Search

Recent retrospective investigations have suggested that optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables the diagnosis of underlying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) causes such as plaque rupture, plaque erosion, and calcified nodule. The relationships of these etiologies with clinical outcomes, and the clinical utility of OCT-guided primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not systematically studied in real-world ACS treatment settings.The TACTICS registry is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, observational study to be conducted at 21 hospitals in Japan. A total of 700 patients with ACS (symptom onset within 24 h) undergoing OCT-guided primary PCI will be enrolled. The primary endpoint of the study is to identify the underlying causes of ACS using OCT-defined morphological assessment of the culprit lesion. The key secondary clinical endpoints are hazard ratios of the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, or ischemia-driven revascularization in patients with underlying etiologies at the 12- and 24-month follow-ups. The feasibility of OCT-guided primary PCI for ACS will be assessed by the achievement rates of optimal post-procedural results and safety endpoints.The TACTICS registry will provide an overview of the underlying causes of ACS using OCT, and will reveal any difference in clinical outcomes depending on the underlying causes. The registry will also inform on the feasibility of OCT-guided primary PCI for patients with ACS.

Background This analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of high bleeding risk (HBR) on adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1695 patients in the MODEL U-SES study, which was a multicenter, open-label, prospective observational study evaluating safety of 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after Ultimaster stent (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) implantation at 65 sites in Japan. Patients were divided into 2 groups (HBR/Non-HBR) according to modified Academic Research Consortium-HBR criteria. Ischemic/thrombotic event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and stent thrombosis) and bleeding event (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5) at 1 year were evaluated. Results Of 1695 patients, 840 patients were categorized as HBR and 855 patients were Non-HBR. One-year follow-up was completed in 95.3%. During 1-year follow-up, ischemic/thrombotic events were observed in 31 cases (1.8%) and bleeding events occurred in 21 cases (1.2%). Presence of HBR was significantly associated with higher incidence of ischemic/thrombotic events as compared to Non-HBR (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.50), whereas the incidence of bleeding events did not reach statistical significance between HBR and Non-HBR. In comparison of monotherapy after DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after DAPT had comparable ischemic/thrombotic and bleeding events with aspirin monotherapy after DAPT in both HBR and Non-HBR. Conclusion In contemporary PCI practice, nearly half of patients had HBR and presence of HBR significantly increased risk of ischemic/thrombotic events. Both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short DAPT had low and comparable ischemic/bleeding events.

Background The prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in elderly people is increasing worldwide. However, their characteristics and prognosis have been rarely investigated. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis in elderly patients with cardiac troponin-positive AMI. Methods Consecutive patients with AMI from the J-MINUET study were divided into the following 3 groups: patients aged less than 65 years, those aged between 65 and 79 years, and those aged 80 years or over. Their characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Results Patients with AMI aged 80 years or over had the highest incidence of female gender, and the highest incidence of hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease, such as peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke, whereas they had the lowest body mass index, and the lowest incidence of current smoker, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Patients with AMI aged 80 years or over had significantly longer onset to door time and longer door to device time, and lower peak creatine kinase (CK). The incidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the lowest in the AMI patients aged 80 years or over, but the patients had a higher incidence of in-hospital death and cardiac failure than the other two groups. In addition, the presentation with STEMI and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with CK elevation among patients aged 80 years or over showed the highest incidence of in-hospital death and cardiac failure. Conclusions J-MINUET showed different clinical characteristics between the aged and younger populations. The incidence of in-hospital death and cardiac failure in patients aged 80 years or over with AMI was poorer than their younger counterparts.

Beta-blockers are associated with several clinical benefits in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (REF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), such as lower rates of mortality, recurrence of myocardial infarction, and heart failure. However, the long-term prognosis of beta-blockers has rarely been investigated in patients with non-REF after AMI. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of beta-blockers in these patients.A total of 3281 consecutive patients who were hospitalized within 48 h after AMI were registered in the J-MINUET study. Patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40 % were enrolled, and patients who died during admission were excluded. Included patients were divided into two groups according to the prescription of beta-blockers at discharge. Their characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared.The number of AMI patients treated with beta-blockers was 1353 (70.4 %). Patients who received beta-blockers were younger and had a higher incidence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than those who did not receive beta-blockers. The peak creatine kinase level after primary PCI was significantly higher in patients who received beta-blockers. These patients also had a lower incidence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared to those that did not receive beta-blockers (7.3 % vs. 11.9 %, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that beta-blocker use was an independent factor for better clinical outcomes.The J-MINUET study revealed the clinical benefit of beta-blockers in AMI patients with non-REF after primary PCI.

Background: Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging can be used to evaluate the effect of cholesterol-lowering on coronary atheroma progression and plaque volume, with evidence of potential incremental effects with more aggressive lipid-lowering treatments. Alirocumab is a highly specific, fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). This study will investigate the effect of alirocumab on coronary artery plaque volume in Japanese patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and hypercholesterolemia while on stable statin therapy. Methods: ODYSSEY J-IVUS is a phase IV, open-label, randomized, blinded IVUS analysis, parallel-group, multicenter study in Japanese adults recently hospitalized for an ACS and who have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values [≥100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L)] at ACS diagnosis and suboptimal LDL-C control on stable statin therapy. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive alirocumab or standard-of-care (SOC). The alirocumab arm will receive alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) added to statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥10 mg/day or rosuvastatin ≥5 mg/day), with a dose increase to 150 mg Q2W in patients whose LDL-C value remains ≥100 mg/dL at week 12. The SOC arm will receive atorvastatin ≥10 mg/day or rosuvastatin ≥5 mg/day, with dose adjustment to achieve LDL-C

The association between patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who present during off-hours and clinical outcomes has not been fully elucidated.We investigated 3283 consecutive patients with AMI who were selected from a prospective, nationwide, multicenter registry (J-MINUET) database comprising 28 institutions in Japan between July 2012 and March 2014 to determine the current impact of off-hours presentation on in-hospital mortality among Japanese patients with AMI.Among the patients, 52% presented in off-hours. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although those who presented during off-hours were younger and had a higher incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and advanced Killip Class. The time from symptom onset to presentation time was shorter in off-hour patients (120min, interquartile range 60 to 256 vs. 215min, interquartile range 90 to 610, p0.0001). In contrast, 85% of patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and door to balloon time was comparable between the groups (74min, interquartile range 52 to 113 vs. 75min, interquartile range 52 to 126, p=0.34). The rates of in-hospital mortality were comparable (6.2% vs 6.8%, p=0.39). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that off-hours presentation was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.30, p=0.70].The clinical impact of presenting during off-hours or regular hours on AMI patients in Japan is comparable in contemporary practice.UMIN Unique trial Number: UMIN000010037.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular death. However, the impact of PAD on prognosis in Japanese patients with acute MI remains unclear.The Japanese registry of acute Myocardial INfarction diagnosed by Universal dEfiniTion (J-MINUET) is a prospective multicenter registry that registered 3283 patients with acute MI. Among them, 2970 patients with available data of PAD were divided into the following 4 groups: 2513 patients without prior MI or PAD (None group), 320 patients with only prior MI (Prior MI group), 100 patients with only PAD (PAD group), and 37 patients with both previous MI and PAD (Both group). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, cardiac failure, and urgent revascularization for unstable angina.The 3-year cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 26.9% in None group, 41.4% in Prior MI group, 48.0% in PAD group, and 60.3% in Both group (p 0.001). In multivariate analysis, hazard ratio using None group as reference was 1.55 (95% confidence intervals 1.25-1.91; p 0.001) for MI group, 2.26 (1.61-3.07; p 0.001) for PAD group, and 2.52 (1.52-3.90; p 0.001) for Both group.Concomitant PAD was associated with poor prognosis in Japanese patients with acute MI.

This study aimed to compare very late vascular response after stent implantation between everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with a thin, non-adhesive, durable, biocompatible fluorinated polymer and biolimus-eluting stent (BES) with a biodegradable polymer by optical coherence tomography (OCT).In the NOBORI-BES Versus XIENCE V/PROMUS-EES Trial (NEXT), a formal OCT substudy investigated 48 patients (27 EES-treated lesions in 23 patients and 28 BES-treated lesions in 25 patients) with 2-year (18-30 months) follow-up imaging at 18 centers. The percentage of uncovered strut by neointima was significantly lower in EES compared with BES (2.1±4.7% vs. 7.9±10.8%, p=0.013). The percentage of malapposed strut was not different between EES and BES (0.1±0.3% vs. 0.5±1.3%, p=0.138). The frequency of stent with evagination, which is identified as outward bulges in the luminal contour between struts, was significantly lower in EES compared with BES (22% vs. 86%, p0.001). The frequency of neoatherosclerosis was not different between EES and BES (11% vs. 11%, p=1.000).At 2 years after stent implantation, uncovered stent strut by neointima and evagination were less frequently observed in EES compared with BES. This OCT study suggests that the very late vascular response is different between EES and BES.

Background Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance. Methods and design The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Conclusion When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.

Background The endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) plays an important role in repairing vascular injury. Statins and angiotensin II receptor blockers increase the level of circulating EPCs. However, it is unknown whether the angiotensin II receptor blocker olmesartan synergistically acts with statins to increase the levels of circulating EPCs. Moreover, the association between the levels of circulating EPCs and endothelial dysfunction after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has not been evaluated. Methods Nine patients with stable coronary artery disease underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received DES implantation. All patients received olmesartan in addition to statin therapy after PCI. The dose of olmesartan was based on the physician's discretion as per the patients’ blood pressure. The levels of circulating EPCs were analyzed at baseline, post-PCI, and 1, 2, 3, and 8 months after PCI. Coronary angiography and the acetylcholine provocation test were performed on all patients at 8 months. Results Although the angiotensin II level significantly changed, the levels of circulating EPCs did not change during 8 months of olmesartan treatment (3.1 ± 0.6 cells/ml, 2.5 ± 0.8 cells/ml, 2.0 ± 0.6 cells/ml, 2.9 ± 0.9 cells/ml, 3.0 ± 0.4 cells/ml, 3.4 ± 0.8 cells/ml, p = 0.64). The patients were subsequently divided into two groups based on whether the level of circulating EPCs was less or greater than 4 cells/ml at 8 months. There were no significant differences in the mean vessel diameter of each segment (proximal, proximal edge, distal edge, and distal) after the acetylcholine provocation test between the two groups. Conclusions Low-to-moderate doses of olmesartan might not increase the level of circulating EPCs in patients receiving statin therapy. There might be no association between the levels of circulating EPCs and the degree of coronary vasospasm in the acetylcholine provocation test 8 months after DES implantation.

A 75-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency room because of hypotension and loss of consciousness induced by cardiac tamponade. Electrocardiography revealed ST elevation and laboratory data showed elevation of serum creatine kinase and troponin I. The patient was referred to the cardiology department 5 days later. Cardiac catheterization revealed ventricular aneurysm in the anterior wall, significant stenosis (75%) in the left anterior descending coronary artery and subtotal stenosis (99%) in the diagonal branch. Cardiac multislice computed tomography suggested that the ventricular pseudoaneurysm was probably due to cardiac rupture caused by myocardial infarction in the diagonal area. Subsequently, aneurysmectomy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery were performed. Cardiac multislice computed tomography is useful for evaluating coronary artery and cardiac rupture.

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) occurs in 6-12% of lesions after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA). The prognosis and the optimal treatment for DCA-related CAAs have not been well known. Therefore, we reviewed the clinical course of 214 consecutive patients with DCA-related CAAs who underwent DCA in our hospital. Follow-up coronary angiography 6 months after DCA was completed in 193 patients (212 lesions) and 14 lesions with CAAs (14 patients) were detected. We evaluated these 14 lesions by repeat coronary angiography at an average of 32 months after DCA in comparison with the adjacent reference vessel. Twelve of the 14 patients have been uneventful but 2 suffered from de novo angina due to new stenotic lesion unrelated to the DCA procedures. We compared the preprocedural angiographic characteristics and periprocedural parameters between the 14 lesions with CAAs[CAA(+)group] and the 198 without CAAs [CAA(-)group], but found no significant differences. Histological examination of specimens retrieved during atherectomy demonstrated that subintimal resection was more frequent in the CAA(+)group(57%) than the CAA(-)group(31%). The diameter of the aneurysm divided by the reference diameter was significantly larger at 6 months immediately after DCA(1.71 +/- 0.21 vs 1.31 +/- 0.18, p0.05) but did not change subsequently (1.68 +/- 0.23). Our retrospective analysis revealed a good mid-term (an average of 32 months) prognosis for CAAs found by routine follow-up coronary angiography and also demonstrated that the depth of resection was significantly associated with aneurysm formation.

Background The outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported to be poor in hemodialysis (HD) patients even in the drug-eluting stent era. We have reported relatively poor outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in the OUCH study. Methods The OUCH-TL study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm registry designed to assess the results of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in HD patients with follow-up quantitative coronary angiography analysis. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of target-vessel failure (TVF) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Results A total of 119 patients with 154 lesions were enrolled (one withdrawal). Mean age was 65 ± 10 years, male gender was 79%, 89% of cases had stable coronary disease. Diabetic nephropathy was diagnosed in 61% of the patients. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type B2/C accounted for 96% of lesions and 22.7% of lesions were treated with Rotablator (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, USA). Rates of TVF, death, MI, stent thrombosis and TVR at 12 months were 20.2%, 5.9%, 5.0%, 1.4%, and 12.6%, respectively. TVR was performed in 8.4% of the patients up to 12 months. Late loss in-stent was 0.48 ± 0.61 mm, and late loss in-segment was 0.37 ± 0.61 mm at 9 months. Binary restenosis in-stent was 10.3% and in-segment was 14.5%. Conclusions Outcomes of PES implantation in hemodialysis patients appears comparable to those of non-hemodialysis patients.