Search

A statistical model based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was used to explore climatic associations and predictability of June–August (JJA) maximum and minimum surface air temperatures (Tmax and Tmin) as well as the frequency of Tmax daily extremes (Tmax90) in the central and western United States (west of 90°W). Explanatory variables are monthly and seasonal Pacific Ocean SST (PSST) and the Climate Division Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) during 1950–2001. Although there is a positive correlation between Tmax and Tmin, the two variables exhibit somewhat different patterns and dynamics. Both exhibit their lowest levels of variability in summer, but that of Tmax is greater than Tmin. The predictability of Tmax is mainly associated with local effects related to previous soil moisture conditions at short range (one month to one season), with PSST providing a secondary influence. Predictability of Tmin is more strongly influenced by large-scale (PSST) patterns, with PDSI acting as a short-range predictive influence. For both predictand variables (Tmax and Tmin), the PDSI influence falls off markedly at time leads beyond a few months, but a PSST influence remains for at least two seasons. The maximum predictive skill for JJA Tmin, Tmax, and Tmax90 is from May PSST and PDSI. Importantly, skills evaluated for various seasons and time leads undergo a seasonal cycle that has maximum levels in summer. At the seasonal time frame, summer Tmax prediction skills are greatest in the Midwest, northern and central California, Arizona, and Utah. Similar results were found for Tmax90. In contrast, Tmin skill is spread over most of the western region, except for clusters of low skill in the northern Midwest and southern Montana, Idaho, and northern Arizona. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Observed vegetation feedbacks on temperature and precipitation are assessed across the United States using satellite-based fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) and monthly climate data for the period of 1982–2000. This study represents the first attempt to spatially quantify the observed local impact of vegetation on temperature and precipitation over the United States for all months and by season. Lead–lag correlations and feedback parameters are computed to determine the regions where vegetation substantially impacts the atmosphere and to quantify this forcing. Temperature imposes a significant instantaneous forcing on FPAR, while precipitation's impact on FPAR is greatest at one-month lead, particularly across the prairie. An increase in vegetation raises the surface air temperature by absorbing additional radiation and, in some cases, masking the high albedo of snow cover. Vegetation generally exhibits a positive forcing on temperature, strongest in spring and particularly across the northern states. The local impact of FPAR on precipitation appears to be spatially inhomogeneous and relatively weak, potentially due to the atmospheric transport of transpired water. The computed feedback parameters can be used to evaluate vegetation–climate interactions simulated by models with dynamic vegetation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]