Search

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) patients harbor germ line mutations in the TP53 gene and are at increased risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Recently, elevated levels of aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme for estrogen biosynthesis, were found in the breast tissue of LFS patients. Although p53 down-regulates aromatase expression, the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. In the present study, we found that LFS stromal cells expressed higher levels of Hsp90 ATPase activity and aromatase compared with wild-type stromal cells. Inhibition of Hsp90 ATPase suppressed aromatase expression. Silencing Aha1 (activator of Hsp90 ATPase 1), a co-chaperone of Hsp90 required for its ATPase activity, led to both inhibition of Hsp90 ATPase activity and reduced aromatase expression. In comparison with wild-type stromal cells, increased levels of the Hsp90 client proteins, HIF-1α, and PKM2 were found in LFS stromal cells. A complex comprised of HIF-1α and PKM2 was recruited to the aromatase promoter II in LFS stromal cells. Silencing either HIF-1α or PKM2 suppressed aromatase expression in LFS stromal cells. CP-31398, a p53 rescue compound, suppressed levels of Aha1, Hsp90 ATPase activity, levels of PKM2 and HIF-1α, and aromatase expression in LFS stromal cells. Consistent with these in vitro findings, levels of Hsp90 ATPase activity, Aha1, HIF-1α, PKM2, and aromatase were increased in the mammary glands of p53 null versus wild-type mice. PKM2 and HIF-1α were shown to co-localize in the nucleus of stromal cells of LFS breast tissue. Taken together, our results show that the Aha1-Hsp90-PKM2/HIF-1α axis mediates the induction of aromatase in LFS.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) patients harbor germ line mutations in the TP53 gene and are at increased risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Recently, elevated levels of aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme for estrogen biosynthesis, were found in the breast tissue of LFS patients. Although p53 down-regulates aromatase expression, the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. In the present study, we found that LFS stromal cells expressed higher levels of Hsp90 ATPase activity and aromatase compared with wild-type stromal cells. Inhibition of Hsp90 ATPase suppressed aromatase expression. Silencing Aha1 (activator of Hsp90 ATPase 1), a co-chaperone of Hsp90 required for its ATPase activity, led to both inhibition of Hsp90 ATPase activity and reduced aromatase expression. In comparison with wild-type stromal cells, increased levels of the Hsp90 client proteins, HIF-1α, and PKM2 were found in LFS stromal cells. A complex comprised of HIF-1α and PKM2 was recruited to the aromatase promoter II in LFS stromal cells. Silencing either HIF-1α or PKM2 suppressed aromatase expression in LFS stromal cells. CP-31398, a p53 rescue compound, suppressed levels of Aha1, Hsp90 ATPase activity, levels of PKM2 and HIF-1α, and aromatase expression in LFS stromal cells. Consistent with these in vitro findings, levels of Hsp90 ATPase activity, Aha1, HIF-1α, PKM2, and aromatase were increased in the mammary glands of p53 null versus wild-type mice. PKM2 and HIF-1α were shown to co-localize in the nucleus of stromal cells of LFS breast tissue. Taken together, our results show that the Aha1-Hsp90-PKM2/HIF-1α axis mediates the induction of aromatase in LFS.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is considered to be a target for anticancer therapy. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors exhibit antitumor activity, but the mechanisms of action are incompletely understood. We investigated whether HDAC inhibitors blocked AP-1-mediated activation of COX-2 transcription. Trichostatin A and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, two structurally related inhibitors of HDAC activity, blocked AP-1-mediated induction of COX-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that HDAC inhibitors suppressed c-Jun binding to the COX-2 promoter and thereby blocked transcription. The observed reduction in binding reflected reduced levels of c-Jun. HDAC inhibitors suppressed the induction of c-jun transcription by blocking the recruitment of the preinitiation complex (RNA polymerase II and TFIIB) to the c-jun promoter. HDAC3 but not HDAC1 or HDAC2 was required for AP-1-mediated stimulation of c-jun expression. Because HDAC inhibitors suppressed the induction of c-jun gene expression, resulting in reduced COX-2 transcription, it was important to determine whether other known AP-1 target genes were also modulated. Cyclin D1 and collagenase-1 are AP-1-dependent genes that have been implicated in carcinogenesis. HDAC inhibitors suppressed the induction of both cyclin D1 and collagenase-1 transcription by inhibiting the binding of c-Jun to the respective promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that HDAC inhibitors block the induction of c-jun transcription by inhibiting the recruitment of the preinitiation complex to the c-jun promoter. This led, in turn, to reduced expression of several activator protein-1-dependent genes (COX-2, cyclin D1, collagenase-1). These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying the antitumor activity of HDAC inhibitors.

The p53 tumor suppressor gene encodes a homotetrameric transcription factor which is activated in response to a variety of cellular stressors, including DNA damage and oncogene activation. p53 mutations occur in50% of human cancers. Although p53 has been shown to regulate Wnt signaling, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Here we show that silencing p53 in colon cancer cells led to increased expression of Aha1, a co-chaperone of Hsp90. Heat shock factor-1 was important for mediating the changes in Aha1 levels. Increased Aha1 levels were associated with enhanced interactions with Hsp90, resulting in increased Hsp90 ATPase activity. Moreover, increased Hsp90 ATPase activity resulted in increased phosphorylation of Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), leading to enhanced expression of Wnt target genes. Significantly, levels of Aha1, Hsp90 ATPase activity, Akt, and GSK3β phosphorylation and expression of Wnt target genes were increased in the colons of p53-null as compared with p53 wild type mice. Using p53 heterozygous mutant epithelial cells from Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients, we show that a monoallelic mutation of p53 was sufficient to activate the Aha1/Hsp90 ATPase axis leading to stimulation of Wnt signaling and increased expression of Wnt target genes. Pharmacologic intervention with CP-31398, a p53 rescue agent, inhibited recruitment of Aha1 to Hsp90 and suppressed Wnt-mediated gene expression in colon cancer cells. Taken together, this study provides new insights into the mechanism by which p53 regulates Wnt signaling and raises the intriguing possibility that p53 status may affect the efficacy of anticancer therapies targeting Hsp90 ATPase.

The p53 tumor suppressor gene encodes a homotetrameric transcription factor which is activated in response to a variety of cellular stressors, including DNA damage and oncogene activation. p53 mutations occur in >50% of human cancers. Although p53 has been shown to regulate Wnt signaling, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Here we show that silencing p53 in colon cancer cells led to increased expression of Aha1, a co-chaperone of Hsp90. Heat shock factor-1 was important for mediating the changes in Aha1 levels. Increased Aha1 levels were associated with enhanced interactions with Hsp90, resulting in increased Hsp90 ATPase activity. Moreover, increased Hsp90 ATPase activity resulted in increased phosphorylation of Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), leading to enhanced expression of Wnt target genes. Significantly, levels of Aha1, Hsp90 ATPase activity, Akt, and GSK3β phosphorylation and expression of Wnt target genes were increased in the colons of p53-null as compared with p53 wild type mice. Using p53 heterozygous mutant epithelial cells from Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients, we show that a monoallelic mutation of p53 was sufficient to activate the Aha1/Hsp90 ATPase axis leading to stimulation of Wnt signaling and increased expression of Wnt target genes. Pharmacologic intervention with CP-31398, a p53 rescue agent, inhibited recruitment of Aha1 to Hsp90 and suppressed Wnt-mediated gene expression in colon cancer cells. Taken together, this study provides new insights into the mechanism by which p53 regulates Wnt signaling and raises the intriguing possibility that p53 status may affect the efficacy of anticancer therapies targeting Hsp90 ATPase.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand-activated member of the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors, binds with high affinity to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and the environmental toxin 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin). Most of the biochemical, biological, and toxicological responses caused by exposure to PAHs and polychlorinated dioxins are mediated, at least in part, by the AhR. The AhR is a client protein of Hsp90, a molecular chaperone that can be reversibly acetylated with functional consequences. The main objective of this study was to determine whether modulating Hsp90 acetylation would affect ligand-mediated activation of AhR signaling. Trichostatin A and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, two broad spectrum HDAC inhibitors, blocked PAH and dioxin-mediated induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in cell lines derived from the human aerodigestive tract. Silencing HDAC6 or treatment with tubacin, a pharmacological inhibitor of HDAC6, also suppressed the induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1. Inhibiting HDAC6 led to hyperacetylation of Hsp90 and loss of complex formation with AhR, cochaperone p23, and XAP-2. Inactivation or silencing of HDAC6 also led to reduced binding of ligand to the AhR and decreased translocation of the AhR from cytosol to nucleus in response to ligand. Ligand-induced recruitment of the AhR to the CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 promoters was inhibited when HDAC6 was inactivated. Mutation analysis of Hsp90 Lys294 shows that its acetylation status is a strong determinant of interactions with AhR and p23 in addition to ligand-mediated activation of AhR signaling. Collectively, these results show that HDAC6 activity regulates the acetylation of Hsp90, the ability of Hsp90 to chaperone the AhR, and the expression of AhR-dependent genes. Given the established link between activation of AhR signaling and xenobiotic metabolism, inhibitors of HDAC6 may alter drug or carcinogen metabolism.

Cytochrome P450 aromatase (aromatase), a product of the CYP19 gene, catalyzes the synthesis of estrogens from androgens. Because aromatase-dependent estrogen biosynthesis has been linked to hormone-dependent breast carcinogenesis, it is important to elucidate the mechanisms that regulate CYP19 gene expression. The main objective of this study was to identify the receptors (EP) for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) that mediate the induction of CYP19 transcription in human adipocytes and breast cancer cells. Treatment with PGE2 induced aromatase, an effect that was mimicked by either EP2 or EP4 agonists. Antagonists of EP2 or EP4 or small interference RNA-mediated down-regulation of these receptors suppressed PGE2-mediated induction of aromatase. PGE2 via EP2 and EP4 stimulated the cAMP→protein kinase A pathway resulting in enhanced interaction between P-CREB, p300, and the aromatase promoter I.3/II. Overexpressing a mutant form of p300 that lacks histone acetyltransferase activity suppressed PGE2-mediated induction of aromatase promoter activity. PGE2 via EP2 and EP4 also caused a reduction in both the amounts of BRCA1 and the interaction between BRCA1 and the aromatase promoter I.3/II. Activation of the aromatase promoter by PGE2 was suppressed by overexpressing wild-type BRCA1. Silencing of EP2 or EP4 also blocked PGE2-mediated induction of the progesterone receptor, a prototypic estrogen-response gene. In a mouse model, overexpressing COX-2 in the mammary gland, a known inducer of PGE2 synthesis, led to increased aromatase mRNA and activity and reduced amounts of BRCA1; these effects were reversed by knocking out EP2. Taken together, these results suggest that PGE2 via EP2 and EP4 activates the cAMP→PKA→CREB pathway leading to enhanced CYP19 transcription and increased aromatase activity. Reciprocal changes in the interaction between BRCA1, p300, and the aromatase promoter I.3/II contributed to the inductive effects of PGE2.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is considered to be a target for anticancer therapy. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors exhibit antitumor activity, but the mechanisms of action are incompletely understood. We investigated whether HDAC inhibitors blocked AP-1-mediated activation of COX-2 transcription. Trichostatin A and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, two structurally related inhibitors of HDAC activity, blocked AP-1-mediated induction of COX-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that HDAC inhibitors suppressed c-Jun binding to the COX-2 promoter and thereby blocked transcription. The observed reduction in binding reflected reduced levels of c-Jun. HDAC inhibitors suppressed the induction of c-jun transcription by blocking the recruitment of the preinitiation complex (RNA polymerase II and TFIIB) to the c-jun promoter. HDAC3 but not HDAC1 or HDAC2 was required for AP-1-mediated stimulation of c-jun expression. Because HDAC inhibitors suppressed the induction of c-jun gene expression, resulting in reduced COX-2 transcription, it was important to determine whether other known AP-1 target genes were also modulated. Cyclin D1 and collagenase-1 are AP-1-dependent genes that have been implicated in carcinogenesis. HDAC inhibitors suppressed the induction of both cyclin D1 and collagenase-1 transcription by inhibiting the binding of c-Jun to the respective promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that HDAC inhibitors block the induction of c-jun transcription by inhibiting the recruitment of the preinitiation complex to the c-jun promoter. This led, in turn, to reduced expression of several activator protein-1-dependent genes (COX-2, cyclin D1, collagenase-1). These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying the antitumor activity of HDAC inhibitors.

Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) catalyzes the conversion of cyclooxygenase-derived prostaglandin (PG) H(2) to PGE(2). Increased amounts of mPGES-1 were detected in inflamed intestinal mucosa from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha stimulated mPGES-1 transcription in human colonocytes, resulting in increased amounts of mPGES-1 mRNA and protein. The inductive effect of TNF-alpha localized to the GC box region of the mPGES-1 promoter. Binding of Egr-1 to the GC box region of the mPGES-1 promoter was enhanced by treatment with TNF-alpha. Notably, increased Egr-1 expression and binding activity were also detected in inflamed mucosa from IBD patients. Treatment with TNF-alpha induced the activities of phosphatidylcholine-phospholipase C (PC-PLC) and protein kinase (PK) C and enhanced NO production. A pharmacological approach was used to implicate PC-PLC --> PKC --> NO signaling as being important for the induction of mPGES-1 by TNF-alpha. TNF-alpha also enhanced guanylate cyclase activity and inhibitors of guanylate cyclase activity blocked the induction of mPGES-1 by TNF-alpha. YC-1, an activator of guanylate cyclase, induced mPGES-1. Overexpressing a dominant negative form of PKG blocked TNF-alpha-mediated stimulation of the mPGES-1 promoter. Taken together, these results suggest that overexpression of mPGES-1 in IBD is the result of Egr-1-mediated activation of transcription. Moreover, TNF-alpha induced mPGES-1 by stimulating PC-PLC --> PKC --> NO --> cGMP --> PKG signal transduction pathway.

Taxanes are widely used to treat malignancies and are known to modulate the transcription of several genes. We investigated the effects of taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) on cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) transcription and mRNA stability in human mammary epithelial cells. As reported previously for paclitaxel, docetaxel stimulated COX-2 transcription by an AP-1-dependent mechanism. Treatment with taxanes also enhanced the stability of COX-2 mRNA. To define the mechanism by which taxanes stabilized COX-2 mRNA, transient transfections were carried out using luciferase expression constructs containing the COX-2 3′-untranslated region (3′-untranslated region (UTR)). The stabilizing effects of taxanes were localized to the AU-rich region of COX-2 3′-UTR. RNA binding studies indicated that taxanes stimulated the binding of HuR to the AU-rich region of the COX-2 3′-UTR. Overexpression of antisense HuR suppressed taxane-mediated induction of COX-2 3′-UTR activity. We next investigated the signal transduction pathway responsible for taxane-mediated induction of COX-2. Taxanes enhanced protein kinase C activity; overexpressing dominant negative PKC-α suppressed taxane-mediated stimulation of both COX-2 3′-UTR and 5′-promoter activities. Interestingly, ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 MAPKs were important for taxane-mediated activation of COX-2 transcription, but only p38 MAPK appeared to be responsible for the increase in COX-2 mRNA stability. MAPKAPK-2, a known target of p38 MAPK, contributed to increased COX-2 mRNA stability following taxane treatment. SB 202190, a selective p38 MAPK inhibitor, and dexamethasone suppressed taxane-mediated stimulation of the COX-2 3′-UTR and binding of HuR. Taken together, these data indicate that taxanes induce COX-2 by stimulating both transcription and mRNA stability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence that taxanes can promote stabilization of mRNA in addition to modulating gene transcription.

Markedly increased levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA, protein, and prostaglandin E2synthesis were detected in HER-2/neu-transformed human mammary epithelial cells (184B5/HER) compared with its nontransformed partner cell line (184B5). HER-2/neu stimulated COX-2 transcription via the Ras → Raf → MAPK pathway. The inductive effects of HER-2/neu were mediated, in part, by enhanced binding of AP-1 (c-Jun, c-Fos, and ATF-2) to the cyclic AMP-response element (−59/−53) of the COX-2 promoter. The potential contribution of the transcription factor PEA3 was also investigated. Elevated levels of PEA3 were detected in 184B5/HER cells. A PEA3 site (−75/−72) was identified juxtaposed to the cyclic AMP-response element. HER-2/neu-mediated activation of the COX-2 promoter was blocked by mutagenizing the PEA3 site or overexpressing antisense to PEA3. To determine whether HER-2/neu status was also a determinant of COX-2 expression in vivo, we compared levels of COX-2 protein in HER-2/neu-positive and -negative human breast cancers. Increased amounts of COX-2 were detected in HER-2/neu-positive tumors. Taken together, these results suggest that closely spaced PEA3 and cyclic AMP-response elements are required for HER-2/neu-mediated induction of COX-2 transcription. The clear relationship between HER-2/neu status and COX-2 expression in human breast tumors suggests that this mechanism is likely to be operative in vivo.

We investigated whether peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) ligands (ciglitazone, troglitazone, and 15-deoxy-Δ12,14prostaglandin J2) inhibited cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) induction in human epithelial cells. Ligands of PPARγ inhibited phorbol ester (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, PMA)-mediated induction of COX-2 and prostaglandin E2 synthesis. Nuclear run-offs revealed increased rates of COX-2 transcription after treatment with PMA, an effect that was inhibited by PPARγ ligands. PMA-mediated induction of COX-2 promoter activity was inhibited by PPARγ ligands; this suppressive effect was prevented by overexpressing a dominant negative form of PPARγ or a PPAR response element decoy oligonucleotide. The stimulatory effects of PMA were mediated by a cyclic AMP response element in the COX-2promoter. Treatment with PMA increased activator protein-1 (AP-1) activity and the binding of c-Jun, c-Fos, and ATF-2 to the cyclic AMP response element, effects that were blocked by PPARγ ligands. These findings raised questions about the mechanism underlying the anti-AP-1 effect of PPARγ ligands. The induction of c-Jun by PMA was blocked by PPARγ ligands. Overexpression of either c-Jun or CREB-binding protein/p300 partially relieved the suppressive effect of PPARγ ligands. When CREB-binding protein and c-Jun were overexpressed together, the ability of PPARγ ligands to suppress PMA-mediated induction of COX-2 promoter activity was essentially abrogated. Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether, a compound that binds to PPARγ but lacks the ability to activate transcription, also inhibited PMA-mediated induction of AP-1 activity and COX-2. Taken together, these findings are likely to be important for understanding the anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties of PPARγ ligands.

We investigated whether microtubule-interfering agents (MIAs: taxol, colchicine, nocodazole, vinblastine, vincristine, 17-beta-estradiol, 2-methoxyestradiol) altered cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in human mammary epithelial cells. MIAs enhanced prostaglandin E(2) synthesis and increased levels of COX-2 protein and mRNA. Nuclear run-off assays revealed increased rates of COX-2 transcription after treatment with MIAs. Calphostin C, an inhibitor of protein kinase C, blocked the induction of COX-2 by MIAs. The stimulation of COX-2 promoter activity by MIAs was inhibited by overexpressing dominant negative forms of Rho and Raf-1. MIAs stimulated ERK, JNK, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK); pharmacological inhibitors of MAPK kinase and p38 MAPK blocked the induction of COX-2 by MIAs. Overexpressing dominant negative forms of ERK1 or p38 MAPK inhibited MIA-mediated activation of the COX-2 promoter. MIAs stimulated the binding of the activator protein-1 transcription factor complex to the cyclic AMP response element in the COX-2 promoter. A dominant negative form of c-Jun inhibited the activation of the COX-2 promoter by MIAs. Additionally, cytochalasin D, an agent that inhibits actin polymerization, stimulated COX-2 transcription by the same signaling pathway as MIAs. Thus, microtubule- or actin-interfering agents stimulated MAPK signaling and activator protein-1 activity. This led, in turn, to induction of COX-2 gene expression via the cyclic AMP response element site in the COX-2 promoter.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) present in tobacco smoke and tar, have been implicated in the development of atherosclerosis as well as cancer. Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been detected both in atherosclerotic lesions and in epithelial cancers. To determine whether polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons might directly affect COX expression in vascular cells, we investigated the effects of B[a]P on COX-2 expression in human and rat arterial smooth muscle cells (SMC). Treatment with B[a]P increased levels of COX-2 protein and mRNA and enhanced prostaglandin synthesis. Nuclear runoff assays and transient transfections revealed increased COX-2gene transcription after treatment with B[a]P. Experiments were done to define the signaling mechanism by which B[a]P induced COX-2. B[a]P caused a rapid increase in phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK); pharmacologic inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase blocked B[a]P-mediated induction of COX-2. Depletion of the intracellular antioxidant, glutathione, with buthionine sulfoximine significantly increased B[a]P-mediated induction of COX-2 while exposure to N-acetylcysteine, a precursor of glutathione, suppressed the induction of COX-2 by B[a]P. Several lines of evidence suggest that the induction of COX-2 by B[a]P is mediated, at least in part, by NF-κB. Treatment with B[a]P increased binding of NF-κB to DNA. Moreover, B[a]P-mediated stimulation of COX-2 promoter activity was blocked when a construct containing a mutagenized NF-κB site was used. Pharmacological inhibitors of NF-κB blocked the induction of COX-2 protein and the stimulation of COX-2 promoter activity by B[a]P. Taken together, these data are likely to be important for understanding the atherogenic effects of tobacco smoke.

Treatment of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) causes a 9-fold increase in the level of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA expression. Nuclear run-off assays indicate that this induction is at least partly due to increased transcription. Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway due to the enhanced transforming growth factor α (TGFα) expression plays an important role in the induction of COX-2 by IFN-γ. This is supported by the ability of TGFα to rapidly induce COX-2 and the inhibition of the IFN-γ-mediated COX-2 mRNA induction by an EGFR antibody and EGFR-selective kinase inhibitors. Deletion and mutation analysis indicates the importance of the proximal cAMP-response element/ATF site in the transcriptional control of this gene by TGFα. The increase in COX-2 mRNA by TGFα requires activation of both the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. Inhibition of p38 MAPK decreases the stability of COX-2 mRNA, while inhibition of MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) does not. These results suggest that the p38 MAPK signaling pathway controls COX-2 at the level of mRNA stability, while the ERK signaling pathway regulates COX-2 at the level of transcription. In contrast to NHEK, IFN-γ and TGFα are not very effective in inducing TGFα or COX-2 expression in several squamous carcinoma cell lines, indicating alterations in both IFN-γ and TGFα response pathways.

Oncogenes enhance the expression of cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2, but interactions between tumor suppressor genes and Cox-2 have not been studied. In the present work, we have compared the levels of Cox-2 and the production of prostaglandin E2 in mouse embryo fibroblasts that do not express any p53 ((10)1) versus the same cell line ((10. 1)Val5) engineered to overexpress wild-type (wt) p53 at 32 degrees C or mutant p53 at 39 degrees C. Cells expressing wt p53 showed about a 10-fold decrease in synthesis of prostaglandin E2 compared with those expressing mutant p53. Levels of Cox-2 protein and mRNA were markedly suppressed by wt p53 but not by mutant p53. Nuclear run-offs revealed decreased rates of Cox-2 transcription in cells expressing wt p53. The activity of the Cox-2 promoter was reduced by 85% in cells expressing wt p53 but was reduced only by 30% in cells expressing mutant p53 compared with cells null for p53. The effect of p53 on the suppression of Cox-2 promoter activity was localized to the first 40 base pairs 5' from the transcription start site. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay revealed that p53 competed with TATA-binding protein for binding to mouse Cox-2 or human Cox-2 promoter extending from -50 to +52 base pairs. The results of this study suggest that interactions between p53 and Cox-2 could be important for understanding why levels of Cox-2 are undetectable in normal cells and increased in many tumors.

The ceramide signaling pathway is activated by the sphingomyelinase (SMase)-mediated hydrolysis of cell membrane sphingomyelin to ceramide. We determined whether ceramide, a lipid second messenger, induced cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in human mammary epithelial cells. Treatment of cells with neutral SMase or C2- or C6-ceramide enhanced prostaglandin E2 synthesis and increased levels of COX-2 protein and mRNA. Nuclear runoff assays revealed increased rates of COX-2 transcription after treatment with SMase and C2- and C6-ceramide. Transient transfections utilizing COX-2 promoter deletion constructs and COX-2 promoter constructs in which specific enhancer elements were mutagenized indicated that the effects of ceramide were mediated via a cAMP response element. The induction of COX-2 by ceramide was inhibited by calphostin C, an inhibitor of protein kinase C. Induction of COX-2 promoter activity by SMase was blocked by overexpressing kinase-deficient Raf-1. Triggering of the ceramide pathway also led to increases in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activities; pharmacological inhibitors of MAPK kinase (MEK) and p38 MAPK blocked the induction of COX-2 by SMase. Overexpressing ERK1, JNK, or p38 led to severalfold increases in COX-2 promoter activity. By comparison, overexpression of dominant negatives for ERK1/2, JNK, or p38 blocked the activation of COX-2 promoter activity by SMase. A dominant negative for c-Jun inhibited the activation of COX-2 promoter activity by ceramide. Thus, in response to ceramide, increased MAPK signaling activates c-Jun, which, in turn, induces COX-2 gene expression via the cAMP response element in the COX-2 promoter.

We determined whether resveratrol, a phenolic antioxidant found in grapes and other food products, inhibited phorbol ester (PMA)-mediated induction of COX-2 in human mammary and oral epithelial cells. Treatment of cells with PMA induces COX-2 and causes a marked increase in the production of prostaglandin E2. These effects were inhibited by resveratrol. Resveratrol suppressed PMA-mediated increases in COX-2 mRNA and protein. Nuclear run-offs revealed increased rates of COX-2 transcription after treatment with PMA, an effect that was inhibited by resveratrol. PMA caused about a 6-fold increase in COX-2 promoter activity, which was suppressed by resveratrol. Transient transfections utilizing COX-2 promoter deletion constructs and COX-2 promoter constructs, in which specific enhancer elements were mutagenized, indicated that the effects of PMA and resveratrol were mediated via a cyclic AMP response element. Resveratrol inhibited PMA-mediated activation of protein kinase C. Overexpressing protein kinase C-alpha, ERK1, and c-Jun led to 4.7-, 5.1-, and 4-fold increases in COX-2 promoter activity, respectively. These effects also were inhibited by resveratrol. Resveratrol blocked PMA-dependent activation of AP-1-mediated gene expression. In addition to the above effects on gene expression, we found that resveratrol also directly inhibited the activity of COX-2. These data are likely to be important for understanding the anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties of resveratrol.

CheR methyltransferase from Salmonella typhimurium was directly photolabeled with S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine. The labeled protein was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then was detected by fluorography. The methylase-S-adenosyl-L-methionine adduct was found to be stable under the experimental conditions employed. Labeling was found to be a function of the concentration of enzyme, S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet), and the intensity and time of UV irradiation. The extent of labeling and protein methylation was found to be inhibited by S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, S-adenosyl-L-ethionine, and sinefungin, which are known to compete with AdoMet for the same binding site on the enzyme. Our earlier data showed that the enzyme has 2 cysteine residues and that these are important for enzyme activity. Here, we show that sulfhydryl reagents inhibit the photolabeling of the substrate to the enzyme, indicating the presence of cysteine in the vicinity of the substrate-binding site. We also found that when Cys31 was modified to Ser, no photolabeling of CheR was observed, whereas a modification of Cys229 to Ser had little effect on the ability of AdoMet to label the enzyme. This suggests that Cys31 is located at or near AdoMet-binding site. The labeled protein was cleaved at tryptophan residues, generating two major fragments, each containing 1 cysteine residue. SDS-PAGE and fluorography of the cleaved products indicated the presence of the label being associated with the Cys31 fragment. Similar results were obtained when the labeled protein was cleaved at glutamic acid residues using V8 protease. A tryptic digest of the labeled protein showed two radioactive peptide peaks when subjected to separation on reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography. The labeled peptides were further digested to free amino acids, and the labeled amino acid was identified as S-methylcysteine by thin layer chromatography. These results indicate that Cys31 may be involved with substrate binding, as well as with catalysis.

The CheR methyltransferase catalyzes the transfer of methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine to specific glutamyl residues in bacterial chemoreceptor proteins. Studies with sulfhydryl reagents such as p-chloromercuribenzoate, N-ethylmaleimide, and 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoate) suggest that a cysteine residue is required for enzyme activity. The nucleotide sequence of the cheR gene predicts a 288-amino acid protein with cysteine residues at positions 31 and 229. To ascertain the role of these cysteine residues in the structure and function of the enzyme, oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis was used to change each cysteine to serine. Whereas the Cys229-Ser mutation had essentially no effect on transferase activity, the Cys31-Ser mutation caused an 80% decrease in enzyme activity. The double mutant in which both cysteines were replaced by serines also had markedly reduced transferase activity. Preincubation of the wild type or Cys229-Ser proteins with either S-adenosylmethionine or beta-mercaptoethanol protected it from inhibition by sulfhydryl reagents, whereas prior incubation with the second substrate, the Tar receptor, gave partial protection. From these studies, Cys31 appears to be necessary for enzyme activity, and it seems to be located in the vicinity of the active site.

The kinetic mechanism of the CheR methyltransferase, S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet): protein-L-glutamate O-methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.24), from Salmonella typhimurium was investigated. Initial velocity, product inhibition, and binding studies were performed, and from the data obtained, it was determined that the mechanism of the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme is random. Initial velocity rates were measured with varied amounts of both substrates, and double-reciprocal plots gave patterns which converged on or near the abscissa. The products, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine and methylated receptor, were found to be competitive inhibitors with respect to both AdoMet and receptor. Equilibrium dialysis and immunoprecipitation studies indicated that the two substrates can bind to the enzyme independent of each other. These results are consistent with a random mechanism with no abortive complexes being formed. The Michaelis constants calculated for AdoMet and receptor were 8.62 microM and 2.03 mg/ml total membrane protein (approximately 2.10 microM Tar protein), and the apparent dissociation constants of AdoMet and the receptor were 16.8 microM and 4.07 mg/ml total membrane protein (approximately 4.2 microM Tar protein), respectively. The Kd of AdoMet for the enzyme was 10.9 microM as determined by binding studies.