Search

Background: A dorsal wrist-spanning plate (DWSP) can be affixed to the second or third metacarpal, depending on the morphology of the distal radial fracture (DRF) and on surgeon preference, but comparative biomechanical analyses between these methods are limited. This biomechanical study compared fixation to the second metacarpal versus the third metacarpal as measured by lunate facet fragment displacement in a cadaveric model of an axially loaded intra-articular DRF. The construct rigidity with the addition of an intrafragmentary lunate facet locking screw was also evaluated.Methods: A sample size of 14 cadaveric matched pairs was calculated to achieve 81.7% power. The 28 limbs were randomized to DWSP fixation to the second metacarpal (Group 1) or third metacarpal (Group 2); each wrist underwent an osteotomy simulating an unstable intra-articular DRF. Limbs were tested at axial loads of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 N. Lunate facet displacement from the metaphyseal fragment at each load was measured with use of differential variable reluctance transducers. After initial testing, a locking screw was placed through the plate into the lunate facet fragment in the third metacarpal group (Group 3). Displacement measurements were repeated for all loads. Paired 2-tailed t tests with Bonferroni correction (significance, p < 0.008) were performed to assess differences in fragment stability between groups.Results: The average fracture displacement at 300 N was 0.8 mm in Group 1, 0.4 mm in Group 2, and 0.2 mm in Group 3. Plating to the third metacarpal more effectively resisted displacement compared with the second metacarpal at all axial loads (p < 0.008). The addition of a lunate facet screw further stiffened the construct at loads of ≥200 N (p < 0.008).Conclusions: Plate fixation to the third metacarpal with an intrafragmentary screw was the most biomechanically favorable construct, although other factors may favor an alternative distal fixation site. Mean displacement of the lunate facet fragment at 300 N was <1 mm in all groups.Clinical Relevance: The present study demonstrated that a DWSP affixed to the third metacarpal with an intrafragmentary screw provides the most effective stabilization of the lunate facet fragment in intra-articular DRFs. This study validates the use of intrafragmentary screws to increase stability in DWSP fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Changes in intra-articular pressure have not been previously described in relation to the management of radial head fractures. We hypothesized that pressure within the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints would increase with progressive radial head resection, mimicking a displaced radial head fracture, in a cadaveric model. Methods: Ten cadaveric specimens were tested. Intra-articular pressure sensors were used to measure pressure within the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints with the forearm in full supination. The elbow was loaded to 100 N in extension, 45° of flexion, and 90° of flexion under the following conditions: (1) intact radial head, (2) 20% radial head resection, (3) 40% radial head resection, and (4) 100% radial head resection. Results: The distribution of pressure between the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints did not change with sequential, partial resection of the radial head (radiocapitellar joint, between 48.92% and 53.79%; ulnotrochlear joint, between 46.21% and 51.08%). After 20% resection, radiocapitellar peak contact pressure (PCP) increased by 22% (from 1,410 to 1,721.5 kPa) and ulnotrochlear PCP increased by 36% (from 1,319 to 1,797.5 kPa). After 40% resection, radiocapitellar PCP increased by 123% (from 1,410 to 3,145 kPa; p = 0.0003) and ulnotrochlear PCP increased by 105% (from 1,319 to 2,702 kPa; p = 0.007). Ulnotrochlear PCP increased by a total of 159% after complete radial head resection (from 1,319 to 3,415.5 kPa; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Pressures in the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints were equally distributed with an intact radial head and after partial resection. Radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear pressures increased with increasing radial head resection, significantly exceeding 100% of normal after radial head resection of 40% of the anterolateral diameter. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The modified Kocher and extensor digitorum communis (EDC)-splitting intervals are commonly utilized to approach the lateral elbow. Iatrogenic injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament may result in posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). in the present cadaveric study, we (1) evaluated lateral elbow stability following the use of these approaches and (2) assessed the accuracy of static lateral elbow radiographs as a diagnostic tool for PLRI. Methods: Tenmatched-pair cadaveric upper-extremity specimens (n = 20) were randomly assigned to Kocher or EDC-splitting approaches. Specimens underwent evaluation pre-dissection, post-dissection, and following repair of the surgical interval. Clinical evaluation of lateral elbow stability was performed with the lateral pivot-shift maneuver. Radiographic radiocapitellar displacement was evaluated with the fully extended hanging arm test and on lateral elbow 30° flexion radiographs. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction were utilized to compare groups. Results: AllKocher group specimens (10 of 10) developed PLRI on the pivot-shift maneuver following dissection.No EDC-splitting group specimens (0 of 10) developed instability with pivot-shift testing. The fully extended hanging arm test showed no difference in radiocapitellar displacement between groups (p > 0.008). Lateral elbow 30° flexion radiographs in the Kocher group showed an increased radiocapitellar displacement difference (mean, 8.46 mm) following dissection compared with the pre-dissection baseline (p < 0.008). Following repair of the Kocher interval, the radiocapitellar displacement (mean, 6.43 mm) remained greater than pre-dissection (mean, 2.26 mm; p < 0.008). In the EDC-splitting group, no differences were detected in radiocapitellar displacement on lateral elbow radiographs with either the fully extended hanging arm or lateral elbow 30° flexion positions. Conclusions: The Kocher approach produced PLRI that did not return to baseline conditions following repair of the surgical interval. The EDC-splitting approach did not cause elbow instability clinically or radiographically. The hanging arm test was not reliable for the detection of PLRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]