Current guidelines propose therapeutic algorithms based on left ventricular ejection fraction values and clinical presentations; however, these guidelines do not specify which of the four pillar drugs to start first. However, considering the most recent updates on SGLT2i, I would compare SGLT2i to ACE-inhibitors rather than statins, mainly due to nephroprotection and the multitarget action of ACE-inhibitors and SGLT2i. [Extracted from the article]

To jointly assess the safety and effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiorenal outcomes and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis, systematically searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases up to September 2020. Primary outcomes were composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality and a composite renal outcome. We performed a random effects network meta-analysis estimating the pooled hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio and number needed to treat (NNT). Six trials evaluating empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which comprised 46,969 patients, mostly with established CVD. Pooled estimates (95% CI) of benefits of SGLT2i in terms of HR and NNT were as follows: for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (0.75, 0.97) and 58 (28, 368); for MACE, 0.91 (0.85, 0.97) and 81 (44, 271); for hospitalization for heart failure, 0.70 (0.62, 0.78) and 32 (20, 55); and for composite renal outcome, 0.61 (0.50, 0.74) and 20 (11, 44). Pooled estimates for serious adverse events were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89, 0.95). In patients with T2DM at cardiovascular risk, ertugliflozin is a less potent drug than empagliflozin, canagliflozin or dapagliflozin to prevent cardiorenal events and all-cause mortality. In addition, our data endorse that empagliflozin is the best treatment option among SGLT2i for this type of patient, but the evidence is not consistent enough.

The introduction of new therapeutics for patients with chronic heart failure, including sacubitril/valsartan, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and ivabradine, in addition to beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, lends an opportunity for significant clinical risk reduction compared to what was available just one decade ago. Further clinical options are needed, however, for patients with residual clinical congestion refractory to these therapies. Adaptive servo-ventilation is a novel therapeutic option to address significant clinical volume in cases resistant to medical therapy. The aggregate benefit of these additional therapeutic strategies in addition to foundational medical therapy may be a promising option in the selected candidates who do not achieve acceptable clinical and quality-of-life improvements with oral medical therapy alone. Now is the era to reconsider the implication of an adaptive servo-ventilation-therapy-incorporated medical therapeutic strategy for patients with congestive heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The new heart failure (HF) therapies of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil do not act primarily through the neuro-hormonal blockade, but have shown clinical benefits in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, their respective efficacies remain unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the relative efficacy of new drugs for HFrEF. Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i, vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil, and placebo in HFrEF patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death (CVD) or HF hospitalization (CVD-HF); secondary endpoints were CVD, all-cause death, and HF hospitalization (HFH). Results: Twelve RCTs (n = 23,861 patients) were included. A significant reduction in CVD-HF was observed with SGLT2i compared with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.83), vericiguat (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75–0.93), and omecamtiv mecarbil (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.88). No significant difference was observed between vericiguat and omecamtiv mecarbil (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87–1.04). SGLT2i were superior to placebo and omecamtiv mecarbil for all individual secondary endpoints (CVD, all-cause death, and HFH), and also to vericiguat for HFH. SGLT2i ranked as the most effective therapy for all endpoints, and vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil, and placebo ranked as the second, third, and last options, respectively, for the primary endpoint. Conclusions: In patients with HFrEF on standard-of-care therapy, SGLT2i therapy was associated with a reduced risk of CVD-HF compared to placebo, vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil. Furthermore, SGLT2i were superior to placebo and omecamtiv mecarbil for CVD, all-cause death, and HFH, and also to vericiguat for HFH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atherosclerosis-caused cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective oral drugs for the treatment of T2DM patients. Multiple pre-clinical and clinical studies have indicated that SGLT2 inhibitors not only reduce blood glucose but also confer benefits with regard to body weight, insulin resistance, lipid profiles and blood pressure. Recently, some cardiovascular outcome trials have demonstrated the safety and cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond glycemic control. The SGLT2 inhibitors empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin reduce the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and of hospitalization for heart failure in T2DM patients regardless of CVD. The potential mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardioprotection may be involved in improving the function of vascular endothelial cells, suppressing oxidative stress, inhibiting inflammation and regulating autophagy, which further protect from the progression of atherosclerosis. Here, we summarized the pre-clinical and clinical evidence of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardioprotection and discussed the potential molecular mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors in preventing the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and CVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes is a driver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and fibrosis. We determine current practices in examining liver fibrosis in people with diabetes and record prevalence levels in primary and secondary care. We extracted HbA1c results ≥48 mmol/mol to identify people with diabetes, then examined the proportion who had AST, ALT, and platelets results, facilitating calculation of non-invasive fibrosis tests (NIT), or an enhanced liver fibrosis score. Fibrosis markers were requested in only 1.49% (390/26,090), of which 29.7% (n = 106) had evidence of significant fibrosis via NIT. All patients at risk of fibrosis had undergone transient elastography (TE), biopsy or imaging. TE and biopsy data showed that 80.6% of people with raised fibrosis markers had confirmed significant fibrosis. We also show that fibrosis levels as detected by NIT are marginally lower in patients treated with newer glucose lowering agents (sodium-glucose transporter protein 2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists). In conclusion by utilising a large consecutively recruited dataset we demonstrate that liver fibrosis is infrequently screened for in patients with diabetes despite high prevalence rates of advanced fibrosis. This highlights the need for cost-effectiveness analyses to support the incorporation of widespread screening into national guidelines and the requirement for healthcare practitioners to incorporate NAFLD screening into routine diabetes care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF) has been a hot topic in diabetology in the last few years, mainly due to the central role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (iSGLT2) in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease and heart failure. It is well known that HF is a common complication in diabetes. However, most of the knowledge about it and the evidence of cardiovascular safety trials with antidiabetic drugs refer to type 2 diabetes (T2D). The epidemiology, etiology, and pathophysiology of HF in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is still not well studied, though there are emerging data about it since life expectancy for T1D has increased in the last decades and there are more elderly patients with T1D. The association of T1D and HF confers a worse prognosis than in T2D, thus it is important to investigate the characteristics, risk factors, and pathophysiology of this disease in order to effectively design prevention strategies and therapeutic tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists on glycemic variability (GV), the mean amplitude of glucose excursion (MAGE), mean blood glucose (MBG) levels, and percentage of time maintaining euglycemia were evaluated. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for treating people with diabetes were selected through searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and other databases. Sixteen studies were finally analyzed. There were no differences in the reductions in MAGE after treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.59, 95% CI = −0.82 to −0.36 vs. SMD = −0.43, 95% CI = −0.51 to −0.35, respectively), and treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors was associated with an increased reduction in MBG levels (SMD = −0.56, 95% CI = −0.65 to −0.48, p < 0.00001). Monotherapy and add-on therapy with medications were correlated with MAGE and MBG level reductions. In conclusion, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists were associated with a reduction in GV and could be alternatives for treating people with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is little evidence on the use of sodium−glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in hospitalised patients. This work aims to analyse the glycaemic and clinical efficacy and safety of empagliflozin continuation in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalised for acute decompensated heart failure. This real-world observational study includes patients treated using our in-hospital antihyperglycaemic regimens (basal-bolus insulin vs. empagliflozin-basal insulin) between 2017 and 2020. A propensity matching analysis was used to match a patient on one regimen with a patient on the other regimen. Our primary endpoints were the differences in glycaemic control, as measured via mean daily blood glucose levels, and differences in the visual analogue scale dyspnoea score, NT-proBNP levels, diuretic response, and cumulative urine output. Safety endpoints were also analysed. After a propensity matching analysis, 91 patients were included in each group. There were no differences in mean blood glucose levels (152.1 ± 17.8 vs. 155.2 ± 19.7 mg/dL, p = 0.289). At discharge, NT-proBNP levels were lower and cumulative urine output greater in the empagliflozin group versus the basal-bolus insulin group (1652 ± 501 vs. 2101 ± 522 pg/mL, p = 0.032 and 16,100 ± 1510 vs. 13,900 ± 1220 mL, p = 0.037, respectively). Patients who continued empagliflozin had a lower total number of hypoglycaemic episodes (36 vs. 64, p < 0.001). No differences were observed in adverse events, length of hospital stay, or in-hospital deaths. For patients with acute heart failure, an in-hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen that includes continuation of empagliflozin achieved effective glycaemic control, lower NT-proBNP, and greater urine output. It was also safer, as it reduced hypoglycaemic episodes without increasing other safety endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To jointly assess the safety and effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiorenal outcomes and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis, systematically searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases up to September 2020. Primary outcomes were composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality and a composite renal outcome. We performed a random effects network meta-analysis estimating the pooled hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio and number needed to treat (NNT). Six trials evaluating empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which comprised 46,969 patients, mostly with established CVD. Pooled estimates (95% CI) of benefits of SGLT2i in terms of HR and NNT were as follows: for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (0.75, 0.97) and 58 (28, 368); for MACE, 0.91 (0.85, 0.97) and 81 (44, 271); for hospitalization for heart failure, 0.70 (0.62, 0.78) and 32 (20, 55); and for composite renal outcome, 0.61 (0.50, 0.74) and 20 (11, 44). Pooled estimates for serious adverse events were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89, 0.95). In patients with T2DM at cardiovascular risk, ertugliflozin is a less potent drug than empagliflozin, canagliflozin or dapagliflozin to prevent cardiorenal events and all-cause mortality. In addition, our data endorse that empagliflozin is the best treatment option among SGLT2i for this type of patient, but the evidence is not consistent enough. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin belong to a class of antidiabetic treatments referred to as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors, or SGLT2is). SGLT2is are currently indicated in North America and in Europe in type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease, high CV risk, heart failure, or renal disease. In Europe, dapagliflozin is also approved as an adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. New data provide evidence for benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease, including in patients without diabetes. The use of SGLT2is is expected to increase, suggesting that a growing number of patients will present to the emergency departments with these drugs. Most common adverse events are easily treatable, including mild genitourinary infections and conditions related to volume depletion. However, attention must be paid to some potentially serious adverse events, such as hypoglycemia (when combined with insulin or insulin secretagogues), lower limb ischemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis. We provide an up-to-date practical guide highlighting important elements on the adverse effects of SGLT2is and their handling in some frequently encountered clinical situations such as acute heart failure and decompensated diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors with regard to metabolic parameters and patient safety under routine ambulatory conditions. Retrospective longitudinal study of 95 patients with type 2 diabetes (diabetes duration 13.3 y; HbA1c 8.9%; eGFR 80.1 mL/min) receiving SGLT-2-inhibitors. Metabolic control and adverse event profile were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 1.2 ± 0.8 years. The following changes were observed: HbA1c −1.0% ± 1.9 (p < 0.001), eGFR −7.0 mL/min ± 13.3 (p < 0.001), albuminuria −23.9 mg/g creatinine ± 144.5 (p = 0.118), bodyweight −3.0 kg ± 5.8 (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure −6 mmHg ± 22 (p = 0.01), diastolic blood pressure −2 mmHg ± 14 (p = 0.243). 53 participants continuously applied the therapy. Twenty-eight participants discontinued SGLT-2-inhibitors due to various reasons: 20 participants because of genital- or urinary tract infections. One for dysuria, seven due to reduced eGFR below 45 mL/min. This study showed a considerable reduction of HbA1c and a modest reduction of eGFR, bodyweight and systolic blood pressure under clinical routine conditions. Genital infections occurred markedly more often than in randomized controlled trials. To apply SGLT-2-inhibitors more safely in clinical routine individual risks for genital and urinary tract infections should be considered and re-evaluated during therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heart failure (HF) is one of the mayor contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated to reduce the risk of hospitalization for HF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). We aimed to assess the risk for re-hospitalization in a cohort of patients hospitalized for HF according to whether or not they received canagliflozin at discharge, as well as changes in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) concentration during follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study at a tertiary centre including 102 consecutive T2D patients discharged for acute HF without contraindication for SGLT2 inhibitors. We compared adverse clinical events (HF rehospitalization and cardiovascular death) and NT-ProBNP changes according to canagliflozin prescription at discharge. Results: Among the 102 patients included, 45 patients (44.1%) were prescribed canagliflozin and the remaining 57 (55.9%) were not prescribed any SGLT2 inhibitors (control group). After a median follow-up of 22 months, 45 patients (44.1%) were hospitalized for HF. Most of the rehospitalizations occurred during the first year (37.3%). HF readmission at first year occurred in 10 patients (22.2%) in the canagliflozin group and 29 patients (49.1%) in the control group (hazard ratio (HR): 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21–0.96; p < 0.039). A composite outcome of hospitalization for HF or death from cardiovascular causes was lower in the canagliflozin group (37.8%) than in the control group (70.2%) (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27–0.95; p < 0.035). Analysis of NT-ProBNP concentration showed an interaction between canagliflozin therapy and follow-up time (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Canagliflozin therapy at discharge was associated with a lower risk of readmission for HF and a reduction in NT-ProBNP concentration in patients with diabetes after hospitalization for HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]