Search

Objectives Susceptibility to metronidazole was investigated in 81 Clostridium difficile strains, belonging to nine different PCR ribotypes, by three different laboratory methods. Methods MICs for 81 C. difficile clinical isolates were determined by Etest, the agar dilution method (ADM) and the agar incorporation method (AIM). Twenty selected strains were also subjected to subinhibitory concentrations of metronidazole and the MIC heterogeneity was analysed in colonies from each strain that showed increased values before and after exposure to the antibiotic, using ADM and AIM. Results Overall, the MICs obtained by Etest were lower compared with those obtained by ADM and AIM, causing discrepancies in the categorization (as susceptible or having reduced susceptibility) of some strains. Reduced susceptibility to metronidazole was observed using both ADM and AIM, with higher MIC values by AIM in isolates belonging to PCR ribotypes 001 and 010. An increase in MICs after exposure to metronidazole was observed for strains belonging to these PCR ribotypes (by Etest and ADM, but not by AIM). In particular, MICs for colonies from strains belonging to either PCR ribotype 001 or 010 were less heterogeneous by AIM compared with by ADM, suggesting a better ability of AIM to detect strains with reduced susceptibility. Conclusions These results suggest that the presence of C. difficile subpopulations with reduced susceptibility to metronidazole in the human intestine may be one of the factors responsible for reduced antibiotic efficacy in vivo. The possibility that higher MICs may have often gone unnoticed underlines the importance of choosing the best method for MIC determination and the necessity to monitor C. difficile susceptibility to metronidazole. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives Multidrug resistance and antibiotic resistance mechanisms were investigated in 316 Clostridium difficile clinical isolates collected during the first European surveillance on C. difficile in 2005. Methods MICs of eight different antibiotics were determined using Etest. Reserpine- and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone-sensitive efflux was tested using the agar dilution method. Molecular analysis of the resistance mechanisms was performed using PCR assays, PCR mapping and sequencing. Results One hundred and forty-eight C. difficile strains were resistant to at least one antibiotic and 82 (55%) were multidrug resistant. In particular, 48% of these isolates were resistant to erythromycin, clindamycin, moxifloxacin and rifampicin. New genetic elements or determinants conferring resistance to erythromycin/clindamycin or tetracycline were identified. Even if most multiresistant strains carried an erm(B) gene, quite a few were erm(B) negative. In-depth analysis of the underlying mechanism in these isolates was carried out, including analysis of 23S rDNA and the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22. Interestingly, resistance to rifampicin was observed in multidrug-resistant strains in association with resistance to fluoroquinolones. Mutations in the rpo(B) and gyrA genes were identified as the cause of resistance to these antibiotics, respectively. Conclusions Characterization of multidrug-resistant C. difficile clinical isolates shows that antibiotic resistance is changing, involving new determinants and mechanisms and providing this pathogen with potential advantages over the co-resident gut flora. The present paper provides, for the first time, a comprehensive picture of the different characteristics of multidrug-resistant C. difficile strains in Europe in 2005 and represents an important source of data for future comparative European studies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]