Search

Interventricular Electrical Delay Introduction The left ventricular (LV) pacing site and the magnitude of the electrical delay within the LV, as expressed by prolonged QRS duration, are major determinants of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) efficacy. We investigated the incremental value of positioning the LV lead in areas of late activation in order to enhance the response to CRT in patients with different degrees of QRS complex lengthening. Methods and Results This analysis was performed on 301 heart failure patients who received a CRT defibrillator. On implantation, the right ventricular (RV)-to-LV interval was measured as the delay between local activations recorded through the RV and LV leads in the final position. After 1 year, 171 (57%) patients displayed reverse LV remodeling, as measured by a ≥15% reduction in the LV end-systolic volume. Both the RV-to-LV interval and its percentage value corrected for the QRS duration were significantly associated with a positive response to CRT. An RV-to-LV interval >80 milliseconds and an RV-to-LV interval/QRS >58% yielded the best prediction of reverse remodeling. Although the response to CRT decreased with shorter QRS duration in the overall population, patients with an RV-to-LV interval >80 milliseconds showed a response rate >65% in all QRS subgroups. Conclusion A longer RV-to-LV interval is associated with reverse LV remodeling after CRT. On implantation attempts could be made to maximize it when selecting the LV lead position, especially in patients with shorter QRS duration, and thus less likely to respond positively to CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left Atrial Sphericity Predicts AF Ablation Outcome Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcome is mainly determined by atrial remodeling that, nowadays, is only estimated through clinical presentation (persistent vs. paroxysmal) and left atrial (LA) dimension. The aim of the study was to stage the atrial remodeling process using the Left Atrial Sphericity (LASP) and determine whether this technique may help to predict AF ablation outcome. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography before AF ablation were included in the study. Three-dimensional reconstruction of LA excluding pulmonary veins and the LA appendage was used to define the LA cavity. The LASP was automatically obtained with self-customized software. Results 106 patients were included and categorized in 3 groups (Gs): discoid-LA (G1), intermediate-LA (G2), and spherical-LA (G3). The G3 patients had larger LA anteroposterior diameter than G1 and G2 patients (47 ± 7 vs 43 ± 6 and 39 ± 5mm; P < 0.001), greater LA volume (90 ± 39 vs 86 ± 24 and 73 ± 20 mm; P = 0.012), and higher prevalence of persistent AF (75% vs 48% and 29%; P = 0.034) structural heart disease (75% vs 19% and 19%; P < 0.001), and AF recurrence at 12 months follow-up (58% vs 29% and 5%, P < 0.001). The LASP had linear correlation to predicted probability of recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified LASP (OR 1.320 [1.096-1.591], P = 0.004) and hypertension (OR 3.694 [1.282-10.645]; P = 0.016) as independent risk factors for arrhythmia recurrence. Conclusion Left Atrial Sphericity is a new independent predictor of recurrence after AF ablation and may be useful in selecting the best candidates for AF ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prognostic Impact of Inappropriate Shocks. Introduction: Recent studies suggest a worse impact of inappropriate shock therapies on the outcome of patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). However, it is not known whether the worse impact is attributed to the ICD shock itself or due to the underlying heart disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of inappropriate ICD shocks on clinical outcome by comparing ICD shocks triggered by atrial fibrillation (AF) with shocks caused by lead failure. Methods and Results: A total of 1,411 consecutive patients of the prospective single-center ICD-registry Ludwigshafen who underwent an ICD implantation between 1992 and 2008 for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death were analyzed. During the median follow-up of 3 years, 297 (21%) patients experienced inappropriate ICD shocks. Sixty percent of patients had inappropriate shocks due to AF and 24% due to lead defect or T-wave oversensing. Multiple ICD shocks (≥2) triggered by AF were associated with a worse prognosis, whereas a single shock due to AF or 1 or multiple shocks resulting from lead failure were not. ICD shocks caused by AF occurred more often in tandem with a serious adverse event than in patients with a lead failure (15% vs 6%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Multiple ICD shocks triggered by AF are associated with a worse prognosis in ICD patients, whereas a single shock due to AF or shocks resulting from lead failure are not. These data support that the ICD shock itself has no worse impact on the outcome of ICD patients. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 735-740, July 2012) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Depression and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Background: The relationship between depression and heart failure is neither coincidental nor trivial, since depression is a powerful predictor of re-hospitalization and mortality. We prospectively studied the prevalence and impact of depression on the clinical outcomes of patients attending for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We specifically examined whether patients with depression have a different rate of response to CRT and whether CRT has an effect on depressive symptoms. Methods: Sixty-eight recipients of CRT systems were included. The depressive status was evaluated before implant and after 6 months by a structured diagnostic interview measuring Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria of major depression and by a self-report questionnaire (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D). The CRT response was assessed at 6 months by a clinical composite score. Results: At inclusion, DSM-IV criteria of major depression were identified in 41% of the population, while using the self-report questionnaire 65% were observed to have mild to major depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥ 16). Only 4 patients were taking antidepressants. At 6 months, 75% were considered responders to CRT. Response to CRT did not differ between those with and without depression at baseline. The rate of patients with depression at 6 months was significantly lower in responders to CRT compared with nonresponders. Conclusions: We found a high prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients receiving CRT systems. Patients with depression should not be excluded from CRT, because they demonstrate a similar rate of response than the persons without depression and the responders are less likely to be depressed at 6 months. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 631-636, June 2012) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pacemakers and ICDs in Myotonic Dystrophy. Introduction: We assessed implant rates, indications, characteristics, and outcomes in patients with the neuromuscular disease, myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) receiving a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Methods and Results: Device use was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter registry of 406 genetically confirmed adult patients followed for 9.5 ± 3.2 years. Forty-six (11.3%) had or received a pacemaker and 21 (5.2%) received an ICD. Devices were primarily implanted for asymptomatic conduction abnormalities and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. However, 7 (15.2%) pacemakers were implanted for third-degree atrioventricular block and 6 (28.6%) ICDs were implanted for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia [VT] or fibrillation [VF]). Patients receiving devices were older and more frequently had heart failure, LV systolic dysfunction, atrial tachyarrhythmias, and ECG conduction abnormalities compared to nondevice patients. Five (10.9%) pacemaker patients underwent upgrade to an ICD, 3 for LV systolic dysfunction, 1 for VT/VF, and 1 for progressive conduction disease. Seventeen (27.4%) of the 62 patients with devices were pacemaker-dependent at last follow-up. Three (14.3%) ICD patients had appropriate therapies. Twenty-four (52.2%) pacemaker patients died including 13 of respiratory failure and 7 of sudden death. Seven (33.3%) ICD patients died including 2 of respiratory failure and 3 of sudden death. The patients with ICDs and sudden death all had LV systolic dysfunction and 1 death was documented due to inappropriate therapies. Conclusions: DM1 patients commonly receive antiarrhythmia devices. The risk of VT/VF and sudden death suggests that ICDs rather than pacemakers should be considered for these patients. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1369-1375, December 2011) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]