Search

Circadian behavior is widely observed in insects; however, the mechanisms that drive its evolution remain a black box. While circadian activity rhythms are well characterized in adults within the order Lepidoptera (i.e., most butterfly species are day active, while most moths are night active), much less is known about daily activity and clock gene expression in the larval stage. Additionally, direct comparison of clock gene expression between day-active and night-active species reared together has not been quantified. Our study characterized the daily rhythms of caterpillar feeding and activity in addition to the gene expression of 2 central circadian clock genes, period (per) and timeless (tim), in larvae and adults of the day-active butterfly Danaus plexippus and the night-active moth Heliothis virescens. We found that neither Danaus nor Heliothis caterpillars are strictly diurnal or nocturnal like their adult counterparts; however, we found that slight rhythms in feeding and activity can arise in response to external forces, such as temperature and host plant. Expression levels differed between genes, between butterfly larvae and adults, and between butterfly and moth species, even though expression levels of both per and tim oscillated with a similar phase over 24 hours across all treatments. Our study, the first of its kind to investigate circadian timekeeper gene expression in 2 life stages and 2 species, highlights interesting differences in core clock gene expression patterns that could have potential downstream effects on circadian rhythms.

In Lepidoptera, the roles of period ( per) and the negative feedback involving this gene in circadian rhythm are controversial. In the present study, we established a per knockout strain using TALEN in Bombyx mori, and compared eclosion and hatching rhythms between the per-knockout and wild-type strains to examine whether per is actually involved in these rhythms. The generated per knockout allele was considered null, because it encoded an extensively truncated form of PERIOD (198 aa due to a 64-bp deletion in exon 7, in contrast to 1113 aa in the wild-type protein). In this per knockout strain, circadian rhythms in eclosion and hatching were disrupted. Under LD cycles, however, a steep peak existed at 1 h after lights-on in both eclosion and hatching, and was considered to be produced by a masking effect—a direct response to light. In the per-knockout strain, temporal expression changes of per and timeless ( tim) were also lost. The expression levels of tim were continuously high, probably due to the loss of negative feedback by per and tim. In contrast, the expression levels of per were much lower in the per knockout strain than in the wild type at every time point. From these results, we concluded that per is indispensable for circadian rhythms, and we suggest that the negative feedback loop of the circadian rhythm involving per functions for the production of behavioral rhythms in B. mori.

The spread of adaptive genetic variants in populations is a cornerstone of evolutionary theory but with relatively few biologically well-understood examples. Previous work on the ls-tim variant of timeless, which encodes the light-sensitive circadian regulator in Drosophila melanogaster, suggests that it may have originated in southeastern Italy. Flies characterized by the new allele show photoperiod-related phenotypes likely to be adaptive in seasonal environments. ls-tim may be spreading from its point of origin in Italy by directional selection, but there are alternative explanations for its observed clinal geographical distribution, including balancing selection and demography. From population analyses of ls-tim frequencies collected on the eastern side of the Iberian Peninsula, we show that ls-tim frequencies are inverted compared with those in Italy. This pattern is consistent with a scenario of directional selection rather than latitude-associated balancing selection. Neutrality tests further reveal the signature of directional selection at the ls-tim site, which is reduced a few kb pairs either side of ls-tim. A reanalysis of allele frequencies from a large number of microsatellite loci do not demonstrate any frequent ls-tim-like spatial patterns, so a general demographic effect or population expansion from southeastern Italy cannot readily explain current ls-tim frequencies. Finally, a revised estimate of the age of ls-tim allele using linkage disequilibrium and coalescent-based approaches reveals that it may be only 300 to 3000 years old, perhaps explaining why it has not yet gone to fixation. ls-tim thus provides a rare temporal snapshot of a new allele that has come under selection before it reaches equilibrium.

Despite the significant advance in our understanding of the molecular basis of light entrainment of the circadian clock in Drosophila, the underlying genetic architecture is still largely unknown. The aim of this study was to identify loci associated with variation in circadian photosensitivity, which are important for the evolution of this trait. We have used complementary approaches that combined quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, complementation testing, and transcriptome profiling to dissect this variation. We identified a major QTL on chromosome 2, which was subsequently fine mapped using deficiency complementation mapping into 2 smaller regions spanning 139 genes, some of which are known to be involved in functions that have been previously implicated in light entrainment. Two genes implicated with the clock and located within that interval, timeless and cycle, failed to complement the QTL, indicating that alleles of these genes contribute to the variation in light response. Specifically, we find that the timeless s/ ls polymorphism that has been previously shown to constitute a latitudinal cline in Europe is also segregating in our recombinant inbred lines and is contributing to the phenotypic variation in light sensitivity. We also profiled gene expression in 2 recombinant inbred strains that differ significantly in their photosensitivity and identified a total of 368 transcripts that showed differential expression (false discovery rate < 0.1). Of 131 transcripts that showed a significant recombinant inbred line by treatment interaction (i.e., putative expression QTL), 4 are located within QTL2.

Reverse genetic studies have revealed that common clock genes, such as period ( per), timeless ( tim), cycle ( cyc), and Clock ( Clk), are involved in the circadian clock mechanism among a wide variety of insects. However, to what degree the molecular oscillatory mechanism is conserved is still to be elucidated. In this study, cDNA of the clock gene Clk was cloned in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, and its function was analyzed using RNA interference (RNAi). In adult optic lobes, the Clk mRNA level showed no significant rhythmic changes both under light-dark cycle (LD) and constant darkness (DD). A single injection of Clk double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) resulted in a knockdown of the mRNA level to about 25% of the peak level of control animals. The injected crickets lost their locomotor rhythms in DD. The arrhythmicity in locomotor activity persisted for up to 50 days after the Clk dsRNA injection. Control animals injected with DsRed2 dsRNA showed a clear locomotor rhythm like intact animals. Injection of Clk dsRNA not only suppressed the mRNA levels of both per and tim but also abolished their rhythmic expression. per RNAi down-regulates the Clk mRNA levels, suggesting that per is required for sufficient expression of Clk. These results suggest that Clk is an essential component and plays an important role in the cricket’s circadian clock machinery like in Drosophila, but regulation of its expression is probably different from regulation in Drosophila.

RNA-binding proteins mediate posttranscriptional functions in the circadian systems of multiple species. A conserved RNA recognition motif (RRM) protein encoded by the lark gene is postulated to serve circadian output and molecular oscillator functions in Drosophila and mammals, respectively. In no species, however, has LARK been eliminated, in vivo, to determine the consequences for circadian timing. The present study utilized RNA interference (RNAi) techniques in Drosophila to decrease LARK levels in clock neurons and other cell types in order to evaluate the circadian functions of the protein. Knockdown of LARK in timeless (TIM)– or pigment dispersing factor (PDF)–containing clock cells caused a significant number of flies to exhibit arrhythmic locomotor activity, demonstrating a requirement for the protein in pacemaker cells. There was no obvious effect on PER protein cycling in lark interference (RNAi) flies, but a knockdown within the PDF neurons was associated with increased PDF immunoreactivity at the dorsal termini of the small ventral lateral neuronal (s-LNv) projections, suggesting an effect on neuropeptide release. The expression of lark RNAi in multiple neurosecretory cell populations demonstrated that LARK is required within pacemaker and nonpacemaker cells for the manifestation of normal locomotor activity rhythms. Interestingly, decreased LARK function in the prothoracic gland (PG), a peripheral organ containing a clock required for the circadian control of eclosion, was associated with weak population eclosion rhythms or arrhythmicity.

The circadian transcription of the tim gene is tightly regulated by the protein complex dCLK/CYC, which directly interacts with a series of closely spaced E-box and E-box—like elements in the Drosophila timeless promoter. The tim promoter from D. melanogaster has been studied in detail both in tissue cultures and in living flies yet has never been investigated in other species. This article presents a detailed functional analysis of the tim promoter from the drosophilid fly, C hymomyza costata, in Drosophila tissue cultures. A comparison of tim promoters from wt and npd-mutants confirmed that the 1855 bp deletion in the latter removes crucial regulatory cis-elements as well as the minimal promoter, being subsequently responsible for the lack of tim mRNA expression. Deletion and substitution mutations of the wt tim promoter showed that the region containing the canonical E-box, TER-box, and 2 incomplete E-box sequences is essential for CLK/CYC-mediated expression, while the PERR element appears to be a repressor in S2 cells. Furthermore, the expression of the circadian genes timeless, period , vrille, and doubletime was quantified in C. costata adults. Striking differences were found in expression profiles for tim, per, and vri between wild-type and npd-mutant individuals.

Circadian rhythms of behavior and physiology derive from cell-based clocks (Hastings et al., 2008). Clock cells show circadian molecular oscillations in core clock gene RNAs, proteins, phosphorylation states, and their cellular location. Cellular oscillations are synchronized to one another and to the environment by cycles of light and other cues, zeitgebers, either directly or through neural/hormonal signaling. In flies and mammals the most familiar circadian behavior, locomotion, is largely controlled by discrete groups of brain pacemaker neurons that continue to oscillate synchronously in constant conditions (Nitabach and Taghert, 2008; Okamura, 2007). Clock genes also oscillate in other neural and non-neural tissues (Glossop and Hardin, 2002). These peripheral clocks can entrain to light in flies, but in mammals they respond to SCN signals and other zeitgebers (Plautz et al., 1997; Schibler, 2009). The molecular-genetic basis of the clockworks is based on well-conserved cell-autonomous transcriptional feedback loops. In Drosophila the heterodimeric transcription factor composed of CLOCK and CYCLE drives the transcription of period (per) and timeless (tim) (Allada et al., 1998; Rutila et al., 1998). PER and TIM themselves encode transcription factors that heterodimerize and accumulate in the cytoplasm. After timed phosphorylation PER and TIM enter the nucleus, likely separately, where PER homodimers and/or PER/TIM heterodimers bind to CLK-CYC and thereby reduce their own transcription (Darlington et al., 1998; Landskron et al., 2009; Lee et al., 1998; Meyer, 2006). In this way their repression of CLK-CYC is self-limiting and its relief initiates the next daily cycle of CLK-CYC activation. Many, although not all, clock cells are intrinsically light sensitive through the photopigment CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) (Stanewsky et al., 1998). PER/TIM interactions with CRY provide one route of light entrainment for the fly clock (Ceriani et al., 1999; Rosato et al., 2001). cry may also have other functions in flies, as a component of the oscillator or in temperature-response pathways (Collins et al., 2006; Kaushik et al., 2007; Krishnan et al., 2001). In mammals it functions as one mediator of negative feedback (Kume et al., 1999). Other zeitgebers can also entrain fly clocks, most notably temperature (Stanewsky et al., 1998; Wheeler et al., 1993). CLK-CYC also activates expression of a bHLH repressor, clockwork orange (cwo), that feeds back and represses and/or activates CLK-CYC-mediated activation (Kadener et al., 2007; Lim et al., 2007; Matsumoto et al., 2007; Richier et al., 2008). CLK-CYC activates another feedback loop including the bZIP transcriptional regulators Par domain protein 1 (Pdp1) and vrille (vri) (Blau and Young, 1999; Cyran et al., 2003; Glossop et al., 2003). VRI represses Clk transcription perhaps by antagonizing activation by PDP1 to drive cycling transcription of Clk (Cyran et al., 2003). Because CLK-CYC activates the components of multiple loops that feed back to regulate CLK, this suggests that CLK may act as a master regulator. Consistent with this hypothesis, we showed that ectopic expression of Clk was able to induce circadian tim and cry oscillations in putatively naive cells (Zhao et al., 2003). CLK expression was also found to precede that of PER during late embryonic development (Houl et al., 2008). We suggested Clk expression might be a critical organizer of clock formation, potentially serving as a master regulator capable of inducing the clock program in any cell (Zhao et al., 2003). Here we set out to determine minimal requirements for circadian clock induction. We found Clk uniquely able among clock genes to induce the core molecular feedback loop. Ectopic clocks share cardinal features with endogenous peripheral clocks including genetic requirements, cycling induction of core loop components, and daily rhythmicity. Adult-restricted Clk expression can also induce oscillations in ectopic locations, but such expression must be persistent to sustain clocks. Clocks are induced broadly in the brain; however, in some ectopic locations Clk induces noncycling PER, consistent with a requirement for other factors. Despite the likely role of other contributing factors in sustaining and entraining ectopic clocks, these results indicate that persistent Clock induction is uniquely capable of broadly inducing ectopic rhythms even in adults, consistent with a special role for Clk at the top of a clock gene hierarchy.

The circadian clock, which coordinates daily physiological behaviors of most organisms, maintains endogenous (approximately 24 h) cycles and simultaneously synchronizes to the 24-h environment due to its inherent robustness to environmental perturbations coupled with a sensitivity to specific environmental stimuli. In this study, the authors develop a detailed mathematical model that characterizes the Drosophila melanogaster circadian network. This model incorporates the transcriptional regulation of period, timeless, vrille , PAR-domain protein 1, and clock gene and protein counterparts. The interlocked positive and negative feedback loops that arise from these clock components are described primarily through mass-action kinetics (with the exception of regulated gene expression) and without the use of explicit time delays. System parameters are estimated via a genetic algorithm-based optimization of a cost function that relies specifically on circadian phase behavior since amplitude measurements are often noisy and do not account for the unique entrainment features that define circadian oscillations. Resulting simulations of this 29-state ordinary differential equation model comply with fitted wild-type experimental data, demonstrating accurate free-running (23.24-h periodic) and entrained (24-h periodic) circadian dynamics. This model also predicts unfitted mutant phenotype behavior by illustrating short and long periodicity, robust oscillations, and arrhythmicity. This mechanistic model also predicts light-induced circadian phase resetting (as described by the phase-response curve) that are in line with experimental observations.

The Drosophila clock relies on transcriptional feedback loops that generate daily oscillations of the clock gene expression at mRNA and protein levels. In the evening, the CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) PAS-domain transcription factors activate the expression of the period ( per) and timeless ( tim) genes. Posttranslational modifications delay the accumulation of PER and TIM, which inhibit CLK/CYC activity in the late night. We show here that a null mutant of the clockwork orange ( cwo) gene encoding a bHLH orange-domain putative transcription factor displays long-period activity rhythms. cwo loss of function increases cwo mRNA levels but reduces mRNA peak levels of the 4 described CLK/CYC targets, inducing an almost complete loss of their cycling. In addition, the absence of CWO induces alterations of PER and CLK phosphorylation cycles. Our results indicate that, in vivo , CWO modulates clock gene expression through both repressor and activator transcriptional functions.

Although association of circadian clock properties with the timing of rhythmic behaviors (chronotype) has been extensively documented over several decades, recent studies on mice and Drosophila have failed to observe such associations. In addition, studies on human populations that examined effects of clock gene mutations/polymorphisms on chronotypes have revealed disparate and often contradictory results, thereby highlighting the need for a suitable model organism to study circadian clocks’ role in chronotype regulation, the lack of which has hindered exploration of the underlying molecular-genetic bases. We used a laboratory selection approach to raise populations of Drosophila melanogaster that emerge in the morning ( early) or in the evening ( late), and over 14 years of continued selection, we report clear divergence of their circadian phenotypes. We also assessed the molecular correlates of early and late emergence chronotypes and report significant divergence in transcriptional regulation, including the mean phase, amplitude and levels of period ( per), timeless ( tim), clock ( clk) and vrille ( vri) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression. Corroborating some of the previously reported light-sensitivity and oscillator network coupling differences between the early and the late populations, we also report differences in mRNA expression of the circadian photoreceptor cryptochrome ( cry) and in the mean phase, amplitude and levels of the neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor (PDF). These results provide the first-ever direct evidence for divergent evolution of molecular circadian clocks in response to selection imposed on an overt rhythmic behavior and highlight early and late populations as potential models for chronotype studies by providing a preliminary groundwork for further exploration of molecular-genetic correlates underlying circadian clock-chronotype association.

Extraretinal photoreception is a common input route for light resetting signals into the circadian clock of animals. In Drosophila melanogaster, substantial circadian light inputs are mediated via the blue light photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) expressed in clock neurons within the brain. The current model predicts that, upon light activation, CRY interacts with the clock proteins TIMELESS (TIM) and PERIOD (PER), thereby inducing their degradation, which in turn leads to a resetting of the molecular oscillations within the circadian clock. Here the authors investigate the function of another putative extraretinal circadian photoreceptor, the Hofbauer-Buchner eyelet (H-B eyelet), located between the retina and the medulla in the fly optic lobes. Blocking synaptic transmission between the H-B eyelet and its potential target cells, the ventral circadian pacemaker neurons, impaired the flies' ability to resynchronize their behavior under jet-lag conditions in the context of nonfunctional retinal photoreception and a mutation in the CRY-encoding gene. The same manipulation also affected synchronized expression of the clock proteins TIM and PER in different subsets of the clock neurons. This shows that synaptic communication between the H-B eyelet and clock neurons contributes to synchronization of molecular and behavioral rhythms and confirms that the H-B eyelet functions as a circadian photoreceptor. Blockage of synaptic transmission from the H-B eyelet in the presence of functional compound eyes and the absence of CRY also results in increased numbers of flies that are unable to synchronize to extreme photoperiods, supplying independent proof for the role of the H-B eyelet as a circadian photoreceptor.

Odors elicit a number of behavioral responses, including attraction and repulsion in Drosophila. In this study, the authors used a T-maze apparatus to show that wild-type Drosophila melanogaster exhibit a robust circadian rhythm in the olfactory attractive and repulsive responses. These responses were lower during the day and began to rise at early night, peaking at about the middle of the night and then declining thereafter. They were also independent of locomotor activity. The olfactory response rhythms were lost in period or timeless mutant flies ( per0, tim0), indicating that clock genes control circadian rhythms of olfactory behavior. The rhythms in olfactory response persisted in the absence of the pigment-dispersing factor neuropeptide or the central pacemaker lateral neurons known to drive circadian patterns of locomotion and eclosion. These results indicate that the circadian rhythms in olfactory behavior in Drosophila are driven by pacemakers that do not control the rest-activity cycle and are likely in the antennae.

Circadian clock genes are ubiquitously expressed in the nervous system and peripheral tissues of complex animals. While clock genes in the brain are essential for behavioral rhythms, the physiological roles of these genes in the periphery are not well understood. Constitutive expression of the clock gene period was reported in the ovaries of Drosophila melanogaster; however, its molecular interactions and functional significance remained unknown. This study demonstrates that period( per) and timeless( tim) are involved in a novel noncircadian function in the ovary. PER and TIM are constantly expressed in the follicle cells enveloping young oocytes. Genetic evidence suggests that PER and TIM interact in these cells, yet they do not translocate to the nucleus. The levels of TIM and PER in the ovary are affected neither by light nor by the lack of clock-positive elements Clock( Clk) and cycle( cyc). Taken together, these data suggest that per and tim are regulated differently in follicle cells than in clock cells. Experimental evidence suggests that a novel fitness-related phenotype may be linked to noncircadian expression of clock genes in the ovaries. Mated females lacking either per or tim show nearly a 50% decline in progeny, and virgin females show a similar decline in the production of mature oocytes. Disruption of circadian mechanism by either the depletion of TIM via constant light treatment or continuous expression of PER via GAL4/UAS expression system has no adverse effect on the production of mature oocytes.

The authors cloned the period ( per) gene from the marine mollusk Bulla gouldiana, a well-characterized circadian model system. This allowed them to examine the characteristics of the per gene in a new phylum, and to make comparisons with the conserved PER domains previously characterized in insects and vertebrates. Only one copy of the per gene is present in the Bulla genome, and it is most similar to PER in two insects: the cockroach, Periplaneta americana, and silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi. Comparison with Drosophila PER (dPER) and murine PER 1 (mPER1) sequence reveals that there is greater sequence homology between Bulla PER (bPER) and dPER in the regions of dPER shown to be important to heterodimerization between dPER and Drosophila timeless. Although the structure suggests conservation between dPER and bPER, expression patterns differ. In all cells and tissues examined that are peripheral to the clock neurons in Bulla, bPer mRNA and protein are expressed constitutively in light:dark (LD) cycles. In the identified clock neurons, the basal retinal neurons (BRNs), a rhythm in bPer expression could be detected in LD cycles with a peak at zeitgeber time (ZT) 5 and trough expression at ZT 13. This temporal profile of expression more closely resembles that of mPER1 than that of dPER. bPer rhythms in the BRNs were not detected in continuous darkness. These analyses suggest that clock genes may be uniquely regulated in different circadian systems, but lead to similar control of rhythms at the cellular, tissue, and organismal levels.

Although transcriptional regulation is a major force in generating circadian oscillations of clock molecules, posttranscriptional mechanisms also contribute to molecular rhythms. Applying novel transgenic period-luciferase constructs in transgenic Drosophila, the authors show that sequences within per's 5[.minute]-untranslated region mediate posttranscriptional regulation at the RNA level. Further mapping suggests that the relevant sequences for the correct phasing of period mRNAexpression are located within the first intron. The results are consistent with a clock-regulated temporal stabilization of period mRNA during its daily upswing in the morning. This process is inferred to depend on a function of the PERIOD and TIMELESS proteins, and could further contribute to the observed delay between RNA and protein accumulation. Similarly, applying timeless-luciferase constructs led to the demonstration that regulatory elements for proper temporal timeless expression are present ina4kbpromoter fragment and in sequences within the first intron. The results establish that, for normal rhythmicity, expression of clock genes requires regulation at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and posttranslational levels.

The circadian rhythm genes period ( per) and timeless ( tim) are central to contemporary studies on Drosophila circadian rhythms. Mutations in these genes give rise to arrhythmic or period-altered phenotypes, and per and tim gene expression is under clock control. per and tim proteins (PER and TIM) also undergo circadian changes in level and phosphorylation state. The authors previously described a period-altering tim mutation, timSL, with allele-specific effects in different per backgrounds. This mutation also affected the TIM phosphorylation profile during the mid-late night. The authors show here that the single amino acid alteration in TIM-SL is indeed responsible for the phenotype, as a timSL transgene recapitulates the original mutant phenotype and shortens the period of perL flies by 3 h. The authors also show that this mutation has comparable effects in a light-dark cycle, as timSL also accelerates the activity offset during the mid-late night of perL flies. Importantly, timSL advances predominantly the mid-late night region of the perL phase response curve, consistent with the notion that this portion of the cycle is governed by unique rate-limiting steps. The authors propose that TIM and PER phosphorylation are normally rate determining during the mid-late night region of the circadian cycle.

The authors present a model for circadian oscillations of the Period (PER) and Timeless (TIM) proteins in Drosophila. The model for the circadian clock is based on multiple phosphorylation of PER and TIM and on the negative feedback exerted by a nuclear PER-TIM complex on the transcription of the perand tim genes. Periodic behavior occurs in a large domain of parameter space in the form of limit cycle oscillations. These sustained oscillations occur in conditions corresponding to continuous darkness or to entrainment by light-dark cycles and are in good agreement with experimental observations on the temporal variations of PER and TIM and of per and tim mRNAs. Birhythmicity (coexistence of two periodic regimes) and aperiodic oscillations (chaos) occur in a restricted range of parameter values. The results are compared to the predictions of a model based on the sole regulation by PER. Both the formation of a complex between PER and TIM and protein phosphorylation are found to favor oscillatory behavior. Determining how the period depends on several key parameters allows us to test possible molecular explanations proposed for the altered period in the perl and pers mutants. The extended model further allows the construction of phase-response curves based on the light-induced triggering of TIM degradation. These curves, established as a function of both the duration and magnitude of the effect of a light pulse, match the phase-response curves obtained experimentally in the wild type and pers mutant of Drosophila.

The authors analyzed circadian features of two period-lacZ (per-lacZ) fusion genes in transgenic strains of Drosophila. Both genes manifest circadian fluctuations of mRNA levels, but fluctuations of only the larger chimeric protein are apparent. Fusion protein cycling is indistinguishable from the behavior of wild-type per protein (PER), including apparent temporal regulation of phosphorylation state. Several arguments indicate that the difference in the two constructs is proper regulation at the level of protein turnover: the smaller protein has much higher levels; a β-galactosidase degradation product is visible in both strains but fails to manifest cycling, presumably due to a long half-life; and only the noncycling proteins accumulate as a function of adult age. The large cycling fusion protein also undergoes modest cycling in an arrhythmic per01 background. This is light dependent, resembles the regulation of the timeless protein (TIM) by light, and reflects a documented fusion protein-TIM interaction. The results are discussed with respect to the posttranscriptional regulation that is necessary for proper cycling of both PER and TIM as well as for clock function.

Phase resetting by light is an important feature of circadian rhythms, and the current Drosophila model focuses on light-mediated degradation of the clock protein TIMELESS (TIM). PERIOD (PER) is the binding partner of TIM and a major repressor of the molecular clock, but direct evidence of PER in phase resetting is lacking. Because light sensitivity of the perS short period mutant strain is strongly enhanced compared with wild-type strains, we assayed the importance of PER degradation for light-induced phase shifting. The perS protein (PERS) is markedly less stable than wild-type PER, in tissue culture and in flies, and PERS as well as PER is stabilized by TIM in both systems. Consistent with this finding, light-induced TIM degradation appears to trigger PER degradation. Moreover, TIM degradation is similar in the clock neurons of both strains, suggesting that it is not strongly affected by PERS and does not dictate the difference in the light response. In contrast, there is a dramatic quantitative difference between PER and PERS degradation in these neurons, indicating that PER degradation dictates the enhanced amplitude of the light-induced phase response. The data indicate that TIM inhibits PER degradation and that PER degradation follows light-mediated TIM degradation within circadian neurons; PER degradation then dictates qualitative as well as quantitative features of light-mediated phase-resetting.

The circadian clock modulates the adaptive daily patterns of physiology and behavior and adjusts these rhythms to seasonal changes. Recent studies of seasonal locomotor activity patterns of wild-type and clock mutant fruit flies in quasi-natural conditions have revealed that these behavioral patterns differ considerably from those observed under standard laboratory conditions. To unravel the molecular features accompanying seasonal adaptation of the clock, we investigated Drosophila’s neuronal expression of the canonical clock proteins PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) in nature. We find that the profile of PER dramatically changes in different seasons, whereas that of TIM remains more constant. Unexpectedly, we find that PER and TIM oscillations are decoupled in summer conditions. Moreover, irrespective of season, PER and TIM always peak earlier in the dorsal neurons than in the lateral neurons, suggesting a more rapid molecular oscillation in these cells. We successfully reproduced most of our results under simulated natural conditions in the laboratory and show that although photoperiod is the most important zeitgeber for the molecular clock, the flies’ activity pattern is more strongly affected by temperature. Our results are among the first to systematically compare laboratory and natural studies of Drosophila rhythms.

Most of what we know today about the molecular constituents of the insect circadian clock was discovered in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Various other holometabolous and some hemimetabolous insects have also been examined for the presence of circadian genes. In these insects, per, tim1, and cry2 are part of a core feedback loop system. The proteins inhibit their own expression, leading to circadian oscillations of mRNA and proteins. Although cockroaches are successfully employed circadian model organisms, their clock genes are mostly unknown. Thus, we cloned putative circadian genes in Rhyparobia maderae (synonym Leucophaea maderae), showing the presence of period ( per), timeless 1 ( tim1), and mammalian-type cryptochrome ( cry2). The expression levels of per, tim1, and cry2 in R. maderae were examined in various tissues and photoperiods employing quantitative PCR. In brains and excised accessory medullae, expression levels of rmPer, rmTim1, and rmCry2 oscillated in a circadian manner with peaks in the first half of the night. Oscillations mostly continued in constant conditions. In Malpighian tubules, no significant oscillations were found. In animals raised in different photoperiods (LD 18:6, 12:12, 6:18), the peak levels of rmPer, rmTim1, and rmCry2 expression adjusted with respect to the beginning of the scotophase. The daily mean of expression levels was significantly lower in short-day versus long-day animals. We suggest that rmPer, rmTim1, and rmCry2 are part of the Madeira cockroach nuclear circadian clock, which can adjust to different photoperiods.

Although chronobiology is of growing interest to scientists, physicians, and the general public, access to recent discoveries and historical perspectives is limited. Wikipedia is an online, user-written encyclopedia that could enhance public access to current understanding in chronobiology. However, Wikipedia is lacking important information and is not universally trusted. Here, 46 students in a university course edited Wikipedia to enhance public access to important discoveries in chronobiology. Students worked for an average of 9 h each to evaluate the primary literature and available Wikipedia information, nominated sites for editing, and, after voting, edited the 15 Wikipedia pages they determined to be highest priorities. This assignment ( http://www.nslc.wustl.edu/courses/Bio4030/wikipedia_project.html ) was easy to implement, required relatively short time commitments from the professor and students, and had measurable impacts on Wikipedia and the students. Students created 3 new Wikipedia sites, edited 12 additional sites, and cited 347 peer-reviewed articles. The targeted sites all became top hits in online search engines. Because their writing was and will be read by a worldwide audience, students found the experience rewarding. Students reported significantly increased comfort with reading, critiquing, and summarizing primary literature and benefited from seeing their work edited by other scientists and editors of Wikipedia. We conclude that, in a short project, students can assist in making chronobiology widely accessible and learn from the editorial process.

The ability to adapt to different environmental conditions including seasonal changes is a key feature of the circadian clock. Here, we compared the ability of 3 Drosophila melanogaster wild-type strains to adapt rhythmic activity to long photoperiods simulated in the laboratory. Fruit flies are predominantly crepuscular with activity bouts in the morning (M) and evening (E). The M peak follows dawn and the E peak follows dusk when the photoperiod is extended. We show that this ability is restricted to a certain extension of the phase angle between M and E peaks, such that the E peak does not delay beyond a certain phase under long days. We demonstrate that this ability is significantly improved by simulated twilight and that it depends additionally on the genetic background and the ambient temperature. At 20 °C, the laboratory strain CantonS had the most flexible phase angle between M and E peaks, a Northern wild-type strain had an intermediate one, and a Southern wild-type strain had the lowest flexibility. Furthermore, we found that the 3 strains differed in clock light sensitivity, with the CantonS and the Northern strains more light sensitive than the Southern strain. These results are generally in accord with the recently discovered polymorphisms in the timeless gene ( tim) that affect clock light sensitivity.

Photoperiodic signal stimulates induction of larval diapause in Chymomyza costata. Larvae of NPD strain ( npd-mutants) do not respond to photoperiod. Our previous results indicated that the locus npd could code for the timeless gene and its product might represent a molecular link between circadian and photoperiodic clock systems. Here we present results of tim mRNA (real time-PCR) and TIM protein (immunohistochemistry) analyses in the larval brain. TIM protein was localized in 2 neurons of each brain hemisphere of the 4-d-old 3rd instar wild-type larvae. In a marked contrast, no TIM neurons were detected in the brain of 4-day-old 3rd instar npd -mutant larvae and the level of tim transcripts was approximately 10-fold lower in the NPD than in the wild-type strain. Daily changes in tim expression and TIM presence appeared to be under photoperiodic control in the wild-type larvae. Clear daily oscillations of tim transcription were observed during the development of 3rd instars under the short-day conditions. Daily oscillations were less apparent under the long-day conditions, where a gradual increase of tim transcript abundance appeared as a prevailing trend. Analysis of the genomic structure of tim gene revealed that npd-mutants carry a 1855 bp-long deletion in the 5′-UTR region. This deletion removed the start of transcription and promoter regulatory motifs E-box and TER-box. The authors hypothesize that this mutation was responsible for dramatic reduction of tim transcription rates, disruption of circadian clock function, and disruption of photoperiodic calendar function in npd-mutant larvae of C. costata.

Numerous lines of evidence indicate that the initial photoresponse of the circadian clock in Drosophila melanogaster is the light-induced degradation of TIMELESS (TIM). This posttranslational mechanism is in sharp contrast to the well-characterized pacemakers in mammals and Neurospora, where light evokes rapid changes in the transcriptional profiles of 1 or more clock genes. The authors show that light has novel effects on D. melanogaster circadian pacemakers, acutely stimulating the expression of tim at cold but not warm temperatures. This photoinduction occurs in flies defective for the classic visual phototransduction pathway or the circadian-relevant photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME (CRY). Cold-specific stimulation of tim RNA abundance is regulated at the transcriptional level, and although numerous lines of evidence indicate that period ( per) and tim expression are activated by the same mechanism, light has no measurable acute effect on per mRNA abundance. Moreover, light-induced increases in the levels of tim RNA are abolished or greatly reduced in the absence of functional CLOCK (CLK) or CYCLE (CYC) but not PER or TIM. These findings add to a growing number of examples where molecular and behavioral photoresponses in Drosophila are differentially influenced by “positive” (e.g., CLK and CYC) and “negative” (e.g., PER and TIM) core clock elements. The acute effects of light on tim expression are temporally gated, essentially restricted to the daily rising phase in tim mRNA levels. Because the start of the daily upswing in tim expression begins several hours after dawn in long photoperiods (day length), this gating mechanism likely ensures that sunrise does not prematurely stimulate tim expression during unseasonally cold spring/summer days. The results suggest that the photic stimulation of tim expression at low temperatures is part of a seasonal adaptive response that helps advance the phase of the clock on cold days, enabling flies to exhibit preferential daytime activity despite the (usually) earlier onset of dusk. Taken together with prior findings, the ability of temperature and photoperiod to adjust trajectories in the rising phases of 1 or more clock RNAs constitutes a major mechanism contributing to seasonal adaptation of clock function.

The period ( per) and timeless ( tim) genes play a central role in the Drosophila circadian clock mechanism. PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) proteins periodically accumulate in the nuclei of pace-making cells in the fly brain and many cells in peripheral organs. In contrast, TIM and PER in the ovarian follicle cells remain cytoplasmic and do not show daily oscillations in their levels. Moreover, TIM is not light sensitive in the ovary, while it is highly sensitive to this input in circadian tissues. The mechanism underlying this intriguing difference is addressed here. It is demonstrated that the circadian photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) is not expressed in ovarian tissues. Remarkably, ectopic cry expression in the ovary is sufficient to cause degradation of TIM after exposure to light. In addition, PER levels are reduced in response to light when CRY is present, as observed in circadian cells. Hence, CRY is the key component of the light input pathway missing in the ovary. However, the factors regulating PER and TIM levels downstream of light/cry action appear to be present in this non-circadian organ.

The Drosophila circadian clock is an ideal model system for teasing out the molecular mechanisms of circadian behavior and the means by which animals synchronize to day-night cycles. The clock that drives behavioral rhythms, located in the lateral neurons in the central brain, consists of a feedback loop of the circadian genes period ( per) and timeless ( tim). The molecular cycle, roughly 24 h long, is constantly reset by the environment. This review focuses on the main input pathways of the dominant circadian zeitgeber, light. Light acts directly on the clock primarily through cryptochrome ( cry), a deep brain blue-light photo-receptor. CRY activation causes rapid TIM degradation, which is a predicted means of resetting the clock both on a daily basis at dawn and on an acute basis following an entraining light pulse during the night hours. In the absence of cry, the clock can still be driven by photic input through the visual system, though the mechanisms underlying this entrainment are unclear. Temperature can also entrain the clock, although the mechanisms by which this occurs are also unclear.

In Drosophila melanogaster, disruption of night by even short light exposures results in degradation of the clock protein TIMELESS (TIM), leading to shifts in the fly molecular and behavioral rhythms. Several lines of evidence indicate that light entrainment of the brain clock involves the blue-light photoreceptor cryptochrome (CRY). In cryptochrome-depleted Drosophila ( cry b), the entrainment of the brain clock by short light pulses is impaired but the clock is still entrainable by light-dark cycles, probably due to light input from the visual system. Whether cryptochrome and visual transduction pathways play a role in entrainment of noninnervated, directly photosensitive peripheral clocks is not known and the subject of this study. The authors monitored levels of the clock protein TIM in the lateral neurons (LNs) of larval brains and in the renal Malpighian tubules (MTs) of flies mutant for the cryptochromegene ( cry b) and in mutants that lack signaling from the visual photopigments ( norpA P41). In cry bflies, light applied during the dark period failed to induce degradation of TIM both in MTs and in LNs, yet attenuated cycling of TIM was observed in both tissues in LD. This cycling was abolished in LNs, but persisted in MTs, of norpA P41; cry b double mutants. Furthermore, the activity of the tim gene in the MTs of cry b flies, reported by luciferase, seemed stimulated by lights-on and suppressed by lights-off, suggesting that the absence of functional cryptochrome uncovered an additional light-sensitive pathway synchronizing the expression of TIM in this tissue. In constant darkness, cycling of TIM was abolished in MTs; however, it persisted in LNs of cry b flies. The authors conclude that cryptochrome is involved in TIM-mediated entrainment of both central LN and peripheral MT clocks. Cryptochrome is also an indispensable component of the endogenous clock mechanism in the examined peripheral tissue, but not in the brain. Thus, although neural and epithelial cells share the core clock mechanism, some clock components and light-entrainment pathways appear to have tissue-specific roles.

Increasing evidence indicates that the accessory medulla is the circadian pacemaker controlling locomotor activity rhythms in insects. A prominent group of neurons of this neuropil shows immunoreactivity to the peptide pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH). In Drosophila melanogaster, the PDH immunoreactive (PDH-ir) lateral neurons, which also express the clock genes period and timeless, are assumed to be circadian pacemaker cells themselves. In other insects, such as Leucophaea maderae, a subset of apparently homologue PDH-ir cells is a candidate for the circadian coupling pathway of the bilaterally symmetric clocks. Although knowledge about molecular mechanisms of the circadian clockwork is increasing rapidly, very little is known about mechanisms of circadian coupling. The authors 4used a computer model, based on the molecular feedback loop of the clock genes in D. melanogaster, to test the hypothesis that release of pigment-dispersing hormone is involved in the coupling between bilaterally paired oscillators. They can show that a combination of all-delay- and all-advance-type interactions between two model oscillators matches best the experimental findings on mutual pacemaker coupling in L. maderae. The model predicts that PDH affects the phosphorylation rate of clock genes and that in addition to PDH, another neuroactive substance is involved in the coupling pathway, via an all-advance type of interaction. The model suggests that PDH and light pulses, represented by two distinct classes of phase response curves, have different targets in the oscillatory feedback loop and are, therefore, likely to act in separate input pathways to the clock.

The minimum element from the Drosophila period promoter capable of driving in vivo cycling mRNA is the 69 bp circadian regulatory sequence (CRS). In cell culture, an 18 bp E-box element from the period promoter is regulated by five genes that are involved in the regulation of circadian expression in flies. This E-box is a target for transcriptional activation by bHLH-PAS proteins dCLOCK (dCLK) and CYCLE (CYC), this activation is inhibited by PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) together, and inhibition of dCLK/CYC by PER and TIM is blocked by CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) in the presence of light. Here, the same 18 bp E-box region generated rhythmic expression of luciferase in flies under both light-dark cycling and constant conditions. Flies heterozygous for the Clk mutation maintained rhythmic expression from the E-box although at a lower level than wild type. Homozygous mutant Clk animals had drastically lowered and arrhythmic expression. In a per background, expression from the E-box was high and not rhythmic. Transcription mediated by the per E-box was restricted to the same spatial pattern as the CRS. The per E-box DNAelement and cognate binding proteins can confer per-like temporal and spatial expression. This demonstrates in vivo that the known circadian genes that form the core of the circadian oscillator in Drosophila integrate their activities at a single DNA element.

Phases of circadian locomotor activity rhythms of adult Drosophilareared in constant darkness have been shown to be set by a light stimulus delivered as early as the first-instar larval stage. This implies that a circadian clock functions continuously throughout postembryonic development. The clock genes period ( per) and timeless ( tim) are expressed cyclically in the larval central nervous system of Drosophila, and daily oscillations of per expression persist throughout metamorphosis in a group of cells, which gives rise to the pacemaker cells underlying locomotor activity rhythms of adults. Therefore, PER and TIM cyclings in these neurons may be responsible for the phenomenon of “larval time-memory.” In the absence of any evidence for the involvement of these genes in such a developmental clock, and because circadian-pacemaker functions are underanalyzed in terms of the functions during development, the authors tested the time-memory of a fast-clock period mutant. They show that dark-reared per Smutant individuals as well as wild-type flies can be entrained as larvae and that a brief light pulse given to such entrained larvae can induce phase shifts in animals of either genotype. However, the direction and magnitude of phase shifts were different between wild type and per S, suggesting that a clock under the control of period gene participates in the regulation of developmental time-memory. The authors show that the relevant clock can be entrained by two light input pathways, one involving the phospholipase C encoded by the norpA gene, the other mediated by the blue-light receptor cryptochrome. Phase shifts of molecular oscillations during the larval stage were smaller than those measured by adult behavior, suggesting molecularly transient responses during development.

Circadian rhythms in Drosophila depend on a molecular feedback loop that includes products of the period ( per) and timeless ( tim) genes. RNA and protein products of both genes cycle with a circadian period and the proteins feedback to inhibit expression of their own mRNAs. While cyclic expression of PER protein appears to be necessary for rhythmic behavior, the function of per RNA cycling is somewhat controversial. Rhythmic transcription accounts, in part, for cycling of per RNA, but it is clear now that posttranscriptional mechanisms also contribute to the cyclic expression of both per RNA and protein. As posttranscriptional mechanisms, such as mRNA stability and translation, are frequently mediated by 3’ untranslated regions (UTR) of genes, the authors examined the role of this region of per in the regulation of circadian rhythms. Removal of most of per's 3’ UTR had a small effect on the function of a per transgene. However, replacement of per's 3’ UTR with corresponding sequences of the tubulin gene led to the rescue of behavioral rhythms in per01 flies with periods that were 3 h shorter than those generated by a wild-type per transgene. The hybrid RNA cycles, but the protein produced by it accumulates earlier in a day-night cycle than the PER protein produced by a control per transgene carrying its own 3’ UTR, perhaps because the tubulin sequences counteract the effect of destabilizing elements in the per RNA at earlier points in the circadian cycle. These data indicate that the appropriate regulation of per RNA expression, effected by transcriptional as well as posttranscriptional mechanisms, is critical for the determination of circadian period.