Search

(1) Background: The preferred reconstructive option for closing small- or medium-sized defects of the distal half of the nose is the use of local flaps. The dorsal nasal (Rieger) flap is suitable for closing medium-sized defects at this location, especially when they are medially located, and are wider rather than tall. We describe a rotation–transposition dorsal nasal flap reconstruction for large nasal defects. The novelty of this design includes the addition of a small transposition lobe to the rotation flap, enabling the acquisition of tissue from either the lateral sidewall or the nasolabial sulcus, facilitating closure with guitar-string sutures. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all the patients with large defects (>20 mm) of the nose who underwent nasal dorsum rotation–transposition flap repair between January 2019 and November 2022 at a single academic center. (3) Results: Fourteen patients (eight males, six females; ages 47–83, mean age 60 years) with defects (range: 20.00–35.00 mm) on the dorsum and nasal tip were recruited. Follow-up duration ranged from 12 months to 3 years, with all cases showing good or excellent oncologic and cosmetic results. (4) Conclusions: The rotation–transposition dorsal nasal flap was demonstrated to be a reproducible one-stage technique for large defects of the dorsum and nasal tip, with minimal risk of aesthetic or functional complications. Guitar-string sutures allowed the reduction of the defect size, facilitating a smaller flap design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reconstruction of the auricular concha poses a challenge due to its difficult access and limited tissue flexibility; however, there are no recommendations in the literature on which reconstructive technique should be favored for this anatomical site. This systematic review intends to describe and compare the reconstructive techniques used in conchal bowl reconstruction following cutaneous oncologic surgery of this region, with regard to their complications and aesthetic results. In doing so, we aim to identify the best suited reconstructive procedure(s) for the conchal bowl. The six databases searched (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, SciELO, and CENTRAL) yielded twelve eligible studies that explored the revolving door flap, split-thickness skin grafts (STSG), full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG), second intention healing, the preauricular translocation flap, subcutaneous pedicle grafts, and other local flaps. Qualitative synthesis of the results concluded that the revolving door flap could be the reconstructive procedure of choice for the auricular concha, following skin cancer excision. It has a low risk of necrosis, infection, and postoperative hemorrhage, as well as excellent aesthetic outcomes. STSG may be used as an alternative. Nonetheless, due to the low sample size and the high risk of bias in some studies, further investigations must be conducted on this subject. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Repairing lower extremity defects presents challenges due to the scarcity of available local tissue. Skin grafting is a widely employed technique for addressing non-healing ulcers, improving the quality of life of patients and minimizing discomfort. However, using traditional donor sites, such as the thigh, can hinder mobility and result in noticeable scarring and pigmentation changes. Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel approach utilizing autologous ultra-thin split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) harvested from the scalp using a disposable, commercially available razor blade named DermaBlade. Methods: Fifteen patients (median age: 72 years, eight males and seven females) with diverse lower limb lesions, including carcinomas and ulcers of varying etiologies, were prospectively enrolled. Donor sites included the sideburn extending to the hairy temporal skin (nine cases) and hairy occipital skin (six cases). Ultra-thin skin strips (<0.2 mm thick) were obtained from the scalp through the use of the disposable flexible blade DermaBlade. The strips were positioned over the receptor area with no sutures in most cases and secured using dressings. A substantial majority of patients (90%) achieved successful graft take with no complications. Swift re-epithelialization occurred within a median of 12 days for the donor site and 24 days for the receptor site. No hair transfer or alopecic scars were noted. Conclusions: In contrast to traditional grafting methods, DermaBlade-assisted scalp grafting yields highly viable STSGs that adhere to wound beds without the need for sutures. Notable advantages of this technique encompass rapid wound healing, minimal complications, and superior cosmetic outcomes. Furthermore, it avoids scarring and alopecia, making it a promising approach for addressing lower extremity defects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cutaneous neoplasm, and its incidence is on the rise. While most cSCCs have an excellent prognosis, certain risk factors, especially immunosuppression, have been associated with higher rates of local recurrence (LR), metastasis, and poor prognosis. This study aims to assess the risk factors for LR and metastasis development in cSCC among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) and compare these rates with those in immunocompetent patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study included cSCC cases from the University Hospital Reina Sofía in Córdoba, Spain, between 2002 and 2019. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data were collected. Local recurrence and metastasis rates were analyzed, along with progression-free survival. Univariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors in SOTRs. Results: Among 849 cSCC cases, we found higher rates of local recurrence and metastasis in tumors developed by SOTRs compared to those in immunocompetent individuals. However, no significant differences in local recurrence, metastasis, or progression-free survival were observed between the two groups. Risk factors for adverse outcomes in SOTRs included tumor size > 2 cm, depth > 4 mm, and a higher Clark level. A total of 34.4% of SOTRs developed a second primary cSCC during the follow-up. Conclusions: In our study, cSCCs in SOTRs did not exhibit statistically significant differences in the rates of adverse outcomes compared to immunocompetent patients. The prognosis of cSCCs in SOTRs may be more related to other tumor-dependent risk factors than to the immunosuppression status itself. Future studies are needed to refine risk stratification and follow-up protocols to ensure the optimal management of high-risk cSCC cases, particularly among immunosuppressed patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]