Search

In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Burn Registry (GBR). Its purpose is to help improve the understanding of burn injury worldwide. The purpose of this study was to identify early findings from this database. The GBR was accessed on January 5, 2020. Cases from centers in low income (LIC) and low-middle-income countries (LMIC) were combined into a low resource (LR) group, and cases in high income (HIC) and upper-middle-income countries (UMIC) were combined into a high resource (HR) group. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for death. Revised Baux Score (RBS) was calculated. Odds ratios are expressed as mean (95% confidence interval). The LA50 was calculated from the regression of death and total burn size (TBSA) for different age groups. At the time of analysis, there were 4307 cases in the GBR treated at 28 facilities in 17 countries (5 HIC, 5 UMIC, 4 LMIC, and 3 LIC). There were 2945 cases (68%) from HR countries and 1362 (32%) from LR countries. The mean age of patients in both LR and HR was similar (24.5 ± 0.5 vs 24.2 ± 0.4 years, P = .58), but LR had larger TBSA burns (30.5 ± 0.7% vs 19.8 ± 0.4% TBSA, P < .0001). There were fewer scald burns and more flame injuries in the LR countries (28.4 ± 1.3% vs 43.3 ± 1.0% and 55.2 ± 1.4% vs 39.0 ± 0.9%, P < .0001). Case fatality and RBS were greater in LR (31.9 ± 1.3% vs 9.4 ± 0.5% and 59.4 ± 1.1% vs 45.3 ± 0.6%, P < .0001). In regression analysis, LR was an independent risk factor for death with an odds ratio of 4.2 (3.2-5.4). The LA50 for HR countries was similar to that calculated from cases in the National Burn Repository of the American Burn Association (ABA NBR). For LR countries, the LA50 was lower for all ages except those 65 and older, ranging from 30% to 43% TBSA. Only a few facilities have contributed data to the GBR so far, with LR countries less represented than HR ones. The proportion of cases in the pediatric age group is much less represented in LR countries than in HR, possibly because many burned children in LR countries do not get burn care at specialized centers. Survival in HR countries is similar to that in North America. The GBR provides early insights into global burn care. Opportunities for improvement are greatest in LR countries. New Innovations may be necessary to increase participation from burn centers in LR countries. This report provides an early look at burn care across the globe based on cases in the GBR. It may inform further efforts to characterize and improve burn care in LR countries., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Little is known about the outcomes of pediatric burn patients in resource-limited and rural locations of the developing world. In March 2013, our pediatric burn unit existing in this setting established an electronic registry of all patients. The authors analyzed the registry to determine overall mortality rates and predictors of mortality, including that of underweight status and body part burned. The secure electronic database of all admissions was reviewed for age, gender, weight, burn percentage (TBSA%), body part burned, cause/place of injury, length of stay, underweight status, surgery performed, reason for discharge, and mortality. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were also analyzed. A total of 211 cases (59.7% male) admitted from March 2013 to June 2014 were reviewed. The median age, %TBSA, and length of stay were 2.0 years (1.3-3.3), 8.0% (5.0-13.4), and 8.5 days (4-14). The overall mortality rate was 15/211 (7.1%). Most injuries were unintentional (93.8%) scalds (85.3%) occurring in the home (98.1%). Two factors were significantly associated with mortality in the final multivariable model: %TBSA (odds ratio = 1.31 for 1% increase in %TBSA; 95% confidence interval = 1.17-1.46) and younger age (odds ratio = 0.20; 0.07-0.63). This study characterizes mortality among patients at a pediatric burn unit serving a rural population in the developing world. The majority of pediatric burns were unintentional scalds occurring in the home. %TBSA and lower age were the strongest predictors of mortality. Burn location and underweight status were not independent predictors of mortality. Overall mortality was 7.1%. These data are applicable to improving outcomes for patients in this burn unit and similar settings of its kind.

A foundational skill in burn surgery is tangential excision (TE). The purpose of this study was to develop a simulation model for TE, hypothesizing that simulation could be used in surgical training. TE simulation was created using the TE knife, foam, mineral oil, and base. Subjects, surgeons, or surgeons in training, were given a pre- and post-task questionnaire about experience with TE. Subjects were divided into three TE experience groups: novice--none, intermediate--some, and expert--TE in current or past practice. The task was to excise pre-marked rectangles, generating four excisional products (EPs). Evaluators blindly assessed performance by EP analysis using a novel scoring tool and reviewed videos using a modified objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) rubric. Inter-rater reliabilities and P values were obtained, comparing Novice and Intermediate with Expert scores. Forty subjects completed the study: 16 were identified as TE novices, 17 as intermediates, and seven as experts. All EPs and videos were reviewed blindly by two evaluators using the EP scoring tool and OSATS methodology, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to measure inter-rater reliabilities, which were acceptable (ICC => 0.42) for OSATS, time, and EP analysis: border and texture. Statistical differences between Novice and Expert scores were found (P < .0100, P < .0200, P < .0025, and P < .0005, respectively). Statistical differences between Intermediate and Expert scores were also found (P < .0100, P < .0200, P < .0100, and P < .0025, respectively). Post-simulation survey results showed experts 86% of the time agreeing or strongly agreeing that the simulation was similar to the clinical skin and 100% felt it would be a useful for training before clinical performance. Simulation for TE was successfully created to blindly discern level of TE experience. Participants agreed that simulation could play an essential role in burn surgical training.

Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, partnered with Weill Bugando Medical College and Sekou Toure Regional Referral Hospital, in Mwanza, Tanzania, to consider the development of a burn unit there. This institutional partnership provided a unique opportunity to promote sustainable academic exchange and build burn care capacity in the East African region. A Weill Cornell burn surgeon and burn fellow collaborated with the Sekou Toure department of surgery to assess its current burn care capabilities and potential for burn unit development. All aspects of interdisciplinary burn care were reviewed and institutional infrastructure evaluated. Sekou Toure is a 375-bed regional referral center and teaching hospital of Weill Bugando Medical College. In 2010-2011, it admitted 5244 pediatric patients in total; 100 of these patients were burn-injured children (2% of admissions). There was no specific data kept on percentage of body surface burned, degree of burn, length of stay, or complications. No adult, operative, or outpatient burn data were available. There are two operating theaters. Patient's families perform wound care with nursing supervision. Rehabilitation therapists consult as needed. Meals are provided three times daily by a central kitchen. Public health outreach is possible through village-based communication networks. Infrastructure to support the development of a burn care unit exists at Sekou Toure, but needs increased clinical focus, human resource capacity building, and record-keeping to track accurate patient numbers. A multidisciplinary center could improve record-keeping and outcomes, encourage referrals, and facilitate outreach through villages.

This study evaluated a 24-hour resuscitation protocol, established a formula to quantify resuscitation volume for the second 24 hours, described the relationship between the first and second 24 hours, and identified which patients required high volumes. A protocol for patients with burn >15% TBSA was implemented in 2009. Initial fluid was based on the Parkland calculation and adjusted to meet a goal urine output. Protocol compliance was defined as appropriate fluid titration to maintain urine output. Resuscitation ratio in the second 24 hours was tabulated as total fluid /(evaporative loss + maintenance fluid + estimated colloid). Data were collected prospectively from 2009 to 2011. A Wilcoxon rank test compared differences between groups. Regression analyses analyzed volume administered. P < .05 was statistically significant. Forty patients with burn >15% TBSA met criteria for inclusion. Mean age, burn size, and resuscitation volumes in the first and second 24 hours (mean + SD) were 47+ 20.7 years, 29.9 + 14.6% TBSA, 7.4 + 3.7 ml/kg/% TBSA, and a ratio of 1.9 times expected volume (SD, 1.3), respectively. Protocol compliance was 34%. Intubation, older age, and increased narcotic administration correlated with higher resuscitation volumes. A higher resuscitation volume in the first 24 hours significantly correlated with a higher resuscitation volume in the second 24 hours (P < .001). In conclusion, there is a significant relationship between fluid administration in the first and second 24 hours of resuscitation; intubation, older age, and narcotics correlate with higher volumes. A formula for observed/expected volumes in the second 24 hours is total fluid/(evaporative loss + maintenance fluid +estimated colloid).

An increasing number of bacteria are resistant to multiple systemic antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to determine if topical antimicrobials are still effective against multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). MDROs, including Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus, were collected from four burn hospitals. The sensitivity of 47 MDROs to 11 commonly used topical agents (mafenide acetate, nystatin, mafenide + nystatin, silver nitrate, Dakin's, polymyxin B, neomycin, polymyxin + neomycin, silver sulfadiazine, bacitracin, silver sulfadiazine + bacitracin) was tested using the agar well diffusion assay and compared with the sensitivity of 27 non-MDROs of similar genera. Overall 88% of the tests of the non-MDROs showed susceptibility to the topicals compared with 80% for the MDROs (P < .05). Specific findings included: all of the gram-positive non-MDROs were sensitive to bacitracin compared with only 67% of the MDROs (P < .05); 74% of the non-MDROs were sensitive to neomycin vs 26% of the MDROs (P < .01). Even for the susceptible isolates, the zones of inhibition were smaller for the MDROs than for the non-MDROs (P < .002), indicating decreased susceptibility of the MDROs. Specifically, while the MDRO Acinetobacter were sensitive to most of the topicals, the zones of inhibition for silvadene, silvadene + bacitracin, neomycin, and neomycin + polymyxin were significantly smaller (P < .001) for the Acinetobacter MDROs than the non-MDROs. Although many topicals are still effective against some MDROs, MDROs are more resistant to topicals than are non-MDROs. Some treatment assumptions based historically on the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents against non-MDROs need to be re-evaluated for MDROs.

Because of their extensive wounds, burn patients are chronically exposed to inflammatory mediators. Thus, burn patients, by definition, already have "systemic inflammatory response syndrome." Current definitions for sepsis and infection have many criteria (fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, leukocytosis) that are routinely found in patients with extensive burns, making these current definitions less applicable to the burn population. Experts in burn care and research, all members of the American Burn Association, were asked to review the literature and prepare a potential definition on one topic related to sepsis or infection in burn patients. On January 20, 2007, the participants met in Tucson, Arizona to develop consensus for these definitions. After review of the definitions, a summary of the proceedings was prepared. The goal of the consensus conference was to develop and publish standardized definitions for sepsis and infection-related diagnoses in the burn population. Standardized definitions will improve the capability of performing more meaningful multicenter trials among burn centers.

On August 29, 2005, the Gulf Coast was hit by Hurricane Katrina, a category 4 storm. The storm was responsible for more than 1000 deaths and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people. Hospitals in the city of New Orleans evacuated because of the complete collapse of infrastructure. This event influenced the decisions and actions taken to protect patients, families, and staff of a 30-bed pediatric burn center in the projected path of a second catastrophic hurricane 3 weeks later. Approximately 80 hours before projected landfall, the local government announced that a mandatory evacuation of the community surrounding the burn center would occur. A coordinated decision was made by administration, nursing, and medical staff to cancel upcoming clinics and elective surgery and to evacuate all 14 inpatients, 52 outpatients, and 66 guardians to other facilities. The evacuation plan was successfully completed in 32 hours. The eye wall of the hurricane passed 65 miles east of the burn center. No significant damage to the physical plant was noted. Repopulation of the hospital by patients and acceptance of new acute burn referrals began approximately 40 hours after the local government permitted the population to return to the area. No morbidity or mortality was attributed to the evacuation. Emergent evacuation of threatened burn centers can be safely accomplished with adequate prior planning of evacuation sites, and modes of transportation. An established communication command center plays a key role in this process.