Search

Autologous skin grafting has permitted survival and restoration of function in burn injuries of ever larger total body surface area (TBSA) sizes. However, the goal of replacing “like with like” skin structures is often impossible because full-thickness donor harvesting requires primary closure at the donor site for it to heal. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), on the other hand, only harvests part of the dermis at the donor site, allowing it to re-epithelialize on its own. The development of the first dermal regenerative template (DRT) in the late 1970s represented a major advance in tissue engineering that addresses the issue of insufficient dermal replacement when STSGs are applied to the full-thickness defect. This review aims to provide an overview of currently available DRTs in burn management from a clinician’s perspective. It focuses on the main strengths and pitfalls of each product and provides clinical pearls based on clinical experience and evidence.

Whereas older age predicts higher burn mortality, the impact of age on discharge disposition is less well defined in older adults with burns. This investigation assesses the relationship between older age and discharge disposition after burns in a nationally representative sample. We queried the 2007 to 2015 National Trauma Data Bank for non-fatal burn hospitalizations in older adults. Pre-defined age categories were 55 to 64 years (working-age comparison group), 65 to 74 years (young-old), 75 to 84 years (middle-old), and 85+ years (old-old). Covariables included inhalation injury, comorbidities, burn total body surface area, injury mechanism, and race/ethnicity. Discharge to non-independent living (nursing home, rehabilitation, and other facilities) was the primary outcome. Logistic regression assessed the association between older age and discharge to non-independent living. There were 25,840 non-fatal burn hospitalizations in older adults during the study period. Working-age encounters comprised 53% of admissions, young-old accounted for 28%, middle-old comprised 15% and old-old comprised 4%. Discharge to non-independent living increased with burn TBSA and older age in survivors. Starting in young-old, the majority (65 %) of patients with burns ≥20% TBSA were discharged to non-independent living. Adjusted odd ratios for discharge to non-independent living were 2.0 for young-old, 3.3 for middle-old, and 5.6 for old-old patients, when compared with working-age patients (all P < .001). Older age strongly predicts non-independent discharge after acute burn hospitalization. Matrix analysis of discharge disposition indicates a stepwise rise in discharge to non-independent living with higher age and TBSA, providing a realistic discharge framework for treatment decisions and expectations about achieving independent living after burn hospitalization.

Mortality associated with burn injuries is declining with improved critical care. However, patients admitted with concurrent substance use have increased risk of complications and poor outcomes. The impact of alcohol and methamphetamine use on acute burn resuscitation has been described in single center studies, however, has not been studied since implementation of computerized decision support for resuscitation. Patients were evaluated based presence of alcohol, with a minimum blood alcohol level of 0.10, or positive methamphetamines on urine drug screen. Fluid volumes and urine output were examined over 48 hours. A total of 296 patients were analyzed. 37 (12.5%) were positive for methamphetamine use, 50 (16.9%) were positive for alcohol use, and 209 (70.1%) with negative for both. Patients positive for methamphetamine received a mean of 5.30 ±2.63 cc/kg/TBSA, patients positive for alcohol received a mean of 5.41 ±2.49 cc/kg/TBSA, and patients with neither received a mean of 4.33 ±1.79 cc/kg/TBSA. Patients with methamphetamine or alcohol use had significantly higher fluid requirements. In the first 6 hours patients with alcohol use had significantly higher urinary output in comparison to patients with methamphetamine use which had similar output to patients negative for both substances. This study demonstrated that patients with alcohol and methamphetamine use had statistically significantly greater fluid resuscitation requirements compared to patients without. The effects of alcohol as a diuretic align with previous literature. However, patients with methamphetamine lack the increased urinary output as a cause for their increased fluid requirements.

Limited evidence suggests that obesity adversely affects burn outcomes. However, the impacts of body mass index (BMI) across the continuum have not been fully characterized. Therefore, we aimed to characterize outcomes after burn injury across the BMI continuum. We hypothesized that “normal” BMI (18.5–24.9) would have the lowest mortality and complication rates. The US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried for adult burn-injured patients from 2007 to 2015. Admission BMI was calculated and grouped according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes of time to wound closure, length of stay, and inpatient complications were similarly assessed. Of the 116,008 burn patient encounters that were identified, 7243 underwent at least one operation for wound closure. Mortality was lowest in the overweight (P = .039) and obese I cohorts (BMI 25–29.9, 30.0–34.9) at 2.9% and increased in both directions of the BMI continuum to 4.1% in the underweight (P = .032) and 5.1% in the morbidly obese (class III) group (P = .042). Time to final wound closure was longest in the two BMI extremes. BMI ≥40 was associated with increased intensive care unit days, ventilator days, renal and cardiac complications. BMI

Although single-institution studies have described the relationship between hypothermia, burn severity, and complications, there are no national estimates on how temperature on admission impacts hospital mortality. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between admission temperature and complications on a national scale to expose opportunities for improved outcomes. The US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was analyzed between 2007 and 2018. Mortality was modeled using multivariable logistic regression including burn severity variables (% total burn surface area (TBSA), inhalation injury, emergency department (ED) temperature), demographics, and facility variables. Temperature was parsed into three categories: hypothermia (

Inhalation injury is associated with high inpatient mortality, but the impact of inhalation injury after discharge and on non-mortality outcomes is poorly characterized. To address this gap, we evaluated the effect of inhalation injury on postdischarge morbidity, mortality, and hospital readmissions among patients who sustained burn injury, as well as on in-hospital outcomes for context. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cutaneous fire/flame burns admitted to a burn center intensive care unit from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2015, with or without inhalation injury. Records were linked to statewide hospital admission and vital statistics databases to assess postdischarge outcomes. Mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to assess mortality, complications, and readmissions. The overall cohort included 830 patients with cutaneous burns; of these, 201 patients had inhalation injury. In-hospital mortality was 31% among inhalation injury patients vs 6% in patients without inhalation injury (adjusted OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.66–3.31). Inhalation injury was also associated with an increased risk of in-hospital pneumonia and tracheostomy (P < .05 for all). Inhalation injury was not associated with greater postdischarge mortality, all-cause readmission, readmission for pulmonary diagnosis, or readmission requiring intubation. Among the subset of patients with bronchoscopy-confirmed inhalation injury (n = 124; 62% of inhalation injuries), a higher injury grade was not associated with greater inpatient or postdischarge mortality. Inhalation injury was associated with increased early morbidity and mortality, but did not contribute to postdischarge mortality or readmission. These findings have implications for shared decision making with patients and families and for estimating healthcare utilization after initial hospitalization.

Preburn comorbidities increase the risk of death in the acute phase, and negatively impact quality of life among survivors. Investigations to date have only evaluated comorbidities as indices, limiting the ability to target conditions and develop strategies for risk reduction. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the differential effects of specific conditions on long-term, patient-reported outcomes after burn injury. A prospectively maintained trauma registry was merged with a longitudinal database of patient-reported outcomes from a regional burn center from 2007 to 2018. Demographic data, injury-specific information, and the prevalence of 20 comorbidities were systematically documented. The impact of comorbidities on responses to Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 (SF/VR-12) health surveys at 6, 12, and 24 months postinjury was evaluated with generalized linear models. The merged dataset included 493 adult participants. Median age was 46 years (interquartile range, IQR 32–57 years), and 72% were male. Median burn size was 14% TBSA (IQR 5–28%). Seventy percent of participants had ≥1 comorbidity (median 1 comorbidity/participant; IQR 0–2 comorbidities). SF/VR-12 mental component summary scores at 6 and 12 months postinjury were negatively associated with mental illness (P < .001, P = .013). SF/VR-12 physical component summary (PCS) scores were negatively associated with smoking (P = .019), diabetes (P = .001), and alcohol use disorder (P = .001) at 6-month follow-up. Twelve-month SF/VR-12 PCS scores were negatively associated with prior trauma admission (P = .001) and diabetes (P = .042). Twenty-four-month SF/VR-12 PCS scores were negatively associated with mental illness (P = .003). Smoking, alcohol use disorder, and diabetes were associated with lower PCS scores 6 months after injury; diabetes persisted as a negatively associated covariate at 12 months. Mental component summary scores were negatively associated with mental illness 6 and 12 months postinjury. Integrated models of postdischarge comorbidity management need to be tested in burn patients.

Wound excision and temporary coverage with a biologic dressing can improve survival for patients with large burns. Healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely have access to allografts, which may contribute to the limited survival of patients with large burns in these settings. Therefore, we aimed to describe the lessons learned from the implementation and maintenance of tissue banks in LMICs to guide system planning and organization. PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and World Health Organization Catalog were systematically searched with database-specific language to represent a priori terms (eg, skin, allograft, and tissue bank) and all LMICs as defined by the World Bank. Data regarding tissue banking programs were extracted and described in a narrative synthesis. The search returned 3346 records, and 33 reports from 17 countries were analyzed. Commonly reported barriers to ideal or planned implementation included high capital costs and operational costs per graft, insufficient training opportunities, opt-in donation schemes, and sociocultural stigma around donation and transplantation. Many lessons were learned from the implementation and management of tissue banks around the world. The availability of skin allografts can be improved through strategic investments in governance and regulatory structures, international cooperation initiatives, training programs, standardized protocols, and inclusive public awareness campaigns. Furthermore, capacity-building efforts that involve key stakeholders may increase rates of pledges, donations, and transplantations. Some issues were ubiquitously reported and could be addressed by current and future tissue banking programs to ensure allograft availability for patients living in countries of all income levels.

Introduction Burn care continues to focus on providing enough fluid resuscitation to perfuse end organs with the least amount of fluid necessary in order to prevent complications related to excess fluid. In this observational trial of 5 ABA-verified burn centers that utilized the Burn Navigator (BN), a clinical decision support tool, we sought to examine resuscitation-related complications that occurred in the first 48 hours after burn injury. Since minimal literature exists regarding the incidence of resuscitation-related complications in the acute phase after burn injury, we aimed to present our data for future comparison. Methods An observational study of adult patients undergoing burn resuscitation utilizing the BN was conducted. Data were gathered hourly for the first 48 hours for patients on fluid infusion rates, laboratory data, critical care elements to include ventilator settings and clinically relevant outcomes. Morbidities were classified based on each burn center’s definition as related to over or under-resuscitation and variables associated with these outcomes were extracted from the data set. Results Three hundred patients were enrolled into the study, and 156 resuscitation-related complications were documented in 92 patients in the first 48 hours after admission. Compartment syndromes (abdominal, extremity, ocular) accounted for 62 (40%) of the complications. ARDS occurred in 9 patients. ARDS patients were the most severely injured, reflected by highest Baux score. None of the ARDS patients had an inhalation injury. The under-resuscitation morbidities of shock and acute kidney injury accounted for 81 (52%) of the complications. Patients experiencing shock received greater than the Parkland formula in the first 24 hours after injury. Most patients with AKI continued to make adequate urine during their resuscitation period, with 59% making an average of >30 ml/hr over the first 24 hours. Nearly half of patients with AKI were placed on renal replacement therapy in the first 48 hours. Seventeen patients (18.5%) experienced both a compartment syndrome and either AKI or shock. Conclusions This large observational study demonstrates variables associated with different complications across 5 major burn centers and shows that complications associated with over- and under-resuscitation can occur within the same patient during resuscitation after burn injury. Additional comparative studies are needed to better understand the cause of these complications, to determine the incidence of these complications in a larger population and criteria used to define each complication.

Introduction Bromelain based debridement (BBD) of deep burns with a concentrate of proteolytic enzymes enriched in Bromelain is approved for use in adults in several regions worldwide. Children are a large part of the patient population in many burn centers around the world. Clinical trial experience and off label reports point to BBD safety and efficacy in children as well. The aim of this study was to further assess the safety and efficacy of BBD in children, in efforts to support regulatory approval for the use of BBD in children. Methods One hundred and forty five children aged 0-18 years old suffering from deep thermal burns between 1-30% TBSA were enrolled in a multicenter, multinational, open label, randomized, controlled phase III study. Seventy two children were randomized to eschar removal with BBD and 73 children to standard of care (SOC) surgical and/or non-surgical eschar removal methods, at the investigators' discretion. Patients who did not achieve complete eschar removal after BBD application were rescued with SOC eschar removal methods. Wound care after achieving complete eschar removal was according to routine methods, at the investigators' discretion. Patients are currently in stages of long term follow-up, planned for a duration of >2 years. This abstract reports the top line results of the study including the first year of follow-up. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the arms. The median age was 3.4 years in the BBD arm and 3.9 years in the SOC arm. The average burn area was 7.0±4.9 %TBSA in the BBD arm and 6.2±4.8 %TBSA in the SOC arm. The study met all 3 primary endpoints: Median time to complete eschar removal was 1 day for BBD and 6 days for SOC (p< 0.001), the percent wound area excised in order to complete eschar removal was 1.5% for BBD and 48% for SOC (p< 0.0001), and the MVSS scores at 12 months were 3.83 for BBD and 4.86 for SOC (non-inferiority endpoint). Secondary endpoints demonstrated 8.3% incidence of surgical excision to complete eschar removal for BBD and 64.4% for SOC (p< 0.0001), mean eschar removal associated blood loss of 32±284ml for BBD and 202±409 for SOC (NS), a 25.9% incidence of autografting in deep partial thickness wounds for BBD and 37.7% for SOC (p=0.054), and a mean percent area of deep partial thickness wound autografting of 15.9±38.6 for BBD and 22.8±43.7 for SOC (NS). Safety endpoints demonstrated a non-inferior time to complete wound closure (median 32 days for BBD, 34 days for SOC) and no significant safety issues were demonstrated during the study. Conclusions BBD was shown to be a safe and effective debridement agent in pediatric burns.

Introduction Protocolized burn resuscitation algorithms with hourly, closed loop feedback, have reduced instances of over- and under-resuscitation and improved outcomes in high income countries. However, a “know-do” gap exists as this practice has yet to be adopted in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We aimed to describe the change management process of the development and implementation of a contextually driven protocolized burn resuscitation bundle at a tertiary burn center in an LMIC using an implementation science framework. Methods We applied strategies from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) for the design and implementation of a burn resuscitation bundle at a major burn center in an LMIC, over a 9-month period. Semi-structured focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted with stakeholders to understand facilitators and barriers to developing and using the protocol, with iterative feedback used to inform and adjust the protocol and documentation tools. Responses were analyzed using content analysis and particularly unique and useful responses were highlighted. Results Stakeholders identified resource constraint-related concerns about the feasibility of an hourly IV resuscitation protocol and reached consensus on performing 2-hourly assessments and fluid adjustments. Corresponding documentation tools were developed and iteratively adjusted. Several initial barriers to adoption and institutionalization were encountered. ERIC strategies used to promote intervention uptake included simplification and visualization of the protocol, identification of a project champion, development of educational materials for multiple cadres (e.g., nurses, physicians, health assistants), use of chain of command to enable change and accountability, utilizing institutional branding and ultimately obtaining endorsement by the center’s leadership (Table 1). Post-implementation FGD with stakeholders revealed high levels of acceptance, utilization and adherence of the protocol bundle, with occasional opportunities for improvement identified in protocol completeness and accuracy. Conclusions Adoption of change in clinical resuscitation practice in a resource-constrained setting required a contextually driven, multi-faceted approach led by a team of change champions and leaders. The ERIC framework allowed for an iterative approach to prioritize stakeholder engagement and feedback, in order to implement a protocolized IV resuscitation bundle in a LMIC.

The number of delirium days in hospitalized patients directly correlates with mortality and long-term cognitive dysfunction. Burn patients are at greater risk for delirium due to prolonged mechanical ventilation, high sedative and analgesic medication requirements, and the common need for multiple operations. Limited research exists on nurses' understanding and comfort using delirium screening tools and preventive interventions. A process improvement project was developed in a single, regional burn intensive care unit (BICU) with the goal of increasing RN staff awareness of delirium, delirium assessment, and preventive interventions. A 10-question survey was developed and administered to the BICU RN staff before and after the educational intervention. Both quantitative and qualitative data analyses were performed. Twenty-seven (38%) anonymous surveys were returned. In pre- and postintervention surveys, respondents agreed that nursing interventions were important in preventing delirium. Despite educational intervention, 26% of the respondents reported that a tool is not needed to identify delirium. Survey analysis indicated strong support for nonpharmacologic nursing interventions in preventing delirium as well as reducing pharmacologic interventions, especially benzodiazepines. Mechanical ventilation was perceived as a barrier to performing the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) in both pre- and postsurveys. Staff compliance with documenting CAM-ICU assessments increased and CAM-positive days decreased over the project timeline. Overall, BICU nurses' awareness and general knowledge about delirium increased and specific knowledge deficits were discovered. Continued education about the CAM-ICU tool is still needed; additionally addressing barriers within the structure of the unit to provide nurses more resources to properly assess and prevent delirium.

Introduction The goal of burn resuscitation is to provide the least amount of fluid necessary to maintain end-organ perfusion and prevent burn shock. The objective of this analysis was to examine how the Burn Navigator (BN), a clinical decision support tool in burn resuscitation, was utilized across 5 major burn centers in the United States. Methods A non-interventional, observational trial of 300 adult patients with embedded prospective and retrospective components was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of the BN in burn resuscitation. 5 ABA-verified burn centers enrolled patients. Data examining patient demographics, burn characteristics, fluid volumes, and resuscitation-related complications were examined. Statistical analysis compared the 5 sites in terms of these variables. Results A total of 285 patients were eligible for analysis. There was no difference among the centers in terms of average age (45.5 + 16.8 years), BMI (29.2 + 6.9), ISS (21.2 + 12.8), or median TBSA (34 [25.8, 47]). Primary crystalloid infusion volumes at 24 hours differed significantly when measured in ml/kg/TBSA (median 3.7 [2.9, 8.8], range 1.3 to 12.3). Similarly, total fluids, which includes colloid adjuncts, drip medications and enteral fluids, differed between groups when measured in both ml/kg (median 149.8 [106.5, 224.1], range 38.4 to 536.2) and ml/kg/TBSA (4.2 [3.3, 5.5], 1.7 to 15.3) at 24 hours. Post-hoc adjustment for pairwise comparisons resulted in a loss of significance between most of the sites. There was a total of 156 resuscitation-related complications reported across the 5 sites with an average incidence of 44.4 % incidence. Conclusions The Burn Navigator appeared to standardize fluid resuscitations across 5 major US burn centers. With primary fluid volumes near the Parkland formula, the device can be utilized effectively in burn centers, and further study should exam the utility of this device in facilities that do not commonly treat burn injuries, as well as the battlefield.

Introduction Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an epidemic in the US that complicates the treatment of burn injuries. Lower extremity burns in diabetic patients, particularly the feet, are challenging problems with predictably unfavorable outcomes, as demonstrated by single-institution studies. National evaluations are absent, especially with regard to limb salvage. We aim to characterize lower extremity burns in persons with DM and evaluate the likelihood of amputation. We hypothesize that the incidence of DM associated foot burns is increasing in the US, and these patients are more likely to undergo lower extremity amputation than those without DM. Methods The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried from 2007-2015 extracting encounters with primary burn injuries of the feet using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th Edition codes. DM is a predefined comorbidity within the NTDB, allowing for cohort comparisons. Logistic regression modeled predictors of lower extremity amputation. Patient covariables included age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities. Burn covariables included % burn total body surface area (TBSA), mechanism, and region of burn center. Poisson regression evaluated for significance in temporal changes in DM foot burns. Results There were 116,796 adult burn encounters of which 7,963 (7%) had foot burns. Of this group, 1,308 (16%) had DM. DM foot burn encounters were older, more likely to be male, and had more comorbidities than non-DM foot burn encounters (all p< 0.001). DM foot burn encounters were more likely to sustain a scald injury (compared to flame) and had smaller %TBSA (all p< 0.001). Additionally, 5.6% of encounters with DM foot burns underwent amputation compared to 1.5% of non-DM encounters (p< 0.001). Independent predictors of lower extremity amputation included DM (OR 3.70, 95% CI 2.98 – 4.59), alcohol use, smoking, chronic kidney disease, burn size >20%, African American/Black race, male sex, and age >40 years (all p< 0.01). The incidence of DM foot burns increased over the study period with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.09 (95% CI 1.07 – 1.12, p< 0.001). Conclusions In the largest cohort study to date, DM was associated with nearly a 4-fold increase in amputation after adjusting for available confounders. Furthermore, the incidence of DM foot burns is increasing. Strategies for optimizing care in persons with DM foot burns are need to improve limb salvage.

Introduction Current early burn care prognostication models predict in-hospital mortality (e.g., revised Baux Score). However, patients, families and clinicians need more holistic tools in the hours and days after injury to identify specific factors that might affect their quality of life and indicate a need for more intensive services. This project aims to predict Satisfaction with Life (SWL) in survivors of burn injury using patient, injury, and care factors available within 24 hours of admission. Methods Two hundred and fourteen participants were identified from a multicenter national longitudinal database and merged with clinical data from a single institution's trauma registry. Patients were randomized into a training dataset (80%) and a testing dataset (20%). A CART algorithm was used to examine the relative contributions of individual predictor variables in classifying low SWL at six-month follow up (SWL ≤ 20). Seventeen covariables obtained within 24 hours of index hospital admission were analyzed from five domains: demographics, comorbidities, injury, care, and host response to injury. Lab values were those closest to but not greater than 24 hours after index hospital admission. Results Multiple covariables contributed to the SWL score. CART analysis selected a pre-injury SWL score < 31 as the first node and strongest indicator of low SWL. CART then selected the following subgroups at risk for SWL ≤ 20 at 6 months: (1) hematocrit >55%; (2) lactate >4 mmol/L, age > 59; (3) total body surface area (TBSA) burned >30%, presence of a hand, neck, and/or face burn. The cross-validated predictive accuracy of the CART model was 69.4% with a cross-validated relative error of 0.379. In the validation data set, sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 72.0%, respectively. Conclusions The findings demonstrate the potential feasibility of creating a model that can predict a clinically meaningful quality of life outcome using covariables gathered within hours of hospital admission after burn injury. Predictive measures suggest that while some of the included covariables may be associated with SWL, they are not consistently and reliably predictive of low SWL alone. With more data and additional refined inputs, a similar model could be used to identify those in need of more intensive services earlier on in the hospitalization.

Introduction Whereas older age strongly predicts higher burn mortality, the impact of age on discharge disposition is less well defined. Both providers and patients need a better understanding of the likelihood of discharge to non-independent living, as this factor may matter most to older patients. This investigation assesses the relationship between older age and discharge disposition after burns, in a nationally representative sample. Methods We queried the 2007-2015 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) for burn hospitalizations in older adults. Pre-defined age categories were 55-64 years (working age group), 65-74 years (young-old), 75-84 years (middle-old), and 85+ years (old-old). Covariables included inhalation injury, comorbidities, burn total body surface area (TBSA), injury mechanism, and race. Discharge to non-independent living (nursing home, rehabilitation, and other facilities) was the primary outcome. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between older age and discharge to non-independent living, adjusting for covariables. Results There were 25,840 burn hospitalizations in older adults with complete data during the study period. Working-age patients comprised 13,563 (53%) of admissions. Young-old accounted for 7,342 (28%), while middle-old comprised 3,876 (15%), and 1,059 (4%) were classified as old-old. Discharge to non-independent living steadily increased with burn TBSA and older age in survivors (Table). Beginning in the 65-74 age group (young-old), most patients with burns ≥20% TBSA were discharged to non-independent living. After adjusting for patient and injury factors, odd ratios for discharge to non-independent living were 2.1 for young-old, 3.5 for middle-old and 7.6 for old-old patients, when compared to working-age patients (all p< 0.001). Conclusions Older age is a strong predictor of discharge to non-independent living after burns. These findings provide a realistic discharge framework for providers and older adults with acute burns.