Search

Objective Evaluate the accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/EV1000 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) system in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis by comparing FloTrac/EV1000-derived cardiac output (CCO-FT) with continuous thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter (CCO-PAC) measurements before and after surgical valve replacement. Design Prospective clinical study. Setting Anesthesia for cardiac surgery, operating room, single-center university hospital. Participants Twenty-five patients were included. After exclusion, 20 patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were analyzed. Interventions After induction of general anesthesia, CCO-FT and CCO-PAC values were recorded every 30 seconds before and after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Measurements and Main Results Data were analyzed separately from skin incision to last suture and before and after CPB. Regression analyses, Bland-Altman analyses, and trending analyses (4-quadrant plot, polar plot) were performed. The percentage errors of the FloTrac/EV1000 were 69.7% and 59.3% before and after CPB, respectively. The concordance rates (CRs) and angular CRs of the FloTrac/EV1000 were 50.9% and 57.1%, and 48.7% and 61.9% before and after CPB, respectively. Conclusion This study revealed a low level of agreement and poor trending ability of the FloTrac/EV1000 system compared to continuous thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Although there was a slight improvement after surgical valve replacement and CPB, the results were not within acceptable limits to replace CCO-PAC in this patient population.

Objective Previous investigations reported a higher incidence of poor laryngoscopic views in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze why children undergoing cardiac surgery have such an increased incidence of poor laryngoscopic views during anesthesia induction. Design This study was designed as a retrospective analysis. Setting This analysis was based on a single-center cohort of a university hospital. Participants One thousand one hundred seventy-seven general anesthesia procedures, including a direct laryngoscopic view over a period of 6 consecutive years, in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Interventions Because of the retrospective character of this study, there were no study-related interventions. Measurements and Main Results Poor laryngoscopic views were defined as Cormack and Lehane (CML) grade III and IV. The overall incidence of poor laryngoscopic views was 3.5%. In patients younger than 1 year of age, the incidence of CML III or IV was significantly higher than in the older patients (5.6% v 1.7%). None of the patients with CML III/IV findings had Down syndrome; whereas in 9 of 41 patients with CML grade III/IV, a concomitant congenital syndrome like DiGeorge syndrome or CHARGE syndrome was found. Conclusions The general incidence of CML III/IV findings during the induction of anesthesia for pediatric cardiac surgery is more than twice as high as reported in unselected pediatric cohorts. In patients below 1 year of age and in male patients, difficult laryngoscopy is more frequent. Concomitant Down syndrome was not associated with difficult laryngoscopy.

Objective To determine safety and efficacy of the water-soluble prodrug fospropofol for anesthesia in cardiac surgery and to compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of fospropofol and propofol. Design Pilot study and a prospective, phase I, open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Setting University hospital; single institution. Participants Sixteen patients undergoing elective first-time coronary artery bypass surgery. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive total intravenous anesthesia with fospropofol (n = 8) or propofol (n = 8) combined with alfentanil as total intravenous anesthesia. Bispectral index, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded continuously, and pulmonary artery catheter measurements were obtained. Plasma concentrations of formate, phosphate, and Ca2+ were monitored closely. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events, neurologic examinations, clinical laboratory tests, and vital signs. Measurements and Main Results The total doses of fospropofol and propofol during anesthesia were 11.3±2.5 and 4.4±1.0 mg/kg/h, respectively. According to the achieved bispectral index (BIS) values, fospropofol was as effective as propofol in providing general anesthesia and sedation. There were no clinical signs of formate toxicity in the fospropofol group. The only treatment-related adverse event after administration of fospropofol was a transient burning sensation in the perineal and perianal region during induction of sedation or anesthesia. Conclusions Fospropofol could be used to provide general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Further larger studies are needed to prove the safety of fospropofol when given to provide general anesthesia for major cardiac surgical procedures.