Search

Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), myelodysplastic syndrome with deletion of chromosome 5q and other haematological malignancies. Recent studies showed that IMiDs bind to cereblon (CRBN), a substrate receptor of the CRL4–CRBN complex, to induce the ubiquitination and degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in MM cells, contributing to their anti-myeloma activity. We aimed to determine whether the CRL4–CRBN complex proteins' expression predicts the prognosis of MM patients treated with IMiDs. Here, we evaluated the expression of CRL4–CRBN complex proteins and their downstream targets with immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in 130 bone marrow samples from MM patients treated with thalidomide or lenalidomide-based regimens. We found that the expression of CRBN and CUL4A was associated with the superior IMiD-based treatment response (p = 0.007 and p = 0.007, respectively). Moreover, the CUL4A expression was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.44–0.99; p = 0.046) and DDB1 expression showed a negative impact on OS both in the univariate (HR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.65–4.61; p = 0.001) and the multivariate (HR 3.67; 95% CI 1.79–7.49; p < 0.001) analysis. Overall, our data suggest that the expression of DDB1, CUL4A and CRBN assessed by IHC predicts the clinical course of MM patients and identifies patients with a high probability of responding to IMiD-based therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) recently introduced the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the multiple myeloma (MM) response criteria, and MRD negativity assessed inside and outside the bone marrow is currently considered the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes. However, MRD evaluation has thus far relied on flow-cytometry or molecular-based methods, despite the limitations associated with the patchy infiltration of bone marrow (BM) plasma cells and the presence of extra-medullary (EMD). On the contrary, imaging-based sensitive response assessment through the use of functional rather than morphological whole-body (WB) imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), likely is a promising strategy to overcome these limitations in evaluating response to therapy and in the assessment of the MRD status in MM patients. However, despite the significant advances in the development and availability of novel functional imaging techniques for MRD evaluation, a worldwide standardization of imaging criteria for acquisition, interpretation, and reporting is yet to be determined and will be object of future investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]