Search

Genomic tools to better define breed composition in agriculturally important species have sparked scientific and commercial industry interest. Knowledge of breed composition can inform multiple scientifically important decisions of industry application including DNA marker-assisted selection, identification of signatures of selection, and inference of product provenance to improve supply chain integrity. Genomic tools are expensive but can be economized by deploying a relatively small number of highly informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) scattered evenly across the genome. Using resources from the 1000 Bull Genomes Project we established calibration (more stringent quality criteria; N = 1,243 cattle) and validation (less stringent; N = 864) data sets representing 17 breeds derived from both taurine and indicine bovine subspecies. Fifteen successively smaller panels (from 500,000 to 50 SNP) were built from those SNP in the calibration data that increasingly satisfied 2 criteria, high differential allele frequencies across the breeds as measured by average Euclidean distance (AED) and high uniformity (even spacing) across the physical genome. Those SNP awarded the highest AED were in or near genes previously identified as important signatures of selection in cattle such as LCORL, NCAPG, KITLG, and PLAG1. For each panel, the genomic breed composition (GBC) of each animal in the validation dataset was estimated using a linear regression model. A systematic exploration of the predictive accuracy of the various sized panels was then undertaken on the validation population using 3 benchmarking approaches: (1) % error (expressed relative to the estimated GBC made from over 1 million SNP), (2) % breed misassignment (expressed relative to each individual’s breed recorded), and (3) Shannon’s entropy of estimated GBC across the 17 target breeds. Our analyses suggest that a panel of just 250 SNP represents an adequate balance between accuracy and cost—only modest gains in accuracy are made as one increases panel density beyond this point.

Genetic strategies aimed at improving general immune competence (IC) have the potential to reduce the incidence and severity of disease in beef production systems, with resulting benefits of improved animal health and welfare and reduced reliance on antibiotics to prevent and treat disease. Implementation of such strategies first requires that methodologies be developed to phenotype animals for IC and demonstration that these phenotypes are associated with health outcomes. We have developed a methodology to identify IC phenotypes in beef steers during the yard weaning period, which is both practical to apply on-farm and does not restrict the future sale of tested animals. In the current study, a total of 838 Angus steers, previously IC phenotyped at weaning, were categorized as low (n = 98), average (n = 653), or high (n = 88) for the IC phenotype. Detailed health and productivity data were collected on all steers during feedlot finishing, and associations between IC phenotype, health outcomes, and productivity were investigated. A favorable association between IC phenotype and number of mortalities during feedlot finishing was observed with higher mortalities recorded in low IC steers (6.1%) as compared with average (1.2%, P < 0.001) or high (0%, P = 0.018) IC steers. Disease incidence was numerically highest in low IC steers (15.3 cases/100 animals) and similar in average IC steers (10.1 cases/100 animals) and high IC steers (10.2 cases/100 animals); however, differences between groups were not significant. No significant influence of IC phenotype on average daily gain was observed, suggesting that selection for improved IC is unlikely to incur a significant penalty to production. The potential economic benefits of selecting for IC in the feedlot production environment were calculated. Health-associated costs were calculated as the sum of lost production costs, lost capital investment costs, and disease treatment costs. Based on these calculations, health-associated costs were estimated at AUS$103/head in low IC steers, AUS$25/head in average IC steers, and AUS$4/head in high IC steers, respectively. These findings suggest that selection for IC has the potential to reduce mortalities during feedlot finishing and, as a consequence, improve the health and welfare of cattle in the feedlot production environment and reduce health-associated costs incurred by feedlot operators.

An enriched environment is widely used to improve domestic animals’ welfare and promote their natural behaviors. Music can reduce abnormal behavior in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents. However, little is known about the effects of music on pigs. This study aims to explore the effects of repeated music stimulation on the behavior, physiology, and immunity of growing pigs. A total of 72 hybrid piglets (Large White × Duroc × Minpig) were randomly divided into three groups, including music (Mozart K.448, 60 to 70 dB), noise (recorded mechanical noise, 80 to 85 dB), and control (natural background sound, 0.05). In conclusion, short-term music stimulus (8 d) reduced the stress response, whereas long-term music stimulus (60 d) enhanced the immune responses. In addition, the noise increased the aggressive behavior, and long-term noise reduced the immunity of the growing pigs.

In animal breeding and genetics, the ability to cope with disease, here defined as immune competence (IC), with minimal detriment to growth and fertility is a desired objective which addresses both animal production and welfare considerations. However, defining and objectively measuring IC phenotypes using testing methods which are practical to apply on-farm has been challenging. Based on previously described protocols, we measured both cell-mediated immune response (Cell-IR) and antibody-mediated immune response (Ab-IR) and combined these measures to determine an animal’s IC. Using a population of 2,853 Australian Angus steers and heifers, we compared 2 alternative methods to combine both metrics into a single phenotype to be used as a tool for the genetic improvement of IC. The first method, named ZMEAN, is obtained by taking the average of the individual metrics after subjecting each to a Z-score standardization. The second, ImmuneDEX (IDEX), is a weighted average that considers the correlation between Cell-IR and Ab-IR, as well as the difference in ranking of individuals by each metric, and uses these as weights in the averaging. Both simulation and real data were used to understand the behavior of ZMEAN and IDEX. To further ascertain the relationship between IDEX and other traits of economic importance, we evaluated a range of traits related to growth, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics. We report estimates of heritability of 0.31 ± 0.06 for Cell-IR, 0.42 ± 0.06 for Ab-IR, 0.42 ± 0.06 for ZMEAN and 0.370 ± 0.06 for IDEX, as well as a unity genetic correlation (rg) between ZMEAN and IDEX. While a moderately positive rg was estimated between Cell-IR and Ab-IR (rg = 0.33 ± 0.12), strongly positive estimates were obtained between IDEX and Cell-IR (rg = 0.80 ± 0.05) and between IDEX and Ab-IR (rg = 0.85 ± 0.04). We obtained a moderately negative rg between IC traits and growth including an rg = −0.38 ± 0.14 between IDEX and weaning weight, and negligible with carcass fat measurements, including an rg = −0.03 ± 0.12 between IDEX and marbling. Given that breeding with a sole focus on production might inadvertently increase susceptibility to disease and associated antibiotic use, our analyses suggest that ImmuneDEX will provide a basis to breed animals that are both highly productive and with an enhanced ability to resist disease.

Nonadditive effects may contribute to genetic variation of complex traits. Their inclusion in genetic evaluation models may therefore improve breeding value estimates and lead to more accurate selection decisions. In this study, we evaluated a systematic series of models accounting for additive, dominance and first-order epistatic interaction (additive by additive, GxG; additive by dominance, GxD; and dominance by dominance, DxD) on body yearling weight (YWT) of 2,550 Tropical Composite (TC) and 2,111 Brahman (BB) cattle in Australia. For both breeds, similar estimates of additive and phenotypic variances and narrow and broad-sense heritability values were obtained across the evaluated models except when GxG effect was considered. In this case, additive variance was slightly lower than that obtained in the models which do not consider this effect. The estimated dominance and epistatic variances from additive and dominance effects (AD) and additive, dominance and epistatic effects models (ADE) were greater than that ADH and ADEH models (as described above plus heterozygosity as a covariate). However, all genetic parameter estimates were associated with a large standard deviation. Averaged across ADH and ADHE models, the magnitude of dominance variance compared to the phenotypic variance of YWT was 14% (BB) and 10% (TC). The magnitude of epistasis compared to the phenotypic variance for BB and TC was 17% and 29%, respectively for GxG; 0.7% and 0% for GxD; and 0% and 0% for DxD. The inclusion of nonadditive effects slightly improves the predictive accuracy of breeding values from 0.28 for A to 0.33 for ADHEGxG and from 0.18 for A to 0.23 ADEGxD in BB and TC cattle. Models that included heterozygosity (ADH and ADHE) must be used to estimate nonadditive genetic variance components. A 1 Mb sliding window analysis identified a region on BTA 14 explaining 10.08% and 1.21% of total genetic variance (additive + dominance) of YWT in BB and TC, respectively. Our results suggest that dominance, epistasis, and heterozygosity should be included in models for genetic parameters estimation. To identify the animals with the highest additive genetic value in selection decisions, only the additive effect should be used in evaluation models.

A combined matrix that exploits genealogy together with marker-based information could improve the selection of elite individuals in breeding programs. We present genetic parameters for adaptive and growth traits in beef cattle by exploring linear combinations of pedigree-based (A) and marker-based (G) relationship matrices. We use a data set with 2,111 Brahman (BB) and 2,550 Tropical Composite (TC) cattle with genotypes for 729,068 SNP, and phenotypes for five traits. A weighted relationship matrix (WRM) combining G and A was constructed as WRM = λG + (1 - λ)A. The weight (λ) was explored at values from 0.0 to 1.0, at 0.1 intervals. Additionally, four alternative G matrices, in the WRM, were evaluated according to the selection of SNP used to generate them: 1) Gw: all autosomal SNP with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 1%; 2) Gg: autosomal SNP with MAF > 1% and mapped inside to gene coding regions; 3) Gp: autosomal SNP with MAF > 1% and previously reported to have significant pleiotropic effect in these two populations; and 4) Gc: autosomal SNP with MAF > 1% and with significant correlated effects previously reported in both BB and TC populations. In addition, two A matrices were evaluated: 1) A: all relationships between animals were considered after tracing back known ancestors; and 2) Ad: a distorted A matrix where a random 1% of the off-diagonal nonzero values were set to zero to simulate relationship errors. Five independent Ad matrices were explored each with a different random 1% of relationships masked. Criteria for comparing the resulting WRM included estimates of heritability (h2) and cross-validation accuracy (ACC) of genomic estimated breeding values. The choice of WRM had a greater impact on h2 than on ACC estimates. The 1% errors introduced in pedigree relationships generated large distortion in genetic parameters and ACC estimates. However, employing a λ > 0.7 was an efficient mechanism to compensate for the errors in A. Additionally, although significant (P-value < 0.0001), we found no consistent relationship between the type of SNP used to compute G and h2 or ACC estimates. We devised the optimal value of λ for maximum h2 and ACC at λ = 0.7 suggesting a 70% and 30% weighting to genomic and genealogical information, respectively, as an optimal strategy to compensate for pedigree errors, to improve genetic parameters estimates and lead to more accurate selection decisions.