Search

Objectives: To compare the frequency of grade 3 or 4 transaminase elevations (TEs) in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients who started a three-antiretroviral drug regimen including efavirenz or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) and the influence of pre-existing significant hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis., Patients and Methods: All pre-treated or treatment-naive HIV/HCV co-infected patients who started an antiretroviral regimen including two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors along with efavirenz or a PI/r in seven Spanish centres from January 2007 to December 2009 were included in this prospective study., Results: Of 262 patients included in this study, 76 (29%) individuals began antiretroviral therapy (ART) including efavirenz and 186 (71%) a PI/r-based combination. The median (interquartile) follow-up was 14.0 (6.2-23.7) months. A total of 20 (7.6%) patients presented grade 3-4 TEs. Four (1.5%) subjects discontinued ART due to this adverse event. Grade 3-4 TEs were observed in 5 (6.6%) subjects receiving efavirenz and 15 (8.1%) treated with PI/r (P = 0.681). Three (6.5%) patients in the efavirenz group with significant fibrosis developed grade 3-4 TEs versus 2 (8.7%) without pre-existing significant fibrosis (P = 0.743). In the PI/r group, the corresponding figures were 10 (8.8%) and 5 (9.3%), respectively (P = 0.931)., Conclusions: The frequency of grade 3-4 TEs associated with efavirenz-based ART combinations under clinical practice conditions is low and similar to that found in patients receiving PI/r currently used in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. The baseline fibrosis stage does not have an impact on the development of TEs caused by these antiretroviral drugs in this population.

Objectives: To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine., Methods: A total of 256 subjects, enrolled in a cohort of 948 HIV-infected patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin from October 2001 to January 2006, were included in this study. All patients were taking one protease inhibitor or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone during HCV therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in both backbone groups were compared., Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 20 out of 70 (29%) individuals under abacavir and 83 out of 186 (45%) under tenofovir showed SVR (P = 0.02). N(t)RTI backbone containing tenofovir was an independent predictor of SVR in the multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), 2.6 (1.05-6.9); P = 0.03]. The association between abacavir use and lower SVR was chiefly seen in patients with plasma HCV-RNA load higher than 600 000 IU/mL and genotype 1 or 4. Among patients treated with ribavirin dose <13.2 mg/kg/day, 3 (20%) of those under abacavir versus 22 (52%) under tenofovir reached SVR (P = 0.03), whereas the rates were 31% and 38% (P = 0.4), respectively, in those receiving >/=13.2 mg/kg/day., Conclusions: HIV-infected patients who receive abacavir plus lamivudine respond worse to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin than those who are given tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone, especially in those receiving lower ribavirin doses.

Background: Combination of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin is the standard treatment for HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients. However, data available on the efficacy of this therapy in co-infected patients who failed a former interferon-based regimen are limited., Methods: We analysed the efficacy and safety of the Peg-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus ribavirin combination in a multicentre observational cohort study including 54 HCV/HIV co-infected patients who had failed to respond to or relapsed on interferon-based treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR), defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL 24 weeks after completion of therapy., Results: By intention-to-treat analysis, 30% of the patients achieved an SVR. Viral eradication by genotype was 18.9% (7/37) genotype 1; 57.1% (8/14) genotype 3 and 33.3% (1/3) genotype 4. The only independent predictor of SVR was genotype 3 (odds ratio: 5.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-19.8). Fourteen (38%) patients with genotype 1 had undetectable viral load at week 48 of treatment. Nevertheless, 50% of them relapsed during the follow-up period. Severe adverse events or progression of HIV infection did not occur during the study; however, 39% of the patients required Peg-IFN dose reduction because of intolerance or haematological toxicity., Conclusions: Combined Peg-IFN and ribavirin achieved a substantial rate of SVR in HCV/HIV co-infected patients who failed a prior standard interferon-based regimen. The decision to retreat any co-infected patient should be individual-based. More aggressive strategies may be necessary to avoid the high relapse rate observed among patients with genotype 1.

Objectives: To investigate whether concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin., Methods: Three hundred and ten HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment, 258 of them with concurrent ART, were included in this retrospective multicentre study. The predictors of SVR were evaluated., Results: SVR was shown by 114 (37%) subjects. HCV genotype 2 or 3, plasma HCV-RNA load lower than 600 000 IU/mL, an exposure to the therapy against HCV infection > or =80% of the planned dose and baseline CD4 cell counts higher than or equal to 300/mm(3) were predictors of SVR. Likewise, patients without ART and those receiving a combination including tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine plus a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) showed a higher SVR rate than the subjects who were on other ART strategies at baseline [44%, 44% and 29%, respectively; adjusted odd ratio (95% CI) for no ART = 1.96 (1.07-4.76), P = 0.025, and for ART including tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine plus a PI or a NNRTI = 2.08 (1.16-3.70), P = 0.014]., Conclusions: The ART strategy on starting therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a predictor of SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Subjects without ART and those receiving combinations of a PI or a NNRTI with a nucleos(t)ide backbone of tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine respond better than those who receive other regimens.

Objectives: To determine the incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens among human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients with known stage of liver fibrosis., Methods: All HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were monitored for a period of 12 months after starting nelfinavir-containing regimens and, with an available liver biopsy, were included in a retrospective study., Results: A total of 82 patients were included in the study. Nine (10.9%) HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showed an episode of severe hepatotoxicity during the study period. Eight (9.8%) individuals showed grade 3 or 4 change in levels of serum alanine aminotransferase and one subject presented with an event of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Six (18.2%) of 33 patients with advanced liver fibrosis and three (6%) of 49 individuals without advanced liver fibrosis showed an episode of severe hepatotoxicity (P = 0.1). In the multivariate analysis, only nevirapine use during nelfinavir therapy [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-54.1; P = 0.01] was independently associated with risk of development of severe liver toxicity., Conclusions: The incidence of severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens is low among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with known stage of liver fibrosis. In addition, our findings show that concomitant nevirapine use is associated with an increased risk of severe hepatotoxicity in these subjects. Likewise, the proportion of severe liver toxicity tended to be higher in individuals with advanced liver fibrosis.