Search

Rapid and accurate point-of-care (POC) tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics are crucial to bridge the TB diagnostic gap. Leveraging recent advancements in COVID-19 diagnostics, we explored adapting commercially available POC SARS-CoV-2 tests for TB diagnosis in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) target product profiles (TPPs). A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines to systematically map POC antigen and molecular SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests potentially meeting the TPPs for TB diagnostic tests for peripheral settings. Data were gathered from PubMed/MEDLINE, bioRxiv, medRxiv, publicly accessible in vitro diagnostic test databases, and developer websites up to 23 November 2022. Data on developer attributes, operational characteristics, pricing, clinical performance, and regulatory status were charted using standardized data extraction forms and evaluated with a standardized scorecard. A narrative synthesis of the data is presented. Our search yielded 2003 reports, with 408 meeting eligibility criteria. Among these, we identified 66 commercialized devices: 22 near-POC antigen tests, 1 POC molecular test, 31 near-POC molecular tests, and 12 low-complexity molecular tests potentially adaptable for TB. The highest-scoring SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests were the near-POC antigen platform LumiraDx (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), the POC molecular test Lucira Check-It (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA), the near-POC molecular test Visby (Visby, San Jose, CA, USA), and the low-complexity molecular platform Idylla (Biocartis, Lausanne, Switzerland). We highlight a diverse landscape of commercially available diagnostic tests suitable for potential adaptation to peripheral TB testing. This work aims to bolster global TB initiatives by fostering stakeholder collaboration, leveraging SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic technologies for TB, and uncovering new commercial avenues to tackle longstanding challenges in TB diagnosis.

Background/Objectives: Individuals with post-COVID-19 conditions risk developing short- and/or long-term neuromuscular impairments, including postural imbalance. However, there is limited evidence showing whether balance deficits are associated with declines in the functional status in post-COVID-19 individuals. This study examined postural balance in non-hospitalized post-COVID-19 individuals using different assessment tools and tested the most relevant balance tools in predicting functional status. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 60 adults split into control (n = 30) and post-COVID-19 (n = 30) groups. Postural balance was assessed in both groups using the Functional Reach Test (FRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Tinetti Balance Test (Tinetti), and Mini-BESTest (MBT). Functional status in the post-COVID-19 group was assessed using post-COVID-19 functional status (PCFS). Results: Significant differences in postural stability between groups were found only for the FRT. All balance tests showed a statistically significant correlation with PCFS in the post-COVID-19 group, with better performance in all tests being associated with better functional status: Tinetti (r = −0.584), FRT (r = −0.542), MBT (r = −0.530), BBS (r = −0.415) and TUG (r = 0.368). Tinetti was the independent variable that significantly played an important role in determining PCFS (adjusted R2 = 0.318, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Post-COVID-19 functional status is best determined by the Tinetti Balance Test, making it an effective tool for assessing postural balance deficits in this population, with potential implications for postural control assessment and rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early risk stratification tools for COVID-19 patients have been indicated yet there are few data about their ability to effectively detect clinical deterioration among COVID-19 patients. Objectives: To evaluate the NEWS-2 to predict severe morbidity and mortality for COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study among adult COVID-19 patients with a confirmed diagnosis who were admitted to the inpatient units at COVID-19 Martyrs Medical Military Complex Hospital, from 1 March 2022, until 29 February 2023. NEWS-2 scores were measured at admission and 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after their admission to the hospital using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Overall, 192 adult COVID-19 patients aged 25–94 years (mean = 62.1, SD = 13.9) were enrolled. Of those, 49.0% were males, 47.4% were vaccinated, and 53.6% had diabetes. The 192 enrolled patients were classified into NEWS-2 score categories, with almost 13% (12.5%) falling into the high-risk category already upon admission. The mean NEWS-2 scores were excellent predictors of mechanical ventilation, admission to the ICU, and mortality, as indicated by an AUROC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–1.00, p < 0.001), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.96, p < 0.001), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00, p < 0.001), respectively. Significant differences in mean NEWS-2 scores were found between the participating patients, both with and without comorbidity in the course of the patient's stay in the ICU, and mortality (p = 0.004, p = 0.043, respectively). Positive correlations of the high NEWS-2 scores were revealed using a multiple linear regression model, indicating the necessity of administering non-invasive ventilatory assistance (p = 0.013), hospitalization for a minimum of six days (p = 0.013), and admission to the ICU (p = 0.006). Nonetheless, there was a negative association between mortality and the NEWS-2 score (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The NEWS-2 had moderate sensitivity and specificity in predicting the deterioration of patients with COVID-19 whereas there was high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the mortality for patients with COVID-19, both with and without comorbidity. Our findings support the utility of NEWS-2 monitoring as a sensitive approach for initially assessing COVID-19 patients. It could be helpful to enhance the accuracy of predictive performance by supplementing the score parameters by adding biological parameters in addition to clinical judgment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although a fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was shown to be effective, the immunogenicity of a fifth dose in immunocompetent individuals had not been well described. This was a prospective observational cohort study of previously vaccinated healthcare workers at a single tertiary hospital in Israel. Individuals were administered up to three booster doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (i.e., up to five overall doses), during the period between July 2021 and January 2023. Immunogenicity was assessed using the SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) semi-quantitative assay, performed at several time points. The cohort consisted of 162 individuals (median age 69 years, 62% female). Of these, 104 (64%) received four doses and 58 (36%) received five doses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels increased in all cases, regardless of the baseline levels. The fold-change increase in the mean sCOVG index was 29.2 (SD 2.6) after the third vaccine, 3.8 (SD 2.4) after the fourth vaccine, and 3.6 (SD 3.0) after the fifth vaccine. A waning effect over time was seen in 78% and 43% of participants for the third and fourth doses, respectively. Adverse events following the fifth dose were limited and mild. Similar to previous booster vaccines, a fifth dose of BNT162b2 is immunogenic and safe in healthy individuals, although the clinical implications remain unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which is essential in AMI management, combines aspirin with a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. This study compared the effectiveness of potent P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in AMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: 65,986 AMI patients included in a nationwide prospective registry who underwent PCI and received DAPT were studied. In total, 9,014 patients received potent P2Y12 inhibitors, and 56,074 received clopidogrel. This study focused on mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over seven years. The analysis utilized unadjusted models and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare prognosis, and decision curve analyses were constructed to aid clinical decision making. Results: Potent P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced mortality risk (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.58; IPTW HR: 0.68) and MACE (unadjusted HR: 0.66; IPTW HR: 0.78). Diabetic patients showed greater benefits (HR:0.45). In patients at high bleeding risk, the mortality rate was 13% (HR: 0.87, p = 0.08). For patients aged 75–79, the HR for mortality was 0.82, whereas for those aged >80 years, it was 0.79, indicating significant mortality risk reduction. Similar trends were observed for MACE. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that potent P2Y12 inhibitors are more effective than clopidogrel in reducing mortality and MACE in patients with AMI and underscored their potential role in improving outcomes across diverse patient subgroups. The trend was consistent even during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings highlight the need for personalized DAPT strategies, particularly for high-bleeding-risk patients, and challenge current guidelines favoring clopidogrel use in older patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The influence of comorbidity on long-term hospitalization and mortality after COVID-19 in adults (40–59 years) and older adults (≥60 years) is yet to be explored. Methods: This is a Danish population-based cohort study of patients with a first-time positive PCR test for COVID-19 from 1 March 2020, to 28 February 2022 (N = 1,034,103). Exposed cohorts were patients with 1) a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score of 1–2 and 2) a CCI score ≥3, who were compared to patients without comorbidity (CCI of zero) within the groups of adults (67.9%) and older adults (32.1%) for the risk of hospitalization and mortality. Next, within the age groups, each disease category of the CCI was considered as an exposed cohort and compared to patients who did not have the specific disease of interest. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for hospitalization and mortality were estimated by Cox regression models adjusted for confounders. Results: The highest HRs were in adult patients with a CCI score of ≥3. The adjusted HR was 4.54 (95%CI: 4.38–4.70) for hospitalization, and among older adults it was 3.05 (95%CI: 2.99–3.11). The adjusted HR for mortality among adults with a CCI score ≥3 was 21.04 (95%CI: 18.86–23.47), and the adjusted HR for mortality among older adults was 4.61 (95%CI: 4.44–4.78). The underlying disease influenced the risk estimates among adults and older adults, and "dementia" had the highest impact on mortality. Conclusion: A CCI score of 1 or above increases the risk of hospitalization and mortality up to 2 years after a positive PCR test of COVID-19 for adults and older adults. Further, the type of underlying disease in older adults highly influences the risk of hospitalization and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant attention to the respiratory system, with much focus on lung-related disorders. However, the diaphragm, a crucial component of respiratory physiology, has not been adequately studied, especially in the context of long COVID. This review explores the multipotential role of the diaphragm in both respiratory health and disease, emphasizing its involvement in long-term complications following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The diaphragm's fundamental role in respiratory physiology and its impact on balance and posture control, breathing patterns, and autonomic nervous system regulation are discussed. This review examines complications arising from COVID-19, highlighting the diaphragm's involvement in neurological, musculoskeletal, and inflammatory responses. Particular attention is given to the neuroinvasive impact of SARS-CoV-2, the inflammatory response, and the direct viral effects on the diaphragm. The diaphragm's role in long COVID is explored, with a focus on specific symptoms such as voice disorders, pelvic floor dysfunction, and sleep disturbances. Diagnostic challenges, current methods for assessing diaphragmatic dysfunction, and the complexities of differentiating it from other conditions are also explored. This article is the first to comprehensively address diaphragmatic dysfunction resulting from COVID-19 and long COVID across various physiological and pathological aspects, offering a new perspective on its diagnosis and treatment within a multisystem context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected young adults' lives globally, including those in Germany. This study investigated mental health and quality of life during the pandemic, with a particular focus on mood. Immune fitness, the body's capacity to respond to health challenges (such as infections) by activating an appropriate immune response, was assessed as a physical health indicator. Methods: Data were collected from 317 participants, aged 18 to 35, via an online survey conducted between November 2021 and March 2022. Participants included 103 men (32.5%) and 214 women (67.5%), with a mean age of 25.5 years (SD = 4.1). Results: Compared to pre-pandemic levels, significant declines in mood, quality of life, immune fitness, and sleep quality were observed during the lockdown periods of the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.0125). The most pronounced effects were observed during the second lockdown, with declines extending into the second no-lockdown period for fatigue, depression, happiness, optimism, and immune fitness (p < 0.0125). Significant sex differences were found for the magnitude of mood effects (anxiety, depression, stress). No significant differences were found according to age or occupational status (student vs. work). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown periods had a significant negative effect on the mood, immune fitness, and well-being of young adults living in Germany. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We have previously demonstrated that high-risk obstructive sleep apnea (HR-OSA), based on a modified Berlin Questionnaire (mBQ), is linked to worse clinical outcomes. Chest computed tomography (CT) imaging with the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis program has been a valuable tool for the speedy assessment of huge numbers of patients during the COVID-19 epidemic. In the current study, we addressed how the severity of AI-guided, CT-based total opacity ratio (TOR) scores are associated with high-risk OSA and short-term outcomes in the same cohort. Methods: The ratio of the volume of high opacity areas to that of the total lung volume constituted the TOR. We arbitrarily applied thresholds of <5 (no or mild TOR), ≥5 and <15 (moderate TOR), and ≥15 (severe TOR). Results: In total, 221 patients were included. HR-OSA was observed among 11.0% of the no or mild TOR group, 22.2% of the moderate TOR group, and 38.7% of the severe TOR group (p < 0.001). In a logistic regression analysis, HR-OSA was associated with a severe TOR with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–7.44; p = 0.01). A moderate TOR predicted clinical worsening with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.93 (95% CI 1.00–3.72; p = 0.05) and a severe TOR predicted worsening with an HR of 3.06 (95% CI 1.56–5.99; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our results offer additional radiological proof of the relationship between HR-OSA and worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. A TOR may also potentially indicate the individuals that are at higher risk of HR-OSA, enabling early intervention and management strategies. The clinical significance of TOR thresholds needs further evaluation in larger samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Severe clinical course and mortality from COVID-19 are mostly associated with increased concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10. Findings from clinical trials suggest that both statins and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI) might have the potential to reduce unfavorable outcomes in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of statins and RAASI on the cytokine concentrations in COVID-19 patients. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were enrolled in this study, and demographic, clinical, and routine laboratory data were evaluated. Plasma cytokine levels were measured by multiplex assay. Results: COVID-19 patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) had significantly lower median plasma IL-6 levels than COVID-19 patients with no co-morbidities (26 vs. 53 pg/mL, p = 0.021). COVID-19 patients with CVD who were taking statins had significantly lower median concentrations of IL-6 (21 vs. 44 pg/mL, p = 0.027), TNFα (21 vs. 39.5 pg/mL, p = 0.036), and IL-10 (19 vs. 25.5 pg/mL, p = 0.025) compared to COVID-19 patients with no CVD. In a binary logistic regression model, IL-6 was a significant variable, with an odds ratio value of 0.961 (95% CI 0.929–0.995). Regarding RAASI, only plasma IL-6 (22 vs. 44 pg/mL, p = 0.012) levels were found to be significantly lower in COVID-19 patients with CVD consuming these medications compared to patients who did not have any CVD. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who had chronic cardiovascular co-morbidities and who were administered statins or RAASI had significantly lower concentrations of IL-6 than COVID-19 patients who did not have any co-morbidities. These findings suggest that the use of statins or RAASI may be of value in COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: This retrospective study analyzed soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) plasma levels alongside routine inflammatory markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and D-dimers in COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the Omicron wave of the pandemic. Methods: We measured plasma suPAR levels using a suPARnostic® Quick Triage kit. We divided COVID-19 patients into two groups based on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria. The logistic regression analysis tested the predictive value of the biomarkers. Results: We evaluated 160 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized between January and August 2022. The cohort exhibited a high incidence of comorbidities, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 5.6%. Upon admission, the median suPAR plasma levels were not significantly different between patients with mild COVID-19 (n = 110) and those with moderate/severe disease (n = 50), with 7.25 ng/mL and 7.55 ng/mL, respectively. We observed significant differences (p < 0.01) between the groups for CRP and IL-6 levels that were higher in moderate/severe disease than in mild infection. Additionally, suPAR plasma levels were above the normal range (0–2.00 ng/mL) in all patients, with a significant positive correlation identified between suPAR levels and serum IL-6, PCT, and creatinine levels. Conclusions: These findings indicate that COVID-19 during the Omicron wave is strongly associated with elevated suPAR levels; however, these levels do not directly correlate with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increased fear of infection, social isolation, financial concerns, and feelings of loneliness and uncertainty. Studies reveal that the pandemic has had a significant negative impact on mental health. This systematic review aimed to investigate the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among students in Croatia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed on August 5, 2024, using the electronic databases Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. The search utilized the Boolean logical operator expression ('depression' AND 'anxiety' AND 'stress' AND 'COVID-19' AND 'Croatia' AND 'student'). Results: Out of one hundred and fifty-four identified studies, five met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The studies used the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) to assess mental health. The results indicate a high prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among students in Croatia during the pandemic. Conclusion: A high prevalence of negative affective emotions was observed among students in Croatia during the pandemic. This finding underscores the importance of developing effective strategies for the early identification and management of mental disorders among students, irrespective of the pandemic's conclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and additional progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) techniques in patients with long-term COVID-19 symptoms. Methods: We included 61 patients with long COVID-19 symptoms and randomly assigned them to two groups: PR only (group 1 with 30 subjects) and PR with PMR (group 2 with 31 subjects). The PR program consisted of gradual aerobic conditioning, strength training, and breathing exercises. Group 2 received additional 20 min daily sessions of progressive muscle relaxation techniques. Results: Following a 21-day intervention, it was observed that both groups had noteworthy improvements in lung function, exercise capacity, and sleep quality with statistical significance (p < 0.0001). Group 2 showed significant improvements in overall health (as measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12), patient health (as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), general anxiety levels (as indicated by the Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale-7), and sleep quality (as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), with statistical significance (p < 0.0001), compared to group 1. Moreover, the statistical analysis demonstrated no significant difference in exercise capacity improvement between group 1 and group 2, as indicated by a p-value of 0.1711. Conclusions: The addition of progressive muscle relaxation to pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhances mental health outcomes, particularly in reducing anxiety and improving sleep quality, for patients with long-term COVID-19 symptoms. These findings suggest that incorporating PMR into PR programs offers a valuable non-pharmacological approach to improving overall patient well-being during long-term COVID-19 recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe COVID-19 can lead to a decline in pulmonary and physical functions simultaneously. Patients experiencing significant ambulatory dysfunction often face restrictions in participating in gait training, resulting in insufficient benefits from cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. This underscores the need for tailored rehabilitation approaches that address their specific conditions. Method: This study presents a case examining the impact of combining pulmonary rehabilitation with robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on pulmonary and physical functions in a patient with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. A 56-year-old male patient with severe COVID-19 pneumonia exhibited impaired pulmonary function, reduced lower extremity strength, compromised balance, and significant limitations in functional ambulation. He underwent an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program combined with RAGT for 5 weeks, participating in 30 min RAGT sessions a total of 22 times. The patient showed improvements in his pulmonary function, lower extremity strength, balance, exercise capacity, and functional mobility, along with a reduction in symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue. Conclusions: The combination of RAGT with pulmonary rehabilitation is a treatment method that can be applied without complications and has the potential to improve pulmonary and physical functions in patients with ambulatory dysfunction due to COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alexithymia, a predictor in chronic illnesses, like cardiovascular and bipolar disorder (CD–BD), could be improved with a virtual reality (VR) cognitive remediation program. This secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates alexithymia improvement and its factors in an experimental group versus a control group, exploring extensions to individuals with comorbid non-psychiatric chronic conditions. Methods: A feasibility cross-over RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070065) enrolled individuals aged 18–75 with mood disorders (BD, DSM-IV), excluding those with relapses, epilepsy, or severe eye conditions due to potential risks with VR. Alexithymia levels were measured using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale with 20 items (TAS-20). Results: The study included 39 individuals in the experimental group and 25 in the control group, with no significant age or sex differences observed. Significantly improved alexithymia scores were noted in the experimental group compared to controls (F = 111.9; p < 0.0001) and in subgroups with chronic non-psychiatric comorbidities (F = 4.293, p = 0.048). Scores were particularly improved for difficulty in identifying feelings (F = 92.42; p < 0.00001), communicating feelings (F = 61.34; p < 0.00001), and externally oriented thinking (F = 173.12; p < 0.00001). Conclusions: The findings highlight alexithymia enhancement in BD, even with comorbid non-psychiatric chronic diseases. Given its impact on BD progression and related conditions, like CD, developing and evaluating VR-based tools in this context is suggested by these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic caught healthcare systems in many countries unprepared. Shortages of personnel, medicines, disinfectants, and intensive care unit (ICU) capacities, combined with inadvertent use of antibiotics and emergence of drug-resistant secondary infections, led to a surge in COVID-19-related mortality. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of secondary bacterial infections and the associated antibiotic resistance in a temporary established ICU dedicated to COVID-19 patients. We also assessed the utility of clinical and routine laboratory data as predictors of secondary infections and mortality in these patients. Methods: We examined the medical records of 243 patients admitted to the COVID-19 Medical Support Unit of Târgu Mures, Romania, between 1 August 2020 and 31 January 2021. Results: Among the 243 patients admitted to the COVID-19 Medical Support Unit of Târgu Mures between 1 August 2020 and 31 January 2021, 59 (24.3%) presented secondary infections. Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequent isolates (31.1% and 18.9%, respectively), most of them multidrug resistant. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had a higher prevalence in patients who developed secondary infections (p = 0.012). Secondary infections were associated with longer stay in the ICU and with higher mortality (p = 0.006 and p = 0.038, respectively). Conclusions: Early identification of secondary infections and proper use of antibiotics are necessary to limit the spread of multidrug-resistant microorganisms in COVID-19 patients admitted in the ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause intubation and ventilatory support due to respiratory failure, and extubation failure increases mortality risk. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the feasibility of using specific biochemical and ventilator parameters to predict survival status among COVID-19 patients by using machine learning. Methods: This study included COVID-19 patients from Taipei Medical University-affiliated hospitals from May 2021 to May 2022. Sequential data on specific biochemical and ventilator parameters from days 0–2, 3–5, and 6–7 were analyzed to explore differences between the surviving (successfully weaned off the ventilator) and non-surviving groups. These data were further used to establish separate survival prediction models using random forest (RF). Results: The surviving group exhibited significantly lower mean C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and mean potential of hydrogen ions levels (pH) levels on days 0–2 compared to the non-surviving group (CRP: non-surviving group: 13.16 ± 5.15 ng/mL, surviving group: 10.23 ± 5.15 ng/mL; pH: non-surviving group: 7.32 ± 0.07, survival group: 7.37 ± 0.07). Regarding the survival prediction performanace, the RF model trained solely with data from days 0–2 outperformed models trained with data from days 3–5 and 6–7. Subsequently, CRP, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2), pH, and the arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio served as primary indicators in survival prediction in the day 0–2 model. Conclusions: The present developed models confirmed that early biochemical and ventilatory parameters—specifically, CRP levels, pH, PaCO2, and P/F ratio—were key predictors of survival for COVID-19 patients. Assessed during the initial two days, these indicators effectively predicted the likelihood of successful weaning of from ventilators, emphasizing their importance in early management and improved outcomes in COVID-19-related respiratory failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid and widespread vaccination efforts, which proved critical in reducing the severity and mortality of the virus. However, the interplay between vaccinations, pre-existing skin conditions, and other comorbidities still needs to be explored. This study investigated the occurrence and severity of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) with COVID-19 vaccines in individuals with chronic skin diseases and comorbidities within a Central European cohort. Methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted between May 2022 and February 2023, targeting students and employees of universities in Wrocław, Poland. A total of 513 respondents were analyzed, focusing on AEFIs following the first, second, and third doses of COVID-19 vaccines and the effects of COVID-19 on conditions such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, vitiligo, acne vulgaris, rosacea, and various comorbidities. Results: COVID-19 vaccination effectively protected against severe disease across all doses. The analysis revealed no significant impact of either COVID-19 infection or vaccination on the course of selected skin diseases and comorbidities. The reporting of AEFIs to the Sanitary Inspection was notably low. The Moderna and Pfizer mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher reported number of AEFIs, particularly after the second and third doses, compared to AstraZeneca, which exhibited fewer adverse events after subsequent doses. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination is both safe and effective, even in patients with pre-existing skin conditions and comorbidities. Vaccine selection may benefit from considering individual health profiles, and better reporting of AEFIs is needed to enhance vaccine safety monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The trophoblast is a significant source of vitamin D synthesis during pregnancy, with the literature suggesting its role in fetal growth. We aim to underline a possible mechanism that would explain negative fetal outcomes in COVID-19-positive mothers by examining the relationship between altered placental structure and function and throphoblast cells' vitamin D receptor levels. Methods: The study included 170 placental samples collected from women who gave birth at term without complications, divided into three groups: COVID-19-positive and unvaccinated, COVID-19-negative and vaccinated, and COVID-19-negative and unvaccinated, with exclusion criteria for any other medical complications. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression, and immediate fetal outcomes (weight and Apgar score) were assessed. Results: We found lower gestational age at birth, lower birth weight, and reduced placental VDR (vitamin D receptor) levels in COVID-19-positive women compared to COVID-19-vaccinated and COVID-19-negative women. Conclusions: The presence of the vitamin D receptor in the placenta is related to fetal and placental growth. Its deficiency may contribute to negative fetal outcomes in COVID-19-positive cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected the health of millions of people, both directly through infection and indirectly through delayed diagnosis and treatment of non-COVID-19 illnesses. The aim of this study was to check the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis in children. Methods: The study was carried out at the Department of Paediatric Surgery of the Marciniak Hospital (Wrocław, Poland) and covered two periods, the pre-pandemic one (P1, 01/03/2019–29/02/2020) and the pandemic one (P2, 01/03/2020–28/02/2021). Results: The number of admissions of patients with suspected appendicitis and observation-only patients decreased during the pandemic (400/289 and 226/160, respectively). Although the number of operated children was similar during both analyzed periods (P1: 174, P2: 160), the rate of surgical interventions was significantly higher during P2 (55.4%) than during P1 (43.5%) (χ2 test: p = 0.00272). The values of the variables quantifying disease progression and severity of inflammation, selected inflammation-related parameters detected by laboratory blood tests, latencies from the onset of symptoms to the admission and from the admission to the operation, and total duration of hospitalization did not differ significantly between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Conclusions: These results show that the COVID-19 pandemic led to more rigorous and careful triage of pediatric patients suspected of acute appendicitis that did not have a negative impact on patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nirmatrelvir–ritonavir was granted emergency use authorization in Israel in January 2022 to treat high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The aim of the study was to assess the association between nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment and COVID-19-related hospitalization and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in a country with a high level of vaccinations compared to patients who were offered treatment and declined. Methods: The Maccabi Healthcare Services dataset was used to identify high-risk SARS-CoV-2-positive adults from January to February 2022 who received nirmatrelvir–ritonavir within 5 days of symptom onset (treatment group) or who were offered nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment and declined it (reference group). COVID-19-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality and HCRU within 30 days were compared between treatment and reference groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Treatment and reference groups included 3460 (median age, 68.4 years) and 1654 (70.2 years) patients, respectively. Patients with ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine accounted for 89.5% (treatment group) and 72.1% (reference group) of the total. Treatment was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization (adjusted OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.41,0.83]). Results were similar by age group (18–64/≥65 years) and among patients with/without vaccination in the prior 180 days. There were 11 (0.3%) versus 11 (0.7%) deaths in the treatment and reference groups, respectively. Treated patients had lower inpatient HCRU and greater less intensive outpatient HCRU (e.g., telemedicine and emergency room visits). Conclusions: Nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and a shift to less intensive outpatient HCRU. Comparison with a reference group of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir-eligible patients who declined treatment enabled an unbiased outcome assessment. Real-world data gathered during the Omicron BA.1 variant wave of COVID-19 in Israel support the continued use of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir for high-risk adults of all ages, regardless of previous vaccinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in COVID-19 patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment, which has been insufficiently studied to date. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of HBV infection in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We performed HBV screening on all Romanian adults hospitalized in four COVID-19 wards between October 2021 and September 2022. We enrolled patients with positive hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) without protective hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), HBV treatment, or baseline immunosuppressive conditions, and we conducted a virological follow-up on these patients at 3 months. Results: We identified 333/835 (39.9%) anti-HBc-positive patients. Follow-up was performed for 13 patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and 19 HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients. Among those who received immunosuppressants, 4/23 (17.4%) patients experienced HBVr: 1 out of 8 (12.5%) HBsAg-positive patients (with 1.99 log increase in HBV DNA level) and 3 out of 15 (20%) HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients (with a de novo detectable HBV DNA level). Conclusions: Administration of COVID-19 immunosuppressants may result in a significant risk of HBVr in co-infected patients. We recommend performing an HBV triple screen panel (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc) for all COVID-19 patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment. HBV prophylaxis may be indicated in certain patients. Larger studies are needed in order to establish appropriate and cost-effective management for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was increased interest in the issue of thrombotic complications of acute respiratory infections. Clinical reports and pathological studies have revealed that thrombus formation in COVID-19 may involve the venous and arterial vasculature. As thrombotic complications of infectious respiratory diseases are increasingly considered in the context of COVID-19, the fact that thrombosis in lung diseases of viral and bacterial etiology was described long before the pandemic is overlooked. Pre-pandemic studies show that bacterial and viral respiratory infections are associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications such as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, and other critical illnesses caused by arterial and venous thrombosis. This narrative review article aims to summarize the current evidence regarding thrombotic complications and their pathogenesis in acute lower respiratory tract infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the long-term cardiovascular effects of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in elite male athletes by comparing the heart rate variability (HRV), arterial stiffness, and other cardiovascular parameters between those with and without prior COVID-19 infection. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 120 elite male athletes (60 post COVID-19, 60 controls) using anthropometric measurements, body composition analysis, pulmonary function tests, HRV analysis, arterial stiffness assessments, hemodynamic monitoring, and microcirculatory function tests. Results: Athletes post COVID-19 showed significantly higher lean mass (p = 0.007), forced vital capacity (p = 0.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (p = 0.007) than controls. HRV parameters did not significantly differ between the groups. Post-COVID-19 athletes exhibited peripheral vascular resistance (p = 0.048) and reflection index (p = 0.038). No significant differences were observed in the blood pressure, cardiac output, oxygen saturation, or microcirculatory oxygen absorption. Conclusions: Elite male athletes showed notable cardiovascular resilience after COVID-19, with only minor differences in vascular function. The maintained cardiac autonomic function and improved lung parameters in post-COVID-19 athletes suggests an adaptive response. These findings support the cardiovascular health of elite athletes following COVID-19 but emphasize the importance of continued monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines defined priority groups to guide the prioritization of surgery for urological malignancies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 prioritization recommendations on tumor pathological characteristics in a real-world setting at our academic referral institution. Methods: We compared baseline and pathological tumor features of all patients with urological malignancies treated during the pandemic period (2020–2021) versus in the post-pandemic period (2022–2023). Our institution adhered to the international recommendations and prioritized those cases defined as "high-risk". Results: Data from 9196 patients treated for urological malignancies were reviewed and grouped according to period of surgery (4401 in the pandemic period vs. 4785 in the post-pandemic period). The overall number of surgical procedures was comparable for all diseases except for the number of radical prostatectomies (1117 vs. 1405; p = 0.03) and partial nephrectomies (609 vs. 759; p = 0.02), which were significantly lower in the pandemic period. Regarding tumor pathological features, none of the recorded variables were found to differ according to period of surgery, including disease stage, tumor grading, presence of necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, and histological variants. Conclusions: A correct policy of prioritization of oncological pathologies during emergency periods and a centralization of oncological cases in reference centers reduce the possible risk of worsening cancer disease features related to the reorganization of healthcare resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Early identification of complications in chronic and infectious diseases can reduce clinical deterioration, lead to early therapeutic interventions and lower morbidity and mortality rates. Here, we aimed to assess the feasibility of a novel clinical decision support system (CDSS) based on the automatic generation of alerts through remote patient monitoring and to identify the patient profile associated with the likelihood of severe medical alerts. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with COVID-19 in home isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either conventional primary care telephone follow-up plus access to a mobile app for self-reporting of symptoms (control group) or conventional primary care telephone follow-up plus access to the mobile app for self-reporting of symptoms and wearable devices for real-time telemonitoring of vital signs (case group). Results: A total of 342 patients were randomized, of whom 247 were included in the per-protocol analysis (103 cases and 144 controls). The case group received a more exhaustive follow-up, with a higher number of alerts (61,827 vs. 1825; p < 0.05) but without overloading healthcare professionals thanks to automatic alert management through artificial intelligence. Baseline factors independently associated with the likelihood of a severe alert were having asthma (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.22–2.48, p = 0.002) and taking corticosteroids (OR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.24–4.2, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The CDSS could be successfully implemented and enabled real-time telemonitoring of patients' clinical status, providing valuable information to physicians and public health agencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges, particularly for individuals residing in psychiatric facilities. This study aims to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on psychiatric patients, focusing on factors such as their vaccination status, comorbidities, medication regimens, and biomarkers like C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 100 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections admitted to the private psychiatric clinic "Asclepius of Upper Volos" from March 2020 to March 2023. The data collected included sociodemographic characteristics, vaccination status, symptom severity, medication regimens, and levels of CRP and ferritin. Statistical analyses using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29 included Pearson's chi-square tests, Student's t-tests, and a survival time analysis via the log-rank test to assess associations between clinical characteristics and outcomes. Results: Among the participants, 64% were female and 74% received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The majority experienced mild symptoms, with a survival rate of 74%. Statistically significant findings include a higher survival rate among vaccinated individuals (98.6%) versus unvaccinated individuals (1.4%, p < 0.001). Comorbidities like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease, and renal failure were associated with severe symptoms and higher mortality rates. Higher ferritin levels were significantly associated with poorer outcomes, with survivors having a mean ferritin level of 246.2 (SD = 150.3) compared to the 416.9 (SD = 215.9) seen in non-survivors (p < 0.001). Similarly, mean CRP levels were lower in survivors (1.58, SD = 1.96) than in non-survivors (3.46, SD = 2.92), with a p-value of 0.002. Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of tailored health protocols and continued support for this vulnerable population. Enhanced strategies for managing comorbidities and utilizing biomarkers can aid in better predicting and improving psychiatric patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are often considered separate clinico-radiological entities. Whether these conditions also present a single process-specific systemic biomolecular phenotype and how this relates to patient outcomes remains unknown. A prospective cohort study was conducted, including adult patients admitted to the ICU and general floors for COVID-19-related (COVID+) or non-COVID-19-related (COVID−) acute respiratory failure during the main phase of the pandemic. The primary objective was to study blood biomarkers and outcomes among different groups and severity subsets. Results: A total of 132 patients were included, as follows: 67 COVID+, 54 COVID− (with 11 matched control subjects for biomarker reference), and 58 of these patients allowed for further pre- and post-analysis. The baseline apelin (APL) levels were higher in COVID+ patients (p < 0.0001 vs. COVID− patients) and in SARS COVID+ patients (p ≤ 0.02 vs. ARDS), while the IL-6 levels were higher in ARDS COVID− patients (p ≤ 0.0001 vs. SARS). Multivariable logistic regression analyses with cohort biomarkers and outcome parameters revealed the following: (i) log-transformed neprilysin (NEP) activity was significantly higher in COVID+ patients (1.11 [95% CI: 0.4–1.9] vs. 0.37 [95% CI: 0.1–0.8], fold change (FC): 1.43 [95% CI: 1.04–1.97], p = 0.029) and in SARS patients (FC: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.05–2.6], p = 0.032 vs. non-SARS COVID+ patients, and 1.73 [95% CI: 1.19–2.5], p = 0.005 vs. ARDS COVID− patients) and (ii) higher lysyl oxidase (LOX) activity and APL levels were respectively associated with death and a shorter length of hospital stay in SARS COVID+ patients (Odds Ratios (OR): 1.01 [1.00–1.02], p = 0.05, and OR: −0.007 [−0.013–0.0001], p = 0.048). Conclusion: Process-specific blood biomarkers exhibited distinct profiles between COVID+ and COVID− patients, and across stages of severity. NEP and LOX activities, as well as APL levels, are particularly linked to COVID+ patients and their outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04632732). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The World Health Organization recommends extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a therapeutic option for the most critical cases of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, data on universally agreed-upon risk factors that contribute to ECMO weaning failure and mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO are limited. This lack of consensus leads to significant uncertainties in developing effective management strategies for these patients. We aimed to identify the factors associated with early outcomes after ECMO support in patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome, specifically the success rate of ECMO weaning and in-hospital mortality. Methods: We reviewed 25 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO support at a single institution between January 2020 and July 2022. This retrospective data collection and review included clinical characteristics, adjunctive treatments, complications, and early patient outcomes. Results: A total of 72% of the patients were successfully weaned off ECMO, and 68% were discharged alive. Significant associations were observed between ECMO weaning success and in-hospital survival, particularly younger age and a history of rehabilitation therapy. Furthermore, the absence of a history of immunosuppressive therapy contributed significantly to successful ECMO weaning. Conclusions: Younger age and the implementation of rehabilitation therapy are associated with improved outcomes in patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although confirmed cases of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been declining since late 2020 due to general vaccination, little research has been performed regarding the impact of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in Spain in terms of hospitalizations and deaths. Objective: Our aim was to identify the reduction in severity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at a nationwide level due to vaccination. Methods: We designed a retrospective, population-based study to define waves of infection and to describe the characteristics of the hospitalized population. We also studied the rollout of vaccination and its relationship with the decline in hospitalizations and deaths. Finally, we developed two mathematical models to estimate non-vaccination scenarios using machine learning modeling (with the ElasticNet and RandomForest algorithms). The vaccination and non-vaccination scenarios were eventually compared to estimate the number of averted hospitalizations and deaths. Results: In total, 498,789 patients were included, with a global mortality of 14.3%. We identified six waves or epidemic outbreaks during the observed period. We established a strong relationship between the beginning of vaccination and the decline in both hospitalizations and deaths due to COVID-19 in all age groups. We also estimated that vaccination prevented 170,959 hospitalizations (CI 95% 77,844–264,075) and 24,546 deaths (CI 95% 2548–46,543) in Spain between March 2021 and December 2021. We estimated a global reduction of 9.19% in total deaths during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusions: Demographic and clinical profiles changed over the first months of the pandemic. In Spain, patients over 80 years old and other age groups obtained clinical benefit from early vaccination. The severity of COVID-19, in terms of hospitalizations and deaths, decreased due to vaccination. Our use of machine learning models provided a detailed estimation of the averted burden of the pandemic, demonstrating the effectiveness of vaccination at a population-wide level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Identifying high-risk COVID-19 patients is critical for emergency department decision-making. Our study's primary objective was to identify new independent predictors of mortality and their predictive utility in combination with traditional pneumonia risk assessment scores and new risk scores for COVID-19 developed during the pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in two Italian University Hospitals. A multivariable logistic model was used to locate independent parameters associated with mortality. Results: Age, PaO2/FiO2, and SpO2/FiO2 ratios were found to be independent parameters associated with mortality. This study found that the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) was superior to many of the risk scores developed during the pandemic, for example, the International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC 4C) (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.687, p < 0.001), and to many of the risk scores already in use, for example, the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.589, p < 0.001). Furthermore, our study found that the Pneumonia Severity Index had a similar performance to other risk scores, such as CRB-65 (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.823, p = 0.294). Combining the PaO2/FiO2 or SpO2/FiO2 ratios with the risk scores analyzed improved the prognostic accuracy. Conclusions: Adding the SpO2/FiO2 ratio to the traditional, validated, and already internationally known pre-pandemic prognostic scores seems to be a valid and rapid alternative to the need for developing new prognostic scores. Future research should focus on integrating these markers into existing pneumonia scores to improve their prognostic accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is the most common multisystemic autoimmune disorder affecting the pediatric population. However, little data is available regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination coverage in pediatric patients with CD. This study aims to evaluate the adherence to national recommendations for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children and adolescents with CD and its variation over time. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical charts and electronic registry records of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of patients aged 0–19 years diagnosed with CD in a tertiary center. The vaccination coverage was evaluated according to age groups (young children, children, and adolescents), considering the patients' eligibility for vaccination at different times. Results: Among the 172 patients enrolled, 44.8% received at least one dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, showing no significant differences compared to the Italian population of similar age. Vaccination coverage demonstrated a progressive reduction after an initial peak (up to 65.5% in December 2021) concomitant with a gradual extension of vaccinable eligibility and falling SARS-CoV-2 infections. Histological diagnosis and the presence of other associated autoimmune diseases were associated with higher levels of adherence to vaccination. Conclusions: Adherence to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in young Italian children with CD was very low, while it was better in adolescents and patients with other associated autoimmune diseases. Vaccine hesitancy remains a concern, particularly among those diagnosed using the biopsy-sparing approach. Hesitancy increased during the pandemic period, suggesting the need for ongoing efforts to improve adherence to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post COVID-19 syndrome or long COVID (LC) is a novel fluctuating condition with a protracted course in some patients. Specialist LC services have been operational in the UK since 2020 and deal with a high caseload of patients. Aims: To evaluate long-term outcomes in patients discharged from a community-based LC specialist service. Methods: A service evaluation study that included patients who were well engaged in the services [completed the standard Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and received intervention from clinician(s)] and had been discharged for at least 3 months from the service. They consented to the study and completed standard PROMs: COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS), EQ-5D-5L and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for myalgia encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Results: Out of 460 patients contacted, 112 (average of 37.6 months since infection and 9.8 months post-discharge) completed the PROMs. Of these, 90.2% patients continued to experience LC symptoms and disability and had not returned to their pre-COVID-19 health status. The average EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.53 (SD 0.29), highlighting a significant disability and that LC had become a long-term condition (LTC) in the majority of patients who responded to the survey. Of these patients, 43% met the criteria for suspected ME/CFS. Conclusions: A proportion of LC patients develop persistent long COVID (PLC) consistent with a LTC and had a significant overlap with ME/CFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause liver injury and a deterioration of hepatic function. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is a good predictor for poor prognosis of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United States, Egypt and Turkey. Nevertheless, the best cut-off value for the MELD score to predict mortality in the Mexican population has yet to be established. Methods: A total of 234 patients with COVID-19 were studied in a tertiary-level hospital. Patients were stratified into survivors (n = 139) and non-survivors (n = 95). Receiver operating characteristic curves, Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan–Meier method, and Bonferroni corrections were performed to identify the predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Results: MELD score had an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.56–0.68; p = 0.0009), sensitivity = 53.68%, and specificity = 73.38%. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis suggested that the leukocytes > 10.6, neutrophils > 8.42, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 8.69, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) > 1809.21, MELD score > 9, and leukocyte glucose index (LGI) > 2.41 were predictors for mortality. However, the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed that only the MELD score >9 (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–2.8; Pcorrected = 0.03) was an independent predictor for mortality of COVID-19. Conclusions: Although the MELD score is used for liver transplantation, we suggest that a MELD score >9 could be an accurate predictor for COVID-19 mortality at admission to ICU requiring mechanical ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a prevalent bacterial pathogen implicated in different stomach and duodenal diseases, including chronic gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcer, and stomach cancer. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced antibiotic prescription practices, potentially exacerbating antibiotic resistance in H. pylori. Objective: This study aims to investigate antibiotic prescription during the COVID-19 pandemic in Croatia and its possible impact on H. pylori antibiotic resistance, with a focus on Croatia. Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies from March 2020 to June 2024. The search strategy included terms related to COVID-19, antibiotic prescription, and Croatia. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on observational research addressing antibiotic use during the pandemic. Results: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant fluctuations in community antibiotic consumption within the European Union/European Economic Area. In Croatia, antibiotic use in 2022 surpassed 2019 levels, driven by increased consumption of macrolides and other antibiotics. This surge, influenced by early pandemic treatment claims and penicillin shortages, contributed to rising antibiotic resistance in H. pylori. Resistance rates to clarithromycin and levofloxacin were notably high, driven by mutations in the 23S rRNA, gyrA, and gyrB genes. Discussion: The increased antibiotic use during the COVID-19 pandemic has highly likely complicated H. pylori eradication efforts, highlighting the necessity of judicious antibiotic use and robust antimicrobial stewardship. The pandemic underscored the need for new therapeutic strategies, optimized eradication regimens, and advanced diagnostic methods to manage bacterial infections effectively. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected antibiotic use and resistance patterns, posing new challenges for H. pylori eradication. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including the development of new drugs and advanced diagnostics, coupled with sustained efforts in antimicrobial stewardship to combat emerging resistance threats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To develop a risk prediction model for the identification of features involved in the prediction of erectile dysfunction (ED) at 12 months following COVID-19 recovery. Methods: We performed an observational prospective multicentre study. Participants were classified according to their history of COVID-19: (I) patients with a past history of COVID-19 and (II) patients without a previous microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19. A total of 361 patients (past history of COVID-19, n = 166; no past history of COVID-19, n = 195) were assessed from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients with a past history of COVID-19 were assessed at 12 months following COVID-19 recovery. The primary outcome measure was ED, assessed through the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Data concerning epidemiologic variables, comorbidities and active treatment were also collected. We performed a binary logistic regression to develop a risk predictive model. Among the models developed, we selected the one with the higher Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: The median age was 55 years in both groups. The ED prevalence was 55.9% in patients with past history of COVID-19 and 44.1% in those with no past history of COVID-19. The best predictive model developed for ED comprised 40 variables and had an AUC of 0.8. Conclusions: We developed a regression model for the prediction of ED 12 months after COVID-19 recovery. The application of our predictive tool in a community setting could eventually prevent the adverse effects of ED on cardiovascular health and the associated unfavourable economic impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major challenge. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate occurrences of AEs in patients with ILDs, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), non-IPF (iNSIP: idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia), and connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILDs (CTD-ILDs), at a single tertiary center before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The study aimed to clarify the seasonal and regional trends of AEs of ILDs, assess the roles of viral and bacterial infections, and identify key prognostic factors for patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of hospitalized adult patients with AEs of ILDs from January 2019 to February 2024. Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled: IPF (n = 42), iNSIP (n = 37), and CTD-ILDs (n = 14). The median age was 80 years (interquartile range: 74.0–86.0 years), with males comprising 64.5% (n = 60). AEs of ILDs predominantly occurred in winter and were particularly notable after summer 2023, coinciding with the lifting of COVID-19-related travel restrictions in Japan. Patient referrals from different areas (Northern Tama, East and/or Southern Tama, and other Tokyo metropolitan areas) were evenly distributed throughout the study period. Viral infections were detected in only two patients (SARS-CoV-2), and bacterial infections included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Cox regression analysis identified serum lactate dehydrogenase levels ≥350 IU/L and tachypnea (respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths per min) on admission as prognostic factors for mortality, with a hazard ratio [HR] of 2.783 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.480–5.235, p = 0.001) and an HR of 3.332 (95% CI: 1.710–6.492, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: AEs of ILDs predominantly occur in winter, and viral and bacterial infections are infrequently detected. Elevated serum LDH levels and tachypnea are crucial prognostic markers for mortality. This study highlights the seasonal trend in the AE of ILD and emphasizes the importance of specific prognostic indicators in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: COVID-19 is a pandemic disease and is widespread over the world. This disease shows a 5.1% mortality. The understanding of the disease has expanded rapidly in many areas, including virological, epidemiological, clinical, and management dimensions. To better understand the inflammatory and immune profiles that impact the pathogenesis and development of severe COVID-19 symptoms, further studies are essential. This research aims to explore the inflammatory and adaptive immune responses associated with COVID-19, considering factors such as genetic diversity and environmental exposure among Saudi patients. The goal is to determine if patients with severe COVID-19 exhibit different disease phenotypes. Materials and Methods: This case-control study includes 115 participants (healthy and with COVID-19 infection), 55 of which had confirmed cases of COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICUs) at different hospitals in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia. Whole blood samples were collected from June to September 2021 for cellular analyses, and inflammation marker data were collected from hospital records. The expression of activation markers on B (CD27 and CD38) and T cells (CD27 and HLA-DR) was obtained using the flow cytometry technique. Also, serum was collected for cytokine measurements, including IL-6, INF-γ, and TNF- α. Results: The results indicated that lymphopenia and excessive T cell activation were more prevalent in severe cases than in healthy individuals. Furthermore, the results revealed that severe COVID-19 patients had an increased frequency of CD19+ B cells, with changes in B cell subsets. The current study implies impairment and changes in the phenotype of adaptive cells (including T and B cells), with an increase in HLA-DR molecules and inflammation markers with pro-inflammatory cytokines in severe COVID-19 cases. Conclusions: The current study implies impairment and changes in the phenotype of adaptive cells (including T and B cells), with an increase in HLA-DR molecules and inflammation markers in severe COVID-19 cases, which could be targeted for therapeutic interventions. This might be a valuable approach for the diagnosis and treatment of severe COVID-19 cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies demonstrated the effectiveness of lung ultrasound (LUS) as a frontline tool in diagnosing and managing acute SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. However, its role in detecting post-COVID-19 lung sequelae remains to be fully determined. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in identifying lung parenchymal damage, particularly fibrotic-like changes, following COVID-19 pneumonia, comparing its performance to that of CT. Methods: Relevant studies published before July 2024 were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. The search terms were combinations of the relevant medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, key words and word variants for "lung", "post-COVID", "long-COVID", and "ultrasound". The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve were used to examine the accuracy of CEUS. The selected works used different thresholds for the detection and counting of B-lines by ultrasound. This led to dividing our analysis into two models, the first based on the lower thresholds for detection of B-lines found in the works, and the second on data obtained using a higher detection threshold. Results: In terms of the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in detecting residual fibrotic-like changes in patients post-COVID-19 infection, a low-threshold model displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–0.99] and a pooled specificity of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.49–0.59). The DOR was 44.9 (95% CI: 10.8–187.1). The area under the curve (AUC) of SROC was 0.90. In the second analysis, the model with the higher threshold to detect B-lines showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.91). The DOR was 50.4 (95% CI: 15.9–159.3). The AUC of SROC was 0.93. Conclusions: In both analyses (even using the high threshold for the detection of B-lines), excellent sensitivity (98% in model 1 and 90% in model 2) is maintained. The specificity has a significant variation between the two models from 54 (model 1) to 87% (model 2). The model with the highest threshold for the detection of B-lines displayed the best diagnostic accuracy, as confirmed by the AUC values of the SROC (0.93). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Through the past several years, a constant interaction has been implicated between complement and coagulation cascades. SARS-CoV-2 infection and bacterial sepsis are potent activators of both cascades. This study aims to compare the extent of complement and intrinsic coagulation pathway activation (and the interplay between them) among patients with COVID-19 and bacterial sepsis. Methods: Serum and plasma samples were collected from 25 ICU patients (11 patients with COVID-19 and 14 patients with bacterial sepsis) at two time points (on admission and either on improvement or deterioration). The activities of coagulation factors XI and XII and complement factors C3a and C5a were measured at both time points. Results: The activities of factors XI and XII were increased in both groups of patients and at both time points. However, there were no statistically significant differences between SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial sepsis patients. On the other hand, both C3a and C5a were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group on admission. This correlation was preserved on reassessment. Conclusions: Complement activation seems to be more enhanced in COVID-19 than bacterial sepsis. However, the lack of statistical significance in factors XI and XII indicates t the presence of additional pathways for complement activation in SARS-CoV-2 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multiple studies have linked COVID-19 to a higher incidence of thromboembolic disorders. However, the association of COVID-19 with other potentially life-threatening complications, such as splanchnic vein thrombosis, is less well understood. This study aims to assess the prevalence, patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and COVID-19. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. From all positive patients for a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) swab test from March 2020 to June 2020, we included those who were older than 18 years, had received abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the 6 months following the positive RT-PCR swab, and had no previously known splanchnic vein thrombosis. Results: A total of 60 patients with abdominal CT were selected from all those positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 2987). The prevalence of PVT was 3/60 (5%). The mean age was 66.1 ± 16.5 years and 51.7% were male. In two of the three patients, there was no underlying pathology as a risk factor for PVT and one of them presented cirrhosis. The number of days from the start of COVID-19 symptoms until the PVT diagnosis were 21, 12, and 10 days. Anticoagulation treatment achieved recanalization in 100% of cases. During a mean follow-up of 803 days, none of the patients experienced long-term complications. Conclusions: Portal vein thrombosis is uncommon, and its incidence may be higher in COVID-19 patients. A greater understanding of the features of this disease in the context of COVID-19 could aid towards its diagnosis and allow for early detection and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has had a significant impact on life worldwide since its emergence in late 2019. The virus has caused a global pandemic, leading to widespread health, social, economic, and psychological effects. COVID-19 mainly affects the respiratory system. This study aimed to compare the functional capacity and pulmonary function outcomes between COVID-19 patients and individuals who have not been infected in the Hail region. Methods: Individuals of both genders above 18 years old who had been infected with COVID-19 in the previous 6 months or had never been infected were eligible to participate. Local hospitals and social media apps were used to recruit willing participants. Heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation, blood pressure, pulmonary function test, hand grip strength, and functional tests (6 min walk test, 30 s sit-to-stand test, and timed up and go test) were measured and compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 25. Results: Forty individuals affected with COVID-19 and forty-one healthy individuals were recruited. Our results showed that in individuals affected with COVID-19, scores on the minute ventilation, 30 s sit-to-stand, and 6 min walk tests were significantly lower than among healthy individuals. Other outcomes did not show any statistical differences between the groups. Conclusion: This study contributes to a greater understanding of the functional capacity status of individuals with COVID-19. Patients affected by COVID-19 may develop an impaired lung capacity and a decreased function capacity. These factors may negatively affect physical and cognitive health status. Future studies should evaluate the benefits of interventions with rehabilitation exercises following COVID-19. In light of the functional capacity and pulmonary function decline in individuals affected by COVID-19, interventions encompassing pulmonary and functional rehabilitation exercises are recommended to improve physical fitness and pulmonary function post-COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to assess changes in the morphology of the retina and cornea in patients treated and hospitalized during the acute active phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: A total of 24 patients with symptomatic early COVID-19 disease and 38 healthy participants from a control group were enrolled in our study. Among them, 20 received oxygen therapy at flow rates ranging from 1–10 L, while four received high-flow intranasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT). Some patients were treated with other types of therapy, such as Remdesivir, COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy, or Tocilizumab. In the study, we focused on the analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the cornea and retina including corneal thickness, central retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and optic disc parameters. The measurements were acquired using Spectral-domain OCT REVO FC 130. Results: The analysis did not show significant changes between the examined ophthalmological parameters before and after therapy. Furthermore, there were no detected significant differences between the tested parameters of the retina and cornea in COVID-19-positive patients compared to the control group. Conclusions: No ophthalmological manifestations of COVID-19 disease were observed during the study. Taking into account the results of other publications, the lack of an unambiguous position on this topic requires further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Patients with post-COVID-2019 syndrome may have reduced functional capacity and physical activity levels. The pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP)—an exercise training program—is designed to restore these functions and has been shown to improve dyspnea, exercise capacity, and other measures in these patients. This study aimed to analyze the effects of the RP on post-COVID-19 syndrome patients with respect to objective and subjective functional capacity, balance, and musculoskeletal strength. Methods: A prospective interventional trial was conducted before and after this phase. Patients were referred to the hospital with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently directed to the RP. These patients underwent an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program (45-min sessions 3 times/week). Each session consisted of stationary cycle-ergometer and resistance musculoskeletal exercises tailored to individuals' performance. They were evaluated pre- and post-PRP using the maximal handgrip strength (HGS) test, timed up-and-go test, 6-min walk test and its derived variables, and Duke Activity Status Index questionnaire. Results: From 142 hospitalized patients admitted with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 60 completed the program, with an attendance rate of 85%. Nineteen patients were categorized as severe/critical, with a significantly higher hospital stay, compared to mild/moderate patients, and there were no differences in terms of sex distribution, age, or BMI between groups. Compared to the pre-PRP evaluation, both groups showed significant (p < 0.001) improvements in TUG, HGS, DASI D6MWT, 6MWS, and DSP variables after the PRP conduction. In addition, the groups exhibited similar improvement patterns following PRP (intragroup analysis), with no intergroup differences. Conclusions: RPs promote both objective and subjective functional capacity in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome, with no difference in improvement regardless of the severity of the initial infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We investigated the expression of inflammation, placental development, and function markers, including cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), osteopontin (OPN), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), to shed light on the controversy regarding the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on fetal development and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We immunohistochemically analyzed placental tissue from 170 patients (65 COVID-positive and unvaccinated women; 35 Pfeizer-vaccinated and COVID-negative women; and 70 COVID-negative and unvaccinated women, without any other associated pathology) for particularities in the expression of these three molecules. Results: CD44 expression was highest in COVID-negative and unvaccinated women, moderate in COVID-positive cases, and lowest in vaccinated and COVID-negative women. OPN expression was highest in COVID-negative and Pfeizer-vaccinated cases, moderate in COVID-negative and unvaccinated cases, and lowest in COVID-positive cases. COX-2 expression was increased in COVID-negative and unvaccinated women, modestly elevated in COVID-positive and unvaccinated cases, and lowest in vaccinated cases. Conclusions: These findings reflected an alteration in the placental structure and consequent function due to altered expression of the three studied molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is a significant global cause of viral hepatitis. At present, the anti-HAV vaccine in Italy is proposed exclusively for specific high-risk groups, and a universal vaccination program is not implemented. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the level of immunity against HAV in patients of both sexes across age groups ranging from 0 to 95 years admitted to the San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona Hospital in Salerno, Italy, over a 9-year period (2015–2023). Methods: The total HAV seroprevalence by chemiluminescence Vitros system immunodiagnostics (ortho-diagnostics) was obtained by database analysis, stratifying patients for gender and age group in both the pre-pandemic (2015–2019) and pandemic (2020–2023) periods. Results: Out of 28,104 samples collected in 2015–2023, 20,613 resulted positive by total HAV immune screening, with a significant reduction in the annualized proportion of events during the pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic period. HAV was more abundant in males than females in both periods (exceeding the 70%), with a statistically significant decrease in HAV in females in 2015–2019. The 61–70-year-old age group is more susceptible for both genders, with a strong deviation from the 41–50-year-old age group compared to the 51–60-year-old group. The pandemic period affected the number of analyzed samples in 2020. Conclusions: The study revealed high HAV seroprevalence, especially in males and individuals aged 61–70 years. There was a notable decrease in seroprevalence during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic years. These results emphasize the need for ongoing monitoring and suggest that a universal vaccination program could address regional immunity gaps and lower disease incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early reports suggest that hematological malignancy (HM) is a relevant risk factor for morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. We investigated the characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality in patients hospitalized with HM and COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, nationwide study using data from hospitalized patients that were provided by the Spanish Ministry of Health including all patients admitted to a Spanish hospital from 2020 to 2022 with a COVID-19 diagnosis. A descriptive analysis and correlational analyses were conducted. Logistic regression was used to assess mortality in these patients and to calculate odds ratios (ORs). Results: We collected data on 1.2 million patients with COVID-19, including 34,962 patients with HMs. The incidence of hospitalization for patients with HMs was 5.8%, and the overall mortality rate was higher than for patients without HMs (19.8% versus 12.7%, p = 0.001). Mortality rates were higher for patients with lymphomas, multiple myelomas, and leukemias than for those with myeloproliferative disorders. Having HMs was a risk factor for mortality, with OR = 1.7 (95% CI 1.66–1.75, p = 0.001). By subtype, non-Hodgkin lymphomas were the highest risk factor for mortality (OR = 1.7), followed by leukemias (OR = 1.6), Hodgkin lymphomas (OR = 1.58), and plasma cell dyscrasias (OR = 1.24). Conclusions: This study identifies the different clinical profiles of patients with HMs who are at a high risk for mortality when hospitalized with COVID-19. As members of a vulnerable population, these patients deserve special prophylactic and therapeutic measures to minimize the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) being a critical but resource-intensive intervention. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analyzed veno-venous (VV) ECMO therapy in ARDS patients before and during the pandemic at a high-volume ECMO center in Germany. The study used a reduced ECMO team (one medical and one nursing specialist) to optimize patient care with limited resources, aiming to offer insights for future pandemic management. Data from 181 adult patients (age ≥ 18) with severe ARDS were analyzed: 57 pre-pandemic and 124 during the pandemic. (3) Results: Despite increased isolation measures during the pandemic (25% pre-COVID-19 vs. 79% during COVID-19, p < 0.0001), there was no significant change in transportation mode (ground vs. air) or ECMO implantation times at local hospitals. Similarly, time and distance for primary ECMO transport remained unchanged between the two periods. Complication rates related to ECMO circuit placement and prolonged transport were also insignificant across groups. However, ECMO therapy duration (median 12 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 19 days during COVID-19, p < 0.0001) and hospital stays (median 3 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 7 days during COVID-19, p < 0.01) were longer during the pandemic. Mortality rates were also higher during the pandemic (49% pre-COVID-19 vs. 65% during COVID-19, p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a reduced ECMO team proved to be an effective resource-saving strategy that maintained high-quality care with low complication rates, despite the additional challenges posed by pandemic-related isolation measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has notably affected the epidemiology of various infectious diseases. The imposed public health measures and disruptions in vaccination programs have potentially altered the patterns of these diseases post pandemic. Objective: To investigate the change in epidemiology of otorhinolaryngological infectious diseases in adult and pediatric patients after the COVID-19 pandemic and the relaxation of public health measures. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large tertiary university otolaryngology department in the south of Germany, examining admissions with specific ICD-10 diagnoses from 2019 to 2023. Data were seasonally categorized and statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 1728 inpatient cases were analyzed. There was a significant increase in otorhinolaryngological infections in the post-pandemic winter of 2022, particularly of peritonsillar abscesses, acute tonsillitis and acute mastoiditis. No significant post-pandemic spike in mononucleosis was observed. The duration of hospitalization was shorter in 2022, and the median age of patients did not change significantly pre- versus post-pandemic. Conclusions: The study indicates a significant post-pandemic rise in otorhinolaryngological infections. Remarkably, the typical "dip" in infections during the summer months was not observed in the post pandemic years, possibly reflecting the impact of the termination of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Mononucleosis was the only infection not following this pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive power of non-conventional (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio—NLR; platelet/lymphocyte ratio—PLR) and conventional markers (C-reactive protein—CRP; procalcitonin—PCT; interleukin-6—IL-6) in terms of disease progression and mortality in severe SARS-CoV-2 patients. Methods: In this prospective observatory study, blood samples were collected daily, focusing on the established inflammatory markers. Critically ill COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission were included. Patient treatment followed established COVID-19 protocols, and the data analysis was performed using SPSS with non-normal distribution methods. The study cohort primarily included patients infected with the delta variant. Results: A mortality rate of 76.6% was observed among 167 patients during the study period. Significant differences in conventional and non-conventional markers between survivor and non-survivor groups were observed. The PCT levels were significantly elevated (p < 0.005) in the deceased group. Among the non-conventional markers, the NLR was consistently higher in non-survivors and emerged as a significant predictor of mortality, whereas the PLR was not elevated among the non-survivors. ROC analyses indicated that PCT and the NLR were the markers with the highest predictive power for mortality. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified NLR, PCT, CRP, and IL-6 as significant predictors of mortality across different days. The NLR showed a consistent, though not always statistically significant, association with increased mortality risk, particularly on Days 2 and 5. Conclusions: The NLR's accessibility and simplicity of determination make it a valuable and practical tool for monitoring inflammatory processes in viral infections. Our findings suggest that incorporating NLR analysis into routine clinical practice could enhance the early identification of high-risk patients, thereby improving patient management and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]