Search

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease accompanied by production of autoantibodies directed to a variety of self-proteins and nucleic acids. The genetic basis of SLE is also complex with at least 40 susceptibility loci identified. This complexity suggests that there are a variety of SLE manifestations; nevertheless, SLE is treated as a single disease clinically. One unique SLE target is the Smith antigen (Sm), a nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex. Sm response occurs in 25% of patients with SLE. To simplify analysis of the disease and its associated autoantibody repertoire, we focused on this subset [referred to here as “Sm positive”, Sm+]. We analyzed the memory B cell repertoire and identified a V region, Vκ4-1, which was significantly overrepresented in the Sm+ SLE subset. Antibodies that express Vκ4-1 are enriched in antinuclear (ANA) positive specificities and often associated with speckled ANA pattern that is a characteristic of Sm binding. In healthy individuals Vκ4-1 B cells are enriched in the unswitched memory population. Unswitched memory B cells resemble mouse marginal zone B cells and this population is decreased in all SLE patients. Moreover, we found a similar decrease in healthy African American donors. African Americans have a significantly higher prevalence of SLE compared to Caucasians. Thus, reduced unswitched memory B cell compartment may represent a new susceptibility marker for SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by multiple organ inflammatory damage and wide spectrum of autoantibodies. The autoantibodies, especially anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm autoantibodies are highly specific to SLE, and participate in the immune complex formation and inflammatory damage on multiple end-organs such as kidney, skin, and central nervous system (CNS). However, the underlying mechanisms of autoantibody-induced tissue damage and systemic inflammation are still not fully understood. Single cell analysis of autoreactive B cells and monoclonal antibody screening from patients with active SLE has improved our understanding on the origin of autoreactive B cells and the antigen targets of the pathogenic autoantibodies. B cell depletion therapies have been widely studied in the clinics, but the development of more specific therapies against the pathogenic B cell subset and autoantibodies with improved efficacy and safety still remain a big challenge. A more comprehensive autoantibody profiling combined with functional characterization of autoantibodies in diseases development will shed new insights on the etiology and pathogenesis of SLE and guide a specific treatment to individual SLE patients. • The autoantibody can arise from interplay of multiple mechanisms. • Autoantibodies of SLE is highly heterogenous. • Identification of the pathogenic autoantibodies will improve the specificity of the treatment for SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As iconic and important diagnostic autoantibodies, anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52/tri-partite motif-containing 21 (TRIM21) make a common appearance in a number of systemic autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). These autoantibodies often co-exist together; yet despite their close relationship, there is no evidence that they are physically linked and probably reflect a convergence of separate processes of failed immunological tolerance. Confusingly, they are sometimes classed together as the "SSA" or "Ro" autoantibody system without clear distinction between the two. In this Short Communication, we discuss the diagnostic merits for separate detection and reporting of these two autoantibodies, and discuss avenues for future research. Indeed, further insight into their fascinating origins and pathogenic roles in autoimmunity will surely shed light on how we can prevent and treat devastating autoimmune disorders. • Anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 autoantibodies are common autoantibodies. • They are often classed under the same "SSA/Ro" autoantibody system. • Both autoantibodies have important and distinct diagnostic and predictive potentials. • Laboratories and clinicians need to distinguish between the two autoantibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]