Search

Background: With increased rate of permanent pacemaker's (PPM) implantation, the rate of complication also increased many folds. Infection in pacemakers is one of the dreaded complications which need a multidisciplinary approach in its management. Methods: All patients with permanent pacemakers, who presented with infection of device, were admitted in our unit. The infected device was explanted and wound left open. The same device was used as a temporary pacemaker with a new PPM screwing lead from internal jugular approach. Once the infection was under control, a new device was implanted on the other side and temporary wire (PPM screwing lead) pulled out. Wound on both side closed and patient kept on antibiotics for a week. Results: Total 10 cases of infected device received. Single chambers devices with infection were six and dual chamber pacemakers were four. One case with infection had tine lead and nine patients presented with screwing leads. Male and female ratio was 2.3:1. All leads were explanted in our department with conventional gadgets using rotation and traction maneuvers. Culture sensitivity in all cases remained negative. Patients were kept on broad spectrum antibiotics till the wound was clear. One patient had small pericardial effusion soon after explantation of tine lead, which was treated conservatively. No other major or minor complication documented. Conclusion: Scrupulous planning and preparation before system extraction and later on new Cardiac implantable electronic device re-implantation is essential for better patient outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Overall life span has increased with improved management of cardiac diseases all over the world which has opened the door of degenerative cardiac diseases. On the other hand, stat of the art corrective congenital cardiac disease also increased the volume of adult living with treated congenital heart diseases. Both these factors lead to a new epidemic in cardiology of complete heart block (CHB). Permanent pacemakers (PPM) implantation is a life-saving procedure for CHB. Permanent pacemakers are usually implanted from upper limb veins. But at time upper limb veins are not suitable for implantation due to various anatomical and pathological reasons, so alternative methods are used for implantation of devices. We are reporting a case of PPM implantation from Superior Vena Cava (SVC). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]