Search

Background: Body mass index (BMI) thresholds are used as eligibility criteria to reduce complication risk in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This approach oversimplifies preoperative risk assessment and inadvertently restricts access to effective surgical treatment for osteoarthritis. A prior survey of orthopaedic surgeons in the United States identified complex underlying factors that influence BMI considerations. To understand whether similar factors exist and influence surgeons in a different health-care system setting, we investigated Canadian surgeons' views and use of BMI criterion thresholds for TJA access. Methods: A cross-sectional online qualitative survey was conducted with orthopaedic surgeons performing TJA in the Canadian health-care system. Responses were anonymous and questions were open-ended to allow for candid perspectives. Survey data were coded and a systematic process was followed to identify major themes. Findings were compared with U.S. surgeon perspectives. Results: Sixty-nine respondents had a mean age of 49.0 ± 11.4 years (range, 33 to 79 years), with a mean surgical experience duration of 15.7 ± 11.4 years (range, 2 to 50 years). Surgeons reported variable use of BMI thresholds in practice. Twelve interconnected factors that influence BMI considerations were identified: (1) variable evidence interpretation, (2) surgical challenge, (3) surgeon beliefs and biases, (4) hospital differences, (5) access to resources, (6) health system bias, (7) patient health status, (8) patient body fat distribution, (9) patient decisional burden (to lose weight or accept risk), (10) evidence gaps and uncertainties, (11) need for innovation, and (12) societal views. Nine themes matched with findings from U.S. surgeons. Conclusions: Parallel to the United States, complex, interconnected factors influence Canadian orthopaedic surgeons' variable use of BMI restrictions for TJA eligibility. Despite different health-care systems and reimbursement models, similar technical and personal factors were identified. With TJA practice guidelines advising against hard BMI criteria, attention regarding access to resources, surgical training, and innovations to address TJA complexity in patients with large bodies are critically needed. Future advancements in this sphere must balance barrier removal with risk reduction to ensure safe and equitable surgical care. Clinical Relevance: This study may influence surgeon behaviors with regard to hard BMI cutoffs for TJA and encourage critical thought about factors that influence decisions about surgical eligibility for patients with high BMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rising total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rates in younger patients raises concern about appropriateness. We asked: are younger individuals who seek consultation for TKA less likely to be appropriate for and, controlling for appropriateness, more likely to be recommended for surgery?Methods: This cross-sectional study was nested within a prospective cohort study of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients referred for TKA from 2014 to 2016 to centralized arthroplasty centers in Alberta, Canada. Pre-consultation, questionnaires assessed patients' TKA appropriateness (need, based on knee symptoms and prior treatment; readiness/willingness to undergo TKA; health status; and expectations) and contextual factors (for example, employment). Post-consultation, surgeons confirmed study eligibility and reported their TKA recommendation. Using generalized estimating equations to control for clustering by surgeon, we assessed relationships between patient age (<50, 50 to 59, ≥60 years) and TKA appropriateness and receipt of a surgeon TKA recommendation.Results: Of 2,037 participants, 3.3% and 22.7% were <50 and 50 to 59 years of age, respectively, 58.7% were female, and 35.5% were employed. Compared with older participants, younger participants reported significantly worse knee symptoms, higher use of OA therapies, higher TKA readiness, and similar willingness, but had higher body mass index and were more likely to smoke and to consider the ability to participate in vigorous activities, for example, sports, as very important TKA outcomes. TKA was offered to 1,500 individuals (73.6% overall; 52.2%, 71.0%, and 75.4% of those <50, 50 to 59, and ≥60 years, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the odds of receiving a TKA recommendation were higher with greater TKA need and willingness, in nonsmokers, and in those who indicated that improved ability to go upstairs and to straighten the leg were very important TKA outcomes. Controlling for TKA appropriateness, patient age was not associated with surgeons' TKA recommendations.Conclusions: Younger individuals with knee OA referred for TKA had similar or greater TKA need, readiness, and willingness than older individuals. Incorporation of TKA appropriateness criteria into TKA decision-making may facilitate consideration of TKA benefits and risks in a growing population of young, obese individuals with knee OA.Clinical Relevance: Younger people seeking TKA for knee OA had significant OA pain and disability despite recommended OA therapies, suggesting appropriateness for surgical consideration. However, they were significantly more likely to have morbid obesity, to smoke, and to consider return to vigorous activities, like sport, as important TKA outcomes. Whether the short- and longer-term risks of TKA are outweighed by the benefits is unclear and warrants additional research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studiesthathavebeenpublishedin The Lancethavereporteda survivorship of 82% for total knee arthroplasty and 77% for total hip arthroplasty (with older bearing surfaces) at 25 years 4-6. Fixation methods and tribology 12, including improved cementing techniques 13, biological fixation 14, or just an awareness of implantation technique and choice of implants, have greatly advanced for both hip and knee arthroplasty, resulting in better survivorship 15. Current Situation Hip and knee arthroplasty remain the fastest growing 1 and most successful 2 surgical procedures. Total hip arthroplasty has historically been named the "operation of the century", 3 with outcome scores that suggest that not only is function rapidlyrestored,butlongevityoftheprocedureischaracterized by a high percentage that continues into the third decade 4-6. [Extracted from the article]

There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Closed fractures of the distal third of the forearm are the most common fractures of childhood, but the method of immobilization after closed reduction is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine whether below-the-elbow casts are as effective as above-the-elbow casts in immobilizing these types of fractures and to identify patient and treatment considerations that are related to loss of reduction. Methods: We designed a blinded, randomized, controlled trial. The criteria for reduction and remanipulation were set a priori. The primary outcome measure was fracture immobilization as reflected by reangulation in the cast and by the need for remanipulation. Exploratory analysis with use of stepwise logistic regression analysis was undertaken to search for factors predictive of loss of reduction. Results: A total of 102 children were enrolled in the study and were allocated to two groups: the above-the-elbow cast group (fifty-six children) and the below-the-elbow cast group (forty-six children). The mean age was 8.6 years, and sixty-one patients were boys. The groups did not differ with respect to the initial fracture angulation, postreduction an- gulation, reangulation during cast immobilization, and angulation of the fracture at the time of cast removal. In the above-the-elbow cast group, twenty-three (42%) of fifty-five children with adequate radiographs met the criteria for re- manipulation compared with fourteen (31%) of forty-five children with adequate radiographs in the below-the-elbow cast group (p = 0.27); only four of these thirty-seven children actually underwent remanipulation. Children with fractures of both the radius and ulna (p = 0.01) and those with residual angulation after reduction (p = 0.0001) were at the highest risk of meeting the criteria for remanipulation. The rates of complications related to the cast did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Below-the-elbow casts perform as well as above-the-elbow casts in maintaining reduction of fractures in the distal third of the forearm in children, and the complication rates are similar. Factors that are associated with a higher risk of loss of reduction include combined radial and ulnar fractures and residual angulation of the fracture after the initial reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A personal narrative is presented which explores the authors' experience of their journey known as American Orthopaedic Association (AOA), American, British, and Canadian (ABC) Traveling Fellowship in London, England.