Search

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of high altitude (HA) on work of breathing and external work capacity. On the basis of simultaneous records of esophageal pressure and lung volume, the mechanical power of breathing (Wrs) was measured in four normal subjects during exercise at sea level (SL) and after a 1-mo sojourn at 5,050 m. Maximal exercise ventilation (VEmax) and maximal Wrs were higher at HA than at SL (mean 185 vs. 101 l/min and 129 vs. 40 cal/min, respectively), whereas maximal O2 uptake averaged 2.07 and 3.03 l/min, respectively. In three subjects, the relationship of Wrs to minute ventilation (VE) was the same at SL and HA, whereas, in one individual, Wrs for any given VE was consistently lower at HA. Assuming a mechanical efficiency (E) of 5%, the O2 cost of breathing at HA and SL should amount to 26 and 5.5% of maximal O2 uptake, whereas for E of 20% the corresponding values were 6.5 and 1.4%, respectively. Thus, at HA, Wrs may substantially limit external work unless E is high. Although at SL VEmax did not exceed the critical VE, at which any increase in VE is not useful in terms of body energetics even for E of 5%, at HA VEmax exceeded critical VE even for E of 20%.

We investigated the ventilatory response to spontaneous changes in resistive load during sleep in nine adult asthmatic patients, four of whom were snorers. All patients had a history of nocturnal worsening of respiratory symptoms and were submitted to a nocturnal polysomnographic study in a sleep laboratory. During the night, all patients showed spontaneous increases in pulmonary resistance due to bronchoconstriction. A temporary additional increase in inspiratory resistance (RI) was observed as a result of snoring. In all patients, a highly significant inverse linear relationship was found between ventilation (VE) and RI, but the slopes of the regressions varied considerably among patients; the decrease in VE was due to a reduced mean inspiratory flow. The most effective ventilatory compensation to increasing resistive load (lowest absolute values in the VE/RI slopes) was observed in two patients: one nonsnorer and one snorer. Effective VE compensation appeared to be dependent on the individual's combined adjustments of transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) and duty cycle (TI/TT). In fact, an increase in Ptp, linearly related to RI, was observed in all patients except one (a snorer during nonsnoring breathing); however, the Ptp increase was able to compensate VE only when TI/TT increased. We conclude that, in sleeping asthmatic patients, VE adaptation to increased spontaneous load is highly variable among patients and its effectiveness is related to individual strategies on the basis of adequate adjustments of neuromuscular output and timing of the breathing cycle.

To evaluate the response of normal subjects to assisted ventilation, we studied 6 naive healthy subjects before and during negative-pressure ventilation (NPV) with "low" (-10 cmH2O) and "high" (-30 cmH2O) pressures in an Emerson tank respirator. Ventilation was measured with an inductive plethysmograph (Respitrace), and diaphragmatic electromyogram (DEMG) was studied with a bipolar esophageal electrode. During NPV a 1:1 phase lock was observed between subjects and iron lung frequency in all subjects. Tidal volume increased in most subjects, more with high than with low pressures (P less than 0.05), whereas DEMG increased, decreased, or showed no change. Postinspiratory inspiratory diaphragmatic activity (PIIA) significantly increased during high-pressure NPV and was accompanied by an increase in tonic DEMG in one-half of the subjects. Voluntary relaxation resulted in a decrease in DEMG and PIIA. We suggest that cortical activity can explain persistency of active breathing during negative-pressure ventilation.