Search

Preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) involves utilizing radiographs or advanced imaging modalities, including computerized tomography scans, for precise prediction of implant sizing and positioning. This study aimed to compare 3-dimensional (3D) versus 2-dimensional (2D) preoperative planning in primary THA with respect to key surgical metrics, including restoration of the horizontal and vertical center of rotation (COR), combined offset, and leg length. This study included 60 patients undergoing primary THA for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA), randomly allocated to either robotic arm–assisted or conventional THA. Digital 2D templating and 3D planning using the robotic software were performed for all patients. All measurements to evaluate the accuracy of templating methods were conducted on the preoperative computerized tomography scanogram, using the contralateral hip as a reference. Sensitivity analyses explored differences between 2D and 3D planning in patients who had superolateral or medial OA patterns. Compared to 2D templating, 3D templating was associated with less medialization of the horizontal COR (−1.2 versus −0.2 mm, P =.002) and more accurate restoration of the vertical COR (1.63 versus 0.3 mm, P <.001) with respect to the contralateral side. Furthermore, 3D templating was superior for planned restoration of leg length (+0.23 versus −0.74 mm, P =.019). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that in patients who had medial OA, 3D planning resulted in less medialization of horizontal COR and less offset reduction. Conversely, in patients who had superolateral OA, there was less lateralization of horizontal COR and less offset increase using 3D planning. Additionally, 3D planning showed superior reproducibility for stem, acetabular cup sizes, and neck angle, while 2D planning often led to smaller stem and cup sizes. Our findings indicated higher accuracy in the planned restoration of native joint mechanics using 3D planning. Additionally, this study highlights distinct variances between the 2 planning methods across different OA pattern subtypes, offering valuable insights for clinicians employing 2D planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conflicting reports exist about the effect of offset variation on functional outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. Reproducing native hip offset is thought to optimize function by restoring biomechanics and appropriately tensioning the hip abductor muscles. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of failing to restore global hip offset in comparison to the native contralateral hip. A retrospective analysis of a prospective patient cohort was performed on patients undergoing an elective primary total hip arthroplasty. A total of 414 patients who had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. Postoperative plain radiographs were analyzed for offset and compared to the contralateral native hip. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Regression analyses indicated that a reduction in offset of >20 mm resulted in worse WOMAC pain (P =.005) and motion (P =.015) scores compared to those with maintained offset. WOMAC function (P =.063), global (P =.025), and VR-12 scores were not affected (physical P =.656; mental P =.815). Reduction in offset up to 20 mm and increased offset were not significantly associated with patient-reported outcome measures (P -values ranged from.102 to.995). This study demonstrated an association between reduction in offset by >20 mm and worse WOMAC pain and motion scores following total hip arthroplasty. Surgeons should avoid decreases in offset >20 mm in order to optimize functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although component offset can affect impingement after total hip arthroplasty, the exact impact is unclear. Evaluation of offset on an anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph is different than evaluation in functional positions of impingement, namely flexion/internal rotation and extension/external rotation. We quantified the effect of acetabular (cup/liner) vs femoral (head/stem) offsets on changes in range of motion to extra-prosthetic impingement in these 2 impingement-prone functional positions.Methods: We retrospectively identified 16 total hip arthroplasty patients (age 61.5 ± 12.1 years, body mass index 28.3 ± 4.9 kg/m2) with preoperative and postoperative computerized tomography scans. To eliminate metal artifact, femoral and pelvic 3-dimensional models were created using preoperative scans aligned with postoperative scans, and 3-dimensional scanned implant models were used to reproduce clinical implantation. We tested ±5 mm acetabular cup, acetabular liner, femoral stem, and femoral head offsets. Maximum range of motion (ROM) to bone-bone impingement was calculated for internal rotation at 90° flexion and external rotation at 10° extension.Results: In all cases, increased offset increased ROM to impingement, and vice versa. During internal rotation at 90° flexion, ±5 mm liner offset had the greatest impact on ROM (+9°/-10°), followed by cup (+8°/-9°), head (+5°/-7°), and stem (+3°/-5°) offset. During external rotation at 10° extension, ±5 mm cup offset had the greatest impact on ROM (+10°/-10°), followed by liner (+9°/-9°), head (+7°/-8°), and stem (+4°/-4°) offset. However, no statistically significant differences were found in the changes to ROM in flexion obtained through cup and liner offsets, the changes to ROM in extension obtained through liner and head offsets, and the changes to ROM in extension obtained through increasing stem and head offsets.Conclusion: Increasing offset by any method reduces impingement. Center-of-rotation offset changes via acetabular cup or liner have the greatest impact on extra-prosthetic impingement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with abnormal spinopelvic motion are at increased risk of dislocation. However, little is known about the effect of hip offset on dislocation risk following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with abnormal spinopelvic motion. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of under-restored hip offset and spinopelvic abnormalities in a series of THA patients treated for recurrent instability.Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated for hip instability following primary THA (THA+I) from 2012 to 2020. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and radiographic parameters were recorded. THA+I patients were compared to an age-matched and gender-matched control THA population without hip instability (THA). Univariate analyses were performed to compare differences between groups.Results: Thirty-three THA+I patients (44 hips) were compared to 44 THA patients (44 hips). THA+I patients had a higher prevalence of spinopelvic pathology (odds ratio [OR] 7.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-23.50, P < .001). The majority of acetabular components were placed within the Lewinnek safe zone (86.4% THA+I vs 72.7% THA; P = .119). THA+I patients were at greater risk of markedly under-restored hip offset (Δoffset ≤ 3 mm; OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.20-18.30, P = .001) and small (<32 mm) femoral head diameter (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.53-12.53, P = .006) compared to THA patients.Conclusion: Lumbar degenerative disease and under-restoration of hip offset were present in a high proportion of patients with hip instability. Although multiple factors may contribute to THA instability, these data suggest that restoration of offset is essential, particularly in patients with spinopelvic pathology, and may be more important than historically described acetabular targets.Level Of Evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Soft tissue management in total hip arthroplasty includes appropriate restoration and/or alteration of leg length (LL) and offset to re-establish natural hip biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of LL and offset-derived variables in a multivariable survival model for dislocation., Methods: Clinical, surgical, and radiographic data was retrospectively acquired for 12,582 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single institution from 1998 to 2018. There were twelve variables derived from preoperative and postoperative radiographs related to LL and offset that were measured using a validated automated algorithm. These measurements, as well as other modifiable and nonmodifiable surgical, clinical, and demographic factors, were used to determine hazard ratios for dislocation risk., Results: None of the LL or offset variables conferred significant risk or protective benefit for dislocation risk. By contrast, all other variables included in the multivariable model demonstrated a statistically significant effect on dislocation risk with a minimum effect size of 28% (range 0.72 to 1.54) (sex, surgical approach, acetabular liner type, femoral head size, neurologic disease, spine disease, and prior spine surgery)., Conclusions: Contrary to traditional teaching and our hypothesis, operative changes in LL and offset did not demonstrate any clinically or statistically significant effect in this large and well-characterized cohort. This does not imply that these variables are not important in individual cases, but rather suggests the overall impact of LL and offset changes is relatively minor for dislocation risk compared to other variables that were found to be highly clinically and statistically significant in this population. These results may also suggest that surgeons do a good job of restoring native LL and offset for patients, which may mitigate their analyzed impact., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal stiffness has been shown to increase risk of dislocation due to impingement and instability. Increasing anteversion of the acetabular component has been suggested to prevent dislocation, but little has been discussed in terms of femoral or global offset restoration. The purpose of this study is to quantify dislocation rates after primary THA using standard versus high-offset femoral components and to determine how differences in offset affect impingement-free range of motion in a stiff spine cohort using a novel impingement model.Methods: A total of 12,365 patients undergoing THA from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to determine dislocation rates and utilization of standard- versus high-offset stems. For 50 consecutive patients with spinal stiffness, a CT-based computer software impingement modeling system assessed bony or prosthetic impingement during simulated range of motion. The model was run 5 times for each patient with varying offsets. Range of motion was simulated in each scenario to determine the degree at which impingement occurred.Results: There were 51 dislocations for a 0.41% dislocation rate. Total utilization of high-offset stems in the entire cohort was 49%. Of those patients who sustained a dislocation, 49 (96%) utilized a standard-offset stem. The impingement modeling demonstrated 5 degrees of added range of motion until impingement for every 1 mm offset increase.Conclusion: In the impingement model, high-offset stems facilitated greater ROM before bony impingement and resulted in lower dislocation rates. In the setting of high-risk THA due to spinal stiffness, surgeons should consider the use of high-offset stems and pay attention to offset restoration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Achieving appropriate limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is challenging. Target limb length and offset may not always mean equal radiographic measurements bilaterally. The goal of this study is to introduce a method for determining as well as achieving target limb length and offset using digital radiographic measurements.Methods: One hundred and two consecutive patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis undergoing primary THA in the lateral decubitus position were included. Limb length and offset were measured on anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Offset was defined as the length of a line parallel to the inter-teardrop line, extending from the edge of the ischium, at about the lower border of the ipsilateral obturator foramen, to the edge of the femoral cortex, usually at, or just below, the neck resection level. Target limb length was determined for each patient based on patient perception and severity of disease. Target offset equaled the contralateral limb. Using intraoperative digital radiography, adjustments were made until targets were achieved and the hip was stable. Patients were followed for an average of 4.2 years postoperatively.Results: Limb length was within 5 mm of target measurements in 100% of patients and offset was within 5 mm of targets in 97.1%. Target measurements differed by >5 mm from the contralateral side in 2.0% of limb length and 2.9% of offset measurements. There were no significant differences between intraoperative and postoperative limb length (P = .261) or offset (P = .747) measurements. At final follow-up, there were no dislocations or reoperations and average Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement was 95.78.Conclusion: Target limb length and offset goals can be determined for most patients undergoing THA. Targets are not always equal to the contralateral side. Intraoperative digital radiography can allow surgeons to accurately achieve target limb length and offset to within 5 mm in a homogenous cohort of patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis with excellent clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives of the present study were to (1) evaluate the accuracy and reliability of native acetabular offset (AO) measurements performed on conventional supine anterior-posterior (ap) pelvis radiographs with reference to computed tomography (CT) in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA); (2) determine the minimum and maximum amount of medialization of the center of rotation (COR) simulating different reaming techniques; and (3) identify patients at increased risk of excessive medialization of the COR. A consecutive series of corresponding 131 CT scans and radiographs of patients with primary hip OA was evaluated using validated software for three-dimensional acetabular and femoral measurements. We simulated the implantation of a hemispherical press-fit cup comparing anatomic and conventional reaming techniques and assessed corresponding changes in AO. Standardized ap pelvis radiographs allowed for an accurate and reliable assessment of AO compared with CT. Cup placement in the most lateral position (anatomic reaming technique) resulted in a mean implant-related medialization of 5.9 ± 3.4 mm. Anatomic cup placement did not require reaming to the true floor in 64 hips (49%). With the conventional reaming technique, the total medialization of the COR (implant-related and reaming-related) was 6.8 ± 2.9, with 34% of cases having a medialization ≥8 mm. The present study highlights the variability of acetabular anatomy in patients with primary OA. AO can be accurately and reliably determined on conventional radiographs and appears to be independent of femoral shape and geometry. Depending on the preferred reaming technique a substantial number of patients appear at risk for excessive cup medialization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a lack of prospective studies investigating the additive effect of both acetabular and femoral reconstruction parameters on the functional outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA).Methods: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the combined influence of hip geometry reconstruction and component positioning on the clinical outcome following primary THA for unilateral osteoarthritis. We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and radiographic parameters for hip geometry reconstruction, component position, and orientation using validated measurements for the operated hip compared to the contralateral native hip in a consecutive series of 113 patients with primary unilateral cementless THA. The correlation of reconstruction parameters was investigated using a multivariate polynomial regression model for the dependent variable ΔHHS (difference between the Harris hip scores preoperatively and 2.0-4.8 years postoperatively). Target zones for hip reconstruction and component positioning were investigated for an association with superior clinical outcome.Results: The regression model demonstrated a significant correlation for the ΔHHS and both hip offset (HO) reconstruction and leg length difference. Patients with accurate to slightly increased HO reconstruction combined with balanced leg length demonstrated a significantly higher ΔHHS than patients outside this zone (HO: 5 ± 5 and LLD: 0 ±5 mm, P = .029). This finding could be confirmed for 2 enlarged zones (zone 1: HO, 7.5 ± 7.5 and LLD, 2.5 ± 7.5 mm, P = .028; zone 2: HO, 7.5 ± 7.5 and LLD, 7.5 ± 7.5 mm, P = .007).Conclusion: HO and leg length reconstruction demonstrated an additive effect on clinical outcome and surgeons should aim for high accuracy in the reconstruction of both factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Predisposing factors for trunnionosis and elevated metal ion levels in metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) total hip arthroplasty (THA) are currently unknown.Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 80 consecutive patients (43 males) with an asymptomatic MOP THA at 2- to 5-year follow-up and no other metal implants. Serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) levels were collected at the time of enrollment, and retrospective review was performed regarding demographic, implant, and surgical characteristics. Mean age at the time of surgery was 65.7 years (range 35.6-85.9 years), and mean postoperative follow-up was 28.7 months (range 24.4-58.9 months).Results: Femoral head offset was the only evaluated factor shown to increase serum Co ion levels above baseline within the cohort. Mean difference in Co level for high and low offset implants was 0.58 ppb (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05-1.11 ppb; P = .03). Mean difference in Cr level for high and low offset implants was 0.19 ppb (95% CI = -0.23 to 0.60 ppb; P = .37). Mean difference in Co level for small and large femoral heads was 0.20 ppb (95% CI = -0.41 to 0.81 ppb; P = .59). Mean difference in Cr level for small and large femoral heads was 0.28 ppb (95% CI = -0.18 to 0.74 ppb; P = .06). Age, gender, Harris Hip Score, and implant duration were not associated with changes in metal ion levels.Conclusion: Femoral head offset appears to be an important source of elevated metal ion levels in MOP THA. Further studies will be needed to understand if increasing femoral head offset is associated with subsequent adverse local tissue reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the rate of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rises, attention must be paid to potential complications relating to bone loss, soft tissue deficiencies, and loss of tissue planes. Using modular femoral stems in revision surgery allows for varying amounts of bone loss in the proximal and distal femur while letting the surgeon adjust rotation, leg length, and offset. We retrospectively reviewed 125 patients that underwent revision THA with a modular femoral component system and had minimum 2 year follow-up. Ten patients required reoperations for infection, recurrent dislocation, or fracture treatment. There was no evidence of radiographic loosening or mechanical failure in the remaining patients. Modular femoral components provide excellent intraoperative flexibility and significant radiographic and clinical benefits as seen in this patient cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This extensive radiographic study asks if there is a statistical relationship between the size of the stem that will best fit the femur and the vertical and lateral offsets of the reconstructed acetabular center, what is the distribution of vertical and lateral offsets in this large and if there is a statistical difference among surgeons in the planned location of the reconstructed acetabular center. On 466 radiographs, five surgeons separately templated stem size and acetabular cup location. The vertical and horizontal coordinates of the reconstructed acetabulum center were measured relative to the planned position of the stem. We found a strong correlation between the stem size and the average lateral and vertical offsets. Acetabular reaming associated with the anatomic variability of native femoral necks, leads to a span of 36mm in lateral offset, and a span of 39mm in vertical offset. Statistically significant differences were also found in the way surgeons plan acetabular reaming. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In situ femoral preparation refers to implanting a femoral component before the femoral neck osteotomy and without dislocating the hip joint, which allows the implanted femoral component to be used to measure leg length and offset. One hundred hip arthroplasty surgeries among 93 patients were compared with a control group of 15 patients. A modular neck femoral component was implanted in a technique similar to implanting a femoral nail. The differences between the in situ measurements and the preoperative and postoperative radiograph measurements averaged −0.1 mm for leg length (r = 0.89) and −0.37 mm for offset (r = 0.57). In situ leg length measurement allows accurate measurement of leg length and offset and guides surgeons in selecting appropriate modular components to attain a near anatomical hip arthroplasty. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This report represents a 5- to 10-year follow-up of our initial 2- to 5-year data with this proximally hydroxyapatite-coated stem design (Secur-Fit, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). This is a retrospective review of a single surgeon''s consecutive cases. A total of 105 cases were available for complete review. The average follow-up was 6.7 years (60-123 months). All stems achieved bony ingrowth. Harris hip score and Oxford hip score averaged to 91 and 17, respectively, with no differences seen between the 132° and the 127° stem designs. Leg length measurements were considered equal side-to-side differences of 7 mm or less in 87% of cases: 82% of standard- and 92% of high-offset cases (P < .05). Four cases of osteolysis were identified and occurred only in patients with an elevated rim liner, implicating neck-liner impingement. The stem design performed exceedingly well over the course of this study. Having a high-offset option aids the surgeon in proper leg length management. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This study defines normal bilateral variations in offset and hip center location on pelvic radiographs. The relationship of the femoral head center to the tip of the greater trochanter and that of offset to medullary canal diameter are also defined. Measurements of the offset, hip center location, height of the tip of the greater trochanter from the femoral head center, and medullary canal diameter were carried out on 100 normal pelvic radiographs. The offset of one hip was found to predict that of the contralateral hip to within 4.62 mm with 95% confidence. Their hip center locations differed by 6.3 mm. The tip of the greater trochanter was, on average, 8 mm higher than the femoral head center. Although offset generally increased with an increase in medullary canal diameter, frequent discrepancies occurred in their relationship. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The lateral offset acetabular component, a reconstruction technique for hips with acetabular bone loss, causes a torsional moment because of the displacement of the center of hip rotation and may increase the risk of fixation failure. Eighteen patients who had an acetabular revision with a 7-mm offset cementless component were retrospectively studied to identify factors that influence outcome and to clarify indications for its use. The average follow-up time was 47 months and all patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years or until the failure of the fixation. At the latest follow-up examination, 3 of the 18 cups had been revised for loosening, 1 cup had radiographic loosening, and 1 patient was considered a clinical failure. Clinical or radiographic failure was significantly more likely (P < .05) in patients with a higher shell abduction angle. On the basis of the definitive failures in more than one fourth of reconstructions at early follow-up, the routine use of this component is not recommended in revision surgery with acetabular deficiency. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]