Search

Although some sex differences in stroke have been reported, differences in the effects of antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention have not been clarified.In the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination trial, patients with high-risk, non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke between 8 and 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and followed up for 0.5-3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening hemorrhage. Outcomes were analyzed by sex.A total of 1,320 male patients and 558 female patients were included. The male patients had more risk factors than the female patients. In male patients, the primary endpoint occurred at a rate of 2.0 per 100-patient years in the DAPT group and 5.1 per 100 patient-years in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.68). In male patients, DAPT prolonged the time to recurrent stroke by 4.02-fold (95% CI, 1.63-9.96) compared with monotherapy. In female patients, the average annual event rates were 2.7 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 3.3 per 100 patient-years in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.37-1.84). Safety outcomes did not differ significantly in both male and female patients.Long-term DAPT using cilostazol reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke and prolonged the recurrence-free time in male patients, but not in female patients.

Aim: Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has different clinical features and prognosis compared with anterior circulation stroke (ACS), and whether the effect of statin therapy on stroke prevention differs according to infarction location remains unclear. This post hoc analysis of the J-STARS study aimed to compare the usefulness of statin at different infarction locations (i.e., ACS and PCS). Methods: In the J-STARS study, 1578 patients were randomly assigned to the pravastatin or control group. The subjects were divided into two subgroups (ACS and PCS groups) based on the arteries responsible for the infarction. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate whether the all stroke recurrence rate was different between the ACS and PCS groups. Results: The PCS group (n = 499) had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes than the ACS group (n = 1022) (30.7% vs. 19.8%, P < 0.001). During the follow-up (4.9 ± 1.4 years), the incidence of all stroke was significantly lower in the pravastatin group than in the control group among patients with PCS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.83, P = 0.009); however, the stroke recurrence rates were not significantly different between both groups among patients with ACS (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.93–1.88, P = 0.123). A significant interaction between the ACS and PCS groups in terms of pravastatin effects was noted (P = 0.003 for interaction). Conclusions: Pravastatin significantly reduced the recurrence rate of all stroke among patients with PCS. Thus, the effect of statin on the recurrence of stroke may differ according to infarction location.

Aims To understand the different influences of statins on the incidence rate of each stroke subtype in association with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, we performed a post hoc analysis on the data from the Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke (J-STARS) study. Methods Subjects (n=1,578) were divided into three groups according to their mean postrandomized LDL cholesterol level (＜100, 100-120, and ≥ 120 mg/dL) until the last observation before the event or the end of follow-up. A Cox proportional hazard model for time to events was used for calculating adjusted hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and the trend tests. Results The event rates for atherothrombotic stroke did not decrease in accordance with the postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroups of either the control or the pravastatin group (p=0.15 and 0.33 for the trend, respectively). In the control group, however, no atherothrombotic stroke event was observed in the subgroup of the low postrandomized LDL cholesterol level (less than 100 mg/dL). The event rates for atherothrombotic stroke were lower in the middle postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroup (100-120 mg/dL) of the pravastatin group than that of the control group. The event rates for lacunar stroke decreased in the lower postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroup of the control group but not of the pravastatin group (p=0.004 and 0.06 for the trend, respectively). Conclusions Statins showed different influences on the risks of atherothromobotic and lacunar stroke according to postrandomized LDL cholesterol levels.

Aims: To investigate the relative contribution of on-treatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and C-reactive protein (CRP) to the risk of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with history of ischemic stroke. Methods: A total of 1095 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke were randomized into two groups: control and patients receiving 10 mg of pravastatin per day. After excluding 18 patients who did not have baseline CRP data, the effects of LDL cholesterol and CRP on recurrent stroke and TIA were prospectively assessed in 1077 patients. Results: During the follow-up of 4.9 ± 1.4 years, there were 131 recurrent stroke or TIA cases. Patients with ontreatment LDL cholesterol < 120 mg/dL showed 29% reduction in recurrent stroke and TIA than those with LDL cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dL (event rate 2.20 vs. 3.11 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.99, p = 0.048). Patients with CRP < 1 mg/L had 32% reduction compared with that of patients with CRP ≥ 1 mg/L (event rate 2.26 vs. 3.40 per 100 person-years; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.96, p = 0.031). Although LDL cholesterol and CRP levels were not correlated in individual patients, those who achieved both LDL cholesterol < 120 mg/dL and CRP < 1 mg/L showed 51% reduction compared with that of patients with LDL cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dL and CRP ≥ 1 mg/L (event rate 2.02 vs. 4.19 per 100 person-years; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31–0.79). Conclusions: The control of both LDL cholesterol and CRP levels appears to be effective for preventing recurrent stroke and TIA in patients with non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke.

Aims: There may be ethnic differences in carotid atherosclerosis and its contributing factors between Asian and other populations. The purpose of this study was to examine intima-media complex thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery and associated clinical factors in Japanese stroke patients with hyperlipidemia from a cohort of the Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke Echo Study. Methods: Patients with hyperlipidemia, not on statins, who developed noncardioembolic ischemic stroke were included in this study. Mean IMT and maximum IMT of the distal wall of the common carotid artery were centrally measured using carotid ultrasonography. Significant factors related to mean IMT and maximum IMT were examined using multivariable analysis. Results: In 793 studied patients, mean IMT was 0.89 ± 0.15 mm and maximum IMT was 1.19 ± 0.32 mm. Age (per 10 years, parameter estimate = 0.044, p < 0.001), smoking (0.022, p = 0.004), category of blood pressure (0.022, p = 0.006), HDL cholesterol (per 10 mg/dl, −0.009, p = 0.008), and diabetes mellitus (0.033, p = 0.010) were independently associated with mean IMT. Age (per 10 years, 0.076, p < 0.001), smoking (0.053, p = 0.001), HDL cholesterol (−0.016, p = 0.036), and diabetes mellitus (0.084, p = 0.002) were independently associated with maximum IMT. Conclusion: Baseline mean and maximum values of carotid IMT in Japanese noncardioembolic stroke patients with hyperlipidemia were 0.89 ± 0.15 mm and 1.19 ± 0.32 mm, respectively, which were similar to those previously reported from Western countries. Age, smoking, hypertension, HDL cholesterol, and diabetes mellitus were associated with mean IMT, and those, except for hypertension, were associated with maximum IMT.

Aims: The J-STARS study examined whether pravastatin (10 mg/day) reduces recurrence of stroke in non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled within 1 month to 3 years after initial stroke events (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00221104). The main results showed that the frequency of atherothrombotic stroke was low in pravastatin-treated patients, although no effect of pravastatin was found for the other stroke subtypes. We evaluated differences of early (within 6 months) or late (after 6 months) pravastatin treatment benefits on the incidence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), as well as atherothrombotic stroke and the other subtypes. Methods: Subjects in the J-STARS study were classified into two cohorts, depending on whether they enrolled early (1 to 6 months) or late (6 months to 3 years) following initial stroke events. Results: A total of 1578 patients (491 female, 66.2 ± 8.5 years) were randomly assigned to either the pravastatin group (n = 793; n = 426 in the early cohort, n = 367 in the late cohort) or the control group (n = 785; n = 417 in the early cohort, n = 368 in the late cohort). During the follow-up of 4.9 ± 1.4 years, the rate of atherothrombotic stroke was lower in the pravastatin group compared to controls in the early cohort (0.24 vs. 0.88%/year, p = 0.01) but not in the late cohort (0.17 vs. 0.39%/year, p = 0.29). However, this difference of pravastatin effect on atherothrombotic stroke was not significantly interacted by the early or late cohort (p = 0.59). The incidence rates of other stroke subtype were not different in between pravastatin and control groups despite the timing of entry. Conclusions: Pravastatin is likely to reduce atherothrombotic stroke in patients enrolled within 6 months after stroke onset. However, the clinical efficacy for prevention of recurrent stroke was not conclusive with earlier statin treatment.

Aims: The pleiotropic effects of statins on recurrent stroke remain unclear. We investigated the effects of pravastatin on high-sensitivity C-reactive proteins (Hs-CRP) in ischemic stroke, and explored the impact of Hs-CRP on recurrent stroke and vascular events. Methods: This randomized open-label trial was ancillary to the J-STARS trial. One thousand and ninety-five patients with non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke were assigned to the pravastatin (n = 545) or control groups (n = 550). The primary and secondary endpoints were serum Hs-CRP reduction and stroke recurrence, including both ischemic and hemorrhagic ones, respectively. Onset of vascular events and each stroke subtype in relation to Hs-CRP levels were also determined. Results: In the pravastatin treatment group, Hs-CRP levels (median 711 µg/L, IQR 344–1500) significantly decreased 2 months later (median 592 µg/L, IQR 301–1390), and they remained significantly lower until the end of the study. However, in the control group, baseline Hs-CRP levels were similar to those 2 months later. The reduction of Hs-CRP levels from the baseline to 2 months in the pravastatin group was statistically significant compared with the control (p = 0.007). One SD increase in log-transformed Hs-CRP increased the risk of stroke recurrence (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97–1.40) and vascular events (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12–1.51). With an Hs-CRP cut-off of 1000 µg/L, higher Hs-CRP significantly increased the risk of recurrent stroke (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03–2.17) and vascular events (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.23–2.29). Conclusion: In non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke, pravastatin treatment may reduce vascular inflammation as assessed by Hs-CRP, and higher Hs-CRP levels appeared to increase the risk of recurrent stroke and vascular events.

Aim: The Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS) reported a 19% reduction of the risk for coronary artery disease after long-term use of pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. The variation in plasma fatty acid composition influenced the risk of coronary events. The aim of this study was to examine in JELIS participants the possible correlation of changes in plasma fatty acids with those of serum lipids. Methods: The coefficient for the correlation between the absolute change in plasma fatty acid concentrations and the changes in serum lipids was calculated in 13,901 JELIS participants. Results: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol exhibited a positive correlation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; r=0.117 in control group, r=0.155 in EPA group) and linoleic acid (r=0.139 in control group, r=0.177 in EPA group), but the correlation coefficients with EPA (r=0.097 in control group, r=−0.032 in EPA group) were less than 0.1. We distributed the patients into 9 groups according to tertiles of the change in EPA and DHA. The average absolute decrease of LDL cholesterol and L/H ratio in each group was significantly smaller (p ＜0.001) in the DHA-high tertile, but not in any EPA tertile. Conclusion: The changes in DHA, but not in EPA, showed a positive correlation with the changes in LDL-cholesterol. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2012; 19:673-679.

Aim: The Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS) was the first prospective randomized clinical trial to demonstrate prevention of coronary events by pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between various plasma fatty acid concentrations and the risk of coronary events in JELIS participants.Methods: In 15,534 participants, we calculated the hazard ratio for major coronary events (sudden cardiac death, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, and angioplasty/stenting or coronary artery bypass grafting) relative to the on-treatment average level of plasma fatty acids with the Cox proportional hazard model.Results: As a result of EPA intervention, the plasma EPA concentration increased, but the docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentration did not. The other fatty acids measured decreased slightly. The higher plasma level of EPA (hazard ratio=0.83, p=0.049, in all participants and hazard ratio=0.71, p=0.018, in the EPA intervention group), but not of DHA, was inversely associated with the risk of major coronary events. The associations between other fatty acids and the risk of major coronary events were not significant. In all JELIS participants, the risk of major coronary events was significantly decreased (20%) in the group with high (150 µg/mL or more) on-treatment plasma EPA concentration compared with that in the low (less than 87 µg/mL) group.Conclusion: The risk of coronary artery disease is influenced by variations in plasma fatty acid composition. Among n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, EPA and DHA exhibited differences in the correlation with the risk of major coronary events.

Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the new JAS guidelines as a risk assessment tool in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia, using the cohort of the Holicos-PAT study. The Holicos-PAT study was designed as a prospective observational study. 2039 patients were followed with or without pravastatin for 5 years. We assessed coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) risks by the patient categories described in the JAS guidelines. In the Holicos-PAT study, the primary endpoints were CHD, and the secondary endpoints were CVD and total mortality. CHD event includes onset and worsening of angina pectoris, performing CABG or PTCA, non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction, and death from CHD including heart death and sudden death. CVD events are onset or recurrence of cerebral infarction, onset of cerebral hemorrhage, and death from cerebral infarction or hemorrhage. The event rates were calculated by the person-years method, and the differences in event rates between category groups were analyzed by chi-square test. The event rates of CHD in Category A, B1, B2, B3, B4 and C, were 1.1, 4.0, 2.8, 5.7, 18.2 and 38.8 per 1,000 person-years. The rates of CHD events in the higher risk category groups, Category B4 group (p = 0.004 in whole patients) and C group (p < 0.001 in whole patients), were significantly higher than that in the combined category groups A + B1 + B2. The event rates of CVD in Category A, B1, B2, B3, B4 and C, were 2.1, 1.8, 1.8, 0.6, 10.8 and 6.4 per 1,000 person-years. The event rates of CHD in men were significantly higher than those in women, in categories B4 (p < 0.001) and C (p < 0.001). From these results, each category classified by accumulation of risk factors, showed increasing event rates of CHD and CVD. The categories in the JAS guidelines are useful to assess CHD and CVD risk in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, the risk evaluation by the JAS guideline categories may underestimate the risk in men and overestimate it in women.

Aim: The present study examined the importance of reducing non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) for the primary prevention of the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the JELIS, and the effects of EPA.Methods: The patients were distributed into 4 subgroups using the lipid management goal for LDL-C recommended by the Japan Atherosclerosis Society guideline (2007) and the goal for non-HDL-C defined as 30 mg/dL higher than LDL-C: A) achieved both goals; B) achieved the LDL-C but not non-HDL-C goal; C) achieved the non-HDL-C but not LDL-C goal; and D) did not attain either goal. The incidences of CAD in the 4 subgroups were compared, and the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on the risk of CAD in these subgroups were examined.Results: In the non-EPA group, the incidence of CAD in patients who did not achieve the goals for LDL-C or non-HDL-C was higher than in patients who achieved those goals. Patients in subgroups B, C, and D were at higher risk for CAD than those in subgroup A (B, HR 2.31; C, HR 1.90; D, HR 2.47). EPA reduced the risk of CAD by 38% in subgroups B, C, and D (p= 0.007).Conclusion: We reconfirmed non-HDL-C as a predictor of the risk for CAD and a residual risk marker of CAD after LDL-C-lowering therapy. EPA was useful to reduce the occurrence of CAD in patients who did not achieve the goals for LDL-C and/or non-HDL-C.

The purpose of Holicos-PAT was to investigate the efficacy of serum lipid lowering by pravastatin against coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in the Japanese population. Hypercholesterolemic men and women (n = 2,232), aged 40-70 years, were followed up for 5 years, while they were receiving pravastatin (group P, n = 1,422) or only diet therapy (group C, n = 810). The primary endpoint was CHD (a composite of onset or worsening of angina pectoris, performing CABG or PTCA, non-fatal myocardial infarction, death from CHD including heart death or sudden death). The secondary endpoints were comprised of CVD, total mortality, variation of serum lipid and apoprotein levels, and a relationship between the LDL-C level and occurrence of CHD. For several reasons (proving to meet the exclusion criteria after registration, etc.), 1,290 cases of group P and 749 cases of group C were used as subjects for the primary analysis. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 years in group P and 4.2 years in group C for events of CHD. The mean LDL-C level (SD) in group P was 176 (29) mg/dl and decreased to 134 (29) mg/dl one year later. This effect continued during the follow-up period.CHD events occurred in 9.2/1000 patient-years for men and 2.4/1000 patient-years for women without a history of CHD.CHD events occurred in 55.3/1000 patient-years for men and 23.6/1000 patient-years for women with a history of CHD, which was 6 times higher in men and 10 times higher in women than in those without a history of CHD, respectively. The adjusted relative risk ratio of group P to group C for CHD events was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.47-1.19). In the patients with a history of CHD, the ratio was 0.55 (95%CI: 0.30-1.00). The effect was apparent in the patients with a history of CHD. The incidence of myocardial infarction in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia living in the Hokuriku district was apparently lower, than the worldwide incidence, indicative that pravastatin may have a tendency to inhibit the occurrence of events of arteriosclerotic disease.