Search

AbstractC-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), which is part of the chemokine receptor family, is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. The interactions of CCR5 with HIV-1 during viral entry position it as an effective therapeutic target for designing potent antiviral therapies. The small-molecule Maraviroc was approved by the FDA as a CCR5 drug in 2007, while clinical trials failure has characterised many of the other CCR5 inhibitors. Thus, the continual identification of potential CCR5 inhibitors is, therefore, warranted. In this study, a structure-based discovery approach has been utilised to screen and retrieved novel potential CCR5 inhibitors from the Asinex antiviral compound (∼ 8,722) database. Explicit lipid-bilayer molecular dynamics simulation, in silicophysicochemical and pharmacokinetic analyses, were further performed for the top compounds. A total of 23 structurally diverse compounds with binding scores higher than Maraviroc were selected. Subsequent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations analysis of the top four compounds LAS 51495192, BDB 26405401, BDB 26419079, and LAS 34154543, maintained stability at the CCR5 binding site. Furthermore, these compounds made pertinent interactions with CCR5 residues critical for the HIV-1 gp120-V3 loop binding such as Trp86, Tyr89, Phe109, Tyr108, Glu283 and Tyr251. Additionally, the predicted in silicophysicochemical and pharmacokinetic descriptors of the selected compounds were within the acceptable range for drug-likeness. The results suggest positive indications that the identified molecules may represent promising CCR5 entry inhibitors. Further structural optimisations and biochemical testing of the proposed compounds may assist in the discovery of effective HIV-1 therapy.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Abstractβ-amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme1 (BACE1) has prominently been an important drug design target implicated in Alzheimer’s disease pathway. The failure rate of most of the already tested drugs at different clinical phases remains a major concern. Recently, AM-6494 was reported as a novel potent, highly selective, and orally effective inhibitor against BACE1. AM-6494 displayed no alteration of skin/fur colour in animal studies, an adverse effect common to previous BACE1 inhibitors. However, the atomistic molecular mechanism of BACE1 inhibition by AM-6494 remains unclear. To elucidate the binding mechanism of AM-6494 relative to umibecestat (CNP-520) as well as the structural changes when bound to BACE1, advanced computational techniques such as accelerated MD simulation and principal component analysis have been utilised. The results demonstrated higher binding affinity of AM-6494 at BACE1 with van der Waals as dominant energy contributor compared to umibecestat. Conformational monitoring of the β-hairpin flap covering the active site revealed an effective flap closure when bound with AM-6494 compared to CNP-520, which predominantly alternates between semi-open and closed conformations. The observed effective flap closure of AM-6494 explains its higher inhibitory power towards BACE1. Besides the catalytic Asp32/228 dyad, Tyr14, Leu30, Tyr71 and Gly230 represent critical residues in the potency of these inhibitors at BACE1 binding interface. The findings highlighted in this research provide a basis to explain AM-6494 high inhibitory potency and might assist in the design of new inhibitors with improved selectivity and potency for BACE1.

Human leukotriene A4hydrolase/aminopeptidase (LTA4H) is a zinc metalloenzyme with a dual catalytic activity; conversion of LTA4into LTB4and degradation of chemotactic tripeptide Pro-Gly-Pro (PGP). Existing inhibitors, such as SC-57461A, block both catalytic activities of the enzyme, leading to drug failures. Recently, a novel compound, ARM1, was reported to selectively inhibit the hydrolase activity of LTA4H while sparing its aminopeptidase activity. However, the molecular understanding of such preferential inhibitory mechanism remains obscure. The discovery of ARM1 prompted us to further explore its binding theme and provide more insight into the structural and dual mechanistic features of LTA4H protein. To accomplish this, we embarked on wide range of computational tools, including comparative molecular dynamics (MDs) simulations and postdynamic analyses for LTA4H and in complex with ARM1, PGP, ARM1-PGP, and SC-57461A. MD analysis reveals that the binding of ARM1 exhibits a more stable active site and overall stable protein conformation when compared to the nonselective inhibitor SC-57461A. In addition, MM/GBSA-binding free energy calculation also reveals that ARM1 exhibit a lower binding affinity, when compared to the nonselective inhibitor SC-57461A – which is in a great agreement with experimental data. Per residue energy decomposition analysis showed that Phe314, Val367, Tyr378, Trp311, Pro382, and Leu369 are key residues critical for the selective inhibition of the epoxide hydrolase activity of LTA4H by ARM1. Findings from this report will not only provide more understanding into the structural, dynamic, and mechanistic features of LTA4H but would also assist toward the rational design of novel and selective hydrolase inhibitors of LTA4H as anti-inflammatory drugs.