Search

Context: Tight glucose control (TGC) to normal-for-age fasting blood glucose levels reduced morbidity and mortality in surgical adult and pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In adults, TGC did not affect the illness-induced alterations in thyroid hormones. With better feeding in children than in adult patients, we hypothesized that TGC in pediatric ICU patients reactivates the thyroid axis., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of TGC on the thyroid axis in pediatric ICU patients and to investigate how these changes affect the TGC outcome benefit., Design and Patients: We conducted a preplanned analysis of all patients not treated with thyroid hormone, dopamine, or corticosteroids who were included in a randomized controlled trial on TGC (n=700)., Main Outcome Measures: Serum TSH, T4, T3, and rT3 were measured upon admission and on ICU day 3 or the last ICU day for patients discharged earlier. Changes from baseline were compared for the TGC and usual care groups. The impact on the outcome benefit of TGC was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, correcting for baseline risk factors., Results: TGC further lowered the T)/rT3 ratio (P=0.03), whereas TSH (P=0.09) and T4 (P=0.3) were unaltered. With TGC, the likelihood of earlier live discharge from the ICU was 19% higher at any time (hazard ratio, 1.190; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-1.407; P=0.03). This benefit was statistically explained by the further reduction of T3/rT3 with TGC because an increase in T3/rT3 was strongly associated with a lower likelihood for earlier live discharge (hazard ratio per unit increase, 0.863; 95% confidence interval, 0.806-0.927; P<0.0001)., Conclusions: TGC further accentuated the peripheral inactivation of thyroid hormone. This effect, mimicking a fasting response, statistically explained part of the clinical outcome benefit of TGC.

Context: Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) improved outcome in the adult and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) compared with conventional insulin therapy (CIT). IIT did not increase the anabolic hormone IGF-I in critically ill adults, but feeding in critically ill children and pediatric hormonal responses may differ. Twenty-five percent of the children with IIT experienced hypoglycemia, which may have evoked counterregulatory responses., Objective: We hypothesized that IIT reactivates the somatotropic axis and anabolism in PICU patients., Design: This was a preplanned subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial on IIT., Patients: We studied 369 patients who stayed in PICU for at least 3 d (study 1) and 126 patients in a nested case-control study (study 2)., Main Outcome Measures: Circulating insulin, C-peptide, GH, IGF-I, bioavailable IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit were analyzed upon admission and d 3. In the nested case-control study, the somatotropic axis, cortisol, and glucagon were analyzed before and after hypoglycemia., Results: On d 3, C-peptide was more than 10-fold lower (P < 0.0001) in the IIT group than in the CIT group. IIT increased circulating GH (P = 0.04) and lowered bioavailable IGF-I (P = 0.002). IIT also decreased IGFBP-3 (P = 0.0005) and acid-labile subunit (P = 0.007), while increasing IGFBP-1 (P = 0.04) and the urea/creatinine ratio, a marker of catabolism (P = 0.03). In the nested case-control study, IGFBP-1 was increased after hypoglycemia, whereas the somatotropic axis and the counterregulatory hormones cortisol and glucagon did not change., Conclusions: Despite improved PICU outcome, IIT did not counteract the catabolic state of critical illness. Suppression of portal insulin may have resulted in lower bioavailable IGF-I.

Context: Targeting normoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) improved short-term outcome of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients but increased the incidence of hypoglycemia. Both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia may adversely affect the developing brain., Objective: We studied the impact of targeting normoglycemia with IIT on brain injury markers., Design: This is a preplanned analysis of PICU patients included in a randomized controlled study., Setting: The study was conducted at a university hospital PICU., Patients: Seven hundred PICU patients participated., Interventions: Patients were assigned to IIT targeting normal-for-age fasting blood glucose levels or insulin infusion only to prevent excessive hyperglycemia., Main Outcome Measures: Serum S100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), biomarkers of astrocytic and neuronal damage, respectively, were measured on fixed days (n = 700) and in a nested case-control design before and after hypoglycemia (n = 126)., Results: Admission levels of S100B and NSE differed according to diagnosis and illness severity (P < 0.0001). IIT did not affect the time course of these markers. Patients experiencing hypoglycemia in PICU had higher S100B and NSE from admission onward than those without hypoglycemia. In the nested case-control study, both markers decreased after hypoglycemia (P = 0.001 and P = 0.009), unlike in the controls on matched days., Conclusions: IIT in PICU did not evoke neurological damage detectable by circulating S100B and NSE, despite increased incidence of hypoglycemia. Elevated markers in patients with hypoglycemia were not caused by hypoglycemia itself but rather reflect an increased incidence of hypoglycemia in the most severely ill. This hypoglycemia risk appears difficult to capture by classical illness severity scores.

Context: Hyper- and hypoglycemia are associated with increased mortality of critically ill patients, but whether this association is causal remains unclear. Early randomized-controlled studies compared insulin infusion targeting "age-normal" blood glucose levels, labeled intensive insulin therapy, with an approach that considered hyperglycemia as a beneficial adaptation. These studies found benefits with maintaining normoglycemia. A recent large multicenter study, NICE-SUGAR, compared a similar age-normal with an intermediate glucose target and found the intermediate target superior. These results require explanation., Evidence Acquisition: All published randomized controlled studies on glucose control in ICU were reviewed. The methodological differences between the repeat studies, most specifically NICE-SUGAR, and the original proof-of-concept studies, were systematically analyzed., Evidence Synthesis: There were important methodological differences, possibly explaining different outcomes. These comprised different target ranges for blood glucose in control and intervention groups, different routes for insulin administration and types of infusion-pumps, different sampling sites, and different accuracies of glucometers, as well as different nutritional strategies and varying levels of expertise., Conclusions: These differences do not permit confident recommendations for a single optimal glucose target in variable ICU settings. Respecting the "primum non nocere" principle, it appears safe not to embark on targeting age-normal levels in ICUs that are not equipped to accurately and frequently measure blood glucose and have not acquired extensive experience with iv insulin administration using a customized guideline. A simple overall fall-back position could be to maintain blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible without evoking unacceptable fluctuations, hypoglycemia, and hypokalemia.

Background and Aims: Cholestatic liver dysfunction and biliary sludge are common problems in critically ill patients. No specific strategies have been described to prevent cholestasis and biliary sludge in the intensive care unit (ICU). We examined liver dysfunction and biliary sludge prospectively in a large medical long-stay ICU population and hypothesized that tight glycemic control with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) reduces cholestasis and biliary sludge., Methods: This study was a preplanned subanalysis of 658 long-stay (at least a fifth day) ICU patients out of a large randomized controlled trial (n = 1200), studying the effects of IIT on the outcome of medical critical illness. Patients were allocated to either IIT (glycemia 80-110 mg/dl) or conventional insulin therapy (CIT) requiring insulin above a glycemia of 215 mg/dl. Different patterns of liver dysfunction were studied based on daily blood sample analysis, and biliary sludge was evaluated by ultrasonography., Results: On admission, cholestasis was present in 17% of patients (n = 649), increasing to 20% on d 10 (n = 347), whereas ischemic hepatitis decreased from 3.4% (n = 588) to less than 1% (n = 328). IIT significantly decreased biliary sludge on d 5 (50.4 vs. 66.4%, P = 0.01; n = 250). The difference did not remain significant on d 10 (57.4 vs. 66.2%, P = 0.29; n = 136). IIT also lowered the cumulative risk of cholestasis (P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Cholestatic liver dysfunction and biliary sludge are very common during prolonged critical illness but are significantly reduced by IIT.

The catabolic state of critical illness has been linked to the suppressed somatotropic GH-IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) axis. In critically ill patients it has been demonstrated that, compared with the conventional approach, which only recommended insulin therapy when blood glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/liter, strict maintenance of blood glucose levels below 6.1 mmol/liter with intensive insulin therapy almost halved intensive care mortality, acute renal failure, critical illness polyneuropathy, and bloodstream infections. Poor blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus has also been associated with low serum IGF-I levels, which can be increased by insulin therapy. We hypothesized that intensive insulin therapy would improve the IGF-I axis, possibly contributing to the clinical correlates of anabolism. Therefore, this study of 363 patients, requiring intensive care for more than 7 d and randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, examines the effects of intensive insulin therapy on the somatotropic axis. Contrary to expectation, intensive insulin therapy suppressed serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit concentrations. This effect was independent of survival of the critically ill patient. Concomitantly, serum GH levels were increased by intensive insulin therapy. The suppression of IGF-I in association with the increased GH levels suggests GH resistance induced by intensive insulin therapy, which was reflected by the decreased serum GH-binding protein levels. Intensive insulin therapy did not affect IGFBP-3 proteolysis, which was markedly higher in protracted critically ill patients compared with healthy controls. Also, intensive insulin therapy did not suppress the urea/creatinine ratio, a clinical correlate of catabolism. In conclusion, our data suggest that intensive insulin therapy surprisingly suppressed the somatotropic axis despite its beneficial effects on patient outcome. GH resistance accompanied this suppression of the IGF-I axis. To what extent and through which mechanisms the changes in the GH-IGF-IGFBP axis contributed to the survival benefit under intensive insulin therapy remain elusive.

Compared with the conventional approach, which recommended only insulin therapy when blood glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/liter, strict maintenance of blood glucose levels less than 6.1 mmol/liter with intensive insulin therapy has shown to reduce intensive care mortality, acute renal failure, critical illness polyneuropathy, and bloodstream infections in critically ill patients by about 40%. This study of 363 patients, requiring intensive care for more than 7 d and randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, examines the effects of intensive insulin therapy on glucose and lipid homeostasis and their respective impact on the improved outcome. Intensive insulin therapy effectively normalized blood glucose levels within 24 h, both in survivors and nonsurvivors. Intensive insulin therapy also increased serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (P = 0.007) and high-density lipoprotein (P = 0.005), whereas it suppressed the elevated serum triglyceride concentrations (P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, corrected for baseline univariate risk factors and the effect on inflammation, indicated that lipid rather than glucose control independently determined the beneficial effects of intensive insulin therapy on morbidity and mortality. In postmortem biopsies obtained from 74 patients who died in the intensive care unit, intensive insulin therapy increased mRNA levels of skeletal muscle glucose transporter 4 (P = 0.02) and hexokinase (P = 0.03), unlike those of hepatic glucokinase. In conclusion, our data suggest that intensive insulin therapy normalizes blood glucose levels through stimulation of peripheral glucose uptake and concomitantly partially restores the abnormalities in the serum lipid profile, which may have contributed significantly to the improved outcome of protracted critical illness.

IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), an important regulator of IGF bioavailability, has been shown to correlate with mortality in critically ill patients. In the liver, IGFBP-1 is transcriptionally repressed by insulin, and it is therefore a potential marker of hepatic insulin sensitivity. We have recently shown that, compared with conventional treatment, maintenance of normoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy decreased morbidity and mortality of continuously fed critically ill patients. This study compares the effect of conventional and intensive insulin therapy on IGFBP-1 and assesses its predictive value for mortality. In 363 patients who were dependent on intensive care for more than 7 d and were randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, serum IGFBP-1 levels were measured on admission, on d 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, and on the day of intensive care unit discharge or death. In addition, IGFBP-1 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase mRNA levels were measured by real-time RT-PCR in postmortem liver biopsies obtained from 74 patients who died in the intensive care unit. Although intensive insulin treatment lowered glycemia, it had no effect on IGFBP-1 serum levels. Instead, serum IGFBP-1 concentration was significantly higher in patients who ultimately died, and it differentiated nonsurvivors from survivors 3 wk before death. The predictive value of serum IGFBP-1 for mortality was similar to that of the APACHE-II score. Like circulating IGFBP-1, hepatic mRNA levels of IGFBP-1 and the similarly insulin-regulated gene, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, were not significantly different between conventional and intensive insulin therapy groups. These data suggest that hepatic insulin resistance in prolonged critically ill patients, reflected by high serum IGFBP-1 levels, is not overcome by intensive insulin therapy, and that this may affect patient outcome.