Search

Purpose: Right-sided colon cancers (RCCs) and left-sided colon cancers (LCCs) have different embryological, epidemiological, physiological, pathological, genetic, and clinical characteristics, which result in differences in the course, prognosis, and outcome of disease. This study aimed to compare RCCs and LCCs regarding clinicopathological and survival characteristics., Methods: The present retrospective study included data of patients who were followed-up and treated for colon cancer from 2008 through 2017. Rectosigmoid, descending colon, and splenic flexure tumors were considered LCC, whereas hepatic flexure and ascending colon tumors were considered RCC. Tumors were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification., Results: The study included 1725 patients (female, 58.7%) having colon cancer with a mean age of 64±12 years. Of the patients, 83.2% (n=1436) had LCC and 16.8% (n=289) had RCC. The rate of patients aged ≥65 years and the rate of patients with a family history of colon cancer were higher in the RCC patients. The rate of metastatic patients was 29.1% in the RCC group and 23.2% in the LCC group (p=0.087). The median follow-up period was 18 months in the RCC group and 23 months in the LCC group (p=0.011). Although the median survival time was higher in the LCC group (62 vs. 43 months), no significant difference was determined between the RCC and LCC groups in terms of survival., Conclusions: There are numerous clinicopathological differences between RCC and LCC and these differences are reflected in prognostic and survival differences among certain subgroups.

Purpose: In advanced stage renal cell cancer (RCC), overall survival (OS) of patients has been prolonged due to targeted therapies. To date, there are several prognostic risk models that have been developed for metastatic RCC (mRCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the sequential therapy (IFN-α, tyrosine kinase inhibitors/TKIs, m-TOR inhibitor) and prognostic factors in patients with mRCC, especially those with bone metastasis., Methods: We retrospectively examined the data of 82 patients with pathologically proven mRCC who were followed-up and treated at the Medical Oncology Clinic of the Dr A.Y Oncology Hospital between 2005 and 2013., Results: Median OS was 23 months in all patients with mRCC and 20 months in patients treated with TKIs. According to MSKCC and HENG risk classifications, median OS differed between the groups (p=0.02, p<0.001, respectively). Median OS was lower in patients with isolated bone metastasis compared to those with lung metastasis (16 vs 24 months, p=0.25). Median OS improved with increasing number of sequential therapies (p=0.08)., Conclusion: This study confirmed the correlation between MSKCC and HENG risk models and survival data. Additionally, it was shown that increase of the number of therapeutic lines in sequential therapy prolonged survival and that bone metastases were negative prognostic factors.

Purpose: Aging is an important risk factor for cancer. Molecular changes and defective immunity associated with aging result in increased susceptibility to many carcinogens of the gastrointestinal system (GIS). Comorbidities and changes in drug metabolism in elderly patients make the treatment of GIS cancers difficult., Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2012, a total of 790 patients diagnosed with GIS cancers were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 357 patients aged ≥ 65 years constituted the study population in which the patient characteristics, disease location, TNM stage, ECOG PS, co-morbidities, chemotherapy regimens and overall survival (OS) were assessed., Results: The patient median age was 71 years (range 65-94). Cancer localizations were colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer, and the pancreaticobiliary system (PBS) cancer in 178 (49.9%), 124 (34.7%), and 55 (15.4%) patients, respectively. A total of 260 (69%) patients underwent chemotherapy: 167 (64.3%) patients received optimal chemotherapy, and 93 (35.7%) suboptimal chemotherapy. The median OS was 47, 14, and 11 months in CRC, gastric, and PBS cancers, respectively. OS was better in the optimally-treated group than in the suboptimally-treated group among patients with all types of cancer. OS was 67 vs 19 months (p<0.001), 17 vs 8 months (p=0.004), and 12 vs 10 months (p=0.46) in CRC, gastric, and PBS cancers in the optimal and suboptimal chemotherapy groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the disease stage in all cancer types and optimal chemotherapy in the CRC group were important predictors of survival (p<0.001 and p=0.021, respectively)., Conclusion: Cancer is usually in advanced stage at the time of diagnosis in these elderly patients and screening programs might improve outcomes in this age group. Patients with GIS cancers (especially CRC and gastric cancer) should be encouraged to receive optimal chemotherapy regimens.

Purpose: The duration of anti-HER2 blockage therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the anti-HER2 blockage therapy duration and other factors on survival in HER2 positive metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) patients., Methods: The medical records of 193 HER2 positive MBC patients, who did not have the opportunity to receive adjuvant trastuzumab therapy but had received trastuzumab in the metastatic setting were retrospectively evaluated., Results: The median age at diagnosis was 45.0 years (range 21-83). Ninety-two (47.7%) patients received palliative trastuzumab < 6 months median, whereas 101 patients received trastuzumab ≥ 6 months median. The median number of trastuzumab cycles was 8 (range 1-51). Median survival after breast cancer recurrence was 31.0 months (range 24.3-37.7). The duration of trastuzumab therapy had a significant impact on the prognosis of recurrent breast cancer (22.0 vs 49.0 months, for ≤ 6 months of treatment duration, respectively; p<0.0001). Survival after breast cancer recurrence for the patients who received lapatinib plus capecitabine vs those who did not was significantly different (59 patients, p=0.005). Moreover, there was a statistically significant relationship between prolonged lapatinib plus capecitabine combination therapy and improved survival after disease recurrence (p=0.022). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, treatment with trastuzumab > 6 months (p=0.003) was the only independent prognostic factor for survival after breast cancer recurrence., Conclusion: The duration of anti-HER2 blockage therapies, especially with trastuzumab, seems to improve survival of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who were not previously treated with adjuvant trastuzumab, regardless of other therapies.

Purpose: The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer has limited impact on overall survival (OS). Patients eligible for chemotherapy should be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 343 locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy between December 2000 and June 2011. Fifteen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine prognostic factors., Results: Among the 15 variables of univariate analysis, 6 were identified to have prognostic significance: stage (p<0.001), cholestasis (p=0.02), weight loss, prior pancreatectomy, serum CEA level (p<0.001) and serum CA19-9 level (p>0.001). In addition, age, chemotherapy and liver metastasis were of borderline significance (p=0.06). Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) included the 6 significant prognostic factors of univariate analysis and showed that stage was independent prognostic factor for OS, as were weight loss, and serum CEA level., Conclusion: Stage, weight loss, and serum CEA level were identified as important prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. These findings may also facilitate pretreatment prediction of OS and can be used for selecting patients for treatment.