Search

Introduction: In the last few years, short metaphyseal-socket prosthetic humeral stems have been introduced for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A short stem may have advantages in humeral force distribution, reducing shear stress and preserving bone stock, keeping in mind the need for possible future revision surgery. The main objective of our study was to validate the use of a short stem prosthesis in the surgical treatment of humeral fractures by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes of our studied implant with those obtained with the use of traditional long-stem implants. Methods: In this multicentric, controlled prospective study, 125 patients with proximal three- or four-fragment humerus fractures were selected and treated with RSA. A short stem was used in group A (n = 53, mean age: 75.6 ± 5.6 years old), and a long stem was used in group B (n = 72, mean age: 71.76 ± 3). Active range of motion (ROM), Constant score (CS), Quick DASH, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were collected and analyzed at 2 years mean follow-up, as well as humeral and glenoid bone resorption (sum Inoue scores and Sirveaux scores were used). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between group A and B in ROM, Constant score (51.69 ± 15.8 vs. 53.46 ± 15.96, p > 0.05), Quick DASH (31.5 ± 21.81 vs. 28.79 ± 13.72, p = 0.85), ASES (82.53 ± 17.79 vs. 84.34 ± 15.24, p = 0.57), or the VAS (0.53 ± 1 vs. 0.56 ± 1.07, p = 0.14) at the final follow-up. No statistically significant differences were found in the radiographic parameters between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were found for the average degree of humeral and glenoid bone resorption either. Conclusions: The use of a short metaphyseal-socket stem can be considered a safe, effective, and feasible option in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treating proximal humerus fractures. Our results are encouraging, with no statistically significant differences identified between the proposed treatment and traditional long stems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thanks to modern surgical techniques and implants, traditional exclusion criteria for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are no longer considered contraindications. The aim of this study is to clarify the impact of obesity on functional outcomes and revision rates of UKA. We performed a comprehensive systematic review using PubMed–Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central. Then, we extracted data related to body mass index (BMI), age and follow-up, functional outcome scores and rate of revisions (all-cause, aseptic and septic). Patients were stratified according to BMI into two groups: non-obese (BMI < 30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30). We identified 22 eligible studies, of which 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with a BMI > 30 had a significantly higher likelihood for revision (p = 0.02), while the risk of septic revision was similar (p = 0.79). The clinical outcome measures showed a significant difference in favor of patients with a BMI < 30 (p < 0.0001). The improvements in Oxford Knee Score and Knee Society Score were significant in both obese and non-obese patients, although the latter showed inferior results. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that BMI is not a contraindication to UKA. However, obese patients have a higher risk for aseptic failure and lower improvement in clinical scores compared to non-obese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events and clinical outcomes of geriatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF) involving the anatomical neck (type C according to AO classification) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using locking plate vs. arthroplasty. In this retrospective cohort study, geriatric patients (>64 years) who underwent operative treatment using ORIF or arthroplasty for type C PHFs were included. Complications, revisions and clinical outcomes using Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score were assessed and compared between groups. At a mean follow up of 2.7 ± 1.7 years, 59 patients (mean age 75.3 ± 5.5 years) were included. In 31 patients ORIF was performed and 29 patients underwent arthroplasty. Complications and revision surgeries were significantly more frequent after ORIF (32.6% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.023 and 29.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.045). In contrast, clinical outcomes showed no significant differences (DASH 39.9 ± 25.7 vs. 39.25 ± 24.5, p = 0.922; CMS 49.7 ± 29.2 vs. 49.4 ± 25.2, p = 0.731). ORIF of type C PHFs in geriatric patients results in significantly more complications and revision surgery when compared to arthroplasty. Therefore, osteosynthesis of geriatric intraarticular fractures of the proximal humerus must be critically evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the frequency of arthroscopic revision surgery is increasing in patients with recurrent dislocation after a primary shoulder stabilization, the literature describing arthroscopic revision Bankart repair has been limited. Preferred reporting items for systematic meta-analyses guidelines were followed by utilizing PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Keywords included shoulder dislocation, anterior shoulder instability, revision surgery, stabilization, and arthroscopic Bankart repair. Quality assessments were performed with criteria from the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS). A total of 14 articles were included in this analysis. The mean MINORS score was 12.43. A total of 339 shoulders (337 patients) were included (281 males and 56 females). The mean follow-up period was 36.7 months. Primary surgeries were as follows: arthroscopic procedures (n = 172, 50.7%), open procedure (n = 87, 25.7%), and unknown (n = 80, 23.6%). The mean rate of recurrent instability after revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was 15.3% (n = 52), and an additional re-revision procedure was needed in 6.5% of cases (n = 22). Overall, there were 18.0% (n = 61) of complications reported. This systematic review suggests that arthroscopic revision Bankart repair can lead to an improvement in functional outcomes and reasonable patient satisfaction with proper patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite increasing numbers of primary hip arthroplasties performed through the direct anterior approach (DAA), there is a lack of literature on DAA revision arthroplasty. The present study was performed in order to evaluate outcomes and revision rates after revision through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed prospectively collected data of 57 patients (61 hips, 43 female, 18 male) who underwent aseptic acetabular component revision through the DAA with the abovementioned implant system between January 2015 and December 2017. The mean follow-up was 40 months (12–56). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. All complications were documented and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed an estimated five-year implant survival of 97% (confidence interval CI 87–99%). The estimated five-year survival with revision for any cause was 93% (CI 83–98%). The overall revision rate was 6.6% (n = 4). Two patients had to undergo revision due to periprosthetic infection (3.3%). In one patient, the acetabular component was revised due to aseptic loosening four months postoperatively. Another patient suffered from postoperative iliopsoas impingement and was treated successfully by arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy. Two (3.3%) of the revised hips dislocated postoperatively. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 35 (2–66) preoperatively to 86 (38–100) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The hip joint's anatomical center of rotation was restored at a high degree of accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that acetabular revision arthroplasty through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation is safe and practicable, resulting in good radiographic and clinical midterm results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lung cancer misdiagnosed as tuberculosis (TB) is not rare, but the factors associated with early diagnosis revision remain unclear. Methods: We screened the cases with TB notification from 2007 to 2018 and reviewed those with misdiagnosis with a revised diagnosis to lung cancer. We analyzed the factors associated with early diagnosis revision (≤1 months) and early obtained pathology (≤1 months) using multivariable Cox regression. Results: During the study period, 45 (0.7%) of 6683 patients were initially notified as having TB, but later diagnosed with lung cancer. The reasons for the original impression of TB were mostly due to image suspicion (51%) and positive sputum acid-fast stain (AFS) (27%). Using multivariable Cox proportional regression, early diagnosis revision was associated with obtaining the pathology early, lack of anti-TB treatment, and negative sputum AFS. Furthermore, the predictors for early obtained pathology included large lesion size (>3 cm), presence of a miliary radiological pattern, no anti-TB treatment, and a culture-negative result when testing for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) using multivariable Cox regression. Conclusion: In patients who are suspected to have TB but no mycobacterial evidence is present, lung cancer should be kept in mind and pathology needs to be obtained early, especially for those with small lesions, radiological findings other than the miliary pattern, and a culture positive for NTM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]