Search

Purpose: The main goal in the present study was to comparefollicular development and estradiol levels after ovarianstimulation in pituitary suppressed normally ovulatingwomen undergoing IVF, using highly purified urinary folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) (u-FSH-HP) and recombinantFSH (rec-FSH). A secondary variable in our study wasembryo implantation potential, which is closely related toappropriate follicular development and oocyte competence.

Purpose: Our purpose was to determine prospectively, usingreceiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, whetherthe ovarian reserve test with hMG could improve thepredictive value of a woman's age and basal levels of folliclestimulating hormone (FSH), E2, and inhibin or anycombination of them regarding ovarian response and pregnancy ratein IVF treatment following pituitary desensitization. Methods: The hMG test was performed within 3 months ofIVF treatment in 80 women undergoing the first cycle ofIVF and consisted of 2 ampoules of hMG daily for 5 daysstarting on cycle days 2 to 3. Hormone and ultrasoundevaluation was performed on cycle days 2 to 3 and 7 to 8. Results: The mean age and basal FSH levels weresignificantly higher in the canceled (n = 28) than in the control(n = 52) group, whereas the basal inhibin level wassignificantly higher in the latter. Regarding ovarian response, thecombination FSH plus inhibin had the better diagnosticaccuracy (predictive value of 70%) among basal variables.When post-hMG parameters (alone or in combination) wereanalyzed, E2 alone, with a 77% diagnostic accuracy,emerged as the best predictive variable of cancellation inIVF cycles. When ROC analysis was used, the area underthe ROC curve for E2 post-hMG (diagnostic accuracy of84.5%) was significantly higher than that for the estimatesbased on the combination of basal FSH and inhibin(diagnostic accuracy of 71.3%). However, woman's age was theonly variable independently associated with pregnancy rate. Conclusions: The predictive power of the hMG test ofovarian reserve is better than that of age and basal hormonevalues (FSH and inhibin) and it is based mainly on the E2response to hMG treatment. However, given that age is theonly predictor of pregnancy and considering the cost anddiscomfort of the hMG test, the usefulness, if any, of the testin predicting IVF performance in the daily clinical settingremains to be established.

Purpose: The aim was to compare the follicular response to 37.5 and 50 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as starting doses for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: Prospective, randomized, crossover study including 15 women with clomiphene citrate-resistant chronic anovulatory infertility. Patients were treated with subcutaneous recombinant FSH at starting doses of 37.5 IU and 50 IU, respectively, according to a low-dose step-up protocol. Each woman received both treatments, in a randomized order, with an interval of ≥1 month between treatments. Results: All treatment cycles were ovulatory after an appropriate follicular response and hormone levels were similar with both treatments, although the total quantity of FSH required and the mean daily dose required to induce identical follicular development were significantly lower with a starting dose of 37.5 IU FSH. The mean duration of treatment to achieve ovulation was approximately 13 days with both treatments but treatment periods ≥20 days were required in some patients. Conclusions: In women with PCOS, a starting dose of 37.5 IU recombinant FSH may be adequate to induce follicular growth. However, the use of low starting doses may result in some cases in increased treatment periods and need for monitoring.

Purpose:Our purpose was to compare ovarian performance and hormonal levels, after ovulation induction, in both normal ovulatory women undergoing intrauterine insemination (group 1) and World Health Organization (WHO) group II anovulatory infertile patients (group 2), using two different gonadotropin drugs.

Submitted April 9, 2003; accepted October 23, 2003 Purpose : To investigate the relative power of HCG, estradiol, and progesterone determinations in the prediction of pregnancy outcome after IVF. These prognostic hormonal factors were studied as single and combined predictors. Methods : Serum concentrations of fl-HCG, progesterone, and estradiol were measured 12‐ 13 days after embryo transfer (study point 1) and 7 days later (study point 2) in a series of 20 consecutive infertile patients having a first-trimester spontaneous clinical abortion after an IVF-embryo transfer cycle. As a control group (nD 60), the next three IVF-embryo transfer cycles resulting in an ongoing pregnancy after each miscarried IVF cycle in our assisted reproduction program was used. The discrimination attained between the two study groups (ongoing pregnancies and miscarriages) was evaluated by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results : Mean hormone concentrations at study points 1 and 2 were higher in the ongoing pregnancy than in the abortion group. Regarding pregnancy outcome the percentage increment of HCG serum levels (‚1321%), with an accuracy (predictive value of pregnancy outcome) of 81.2% (sensitivity 98%, specificity 50%), had the best prognostic reliability but no significant differences were found when this parameter was compared with the predictive value of HCG concentration (‚72 IU/l) at study point 1 (diagnostic accuracy 80.5%; sensitivity 70%; specificity 80%). When ROC analysis was used, the best predictor of ongoing pregnancy according to the AUC ROC was HCG concentration at study point 2 but again no significant differences were found when this parameter was compared with the predictive value of HCG serum levels at study point 1. A multiple marker strategy did not help distinguish viable from nonviable pregnancies. Conclusion : A single, early (days 12‐13 after embryo transfer) HCG quantitative serum measurement in IVF cycles not only is diagnostic but also has good predictive value for pregnancy outcome.

Purpose: To investigate endometrial receptivity in terms of pinopode formation and αvβ3 integrin expression in infertile women with endometriosis during natural cycles. Methods: We investigated the expression of αvβ3 integrin and pinopode formation in the endometrium of 12 infertile patients with stage I or II endometriosis as the only cause of infertility, 12 infertile patients having unexplained infertility, and 12 fertile women who were undergoing tubal sterilization. Two endometrial biopsies (postovulatory day +7 to +8 and 4 days later) were performed during a single menstrual cycle in each subject. Results: No statistically significant difference regarding αvβ3 integrin expression and pinopode formation was found between infertile patients with endometriosis and the two control groups. Conclusion: αvβ3 integrin expression and pinopode formation are not reduced during the window of implantation in patients with stage I–II endometriosis. Whether these results imply normal endometrial receptivity in such patients or add to the increasing uncertainty about the clinical value of assessing the endometrium with those markers of implantation, warrants further studies.