1. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis
- Author
-
Salvatore De Rosa, Sabato Sorrentino, Alberto Polimeni, Annalisa Mongiardo, Carmen Spaccarotella, Ciro Indolfi, Jolanda Sabatino, Polimeni, A., Sorrentino, S., De Rosa, S., Spaccarotella, C., Mongiardo, A., Sabatino, J., and Indolfi, C.
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Aortic stenosi ,medicine.medical_treatment ,lcsh:Medicine ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,TAVR ,Lower risk ,STS ,Article ,law.invention ,TAVI ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Aortic valve replacement ,Randomized controlled trial ,Valve replacement ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Stroke ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,low risk ,aortic stenosis ,Atrial fibrillation ,General Medicine ,SAVR ,medicine.disease ,Stenosis ,Relative risk ,Cardiology ,Aortic stenosis ,Low risk ,business - Abstract
Recently, two randomized trials, the PARTNER 3 and the Evolut Low Risk Trial, independently demonstrated that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is non-inferior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients at low surgical risk, paving the way to a progressive extension of clinical indications to TAVR. We designed a meta-analysis to compare TAVR versus SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019131125). Randomized studies comparing one-year outcomes of TAVR or SAVR were searched for within Medline, Scholar and Scopus electronic databases. A total of three randomized studies were selected, including nearly 3000 patients. After one year, the risk of cardiovascular death was significantly lower with TAVR compared to SAVR (Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.56, 95% CI 0.33&ndash, 0.95, p = 0.03). Conversely, no differences were observed between the groups for one-year all-cause mortality (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.42&ndash, 1.07, p = 0.10). Among the secondary endpoints, patients undergoing TAVR have lower risk of new-onset of atrial fibrillation compared to SAVR (RR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.17&ndash, 0.39, p <, 0.00001), major bleeding (RR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.14&ndash, 0.65, 0.002) and acute kidney injury stage II or III (RR = 0.28, 0.58, p = 0.0005). Conversely, TAVR was associated to a higher risk of aortic regurgitation (RR = 3.96, 95% CI 1.31&ndash, 11.99, p = 0.01) and permanent pacemaker implantation (RR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.33&ndash, 9.07, p = 0.01) compared to SAVR. No differences were observed between the groups in the risks of stroke (RR= 0.71, 95% CI 0.41&ndash, 1.25, p = 0.24), transient ischemic attack (TIA, RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.53&ndash, 1.83, p = 0.96), and MI (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.43&ndash, 1.29, p = 0.29). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis, including three randomized studies and nearly 3000 patients with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk, shows that TAVR is associated with lower CV death compared to SAVR at one-year follow-up. Nevertheless, paravalvular aortic regurgitation and pacemaker implantation still represent two weak spots that should be solved.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF