Search

Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality but has the potential to alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobials. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an antibiotic with utility in treating certain multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections. Herein, we describe the population pharmacokinetics of imipenem and relebactam in critically ill patients supported on ECMO. Methods Patients with infection supported on ECMO received 4–6 doses of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam per current prescribing information based on estimated creatinine clearance. Blood samples were collected following the final dose of the antibiotic. Concentrations were determined via LC–MS/MS. Population PK models were fit with and without covariates using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations of 1000 patients assessed joint PTA of f AUC0–24/MIC ≥ 8 for relebactam, and ≥40% f T > MIC for imipenem for each approved dosing regimen. Results Seven patients supported on ECMO were included in PK analyses. A two-compartment model with creatinine clearance as a covariate on clearance for both imipenem and relebactam fitted the data best. The mean ± standard deviation parameters were: CL0, 15.21 ± 6.52 L/h; Vc, 10.13 ± 2.26 L; K12, 2.45 ± 1.16 h−1 and K21, 1.76 ± 0.49 h−1 for imipenem, and 6.95 ± 1.34 L/h, 9.81 ± 2.69 L, 2.43 ± 1.13 h−1 and 1.52 ± 0.67 h−1 for relebactam. Simulating each approved dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam according to creatinine clearance yielded PTAs of ≥90% up to an MIC of 2 mg/L. Conclusions Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosed according to package insert in patients supported on ECMO is predicted to achieve exposures sufficient to treat susceptible Gram-negative isolates, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Two of the three recently approved β-lactam agent (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity. Methods OXA-48-positive (n  = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n  = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae wild-type, n  = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls. Results On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs, and 96% (49/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold. Conclusions Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Two out of the three recently approved β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.Methods: OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae WT, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.Results: On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs and 73% (37/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold.Conclusions: Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Previous investigations into metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-harbouring Enterobacterales suggest that susceptibility testing in zinc-limited media may be more appropriate in predicting β-lactam in vivo activity. There are limited data with MBL-harbouring Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Methods: Forty-three MBL-harbouring P. aeruginosa isolates (IMP, n = 11; VIM, n = 12; NDM, n = 10; SPM, n = 10) and two P. aeruginosa control isolates (KPC, n = 1; WT, n = 1) were evaluated. Meropenem activity was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using humanized exposures. Susceptibility testing was conducted in conventional CAMHB, EDTA-supplemented CAMHB (3-300 mg/L EDTA) and Chelex-treated CAMHB (0-1.0 mg/L re-supplemented zinc), resulting in a range of meropenem MIC values for each isolate. A sigmoidal Emax model was fitted to fT>MIC versus change in log10 cfu/thigh to estimate the goodness of fit (R2).Results: Increasing EDTA concentrations or limiting the amount of zinc in broth resulted in several-fold reductions in MIC among the majority of the MBL-harbouring P. aeruginosa while the MICs for the KPC and WT isolates were unchanged. Bacterial killing in vivo was variable, with the range of killing spanning -3.29 to +4.81 log10 change in cfu/thigh. Addition of 30 mg/L EDTA and Chelex-treated CAMHB (with no zinc supplementation) provided broth conditions for susceptibility testing that best predicted in vivo efficacy (R2 > 0.7).Conclusions: Among MBL-harbouring P. aeruginosa, meropenem in vivo efficacy is best represented by the pharmacodynamic profile generated using MICs determined in EDTA-supplemented or zinc-limited broth. In addition to previous data with Enterobacterales, antibiotic susceptibility testing in media that approximates physiological conditions makes it possible to uncover potential and existing therapeutic agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]