Search

Blepharitis is a common ophthalmic condition with multiple etiologies and no definitive, universal treatment. The treatment modalities for managing lid margin diseases vary depending on the disease's cause, location, and severity. For anterior blepharitis, management options include eyelid hygiene with warm compresses, eyelid scrubs, baby shampoo, and over-the-counter eyelid cleansers. Topical antibiotics and antibiotic-steroid combination drops/ointments for the eye and eyelid may accompany these. For posterior blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), at-home warm compress or in-office administration of heat therapy/thermal pulsation treatment that aims to clear obstruction in the meibomian glands and restore meibum secretions to maintain a healthy tear film is recommended. In addition to the above treatment strategies, various other compounds to manage lid margin diseases are in the late stages of development. This review summarizes the available treatment modalities or those in the pipeline for treating blepharitis and MGD., (Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

The eyelid margin is vital to ocular surface integrity. Much peer-reviewed literature has been established in eyelid margin inflammation, better known as blepharitis. The purpose was to review and understand the impact of eyelid margin disease. Anterior blepharitis causes inflammation at the eyelash base, ciliary follicles, and the palpebral skin. Posterior blepharitis occurs when there is inflammation with the posterior eyelid margin disease. In common usage, the term "blepharitis" used alone almost always refers to anterior blepharitis. Classification of eyelid margin disease should be based on etiopathogenesis, location, primary vs secondary, and chronicity. Blepharitis has several etiopathologies (infectious, inflammatory, and squamous). Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) can refer to the functional and/or structural problems with the meibomian gland. Meibomitis (or meibomianitis) occurs when there is inflammation associated with the MGD. The presence of blepharitis and/or MGD (with or without inflammation) can affect the ocular surface and thereby affect anterior segment and cataract surgeries. This review article evaluates the differential diagnoses of eyelid margin disease, including various forms of blepharitis, MGD, and meibomitis., (Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

A 27-year-old woman had BrightOcular iris implants placed for cosmetic purposes that changed eye color from brown to blue bilaterally. Of note, BrightOcular implants are not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the United States and have been associated with severe ocular complications. In keeping with their design, they were placed in the anterior chamber (AC) in both eyes of this patient; surgery was performed outside the United States. As has been described previously and tragically in other cases, she developed chronic inflammation, intolerable glare, angle-closure glaucoma, corneal edema, and cataracts in both eyes. For medically unmanageable elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), she underwent diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) in both eyes, and eventually, an Ahmed tube shunt (New World Medical, Inc.) was placed in the right eye. Although she was advised and urged to have the iris implants removed, despite her ocular issues, she refused removal until intolerable glare and reduced vision ensued. Ultimately, both iris implants were extracted 5 years after implantation by a U.S. surgeon; the procedures resulted in corneal decompensation and progressive cataract development. Subsequent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was performed for the right eye, but it failed because of contact with the glaucoma tube shunt. She sought additional consultation and presented with the following findings: corrected distance visual acuity was 20/400 in the right eye and 20/40 in the left eye, IOP of 18 mm Hg in the right eye and 16 mm Hg in the left eye, pupils were nonreactive and fixed, and extraocular muscles and central visual field were normal. Pachymetry was 868 μm in the right eye and 653 μm in the left eye. Anterior segment examination in the right eye revealed a failed corneal graft with 3+ edema, peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) for 360 degrees, shallow AC, Ahmed tube shunt at the 11 o'clock position and remnant iris adherent to the graft-host junction for 270 degrees, 3+ posterior subcapsular cataract, and 2+ cortical cataract (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202208000-00024/figure1/v/2022-08-01T210317Z/r/image-tiff). The sclera revealed multiple circular and circumferential atrophic blue spots consistent with high-energy transscleral CPC (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202208000-00024/figure2/v/2022-08-01T210317Z/r/image-tiff). In the left eye, she had remnant fixed dilated iris for 270 degrees, missing iris superiorly for 3 clock hours, an adequate AC, and 2+ cortical cataract (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202208000-00024/figure3/v/2022-08-01T210317Z/r/image-tiff). Posterior segment examination revealed a 0.5 cup-to-disc ratio in both eyes with normal vessels, macula, vitreous, and retinal periphery, bilaterally. Given this constellation of findings, how would you proceed?, (Copyright © 2022 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

This review of wavefront technology looks at 2 major aspects. The first is the basics and principles of the optics of the eye, how to decompose the wavefront in a more adequate way for interpretation, and how these aberrations affect the visual acuity. It also addresses the diversity and complexity of wavefront sensors; how these devices transform the principles into clinically useful data, with the advantages and limitations of each system. The second major aspect is the clinical uses of the technology: wavefront-guided and newer and enhanced profiles related to wavefront as well as the limitations of the technology. Finally, recent innovations made possible by wavefront technology that are not limited to refractive surgery are reviewed., (Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of higher-order aberrations on depth of focus using an adaptive optics visual simulator., Setting: Refractive Surgery Department, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Methods: An adaptive optics simulator was used to optically introduce individual aberrations in eyes of subjects with a 6.0 mm pupil under cycloplegia (coma and trefoil, magnitudes +/-0.3 microm; spherical aberration, magnitudes +/-0.3, +/-0.6, +/-0.9 microm). A through-focus response curve was assessed by recording the percentage of Sloan letters at a fixed size identified at various target distances. The subject's ocular depth of focus and center of focus were computed as the half-maximum width and the midpoint of the through-focus response curve., Results: The dominant eyes of 10 subjects were evaluated. The simulation of positive or negative spherical aberration had the effect of enhancing depth of focus and resulted in linearly shifting of the center of focus by 2.6 diopters (D)/microm of error. This increase in depth of focus reached a maximum of approximately 2.0 D with 0.6 microm of spherical aberration and became smaller when the aberration was increased to 0.9 microm. Trefoil and coma appeared to neither shift the center of focus nor significantly modify the depth of focus., Conclusion: The introduction of both positive and negative spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology significantly shifted and expanded the subject's overall depth of focus; simulating coma or trefoil did not produce such effects.

Purpose: To compare central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) using Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam), high-speed optical coherence tomography (Visante OCT), and ultrasound (US) pachymetry (Sonogage Corneo-Gage Plus) in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes., Setting: Department of Refractive Surgery, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA., Methods: The CCT and PCT were retrospectively measured using US pachymetry, Scheimpflug imaging, and high-speed OCT from January 2006 to March 2008. The influence of age and absolute magnitude of corneal thickness were also analyzed. Analysis was by multivariate generalized estimating equations, multivariate linear regression, and linear regression plots., Results: One hundred sixty-three eyes were analyzed. Ultrasound pachymetry CCT measurements were consistently higher than Scheimpflug and OCT measurements (mean difference 6.5 microm +/- 1.8 [SD] and 7.5 +/- 1.4 microm, respectively) (both P<.0005) in normal eyes; the difference was statistically similar and not greater with keratoconus suspicion, age, or absolute magnitude of corneal thickness (P>.05). Scheimpflug measurements were significantly lower than US pachymetry in post-LASIK eyes (P<.0005). There was no statistically significant difference (mean 0.9 +/- 1.4 microm) in Scheimpflug and OCT CCT measurements (P>.5), although Scheimpflug measurements were significantly lower in post-LASIK eyes (P<.0005). Scheimpflug PCT measurements were higher than OCT measurements, showing more agreement with increasing age (P = .017)., Conclusions: Scheimpflug and OCT CCT measurements were reproducible but always thinner than US pachymetry in normal and keratoconus-suspect eyes. In post-LASIK eyes, OCT pachymetry maps were more accurate than Scheimpflug maps. The influence of age on PCT requires further study.

Purpose: To analyze higher-order aberrations induced by different types of lenticular opacities., Setting: Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Methods: One hundred thirty-eyes of 65 patients with bilateral cataract, classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III), had complete ophthalmic examinations, corneal topography (EyeSys Technologies), and wavefront analysis (LADARWave, Alcon Laboratories). Patients with cataracts that could not be measured by a Hartmann-Shack sensor or those with coexisting ocular disease were excluded. Higher-order aberrations were compared between the nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular groups for statistical significance., Results: One hundred five eyes of 65 patients were assessed. Twenty-eight eyes (23.33%) had predominantly nuclear opacification (NO1-NO6 and C1-2), and 13 (10.83%) had mainly cortical opacification (C1-4). Sixty-four eyes (65.83%) had a mixed pattern of LOCS III classification, which hindered the establishment of a correlation between the aberrometry and cataract type. Eighteen eyes that presented with dense posterior subcapsular cataract (P4-5) and 7 eyes with cortical C5 LOCS III classification were excluded. In eyes with nuclear opacification, the mean spherical aberration with a 6.0 mm pupil was 0.45 microm +/- 0.17 (SD) and the mean coma was 0.29 +/- 0.13 microm. In eyes with predominantly cortical cataract, the mean spherical aberration was 0.12 +/- 0.10 microm and the mean coma was 0.49 +/- 0.23 microm. The cortical cataract group had statistically significantly higher coma than the other groups (P<.001). The nuclear cataract group had statistically significantly higher spherical aberrations than the other groups (P<.001)., Conclusions: Different types of early lenticular opacities induced different wavefront aberration profiles. Coma predominated in the cortical cataract group, and spherical aberration predominated in the nuclear cataract group.