Search

Growth models are important for optimization of feed formulation and breeding programs in turkeys. The objectives of this study were 1) to compare sex and line differences in turkeys in parameter estimates of mono- and di-phasic Gompertz growth models, and 2) to evaluate mono and diphasic mixed Gompertz growth models to determine the variation in parameter estimates in a group of female line turkey toms. A total of 1,056 manually recorded weekly average body weight (BW) observations from male and female turkeys of a male and female line from weeks 1 to 20 were used for objective 1. Daily median values of automatically collected individual BW of female line turkey toms were used for objective 2 and random components associated with individual subject animals related to mature weight and/or timing of maximum gain during each phase were introduced in the Gompertz model. Growth curve shapes were different between male line toms, male line hens, female line toms, and female line hens (P < 0.001). However, inflection points were similar between male and female line toms and between male and female line hens (14.06 vs. 13.72 wk and 11.22 and 10.71 wk, respectively), while mature BW differed between lines by 6.49 and 3.81 kg for toms and hens, respectively. The normalized growth rate constant (growth rate constant corrected for mature weight) was around the same magnitude between male and female line toms (0.0031 vs. 0.0038, respectively), but slightly lower in male line hens compared to female line hens (0.0072 vs. 0.0091, respectively). Diphasic Gompertz models described growth better in all line × sex combinations compared to the monophasic models (P < 0.001) and mixed diphasic Gompertz models showed improved fit over mixed monophasic Gompertz models. The correlation structure of the random components identified that individuals with a higher mature weight had a later inflection point and lower growth rate coefficients. These results provide tools for improved breeding practices and a structure to evaluate the effects of dietary or environmental factors on growth trajectories., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

With increasing disparity between broiler breeder target weights and broiler growth potential, maintenance energy requirements have become a larger proportion of total broiler breeder energy intake. Because energy is partitioned to growth and egg production at a lower priority than maintenance, accurate prediction of maintenance energy requirements is important for practical broiler breeder feed allocation decisions. Environmental temperature affects the maintenance energy requirement by changing rate of heat loss to the environment. In the ME system, heat production (energy lost) is part of the maintenance requirement (ME). In the current study, a nonlinear mixed model was derived to predict ME partitioning of broiler breeder hens under varied temperature conditions. At 21 wk of age, 192 Ross 708 hens were individually caged within 6 controlled environmental chambers. From 25 to 41 wk, 4 temperature treatments (15°C, 19°C, 23°C, and 27°C) were randomly assigned to the chambers for 2-week periods. Half of the birds in each chamber were fed a high-energy (HE; 2,912 kcal/kg) diet, and half were fed a low-energy (LE; 2,790 kcal/kg) diet. The nonlinear mixed regression model included a normally distributed random term representing individual hen maintenance, a quadratic response to environmental temperature, and linear ADG and egg mass (EM) coefficients. The model assumed that energy requirements for BW gain and egg production were not influenced by environmental temperature because hens were homeothermic, and the cellular processes for associated biochemical processes occurred within a controlled narrow core body temperature range. Residual feed intake (RFI) and residual ME (RME) were used to estimate efficiency. A quadratic effect of environmental temperature on broiler breeder MEm was predicted ( < 0.0001), with a minimum energy expenditure at 24.3°C. Predicted ME at 21°C was 92.5 kcal/kg; requirements for gain and EM were 2.126 and 1.789 kcal/g, respectively ( < 0.0001). Birds fed the HE diet were more efficient, with a lower RME than birds on the LE diet (-0.63 vs. 0.63 kcal/kg), translating to ME of 135.2 and 136.5 kcal/kg, respectively. In the current experiment, optimal biological efficiency was predicted at 24.3°C in feed-restricted broiler breeders fed the HE diet.