Search

Purpose: We investigated the impact of surgical masks (SM) during oxygen therapy using oxygen masks in volunteer- and simulation-based studies. Methods: Fifteen volunteers wore the Hudson RCI® or Open-Face Mask® with/without an SM. The fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), partial pressure of inspired CO2 (PICO2), and respiratory rate (RR) were measured. The oxygen flow rate increased from 0 to 10 L/min. In the simulation-based study, FIO2 was measured using a simulator that reproduced spontaneous breathing. RR was 12 or 24 bpm, and the tidal volume (Tv) was 300, 500, or 700 mL. The effect of oxygen mask fitting conditions were also examined. The primary outcome measure was FIO2 at 6 L/min. Results: In the volunteer-based study, FIO2 was reduced when the SM was used with the Hudson RCI® or Open-Face Mask®. The FIO2 drop was larger with the Open-Face Mask® than with the Hudson RCI®. The RR, EtCO2, and PICO2 significantly changed with the SM, but the differences were not clinically meaningful. In the simulation-based study, the SM with the Hudson RCI® did not reduce FIO2, but the SM with the Open-Face Mask® significantly decreased FIO2 under several conditions. However, the SM with the Hudson Mask® reduced FIO2 when the fit of the mask was inadequate. With the Open-Face Mask®, lower RR and Tv resulted in larger differences in FIO2. Conclusions: The SM decreased FIO2 during oxygen therapy with oxygen masks. The impact of SM depended on the type of the oxygen mask, mask fitting, and respiratory condition.

Purpose: Although it is important to recognize gender disparities in publishing to achieve gender diversity, women's authorship in Japan remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the percentage and analyze the trends of articles authored and published in anesthesiology journals by Japanese female authors. Methods: The genders of the first and last authors affiliated with Japanese institutions were surveyed in the Journal of Anesthesia (JA) (1990, 1995, and 2000–2022) and 11 international anesthesiology journals (2010–2022). Results: We included 845 and 819 original research articles from JA in the analyses of the first and last authors, respectively. The proportion of female first authors significantly increased from 41 (11.7%) out of 351 before 2009 to 119 (24.1%) out of 494 after 2010 (p < 0.001). The proportion of female last authors was 11 (3.3%) out of 335 before 2009 and 22 (4.5%) out of 484 after 2010, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.470). We included 624 and 572 original research articles from international anesthesiology journals in the analyses of first and last authors, respectively. Among these, there were 134 (21.5%) and 23 (4.0%) female first and last authors, respectively. These proportions in international anesthesiology journals did not significantly differ from those in JA (p = 0.334, p = 0.789, respectively). Conclusion: The percentage of female first authors has increased, commensurate with the percentage of female anesthesiologists. However, the percentage of female last authors has not increased and remains low in Japan.