Search

Background: Breast-implant-based reconstruction is one of the most performed procedures in plastic surgery. Despite the high durability of breast implants, various complications are accompanied with prolonged inlay duration, particularly implant rupture. Many aftereffects can be associated with implant rupture, especially siliconoma and BIA-ALCL. Without regular implant check-ups, implant-related issues may remain underrecognized. Here, we analyzed the number of breast implant carriers needing revisions and if patients adhered to annual implant follow-up recommendations. Methods: We reviewed 1128 breast procedures at the department of plastic surgery at the University Clinic of St. Poelten between August 1 st 2018 and December 31 st 2023. Patients were analyzed to see whether regular check-ups of their breast implants were performed. Additionally, implant-related complications were investigated, as well as if they were noticed by implant carriers. Results: Only 15.46% of breasts implants were regularly checked at least once a year in our cohort. The remaining 84.54% of patients consulted our department due to pain or aesthetic discomfort without periodical follow-ups. Most implant ruptures (73.8%) were diagnosed in patients consulting acutely due to pain or capsular contraction after an average of 17.36 ± 10.57 years. Routine examination uncovered 26.2% of silent implant ruptures without patients yet complaining of clinical symptoms as early as 15.44 ± 11.17 years. Conclusions: Most implant ruptures develop clinical symptoms as an indicator that removal is warranted. However, only regular follow-ups can identify implant complications several years earlier and possibly reduce severe sequalae such as BIA-ALCL. This highlights the significance and necessity of annual breast implant controls by surgeons and radiologic imaging to prevent devastating implant-associated aftereffects.

Background : Lipedema is a subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder characterized by increased pathological adipocytes mainly in the extremities. Vitamin D is stored in adipocytes, and serum levels inversely correlate with BMI. As adipocytes are removed during liposuction, lipedema patients might be prone to further substantial vitamin D loss while their levels are already decreased. Therefore, we examined the effect of liposuction on perioperative serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Methods : In patients undergoing lipedema liposuction, blood samples were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed to correlate the volume of lipoaspirate, patients' BMI and number of sessions to vitamin D levels. Results : Overall, 213 patients were analyzed. Mean liposuction volume was 6615.33 ± 3884.25 mL, mean BMI was 32.18 ± 7.26 kg/m 2 . mean preoperative vitamin D levels were 30.1 ± 14.45 ng/mL (borderline deficient according to the endocrine society) and mean postoperative vitamin D levels were 21.91 ± 9.18 ng/mL (deficient). A significant decrease in serum vitamin D was seen in our patients ( p < 0.001) of mean 7.83 ng/mL. The amount of vitamin D loss was not associated with BMI or aspiration volume in our patients ( p > 0.05). Interestingly, vitamin D dynamics showed a steady drop regardless of volume aspirated or preoperative levels. Conclusions : Many lipedema patients have low vitamin D levels preoperatively. Liposuction significantly reduced these levels additionally, regardless of aspirated volume or BMI. However, vitamin D loss was constant and predictable; thus, patients at risk are easily identified. Overall, lipedema patients undergoing liposuction are prone to vitamin D deficiency, and the long-term effects in this population are currently unknown.

Background: Surgical breast reconstruction is an integral part of cancer treatment but must not compromise oncological safety. Patient-dependent risk factors (smoking, BMI, etc.) are said to influence perioperative outcomes and have often been investigated. Here, we analyzed independent perioperative risk factors for increased postoperative blood loss or drainage fluid volume loss and their possible impact., Methods: Patients undergoing breast reconstructions after breast cancer with either tissue expanders, definitive breast implants, or autologous breast reconstruction were analyzed. The collected data on patients' characteristics, blood, and drainage fluid loss were correlated and statistically investigated., Results: Traditional patient-dependent risk factors did not influence blood loss or drainage volumes. On the contrary, patients with preoperative anemia had significantly higher drainage outputs compared to non-anemic patients (U = 2448.5; p = 0.0012). The administration of low molecular weight heparin showed a tendency of increased drainage output. Similar correlations could be seen in prolonged procedure time, all of which contributed to prolonged hospital stay (τb = 0.371; p < 0.00001)., Conclusions: Preoperative anemia is one of the most critical factors influencing postoperative drainage fluid output. Previously assumed patient-dependent risk factors did not affect drainage output. Preoperative anemia must be monitored, and if possible, treated preoperatively to reduce postoperative morbidity.