1. Carbon–water–energy footprint impacts of dyed cotton fabric production in China.
- Author
-
Li, Changting, Zhang, Tianzuo, Zhou, Xinying, Cheng, Ziyue, Xu, Tianshu, Li, Ziheng, and Hong, Jinglan
- Subjects
- *
COTTON textiles , *TEXTILE cleaning & dyeing industry , *TEXTILE dyeing , *REMANUFACTURING , *ENERGY consumption , *NATURAL fibers - Abstract
The textile industry, associated with substantial resource consumption, has posed crucial environmental challenges, mainly in climate change, energy, and water crisis. Considering that cotton is the most manufactured natural fiber and that textile dyeing plays an indispensable role in serving people's demand for fashion and aesthetics, this study conducted an integrated impact-oriented carbon–water–energy (CWE) footprint analysis of dyed cotton fabric production in China from a cradle-to-gate perspective. Results showed that the carbon, energy, and freshwater ecotoxicity footprints of dyeing 1 ton of pure cotton fabrics were 15627.20 kg CO 2 eq, 3405.30 kg oil eq, and 2.01 × 105 PAF·m3·d, respectively. Fiber production, chemical production, and direct emissions were identified as the major contributors to CWE footprints. Cotton straw mulching, advanced dyeing technology, and national power structure optimization were explored to foster sustainable optimization of the cotton-made textile industry. At the conventional wet-processing stage, the dyeing phase had the greatest contribution (56.3%–85.6%) to the environmental impacts from chemicals, followed by pretreatment with a 13.8%–28.3% share. Nonaqueous dyeing routes reduced carbon footprint by 49.1% and water scarcity by 75% compared with water-based dyeing processes, with noticeable increases in noncarcinogen and carcinogen categories. Comprehensive wastewater discharge regulations should be further developed, and the scientific layout between regions along the supply chain from the upstream link to dyeing areas should be strengthened to effectively manage environmental pressures in the textile dyeing industry. • A carbon–water–energy footprint analysis of cotton fabric dyeing is conducted. • Fiber cultivation, chemicals, and direct emissions dominated the footprint. • Heavy metals discharged to water played a 31.8% role on freshwater ecotoxicity. • Sodium sulfate and dyes prevailed in the footprint of chemicals for wet-processing. • Straw utilization and renewable energy utilization yield environmental benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF