Search

Background: Socioeconomic disadvantage has been associated with negative outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The area deprivation index (ADI) and distressed communities index (DCI) are composite rankings that score socioeconomic status (SES) using patients' home addresses. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of ADI and DCI with outcomes following THA and TKA while controlling for potential confounding covariates., Methods: A series of 4,146 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA and TKA between January 2018 and May 2023 were queried from our institutional total joint registry. The 90-day medical and surgical complications and resource utilization were collected. The ADI and DCI scores were obtained for each patient, and the association between these scores and postoperative outcomes was analyzed., Results: The ADI and DCI were both associated with patient age, sex, race, comorbidity burden, and smoking status. After controlling for these variables, higher ADI and DCI scores were associated with increased length of stay (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively), but were not associated with the occurrence of any 90-day complication, reoperation, or revision., Conclusions: The SES, as quantified by ADI and DCI, was associated with multiple known risk factors for complications following THA and TKA, but was not independently associated with complications, reoperations, or revision surgeries at 90 days postoperatively. While convenient metrics for the quantification of SES, in some populations, ADI and DCI may not be independently associated with detrimental outcomes following THA and TKA., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the preferred anesthesia modality for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, studies establishing SA as preferential may be subject to selection bias given that general anesthesia (GA) is often selectively utilized on more difficult, higher-risk operations. The optimal comparison group, therefore, is the patient converted to GA due to a failed attempt at SA. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors and outcomes following failed SA with conversion to GA during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA)., Methods: A consecutive cohort of 4,483 patients who underwent primary TJA at our institution was identified (2,004 THA and 2,479 TKA). Of these patients, 3,307 underwent GA (73.8%), 1,056 underwent SA (23.3%), and 130 patients failed SA with conversion to GA (2.90%). Primary outcomes included rescue analgesia requirement in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time to ambulation, pain scores in the PACU, estimated blood loss, and 90-day complications., Results: Risk factors for SA failure included older age and a higher comorbidity burden. Failure of SA was associated with increased estimated blood loss, rescue intravenous opioid use, and time to ambulation when compared to the successful SA group in both THA and TKA patients (P < .001). The anesthesia modality was not associated with significant differences in PACU pain scores. The 90-day complication rate was similar between the failed SA and GA groups. There was a higher incidence of postoperative pain prompting unplanned visits and thromboembolism when comparing failed SA to successful SA in both THA and TKA patients (P < .05)., Conclusions: In our series, patients who had failed SA demonstrated inferior outcomes to patients receiving successful SA and similar outcomes to patients receiving GA who did not have an SA attempt. This emphasizes the importance of success in the initial attempt at SA for optimizing outcomes following TJA., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following both total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been reported to reduce PJI following TJA in high-risk patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if EOA reduces PJI in all-comers and high-risk THA and TKA populations., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, including 4,576 patients undergoing primary THA or TKA at a single institution from 2018 to 2022. Beginning in 2020, EOA prophylaxis was administered for 10 days following THA or TKA at our institution. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts (1,769 EOA, 2,807 no EOA) based on whether they received postoperative EOA. The 90-day and 1-year outcomes, with a focus on PJI, were then compared between groups. A subgroup analysis of high-risk patients was also performed., Results: There was no difference in 90-day PJI rates between cohorts (EOA 1 versus no EOA 0.8%; P = .6). The difference in the rate of PJI remained insignificant at 1 year (EOA 1 versus no EOA 1%; P = .9). Similarly, our subgroup analysis of high-risk patients demonstrated no difference in postoperative PJI between EOA (n = 254) and no EOA (n = 396) (0.8 versus 2.3%, respectively; P = .2). Reassuringly, we also found no differences in the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (EOA 0.1 versus no EOA 0.1%; P > .9) or in antibiotic resistance among those who developed PJI within 90 days (EOA 59 versus no EOA 83%; P = .2)., Conclusions: With the numbers available for analysis, EOA prophylaxis was not associated with PJI risk reduction following primary TJA when universally deployed. Furthermore, among high-risk patients, there was no statistically significant difference. While we did not identify increased antibiotic resistance or Clostridium difficile infection, we cannot recommend wide-spread adoption of EOA prophylaxis, and clarification regarding the role of EOA, even in high-risk patients, is needed., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)